Connect with us

News

Prof. Udagama raises alarm over possible govt. abuse of newly amended CPC

Published

on

Prof. Deepika Udagama

There are legitimate fears that the government will weaponise the increased fines for election-related offences, to harass their political opponents, Head of the Department of Law, University of Peradeniya, Prof. Deepika Udagama, told The Island.

The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill gazetted on 19 July 2024 has significantly increased fines related to election related offences.

The amendments to Section 169E have significantly increased fines for various election-related offenses. The fine for “bribery by treating” has been raised from 200 rupees to 750,000 rupees, and for “bribery in connection with an election,” it has increased from 500 rupees to 1,000,000 rupees. Similarly, Section 169F now imposes a higher fine for “undue influence at an election,” increasing it from 500 rupees to 100,000 rupees, while the fine for “personation at an election” has been raised from 300 rupees to 100,000 rupees.

“These changes were necessary because the existing laws were outdated, and the fines for election-related offenses were insignificant,” she said. “However, these new fines could be weaponised by the government against their opponents. The issue lies not with the law itself, but with its implementation. We need to closely monitor whether these laws are enforced in a politicised manner.”

Prof. Udagama noted that the government has recently pushed through several amendments to existing laws. She expressed serious concern over the hasty changes and the introduction of new laws with minimal deliberation.

Prof. Udagama mentioned that 22A was gazetted on July 18, 2024. She clarified that technically, the publication of the gazette has no legal impact on the upcoming presidential election.

“However,” she added, “this situation breeds mistrust and suspicion. It could create chaos if deliberations on 22A proceed and the court determines that it requires a referendum to become law. A referendum is also an election. Can we realistically hold two elections so close to each other? This raises the question: why did the government introduce 22A? Politically and legally, we see this as a mischievous act.”

Prof. Udagama noted that a few months ago, the General Secretary of the United National Party (UNP) suggested that the President should be granted a few additional years in office. She also mentioned that in the past two weeks, two individuals have filed fundamental rights petitions with the Supreme Court, urging a delay in the presidential election.

“The Supreme Court ordered the first petitioner to pay 100,000 rupees in legal costs. Recognizing this trend, the Court increased the legal costs for the second petitioner to 500,000 rupees. Amidst this, the government introduced 22A. It is evident to everyone that this a is part of a larger process,” she said.

“19A re-established the independent commissions, which can be powerful forces for good if they are staffed with independent and respected individuals. Among these, the Elections Commission holds a special significance,” she said.

“The government cannot conduct an election themselves since they are participants. Therefore, the Elections Commission serves as the backbone of the country’s democracy. There is public suspicion about why the commission is delaying the election announcement. Although the commission has provided several reasons for the delay, people need assurance that there are no external influences affecting its decisions,” she said.

Prof. Udagama expressed concerns about state administration regarding the way 22A was gazetted. She noted that the Bill was presented to the Cabinet by the President and the Minister of Justice. The Minister initially declared that 22A would not be gazetted until after the presidential election, but the President instructed the Bill to be gazetted the following day.

“A constitutional amendment is a serious matter. The way the Bill was gazetted suggests a lack of consensus within the government,” she said. Prof. Udagama highlighted that Sri Lankans believe it is the executive that decides which elections to hold.

“The President claimed there was no money for local council elections, so they couldn’t be held. Now, suddenly, we can hold the presidential election because Ranil Wickremesinghe says there is money. Election decisions should not depend on the whims of an individual. People now perceive the Elections Commission as being beholden to the President, and this is not a good sign,” she said. (RK)



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Easter Sunday carnage: WR asks AG to question Dappula on ‘grand conspiracy’ claim

Published

on

Former Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, PC, yesterday urged the Department (CID) to question former Attorney General Dappula de Livera, PC, regarding his claim that the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage was a grand conspiracy.

Dr. Rajapakshe, a former President of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, pointed out that the former Director of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) and the ex-head of State Intelligence Service (SIS) had been arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations levelled by a fugitive from the Sri Lankan law that Gen. Sallay masterminded the Easter Sunday carnage.

The CID arrested Sallay on February 25, 2026, at Peliyagoda.

Attorney General Parinda Ranasinghe, (Jnr), PC, could not under any circumstances further delay seeking an opportunity for the CID to question de Livera. The ex-Minister said so yesterday (15) when The Island sought his explanation regarding the claim he made in Kandy on Sunday that de Livera alleged a grand conspiracy after the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa declined to grant him a one-year extension.

Ex-parliamentarian Rajapakshe quoted President Rajapaksa as having told him that de Livera was told of his inability to grant the outgoing AG’s request. However, the then government offered him the opportunity to serve as Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner in Canada. He declined that offer.

Responding to The Island queries, Rajapakshe said that though de Livera succeeded in thwarting the Terrorist Investigation Department (TID) from questioning him over his claim made on the eve of his retirement, in May, 2021. According to him, when a major controversy erupted over De Livera’s claim, the TID had been sent to record his statement.

Having evaded the police and successfully moved the Court of Appeal against the TID, the former AG sent a lawyer to the TID on his behalf. That lawyer declared that a seven-paged legal objection to the matter in question has been submitted to the TID.

“Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith and all those who had been demanding justice for Easter Sunday victims should urge AG Parinda Ranasinghe (Junior), PC to record de Livera’s statement. The ex-Minister said that the Leader of the House, Minister Bimal Ratnayake, disclosed that SSP Shanie Abeysekera and Senior DIG Ravi Seneviratne had been appointed Director, CID and Secretary to the Public Security Ministry, respectively, on the Cardinal’s advice. Therefore, the Cardinal should stress the urgent need to record the former AG’s statement.

Dappula de Livera received his appointment on 10 May, 2019, just weeks after the Easter Sunday carnage, and retired on 25 May, 2025.

On the eve of his retirement, alleging that there had been a grand conspiracy, de Livera said that the information by the SIS with times, targets, places, method of attacks and other information proved the conspiracy. He said that the identities of those involved in the grand conspiracy must come by the way of evidence.

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe said that investigations into the Easter Sunday carnage couldn’t be brought to a successful conclusion until de Livera revealed what he knew about the grand conspiracy, mastermind or whatever various interested parties chose to call the attacks.

The government sent a CID team to Paris to record a statement of Azad Moulana, a fugitive seeking asylum in Switzerland and who implicated Sallay in the Easter Sunday attacks. “This matter is so serious de Livera must consider volunteering to assist the investigation,” ex-lawmaker Rajapakshe said, challenging all those genuinely concerned about the inordinate delay in bringing the high profile investigation into a conclusion to push for immediate questioning of de Livera.

Having spearheaded the Easter Sunday investigation at the onset of the probe, de Livera could shed light on the alleged conspiracy if he really meant his declaration on the eve of his retirement, Dr. Rajapakshe said.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Beijing Capital Airlines to resume flights to Colombo signalling boost to tourism

Published

on

Beijing Capital Airlines to resume direct flights between Beijing and Colombo in September this year, restoring an important air link and strengthening tourism, business, and people-to-people connectivity. This service will complement the existing 23 weekly flights between Mainland China and Colombo.

This was announced at Sri Lanka tourism briefing and networking reception held recently in Beijing. Sri Lanka embassy in Beijing with the support of the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau (SLTPB) held the event that brought together over 120 representatives from China’s travel trade, media organizations, tourism-related investment sector, airlines, content creation industry, and Meetings, Incentives, Conferences and Exhibitions (MICE) sector.

Among the participants were representatives of leading Chinese travel companies and media organisations, including China Tourism Group Travel Services Corporation Limited, China International Travel Service (CITS), China Youth Travel Service (CYTS), Spring Tour, Mafengwo, Xinhua News Agency, People’s Daily, Global Times, Guangming Online, and China Times, together with representatives of SriLankan Airlines and Beijing Capital Airlines.

The event, led by Deputy Chief of Mission (DCM), Poornima Gunasekera marked the resumption of the Embassy’s direct engagement with China’s travel trade and media community after a considerable period and provided a platform to outline new initiatives aimed at strengthening tourism cooperation between Sri Lanka and China ahead of the 70th Anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries in 2027.

In her keynote address, the DCM highlighted the longstanding historical ties between Sri Lanka and China, dating back more than 2,000 years through the ancient Maritime Silk Route, and stressed tourism as a key channel for deepening people-to-people exchanges. She noted Sri Lanka’s strong tourism recovery, with over two million international arrivals in 2025, and reaffirmed the country’s image as a safe, peaceful, and welcoming destination. She also highlighted the Government’s expanded visa-free entry programme covering 40 countries, including China, designed to make travel easier and more convenient.

She emphasised Sri Lanka’s unique tourism offering, which combines exceptional diversity within a compact geographical area. Within just 65,610 square kilometres—about four times the size of Beijing—visitors can experience beaches, UNESCO World Heritage Sites, wildlife safaris, tea country, wellness tourism, adventure activities, cultural heritage, gemstones, and authentic Sri Lankan hospitality. She also underlined improved connectivity, noting that a direct flight from Beijing to Colombo takes around seven hours, making Sri Lanka a convenient option for Chinese travellers within broader Asian travel itineraries.

Continue Reading

News

Delegation of UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture here amidst protests against new anti-terrorism law

Published

on

Aisha Shujune

A delegation of the United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) is in Colombo. The SPT’s second visit, from 15 to 24 June 2026, takes place amidst the ongoing debate over the NPP government’s decision to bring in a new anti-terrorism law in place of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) enacted in 1979.

Some political parties, and civil society groups, have criticised the NPP move as the ruling party, during the presidential and parliamentary polls campaigns, promised to abolish the PTA.

The SPT conducted its first visit to Sri Lanka in April 2019, following Sri Lanka’s accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT) in December 2017. Upon accession, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) was designated as the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM), under OPCAT, by the Government of Sri Lanka.

The Foreign Ministry said that the four-member SPT delegation was scheduled to hold meetings at ministerial level, and engage with senior officials of relevant ministries, departments and institutions. The delegation would also meet representatives of the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka and members of civil society, the ministry said.

“The Government of Sri Lanka will engage with the Subcommittee in an open, constructive, and transparent manner, consistent with its policy of continued engagement with the United Nations, and in fulfilment of its Treaty Body obligations undertaken voluntarily and enshrined in relevant international instruments, in accordance with the Constitution.

The delegation will comprise Ms. Aisha Shujune Muhammad (Maldives) (Head of delegation); Jakub Julian Czepek (Poland); Ms. Anica Tomsic (Croatia); and Nika Kvaratskhelia (Georgia). They will be accompanied by officials of the SPT Secretariat in Geneva, Switzerland.”

Continue Reading

Trending