Connect with us

Business

Priorities in Focus: Will Budget 2025 address Sri Lanka’s agricultural challenges?

Published

on

Manoj Thibbotuwawa is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka (IPS) with 

research interests in agriculture, agribusiness value chains, food security, climate change and environmental and natural resource economics. He has more than 19 years of research experience at IPS. . Dr Thibbotuwawa holds a BSc (Agriculture) with Honours from the University of Peradeniya, an MSc (Agricultural Economics) from the Post-Graduate Institute of Agriculture at the University of Peradeniya, and a PhD from the University of Western Australia. He has also obtained a Post-Graduate Diploma in Modelling and Accounting for Sustainable Development from the International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) in The Hague. Dr Thibbotuwawa is a recipient of the prestigious Nuffic Fellowship from the Government of the Netherlands and the Endeavour Award from the Government of Australia.

Lakmini Fernando is a Research Fellow at IPS with primary research interest in Development Economics, Public Finance and Climate Change. She has expertise in econometric data analysis, research design and causal methodologies. Dr Fernando holds a BSc in Agriculture from the University of Peradeniya, a Master of Development Economics (Advanced) from the University of Queensland, Australia and a PhD in Economics from the University of Adelaide, Australia. She was awarded the Dean’s Honour Roll from the University of Queensland for Outstanding Academic Excellence in 2015 and the Dean’s Commendation for Doctoral Thesis Excellence from the University of Adelaide in 2021.

By Dr Manoj Thibbotuwawa and Dr Lakmini Fernando

Public expenditure on agriculture as a share of total government spending has decreased from 6.4% to 2% between 2014 and 2023.

The irrigation subsector receives most of the agricultural spending (41%), with subsidies accounting for a high 26%.

Change to funding priorities necessary to address critical concerns.

The agricultural sector in Sri Lanka has long been a pillar of the nation’s economy, yet its decline reflects a complex interplay of economic shifts, policy decisions, and underutilised potential. Agriculture’s contribution to the overall economy in Sri Lanka has gradually diminished over time, while the agricultural labour force has shrunk at a slower rate. This disparity between a declining sector and a stagnant workforce, coupled with the failure to address structural changes by improving land and labour productivity, has led to poor sector performance, particularly in terms of food security and farm income.

Additionally, unproductive public spending in the form of inefficient allocation, short-term concentration, and neglect of crucial areas is an important contributory factor. In this context, it is crucial to assess whether public expenditure allocation in Sri Lanka has undergone significant shifts aimed at unlocking the agriculture sector’s potential while advancing food security and fostering rural development.

Tracking the Shift: Trends in Public Spending on Agriculture

Over the last decade, Sri Lanka has struggled to spend adequately on agriculture due to competing fiscal concerns. Before COVID-19, total agricultural investment was around LKR 112 billion in real terms between 2014 and 2020. However, due to the impact of COVID-19, it sharply declined to LKR 88 billion in 2021. Since then, agricultural investment has slightly increased, averaging LKR 97 billion in the past two years (2022-2023). Despite an increase in absolute public expenditure on agriculture (PEA), both the GDP share and the percentage of the total budget allocated to agriculture have been declining.

PEA as a percentage of GDP has fallen from 1.1% in 2014 to 0.8% by 2023. Similarly, PEA as a percentage of total government spending has decreased from 6.4% to 2% throughout the same period. Notably, the balance between capital and recurring expenditures has shifted dramatically in favour of more recurrent expenditures during institutional structure changes linked to changes of government, as shown in 2015, 2019, and 2020.

Guiding the Budget: Who Shapes Agricultural Investments?

The agriculture sector in Sri Lanka is primarily managed by the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), the Ministry of Plantation Industries (MOP) and the Ministry of Fisheries (MOF), as outlined in the Public Investment Programme (PIP). While the land and irrigation sectors are closely linked to agriculture, they fall under the jurisdiction of separate ministries: the Ministry of Lands (MOL) and the Ministry of Irrigation (MOI), respectively. In terms of budgetary allocations, MOA historically receives the largest share, accounting for 51% of agriculture-related expenditures.

This is followed by the Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment (MOE) with 23%, and MOI with 13%. MOF and MOP receive smaller allocations, at 3% and 4% respectively. While the nominal PEA has been on the rise, real-term PEA has either declined or remained largely unchanged across all ministries.. However, this does not necessarily indicate whether agricultural expenditures are aligned with sectoral policies, making it challenging to evaluate the effectiveness of spending in addressing critical concerns within the sector.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Relief measures to assist affected Small and Medium Enterprises

Published

on

As agreed with the Sri Lanka Banks’ Association (Guarantee) Ltd. (SLBA), to provide relief measures to affected SMEs by licensed commercial banks and licensed specialised banks, Circular No. 04 of 2024 dated 19.12.2024, and its addendum, Circular No. 01 of 2025 dated 01.01.2025 were issued by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka to ensure the effective implementation of the relief measures specified in the cited Circulars in a consistent manner across all licensed banks.

