Connect with us

Features

Realistic response to present daunting challenges essential

Published

on

by Gnana Moonesinghe

We went through a debilitating three decade war that intruded into civilian space in all parts of the country resulting in an acrimonious fallout of the Sinhalese and Tamils fighting for rights and space within Sri Lanka.

Over a long period of time the Tamil community had enjoyed an unequal share of professional and public sector employment, a cause for disgruntlement among the Sinhalese. The war between the Sinhalese and the Tamils engaged not only the armed forces but also the attention of the entire nation. It debilitated the nation’s development and growth and its potential remained unexploited.

Yet once violence erupted there was no attempt by the Sinhala majority or the Tamil minority to attempt to reach a fair resolution of the problem. The majority nursed its demographic advantage while the minority placed their faith in democracy and the need to secure equal rights and space in the country without realizing that in an unequal situation, minorities cannot expect to gain that.

The war ended in 2009 and the terrorist leader was killed along with many of his cadres including children sacrficed to buy time. Accusation that children were used as cannon fodder in the battlefront were levelled against the terrorists while the army was accused of using excessive force during the course of the war, especially towards its end.

The failure to resolve the accountability issue created and continues to create bitterness among the international community, the diaspora and among Lankans themselves. It will not be correct to say that we are being unfairly attacked; that is to move to the shady side of untruthfulness. International opinion is that the country is not addressing the issues with a view to settlement and ensuring justice and accountability with those found culpable brought to justice. That people cannot commit crimes with impunity and avoid accountability is axiomatic.

Reconciliation?

The war ended in 2009 and it is over a decade since hostilities ceased. Who is to initiate the move for reconciliation? The SL govt believes that it is subject to unfair persecution while the international community wants answers to its many questions and quick resolution of the conflict. There are questions to which answers must be found; they cannot to be overlooked. The response from the Lankan perspective seems to be aimed at ‘external’ initiatives purportedly established by resolution 46/1 while domestic processes are vigorously addressing relevant matters.

The expression ‘vigorously’ can be classified as an exaggeration or bordering on the untruthful; no doubt at some time or other certain matters have been taken up as a response to the general hue and cry when recriminations were on centre stage and some initiatives were undertaken. But when the noise abated, these matters often lost steam. The UN’s Human Rights High Commissioner on a compromising note decided to confine investigation to “emblematic” cases.

Responses to international demands for investigation into rights violations

Some efforts to respond to the concerns of the international community were part of the LLRC and the Paranagama reports. The problem rests with a failure to implement recommendations suggested by these reports. To take refuge in the face value of setting up these commissions without a follow-up is not what these countries are looking for. When queries on investigation are raised, it would be misleading to consider them as a part of the geopolitical interests of the international community or an intrusion into the sovereignty of the country.

No doubt investigation and resolution of UNHRC concerns is long overdue. The LLRC Report which has gained universal recognition as a pathfinder can be the starting point.The SL govt has failed to address this matter with the urgency it requires. My hope is that sanity will return, investigations will be undertaken, the guilty punished and the innocent exonerated. What is necessary is to remember the purpose behind procedures for investigating war crimes. To keep repeating that some evidence – as in the case of the Darusman report – was denied to SL on the basis of confidentiality will be to be in a state of denial. It is possible for new evidence to be collected to complete the task. The facts/evidence so collected can be used to prosecute in the criminal courts or even to further accommodate investigations.

Military administration

The Sri Lankan govt has widely involved the military in the administration of the country. High Commissioner Bachelet considers the military administration to have a ‘corrosive (negative) impact’ on governance. The Sri Lankan government denies militarization of the administration and also that the military administration could be ‘corrosive’ as alleged. However that be, an urgent response to Bachelet and to the international community investigating rights violation is necessary. There must be a response to Resolution 46/1 whichever way the question is looked at.

