Editorial
Probe reports, skewed logic and emerging threats

Thursday 24th October, 2024
Former MP Udaya Gammanpila has raised many hackles by releasing a presidential probe committee report on intelligence coordination and investigative processes in respect of the Easter Sunday terror attacks (2019). Among those who have seen red are prominent ruling party politicians and some religious dignitaries. Their ire is baffling, for Gammanpila has only done what Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as an Opposition MP, kept pressuring the Rajapaksa-Wickremesinghe government to do.
Dissanayake would tear into the then government leaders for refusing to respect ‘the people’s sacred right’ to know what the presidential probe committee reports on the Easter Sunday tragedy contained. There is reason to believe that if the two committee reports had found their way into Dissanayake’s hands while he was an Opposition firebrand, he would not have hesitated to gain maximum possible political mileage by releasing them. So, why is the JVP/NPP government making a brouhaha over what Gammanpila has done?
Instead of countering the findings and recommendations of the Alwis committee, and Gammanpila’s interpretation thereof, Public Security Minister Vijitha Herath has carried out personal attacks on Alwis and Gammanpila; he and other government leaders have also imputed motives to Gammanpila and Alwis. In doing so, they have committed ad hominem, a fallacious attack, which has taken its toll on the credibility and validity of their arguments.
Instead of presenting evidence in support of their arguments, the JVP/NPP heavyweights are making emotional appeals to the public—argumentum ad passiones, which has no place in logical reasoning; they keep claiming, at public rallies, that there is a sinister campaign against their efforts to probe the Easter Sunday carnage properly! Herath has said Secretary to the Ministry of Public Security, Ravi Seneviratne, and Director of the Criminal Intelligence Analysis Division of the CID, Shani Abeysekera, are good officers and therefore what the Alwis committee says about them is false. Reflected in this argument is petitio principii, or the fallacy of using one’s own conclusion in the premises of one’s argument. It is doubtful whether this kind of circular logic will help sell Herath’s argument to the discerning public.
Minister Herath has alleged that Sagala Ratnayake, as President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s National Security Advisor, appointed the Alwis committee to discredit Seneviratne and Abeysekera as they had refused to back Wickremesinghe’s presidential election campaign. If so, why did the JVP/NPP demand the release of committee reports at issue while it was in the Opposition? Why didn’t it question the integrity of Alwis, in Parliament, before the committee report was submitted?
The crux of what Gammanpila has said, quoting from the Alwis committee report, is that Senviratne and the CID under him failed to take prompt action to prevent the Easter Sunday tragedy despite a warning from a foreign intelligence outfit. This is the point the government and the Catholic priests who are critical of the Alwis committee report should try to counter. It is surprising that the State Intelligence Service conveyed actionable intelligence in a letter to the head of the CID, Seneviratne, without promptly alerting the government leaders to the danger itself. Seneviratne also did not care to take swift action in response to the warning; he merely passed the letter in question with a minute thereon directing the DIG (CID) to conduct a probe and report its progress in a couple of weeks. This, he did although the CID was already aware of the possibility of terror attacks following the detection of a haul of explosives and detonators in a Jihadist training camp in Wanathawilluwa in January 2019, as he himself told the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCOI), which probed the Easter Sunday carnage.
Interestingly, Minister Herath has argued that neither the PCoI, which investigated the Easter Sunday attacks, nor the Supreme Court faulted Seneviratne or Abeyesekera and therefore others cannot blame them. If so, how come the JVP/NPP leaders keep calling Ranil Wickremesinghe the mastermind behind the Treasury bond scams? Neither the Committee on Public Enterprises, headed by the then JVP MP Sunil Handunetti nor the PCoI, which probed the bond rackets, held Wickremesinghe accountable. He has not been found guilty by any court either, but the JVP/NPP has promised to conduct a fresh probe into the Treasury bond scams and press charges against him (Wickremesinghe). In 2022, it insisted that Wickremesinghe was not fit to be the Prime Minister in view of the Treasury bond rackets. This kind of selectivity smacks of duplicity.
