News
PM’s statement sets off angry opposition buzz in Parliament
A tense situation prevailed in Parliament on Friday after Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena declared that the restraining order issued by the Supreme Court preventing IGP Deshabandu Tennekoon from functioning in his post was illegal.
Delivering a special statement, Prime Minister Gunawardena said that President Ranil Wickremesinghe has no legal powers at this moment to appoint an Acting IGP. He said that the position of IGP is not vacant presently.
The Supreme Court has issued an interim injunction preventing Tennekoon from carrying out duties as the IGP until further notice, with the case scheduled to reconvene on November 11. This timeline coincides with the upcoming presidential election. A new President is expected to be in office by November 11.
Citing constitutional provisions, Prime Minister Gunawardena said that the appointment of an Acting IGP requires the President’s recommendation. However, with the President currently a presidential candidate, the process has encountered unprecedented challenges.
“In accordance with our constitutional framework, the responsibility lies with the President to appoint an Acting IGP,” Prime Minister Gunawardena said, adding that the incumbent IGP retains the position until further legal clarity is achieved.
“The President cannot appoint an Acting IGP while the position is not vacant. The incumbent IGP still holds the position.” he said.
Opposition MPs argued that an acting IGP should be appointed while the ruling party MPs argued that a new appointment cannot be made as the post is not vacant.
Opposition and SJB Leader Sajith Premadasa called on President Wickremesinghe to step down, if the latter could not appoint an Acting IGP as per the Supreme Court Order.
He said that the President must uphold the Injunction Order issued by the Supreme Court and appoint an Acting IGP.
“The President cannot evade this issue. He is the President even today. His responsibilities do not cease even if he becomes a Presidential candidate. His responsibility is to appoint an Acting IGP when there is no IGP. Ask the President to resign if he cannot do that. Then, the Acting President can function according to the law of the country. He is trying to resort to an unconstitutional act,” Premadasa charged.
“The President cannot run away from this problem. He is still the President. He cannot abandon his responsibilities just because he is a presidential election candidate. If he cannot do this, ask the President to resign,” he said.
Premadasa pointed out that the exclusive authority to adjudicate fundamental rights petitions is vested in the Supreme Court as outlined in Article 126 of the Constitution.
“The Constitution vests the Supreme Court with the sole authority to hear and issue determinations on fundamental rights petitions,” he said.
He said that decisions, whether interim injunctions or final judgements, pertaining to such matters are within the purview of the judiciary and not Parliament or the executive.
Drawing attention to Article 41 of the Constitution, he highlighted the requirement for presidential appointments, including that of the IGP, to be approved by the Constitutional Council. He pointed out that the recent interim injunction issued by the Supreme Court regarding the IGP appointment is a procedural step, not a final decision, with a subsequent hearing date set.
“It is imperative that we respect the Supreme Court’s order and initiate the process for appointing a new IGP in accordance with constitutional procedures,” Premadasa said.
The Leader of the Opposition said that the checks and balances were among the Executive, Legislature, and Judiciary. He cautioned against selective adherence to constitutional principles based on personal or political preferences, urging consistency in upholding the Constitution regardless of outcomes.
“Our decisions today will shape the future of our country,” Premadasa said, warning against unwanted ramifications by disregarding constitutional provisions. He called for a steadfast commitment to constitutional governance, stressing that adherence to legal principles is essential for the stability and integrity of Sri Lanka’s democratic institutions.
Latest News
Sun directly overhead Nittambuwa, Algama, Malwana, Aranayake, Meegahakiula and Panamkadu about 12.09 noon today (04)
The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from 28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.
The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (04) are Nittambuwa, Algama, Malwana, Aranayake, Meegahakiula and Panamkadu about 12.09 noon.
