Connect with us

News

PNM decries Gota-Ranil govt.

Published

on

… warns SLPP rebels against accepting ministerial portfolios

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Dr. Wasantha Bandara says the appointment of UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe will hinder the formation of an all-party interim administration or a government of national unity.

Speaking on behalf of the Patriotic National Movement (PNM) Dr. Bandara yesterday (15) said that the envisaged administration could only be described as Gota-Ranil government.

Dr. Bandara, who backed Goabaya Rajapaksa’s candidature at the 2019 presidential election, said so in the wake of the President swearing in four ministers, namely Prof. G.L. Peiris (Foreign Affairs), Dinesh Gunawardena (Public Administration, Home Affairs, Provincial Councils and Local Government), Prasanna Ranatunga (Urban Development and Housing) and Kanchanna Wijesekera (power and energy) pending finalisation of other appointments. All of them are either elected or appointed members on the SLPP ticket or the National List.

The Gota-Ranil arrangement could be compared with the Chandrika-Ranil (2002-2003) and Maithri-Ranil (2015-2019) governments. The PNM spokesperson warned the SLPP dissidents, aka 11-party grouping, of catastrophic consequences in case they accepted portfolios in the new administration.

Responding to media queries, Dr. Bandara asserted that President Gotabaya Rajapaksa may have offered the premiership to the UNP leader due to international pressure. Dr. Bandara claimed that the UNP leader would try to implement his agenda that had been interrupted in 2003.

Dr. Bandara said that those who exercised their franchise for Gotabaya Rajapaksa and the SLPP, at the 2019 presidential and 2020 parliamentary elections, respectively, would never endorse Wickremesinghe receiving premiership.

The SLPP rebels have repeatedly assured that they wouldn’t accept ministerial portfolios under any circumstances. Top rebel spokespersons, Wimal Weerawansa and Udaya Gammanpila have alleged that Wickremesinghe would go ahead with projects undertaken by the ousted Finance Minister Basil Rajapaksa.

Dr. Bandara said that the PNM had no faith at all in Wickremesinghe, who always pursued an anti-Sri Lanka agenda regardless of the consequences.

The PNM official recalled how Wickremesinghe signed the Norwegian-arranged Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) with the LTTE, in Feb 2003, and co-sponsored a resolution at the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Oct 2015.

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has proposed what its President Saliya Pieris called an interim government of National Unity consisting of 15 Cabinet Ministers. The BASL, in a statement issued on Saturday (14), stressed the need to be cautious when making crucial appointments.

The BASL said that the appointment of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet of Ministers were important steps to restore economic and political stability. As such it would be necessary that such appointments were made in a manner which would establish public confidence, the BASL stated.

Dr. Bandara said that it wouldn’t be so difficult for the people to understand how Wickremesinghe would proceed and take advantage of the current situation to push his despicable agenda.

Dr. Bandara asserted that offering the premiership to Wickremesinghe was contrary to the proposals made by the Mahanayakes, as well as the BASL. Placing Wickremesinghe at the helm of the government parliamentary group, in Parliament, betrayed the 6.9 mn people who exercised their franchise for Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the presidential and the SLPP at the subsequent parliamentary election.

Political sources said that many SLPP lawmakers were in a quandary over the appointment of Wickremesinghe. Among them was a section of the 145-member parliamentary group that had declared it would sit in the Opposition. But, the dissident group has assured that it wouldn’t undermine the government as long as the new administration didn’t work against the national interest.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Namal, Janaki further remanded

Published

on

SLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa and former Krrish Group Executive Director and businesswoman Janaki Siriwardena were further remanded until October 23 by the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court yesterday in connection with an alleged Rs. 70 million bribery case involving the Krrish Group.

Colombo Chief Magistrate Asanga S. Bodaragama rejected the bail application filed on behalf of Siriwardena.

The Magistrate said the order on Namal Rajapaksa’s bail application was not ready and would be delivered on the next court date.