EU visit and the future of GSP+ for SL

Over and above these concerns, Sri Lanka is now hosting an EU delegation reviewing trade concessions withdrawn in 2011 and thereafter re-granted in 2017 after a review of issues involved. We can’t afford to forego these concessions under which 7,500 Lankan products enter the EU market under favorable tariffs. This translates into thousands of jobs for those working in the manufacturing and support services. Losing this market particularly in the present depression will not be an acceptable proposition.

SL has roused the wrath of the EU whose parliament adopted by a majority of 628 to 15 the call for a suspension of GSP+. There has been a demonstrably low human rights performance here. A questionable law and order situation has arisen with Minister Lohan Ratwatte’s recent antics. He has since resigned his prisons portfolio while retaining gems and jewelry. A clear violation of law and order has been demonstrated. The EU officials visiting SL will review whether we are abiding by the requirements to extend the GSP+ trade concession.

SL falters on Agreements

Apart from the rights violations SL has not abided by the agreement to withdraw the PTA. Since then there has been violation of this particular Act . It is said that under the provision of this Act, 11 organizations have been banned. It is for the EU delegation to inquire into the allegations and decide on their validity. We must ask ourselves whether we can afford to offend the international community particularly in the context of covid, very low economic growth and import capability of essential goods.The finance minister admitted in parliament on Sept. 7 that our foreign exchange reserves were close to zero. This certainly should demonstrate the urgency of resolving our problems and getting on with our lives in peace.



Features

From stabilisation to transformation without delay

Published

on

At a symposium on reconciliation organised by the National Peace Council last week, more than 250 religious clergy, civic activists and political representatives from different communities gathered to discuss the country’s future. Speaking at the event, Minister Bimal Rathnayake explained the government’s approach to national reconciliation. He said the government viewed the country’s recovery in terms of a three stage process. The first stage was stabilisation, the second was development and the third was transformation. Reconciliation, he implied, would come in that final stage. The participation of Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa at the same symposium, and the constructive nature of his comments, strengthens that hope.

When the present NPP government took office in 2024, the country was emerging from one of the gravest crises in its post Independence history. The economic collapse of 2022 had led to shortages of fuel, food, medicines and electricity. Inflation soared, foreign reserves disappeared and long queues became part of daily life. The political upheaval that followed culminated in the resignation of former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa after mass public protests under the banner of the Aragalaya movement. The country was then governed by a leadership that spoke the language of reform and reconciliation but was widely perceived as lacking a direct popular mandate.

Sri Lanka’s past experience suggests that stabilisation and transformation cannot be treated as entirely separate stages. Postponing reconciliation until some future moment risks repeating the failures of the past. If transformation is endlessly delayed until a supposedly perfect moment arrives, there will always be new crises and new reasons for postponement. Minister Rathnayake’s contention that the government’s immediate priority has necessarily been stabilisation flows from the government’s awareness of the precarious situation the country is. Over the past two years, the government has succeeded to a significant extent in restoring economic and political stability. Inflation has reduced, shortages have ended and public institutions have regained a degree of functionality.

Guaranteed Changes

On the other hand, the country’s development continues to face challenges due to adverse global conditions, including disruptions caused by conflict in the Middle East and extreme weather events that have affected tourism, trade and the cost of living. The danger is that reconciliation may be indefinitely postponed in the name of stabilisation. This danger can be reduced if the government works proactively with the opposition and civil society to commence practical measures of transformation now rather than later. The participation of Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa at the symposium, and the constructive nature of his comments, has strengthened the sense that bipartisan engagement on reconciliation may now be possible.

The urgency of transformation came through strongly in the presentations made by representatives of the Sri Lanka Tamil and Malaiyaha Tamil communities. ITAK parliamentarian S.Shritharan spoke of the frustration caused by unresolved post war issues in the north and east. He referred to disputes regarding land occupied during the war years, including controversies linked to Buddhist temples and state sponsored settlement activity in areas claimed by local communities. He also pointed to the continuing large scale presence of the security forces in the north and east nearly two decades after the end of the war. These grievances have remained central to Tamil political discourse since the end of the armed conflict in 2009. Families displaced by war continue to seek the return of ancestral lands. Civil society organisations in the north have repeatedly called for greater civilian control over local administration and a reduction in military involvement in civilian life.