A visibly exasperated Minister Herath declared, at Tuesday’s post-Cabinet press conference, that under no circumstances will the government remove Seneviratne and Abeysekera from their posts. This kind of imperviousness to reasoning is symptomatic of the arrogance of power, which became President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s undoing. Wickremesinghe shielded the Sri Lanka cricket administrators under a cloud, in a similar fashion.
Seneviratne and Abeysekera are beholden to the JVP/NPP leaders, who brought them out of retirement and catapulted them to their current positions, and therefore neither they nor the officers under them can be expected to act independently and impartially in handling cases where the interests of the JVP/NPP and/or its allies are at stake. This kind of conflict of interest as well as serious allegations against Seneviratne and Abeysekera will undermine the integrity of the probe, which is said to be underway, into the Easter Sunday attacks, and leave room for a future government to reject the outcome of that investigation. The Dissanayake government has a choice between defending two of its supporters and ensuring the integrity of probes into the Easter Sunday carnage and other crimes.
Meanwhile, the US yesterday issued a warning of possible terror attacks on popular tourist locations in the Eastern Province. The UK and Russia followed suit. It is believed that a special security plan currently underway in the Eastern Province to ensure the safety of the Israeli tourists and other foreign nationals, in view of the conflict in West Asia, led to the issuance of the US travel advisory. The question is why actionable intelligence about the impending Easter Sunday attacks did not jolt the police, especially the CID, into action in a similar manner, in 2019.
Editorial
Bottom trawling: Right and Might

Indian Prime Minister Narndra Modi’s three-day visit here was predictably heralded by a blaze of publicity in the local press and electronic media. This was no cause for surprise given that good relations with our giant neighbour, or Big Brother as some would prefer to style it, must remain the cornerstone of Sri Lanka’s foreign policy. New Delhi accurately judged in which direction the political winds were blowing well ahead of last year’s presidential and parliamentary elections and invited the soon to be President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to visit India where he was well received. Weeks after being elected president, and scoring a better than two thirds majority in the parliamentary election that followed shortly thereafter, Dissanayake paid a state visit to India, his very first after being elected and was very warmly welcomed.
Prime Minister Modi is now here on a reciprocal visit and has a crowded agenda including a visit to Anuradhapura where he will pay homage to the sacred Jaya Sri Maha Bodhiya, grown from a sapling of the bo tree in India under which the Buddha attained enlightenment; and formally inaugurate the Maho-Anuradhapura railway signaling system and the newly upgraded Maho-Omanthai railway line, both assisted by India. Several memorandums of understanding, including possibly a Defence Co-operation Agreement, kept under wraps at the time of writing this comment, are due to be exchanged. Official word on the subject is that matters to be covered in the MOUs include energy, digitization, security and healthcare along with agreements relating to India’s debt restructuring assistance. But no details have been forthcoming.
Additionally, the visiting prime minister and his delegation who will have bilateral discussions with Sri Lanka’s president is also due to virtually inaugurate several India assisted projects. These include the Sampur solar power plant, the 5,000 mt temperature and humidity controlled cold storage facility in Dambulla and the installation of 5,000 solar panels across 5,000 religious sites here. Sri Lanka cannot forget the massive assistance provided by India in 2022 when this country faced the worst economic crisis in its contemporary history. At that time India provided multi-pronged assistance, including a $4 billion financing package through multiple credit lines and currency support, to help this country sustain essential imports and avoid defaulting on its debts.
Sri Lanka is undoubtedly benefiting from great power rivalry between India and China in the Indian Ocean where India seeks advantages through its Neighbourhood First policy while China seeks leverage through its Belt and Road initiative. The fact that the new Sri Lanka president chose to make his first state visit to India and thereafter follow with a visit to China may be an indication of priorities in Colombo. There is no escaping the reality that all countries must, where foreign relations are concerned, place their own national interest above all other considerations. This is so be it for Sri Lanka, India, China or any other country. Thus while not looking gift horses in the mouth, we must always be conscious that there is no such thing as a free lunch and be protective of our own interests.