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arrested the two suspects and produced them before court over allegations that a bribe of Rs. 70 million had been solicited and accepted in connection with the affairs of the Krrish Group.

Continue Reading

News

Review of progress in reforms and modernisation of key state revenue-collecting institutions

Published

on

By

A progress review meeting on reforms and modernisation initiatives at Sri Lanka’s key state revenue-collecting institutions was held on Thursday  (15) at the Presidential Secretariat, chaired by Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, with the participation of representatives of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and officials of the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau (RARMB) of the Presidential Secretariat.

At the meeting, the IMF representatives commended the revenue collection efficiency of the Department of Inland Revenue, Sri Lanka Customs and the Department of Excise, the country’s three leading state revenue-collecting institutions. Extensive discussions were also held on the progress of the reform and modernisation programmes being implemented at these institutions.

Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake outlined the progress achieved by the three institutions to date and the reforms planned for implementation in the future.

The IMF representatives also highlighted the importance of strengthening risk management, developing human resources and ensuring the efficient operation of computer systems at the respective institutions.

Senior Additional Secretary to the President Seevali Arukgoda also attended the meeting. The IMF was represented by Cindy Negus, Senior Economist in Revenue Administration for the Asia and Pacific, Europe, Middle East and Central Asia regions; Alison Lister, Revenue Administration Adviser; and Gregory Toppin, Resident Revenue Adviser in Sri Lanka. A group of senior officials from the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau of the Presidential Secretariat also participated.

(President’s Media Division)

Continue Reading

News

Cut power bills by 3-5%, don’t hike them, consumers demand

Published

on

By Anuradha Hiripitiyage

Electricity tariffs should be reduced by between 3 and 5 percent instead of being increased by 2.88 percent in the fourth quarter, as proposed by the National System Operator (NSO), Electricity Consumers’ Association Secretary Sanjeewa Dhammika said.

Addressing a media briefing in Maradagahamula, Divulapitiya, Gampaha, yesterday (16), Dhammika said a proper assessment of electricity generation costs, including the contribution of hydropower, could justify a reduction in tariffs.

He said the NSO had sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for a 2.88 percent tariff increase, which was expected to generate an additional Rs. 4,438 million.

However, the Commission had indicated that an increase of only 1.46 percent was warranted, amounting to Rs. 2,245 million, he said, adding that even this increase was unnecessary.

Dhammika alleged that the proposed revision sought to pass on to electricity consumers the financial burden arising from the non-arrival of five coal shipments and failed tenders.

“The Government had said that the burden of coal-related losses would not be passed on to the public. It is therefore unjust to make consumers bear these costs,” he said.

He pointed out that the PUCSL had forecast that hydropower would account for 32.34 percent of total electricity generation in the coming quarter, while the cost of such generation would represent only 3.45 percent of the overall cost of electricity production.

Consumers should benefit from the lower cost of hydropower generation rather than bear the burden of more expensive thermal power generation, he said.

Dhammika also questioned the inclusion of Rs. 669 million in capacity charges that had not been approved by the PUCSL, as well as a further Rs. 1,069 million to repay loans relating to incomplete projects.

Including such charges in the proposed tariff revision was unjustifiable, he said.

The PUCSL has given the public until October 30 to submit their views on the proposed tariff revision.

Dhammika said the possibility of increased hydropower generation in the coming weeks, as reservoir levels rise, should also be taken into account when determining electricity tariffs.

He maintained that tariffs could be reduced by 3 to 5 percent if hydropower generation was properly assessed and coal-related losses and unapproved charges were excluded from the calculations.

He further claimed that electricity tariffs could be reduced by as much as 10 percent through the promotion of renewable energy and the effective use of solar power and battery storage systems.

The Electricity Consumers’ Association urged the Government to withdraw the proposed tariff increase, insisting that consumers should not be made to bear costs arising from coal supply problems and other disputed charges.

Continue Reading

Trending