In case of any rejections or disputes, borrowers are requested to contact the respective banks and to appeal to the Director, Financial Consumer Relations Department of CBSL (FCRD), if required through the following channels:

Based on the repayment capacity and the submission of an acceptable business revival plan by the borrower, the relief measures extended to affected SMEs include rescheduling of credit facilities up to a period of 10 years, extending the time to commence repayments based on the capital outstanding, waiving off unpaid interest subject to conditions, and providing new working capital loans. Despite the availability of the above relief measures, limited number of borrowers had approached licensed banks to avail themselves of these benefits to date.

In addition to the above measures, with the gradual recovery of the economy, in order to facilitate the sustainable revival of businesses that were adversely affected during the recent past, several other measures were taken by CBSL together with the banking industry.

Accordingly, inter alia, strengthening the Post Covid 19 revival units of licensed banks, CBSL issued Circular No. 02 of 2024 dated 28.03.2024 on “Guidelines for the Establishment of Business Revival Units of Licensed Banks” mandating banks to establish Business Revival Units (BRUs) to assist viable businesses that are facing financial and operational difficulties.

Under BRUs, banks may provide support to viable businesses, such as restructuring and rescheduling of credit facilities including the adjustment of interest rates, maturity extensions, providing interim financing, advisory services etc., subject to the condition that such borrowers are required to submit acceptable business plans and feasible repayment plans. As reported by banks, by the end of 2024, around 6,000 facilities had been facilitated through these BRUs.

The above cited Circulars and Guidelines can be accessed via https://www.cbsl.gov.lk

Continue Reading

Business

Visa commits to support women entrepreneurs in Sri Lanka

Published

on

Visa (NYSE: V), the global leader in digital payments reiterated its support to women entrepreneurs across Sri Lanka as a part of its International Women’s Month celebrations across the world, by stating a firm commitment towards financial inclusion and digitization of women-led businesses, and hosted women from different walks of life in a specially curated event at Colombo.

Avanthi Colombage, Country Manager for Visa in Sri Lanka and Maldives stated, “At Visa, we believe in being the best way to pay and be paid by uplifting everyone, everywhere. This year, we celebrated International Women’s Month to support the very capable businesswomen in our country, with an event titled ‘Overcoming Barriers to Growth’ along with Square Hub, an incubator and business accelerator.”

The event by Visa brought together 35 upcoming women entrepreneurs across various sectors, including fashion, e-commerce, fintech, technology, manufacturing, and agriculture. While prominent industry experts shared views, learnings and experiences from their own journeys, the event also facilitated open discussions and networking among entrepreneurs, on how they can build and sustain thriving businesses.

Avanthi elaborates that Visa has built a firm foundation in supporting female entrepreneurship and the empowerment of women in Sri Lanka and understands the challenges women-owned businesses face when seeking capital, access, networks and guidance and continues to actively uplift women in Sri Lanka. Globally and in Sri Lanka, Visa believes that the participation of women is key to the growth of an economy. Avanthi adds, “Two years ago, when we celebrated 35 years of Visa in Sri Lanka, we announced a grant for The Asia Foundation to assist women-led small and medium businesses (SMBs) throughout the country. This initiative offered vital seed funding, skills training, and financial inclusion opportunities for women entrepreneurs, helping remove some major barriers to their success,” she recalled.

Continue Reading

Business

Environmentalists renew concerns over Adani Group’s proposed Mannar wind power project

Published

on

Hemantha Withanage / Dr. Rohan Pathiyagoda

Environmental groups, including the Wildlife and Nature Protection Society (WNPS), the Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ) and the Environmental Foundation Ltd. (EFL), are raising renewed concerns about the potential ecological impact of large-scale wind energy development on Mannar Island. Conservationists argue that the island, home to a unique and sensitive ecosystem, faces serious risks from industrial projects that may disrupt biodiversity and endanger local wildlife.

At the heart of the controversy is whether the environmental issues raised by Adani Group’s proposed wind energy project in Mannar were being adequately considered. Critics argue that tariff negotiations and economic interests overshadowed ecological assessments, potentially leading to a project that might compromise the island’s rich natural heritage.

“Can wind energy coexist with Mannar Island’s fragile ecosystem? asked environmental scientist Hemantha Withanage of the CEJ.

He told The Island Financial Review: “We must ensure that our transition to renewable energy does not come at the cost of irreplaceable biodiversity.”

Other conservationists have pointed out that environmentalists are often misrepresented as obstructionists in debates over development. “Are we being painted as enemies of progress, or is the public being misled about the real consequences of such projects? questioned Dr. Rohan Pethiyagoda, a leading environmental advocate.

With Adani’s possible withdrawal from the project, there is now an opportunity to reevaluate Sri Lanka’s approach to sustainable energy. Experts emphasize the need for a smarter, science-driven path that prioritizes both renewable energy and environmental conservation.

A joint media conference, scheduled for today at the Dutch Burgher Union, Colombo, aims to address these concerns. Organized by WNPS, CEJ, EFL and Pethiyagoda, the event will explore questions such as whether the project might resurface under a new guise and who the true beneficiaries of such large-scale energy initiatives are.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Trending