Academic research and practical work on the ground have shown that reconciliation cannot be separated from questions of dignity, equality and justice. Former minister Mano Ganesan, leader of the Democratic People’s Front, focused on the longstanding problems faced by the Malaiyaha Tamil community. He spoke passionately about continuing housing shortages, landlessness and economic marginalisation, issues that have persisted since Independence. He also highlighted the devastating impact of recent extreme weather events on estate communities that remain socially and economically vulnerable. The condition of the Malaiyaha Tamil community remains one of the enduring social justice issues in Sri Lanka.

After Independence in 1948, a large proportion of them were denied citizenship and voting rights through legislation that rendered them stateless. Though citizenship rights were eventually restored, the social and economic consequences of exclusion continue to be felt generations later.

Many families still lack secure housing and land ownership despite their immense contribution to the country’s plantation economy. Minister Rathnayake’s responses to both these concerns were politically significant. He argued that recent political developments, including the declining influence of narrow ethnic politics across communities, indicated a major shift in public attitudes. According to him, the political ground has changed in ways that make it increasingly difficult for politicians who rely primarily on ethnic division and communal insecurity to retain public support.

Inter-Connected

There is evidence to support the assessment about the changing political grounding which sees future prospects in the resolution of long standing problems. . The economic collapse of 2022 affected all communities alike and generated a new politics centred on governance, anti corruption, accountability and economic justice. The Aragalaya protests brought together Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims in a common demand for political change. Although ethnic grievances have not disappeared, the crisis created space for a broader understanding that the country’s future depends on cooperation rather than division. Opposition Leader Premadasa’s comments at the symposium reflected this changing political climate. He emphasised that national reconciliation could not be separated from economic justice and the need to address disparities between regions and social classes.v He also mentioned the need for civil society organisations to take this message to the community. This wider understanding of reconciliation is important because ethnic inequality and economic inequality have often reinforced each other in Sri Lanka’s history.

Academic studies have identified the denial of citizenship rights after Independence as a historic injustice that set back the Malaiyaha community for decades. The challenge now is to ensure that transformation becomes part of the stabilisation and development process itself. Practical first steps are both possible and necessary. The release of civilian lands still under state control, greater devolution of administrative authority, reduction of military involvement in civilian affairs, language equality in public administration and accelerated housing and land ownership programmes in the plantation sector are all measures that can begin immediately without waiting for a final stage of transformation.

The government’s recent commitment that provincial council elections will finally be held this year is therefore significant. These elections have been repeatedly postponed by successive governments. Holding them would not solve the ethnic conflict by itself. But it would signal a willingness to restore democratic institutions and share power in a meaningful way.

Sri Lanka has repeatedly postponed difficult reforms in the hope that a more convenient political moment would eventually arrive. But opportunities are invariably created and fought for instead of being provided as a gift by a benevolent government.

The present moment, shaped by the economic crisis and public demand for accountable government, offers a rare opportunity to move simultaneously towards stability, development and reconciliation. Provincial council elections can be the first meaningful step. But they must not be the last.

by Jehan Perera

Continue Reading

Features

Researchers to shape new environmental policy framework

Published

on

Some of the researchers at the meeting

In a significant move aimed at steering Sri Lanka’s environmental governance towards a more science-based and evidence-driven path, the Ministry of Environment has initiated a new collaborative mechanism to integrate leading researchers into national policy formulation and conservation planning.

The initiative was discussed at a high-level meeting chaired by Dr. Dammika Patabendi at the Ministry of Environment on Tuesday, where top environmental scientists, wildlife experts and researchers were invited to contribute towards what officials described as a “strategic transition” in the country’s environmental management framework.

The discussions focused on strengthening the scientific basis of environmental conservation programmes and national policy decisions while creating a more research-friendly environment for academics and field scientists engaged in biodiversity and ecological studies.