Relations between Sri Lanka and India saw both high and low points during this century. The low was during the civil war Sri Lanka waged against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in the earlier stages of which India allowed the insurgents to train and base on Indian territory. India, in fact, provided them with weapons and military training and other assistance through its RAW (Research and Analysis Wing). state intelligence agency. It may be argued that the communal disharmony between the Sinhalese and the Tamils that escalated into civil war was a problem of Sri Lanka’s own making and sub-regional sentiment in Tamil Nadu greatly influenced New Delhi’s hand in intervening.
Relations thereby plummeted and were restored to a point by the signing the Indo- Sri Lanka Peace Accord between President J.R. Jayewardene and Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in July 1987. With two insurrections raging in the north and south of the country, Jayewardene had no option but seek Indian assistance on India’s terms. What followed including Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination, as he campaigned for re-election as India’s prime minister is contemporary history that requires no elaboration. But since then, in the post 2022 situation when Sri Lanka faced an unprecedented economic crisis and was forced to declare bankruptcy, India came to our rescue with massive assistance and relations between the two countries have never been better.
At this point of time when Sri Lanka is headed in a new political direction under new leadership, will it be possible for the greatest irritant in present Indo-Lanka relations – bottom trawling by Indian fishermen poaching in Sri Lanka waters and destroying the marine environment – to be conclusively resolved? India has always adopted the position that this issue must be resolved in what she calls a “humanitarian manner.” It is undoubtedly a livelihood issue for fishermen – on both sides. Indian fishermen enjoyed free rein on the Sri Lanka side of the International Maritime Boundary during the war when Lankan fishermen were prohibited from going into deep sea. The Indians claim fishing in our waters to be their “traditional right.”
Prime Minister Modi’s party attempted to win votes in Tamil Nadu during the last election by accusing the Congress of “ceding” Kachchativu to Sri Lanka. The right on this issue is on our side while the might is on India’s. In the midst of honeyed words that will be much of the picture during until Sunday when the visit ends, result in might conceding to right? Even at least as far as stopping bottom trawling, illegal on our side though not in India’s goes?
Editorial
Dulling the pangs of hunger

Saturday 5th April, 2025
The government has, with the help of the National Food Promotion Board, the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture, launched a programme to provide the public with nutritious food at reasonable prices as part of its Clean Sri Lanka initiative. The public, fleeced by private eatery owners ruthlessly, will surely benefit from this programme, which deserves praise. It will also help improve the government’s approval rating significantly. A way to a person’s heart is said to be through his or her stomach.
A widely-held misconception is that every prospect pleases in this country, and only politicians are vile. True, most politicians are thought to be bad, but it is not fair to single them out for castigation. There are many others who are either equally bad or even worse. The blame for people’s hardships due to the high cost of living should be apportioned to the business community, given to unconscionably exploitative practices; its members, from wayside eatery owners to corporate fat cats, jack up the prices of their products and services according to their whims and fancies, at the expense of the public. The rice millers have become a law unto themselves.
Why food inflation is high is not difficult to understand. A plain hopper is priced at Rs. 25, and an egg costs about Rs. 30 at present, but an egg hopper is sold at Rs. 100! Food prices that went into the stratosphere at the height of the economic crisis in 2022 have not come down significantly owing to the greed of the unscrupulous members of the business community.
The government initiative to make quality food available at reasonable prices to the public should continue, and it is hoped that the NPP leaders will also develop the Hela Bojun Hala (HBH) restaurant chain under the Ministry of Agriculture. These eating places not only sell nutritious food made from local ingredients at very reasonable prices but also economically empower women. All HBH outlets are run by women and do not sell wheat flour products or sugary drinks.
The NPP government can give a turbo boost to the HBH programme by expanding it across the country. That will help provide direct employment to many more women. Sri Lanka’s overall unemployment rate is 4.7%, and about 6.7% women are unemployed. Besides, during gluts, fruit and vegetable growers often dump their unsold produce on the roadside in protest. The government may be able to use the HBH network to help the farming community while generating employment opportunities and providing the public with quality food at affordable prices.
Minister of Agriculture K. D. Lalkantha, known for innovative thinking and hard work, was the chief guest at the recent launch of the aforesaid food programme. He should take time off from pursuits such as counting monkeys and give serious thought to developing the HBH network further so that more people will have access to reasonably-priced, hygienic, and nutritious foods, and more jobs can be created for women, and men as well if a home delivery service is set up at the HBH outlets.