News
Norochcholai digs into dwindling coal stocks, two units slash generation
Plant’s output cut from 270 MW to 140 MW amidst dwindling stocks; energy analysts warn system remains “at a razor’s edge”
By Ifham Nizam
The Norochcholai coal-fired power plant is now digging into the last dredges of its coal stock, with two operational units forced to slash generation from around 270 MW to just 140 MW on Sunday as the plant ran critically short of fuel, according to independent energy analysts and sources familiar with the National System Operator (NSO).
The sudden reduction of approximately 130 MW in coal generation has once again exposed the fragile state of the country’s power supply arrangements, with the plant understood to have coal stocks sufficient only until Friday night.
“This is not how a coal plant is expected to operate. They are digging up the last dredges of coal from the plant,” an independent energy analyst told The Island.
The analyst questioned why the units had been allowed to reach this stage without earlier intervention, arguing that at least one unit should have been deloaded around 10 days ago to conserve the remaining coal.
Had that been done, the analyst said, the country could also have reduced its dependence on more expensive diesel-fired generation during the period when
coal stocks were being conserved.
The latest NSO generation figures highlight the continuing pressure on the system.
Around 7 p.m. on Sunday, when the night peak was reached, total demand stood at 2,552.7 MW. Coal contributed only 282 MW, while major hydro accounted for 1,215.8 MW and thermal-oil generation for 791.9 MW.
The night peak of 2,552.7 MW was substantially higher than the daytime peak of 2,246 MW, according to the NSO Generation Summary for August 30.
The most immediate concern is the remaining coal stock at Norochcholai.
Sources said the plant has coal only to Friday night, making the timing of the next shipment critical.
The first shipment under the emergency arrangement is expected to arrive on Friday, September 4, but the coal unloading will have to begin on the same day if
the power plant is to continue operating without further significant deloading.
That creates another potential vulnerability, with rough sea conditions posing an additional challenge to unloading operations.
Energy sector sources said that even the arrival of the September 4 shipment would not completely eliminate the danger.
The next shipment under the new coal tender would need to commence unloading around September 15. Any significant delay beyond that could again force the Norochcholai units to operate at reduced output.
“We are still at a razor’s edge”
The independent energy analyst said the situation should not be viewed merely as a question of whether a particular vessel arrives on time.
The situation also means that any further reduction in coal generation could have a direct impact on the use of oil-fired power generation, potentially increasing the cost of electricity generation.
The latest NSO figures already show the important role being played by thermal-oil generation during the evening peak, when demand rises sharply.
The analyst questioned the rationale behind allowing the coal units to continue operating at higher loading until stocks reached critically low levels instead of taking measures earlier to stretch the available inventory.
News
22A: BASL decides against making written submissions after SC refuses to grant it right of reply
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has informed the Supreme Court that it would not tender written submissions in respect of the petitions challenging the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which were heard on September 1 and 2.
The BASL said it had initially decided not to make written submissions after being deprived of the right of reply when the Solicitor General, appearing for the State, made submissions and explained the rationale and justification for the Bill.
The BASL pointed out that the Solicitor General, who made submissions at the end of the second day of the hearing, had not made a policy document available to the petitioners.
It also said the petitioners had not been given an opportunity to respond orally to the Solicitor General’s submissions or to address the Court on certain questions raised by the judges during their exchanges with the Solicitor General. (SF)
-
Features5 days ago“Wrap Me Up in My Blazer”— A Gentlemanly Bradby Reminiscence
-
Features4 days agoWhen Sri Lankan stories find their own voice
-
Features5 days agoJVP/NPP government as seen from outside by Lionel Bopage now domiciled in Australia
-
News4 days agoBASL takes exception to Justice Ganepola being denied a place in SC
-
Editorial6 days agoGovt. trying to dupe UN Rapporteur?
-
Features5 days agoProf. Savitri Goonesekere: What has she done?
-
Features5 days agoWorld Trade Politics: Canada rebuffs Trump’s tariff blackmail
-
News5 days agoLegal avenues explored to bring back Mahendran, aka Harjan Alexander