Particular attention was paid to long-standing concerns raised by researchers regarding procedural and operational difficulties encountered when conducting studies in collaboration with the Department of Wildlife Conservation and the Forest Department.

Minister Patabendi stressed the need for environmental policies to be guided by credible scientific data rather than ad hoc administrative decisions, ministry sources said.

Among the key proposals discussed was the establishment of a streamlined mechanism that would reduce bureaucratic obstacles faced by researchers in obtaining approvals, accessing field sites and sharing scientific findings with state institutions.

The Minister highlighted the importance of building stronger partnerships between policymakers and the scientific community at a time when Sri Lanka is grappling with escalating environmental challenges including deforestation, biodiversity loss, human-elephant conflict, climate-related disasters and ecosystem degradation.

Environmentalists attending the meeting had also highlighted the urgent necessity of incorporating empirical research into national decision-making processes to ensure long-term ecological sustainability and better resource management.

The meeting brought together several of Sri Lanka’s leading environmental researchers and academics including Rohan Pethiyagoda, Saminda Fernando, Sewwandi Jayakody, Samantha Gunasekara, Dinidu Devapura, Himesh Jayasinghe, Manoj Prasanna, Mendis Wickramasinghe and Suranjan Karunarathna.

Director General of Wildlife Conservation Ranjan Marasinghe also participated in the deliberations.

Officials said the proposed framework is expected to pave the way for a more transparent, data-oriented and scientifically credible environmental governance structure capable of addressing emerging conservation challenges more effectively.

The government expects the new mechanism to support the implementation of practical and scientifically robust programmes aimed at safeguarding Sri Lanka’s ecological future while enhancing cooperation between state agencies and the country’s growing community of environmental researchers.

 

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Features

Back home … for a special occasion

Published

on

Seven Notes: Sri Lankans based in Dubai – with Niluk (second from left)

Niluk Uswaththa, of Seven Notes fame, based in Dubai, surprised many when he and his wife Apeksha, turned up in Colombo, last week … unannounced.

Yes, they had a purpose in their surprise visit … to wish Apeksha’s mum for her birthday, which was on Monday, 18th May, and what a surprise it turned out to be!

In an exclusive chit-chat with The Island, Niluk said that the scene in Dubai is improving and Seven Notes do have work coming their way.

Since the members of Seven Notes are all employed (doing day jobs), they operate only on Saturdays and Sundays.

Niluk: Didn’t come prepared to perform, but obliged
friends in Galle

In fact, to get to Colombo for the birthday surprise (on Monday, 18th May), the band had to skip their 17th May, Sunday gig.

“Although it’s a short vacation, my wife and I are enjoying the setup here,” said Niluk, adding that they spent two days in Galle and that their next destination is Anuradhapura.”

Niluk didn’t come prepared to perform, but he obliged the crowd present, at a friend’s birthday celebrations, in Galle, singing and playing guitar.

They are scheduled to leave for their home, in Dubai, in the first week of June.

Seven Notes is an outfit made up of Sri Lankans and the band has been around for almost nine years.

Niluk came into their scene nearly seven years ago.

“When I went to Dubai, I had offers coming my way but it was Seven Notes that impressed me because of their acoustic style.”

The Dubai’s entertainment scene is showing clear signs of bouncing back and even levelling up in the next few months.

Niluk and Apeksha: Enjoying their short vacation

After a slowdown earlier this year due to regional tensions, shows and festivals are back on the calendar, and organisers say late 2026 could be the busiest concert season in years.

Time Out Dubai says “the 2026 concert calendar is filling up nicely” and “the city is ready to party once again” after some reschedules.

Dubai Summer Surprises in July brings retail activations, comedy nights, and indoor art exhibitions.

Organisers point to a backlog of postponed events that are being rescheduled for late 2026 and early 2027.

Yes, Dubai is calm on the surface but on alert. Life is mostly normal in the city, but there’s a “balancing act” as people watch for escalation.

Continue Reading

Trending