Sri Lanka’s political culture is such that when a new government is elected it launches its own programmes and either scrap the ones introduced by its predecessor or let them wither on the vine. It is hoped that the NPP government will be different and develop the HBH programme, which has become a success.
Editorial
Trump’s pound of flesh and bleeding nations

Friday 4th April, 2025
US President Donald Trump has jacked up tariffs on imports in the name of making America wealthy again. Yesterday, he signed an executive order, with his usual melodrama, increasing tariffs on goods imported from many countries including Sri Lanka, which will now have to pay as much as 44% by way of tariff on its exports to the US. Claiming that the unprecedented tariff hike is a reciprocal measure, Trump has said the new 44% tariff is in response to Sri Lanka’s 88% trade barriers on American goods. It is a case of a giant competing with a dwarf!
Powerful nations are resilient enough to absorb the US tariff shocks, but the weaker economies like Sri Lanka are bound to reel and even go into a tailspin, causing further destabilisation of the developing world. The US tariff hike will deal a body blow to Sri Lanka’s export sector, especially its garment industry, which is showing signs of recovery. Sri Lankan goods, especially garments, will now be less competitive in the US market. Other Asian garment exporters, such as India, Bangladesh and Vietnam, also have higher US tariffs to contend with but not to the same extent as Sri Lanka. There’s the rub.
A drastic decline in export earnings due to the new US tariffs will invariably lead to a decrease in Sri Lanka’s foreign currency reserves, causing a further depreciation of the rupee, an increase in inflation, job losses, and even socio-political upheavals unless the US takes the fragile condition of the Sri Lankan economy and softens its stand.
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has appointed an expert committee to study the economic fallout of the US tariff hike and recommend remedial measures. This is a step in the right direction, and it is hoped that the government, together with all other stakeholders, will be able to formulate a mitigatory strategy to cushion the impact of the new US tariffs on the local industries and the ailing economy. Most of all, the government will have to manage the country’s foreign currency reserves frugally.
What the US can gain from the unprecedented hike in tariffs on Sri Lankan exports is negligible, and it will not give any significant boost to the US economy or industries. Is Washington trying to leverage Sri Lanka’s overdependence on the US as an export destination to further its geopolitical interests in a bigger way? Is the Trump administration goading Sri Lanka into a situation where the latter will be left with no alternative but to agree to anything including controversial agreements, owing to its sheer desperation to have the US tariffs on its exports reduced?
If what Trump said, while announcing the new tariffs is anything to go by, he wants to make America wealthy again by creating conditions for the domestic industries to be ‘reborn’. But he has apparently ignored factors like stringent environmental laws, higher cost of domestic labour, increases in raw material costs due to new tariffs, technological competition, etc., which will stand in the way of the US in achieving his dream.
Whether Trump will be able to realise his MAGA (Make America Great Again) goal by resorting to ruthless actions that weaken the economies in the developing world may be in doubt, but one possible outcome of his tariff war, as it were, is not difficult to predict. Extremely high tariffs the US has imposed on imports are at variance with the liberal economic principles and policies it has long championed. Such excessively protectionist measures could undermine America’s global dominance, driving smaller nations to gravitate towards its rivals in search of favourable trade terms. Russia lost no time in offering to help Sri Lanka’s export sector. Other powerful nations are likely to follow suit where the developing countries troubled by the US tariffs are concerned.
-
Business2 days ago
Daraz Sri Lanka ushers in the New Year with 4.4 Avurudu Wasi Pro Max – Sri Lanka’s biggest online Avurudu sale
-
News7 days ago
Bid to include genocide allegation against Sri Lanka in Canada’s school curriculum thwarted
-
Business3 days ago
Strengthening SDG integration into provincial planning and development process
-
Business2 days ago
New SL Sovereign Bonds win foreign investor confidence
-
Sports4 days ago
To play or not to play is Richmond’s decision
-
Features14 hours ago
Starlink in the Global South
-
Latest News6 days ago
IPL 2025: Rookies Ashwani and Rickelton lead Mumbai Indians to first win
-
Sports5 days ago
Trinity, St. Anthony’s out to end decade long victory drought