News
Peradeniya Uni clash: Arts Faculty dons condemn actions to misuse just struggle against ragging to gain cheap political mileage
Peradeniya Arts Faculty teachers say that that they “recognize the inalienable right of students to engage in political activities and to work towards constructive social and systemic change. It is not our intention and not in the public’s interest to use incidents related to the rag… to undermine the people’s struggle of the past few months which is founded on the call for greater democracy in the country.”
A statement signed by Prof. Arjuna Parakrama, President Peradeniya Arts Faculty Teachers’ Association (PAFTA) says: “On September 14, 2022, a group of students studying law in the Faculty of Arts were assaulted while they were dining in the canteen and were subsequently prevented from entering the canteen premises. This is not an isolated incident. For years now, in the Faculty of Arts, a group identified as ‘Raggers’, through sheer force of might and intimidation, have denied students identified as ‘Anti-Raggers’ entry to public spaces of the university, including canteens. ‘Anti-Raggers’ were forced to find other inadequate spaces for their daily interaction and even to have their meals on campus. The violent and intolerant culture of the rag in the universities is such that Anti-Raggers are either prevented from residing in the halls of residence or hounded out of the halls of residence through other means.
“To return to the specific incident, on the 14th of September a group of students from the Department of Law, who could find no other place, decided to have their midday meal in one of the two main student canteens in the vicinity. This resulted in a faction of the ‘Rag Group’ to assault these students, and to later barring the Law students’ entry into the canteen. On hearing the commotion, the Dean of the Arts Faculty, along with other members of the staff, intervened at this point. The Dean called a meeting representing all factions, in order to resolve the matter amicably even at this stage. He also made it clear on that occasion that all public areas of the University commonly accessed by students, were open to all students, with no exceptions at all.However, promises made at this meeting were willfully broken within hours, resulting in further violence against these Law students.
“To end this spiraling cycle, the Dean, on the basis of the Faculty Board’s decision, asked for a written assurance on the part of the two affected student groups and the student union, the official representative body of the students, guaranteeing their commitment to free and open access to the canteens and other common facilities to all. Initially, in the interest of protecting the anti-rag group, on-site classes were converted to the online mode. However, after further discussion and clear intransigence on the part of the union and its allies who alone of the three groups refused to provide such a letter, it was decided that until such an assurance is made, all academic activities of the Faculty of Arts should be suspended as such activities cannot be conducted in an environment of violence and intimidation. To date, the Student Union has failed to provide such assurance.
Further, subsequent to the interventions made by the Dean, he became the target of threats and intimidation made by some students led by the Student Union. An effigy of him was burnt near the very canteen and he was publicly vilified at a much-publicised student union rally on the 15th September.
“Ragging has been the bane of the university system for decades. It is a violent, unjust, undemocratic, and inhuman practice. As PAFTA, we have zero tolerance for the rag and all related actions that perpetuate this practice. We are also particularly outraged at the intimidation and threats levelled at the Dean by members of the Student Union. We are committed to safeguarding the interests of all members of the university community, the safety and welfare of our members and the safety of all students and others in the university community; upholding that basic principle, we condemn these acts of intimidation unequivocally.
“As teachers in the higher education system we have always demonstrated a firm commitment to the functioning of the State University System. This system has nurtured all of us, and has contributed greatly to the welfare of this country, in the economic, administrative, political and cultural spheres. In condemning the undemocratic and violent practices of groups of students, we only wish to make the state system better, more democratic and be in greater service to the larger society. It is not, as has been implied elsewhere, particularly in media releases of the student union, that we are a part of a conspiracy to undermine the state university system. In condemning the rag and the violence of September 14 and 15, we can only improve the quality of education and the well-being of the university system.
“It has to be made crystal clear that we recognize the inalienable right of students to engage in political activities and to work towards constructive social and systemic change. It is not our intention and not in the public’s interest to use incidents related to the rag, including this incident in particular, to undermine the people’s struggle of the past few months which is founded on the call for greater democracy in the country. We condemn the actions of any group or political faction that seeks to misuse the just struggle against the rag to gain cheap political mileage and to undermine the greater democratic vision of the present political struggle against injustice.
“In sum, we condemn the practice of ragging and require all students to commit to a university environment in which everyone can learn with peace of mind; we condemn all practices of violence and repression, and stand by all those who are unjustly treated in any system. Specifically, we trust that the Student Union can assure us of their commitment to restoring normalcy and to a violence- free environment in the Faculty, so that we can resume the conduct of lectures as soon as possible.”
News
X-Press Pearl disaster fuels global call to classify plastic pellets as hazardous
Nearly five years after the catastrophic sinking of the X-Press Pearl, off Sri Lanka’s western coast, the environmental scars remain visible — from contaminated beaches to disrupted fisheries. Now, that tragedy has become a rallying point for an international coalition of scientists, demanding urgent reforms to global maritime law.
A group of leading researchers and environmental experts is calling on the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to formally recognise plastic pellets — commonly known as nurdles — as hazardous to the marine environment. They argue that existing international shipping regulations fail to adequately address the environmental devastation caused by pellet spills.
Their appeal comes through a newly accepted scientific commentary, published in Cambridge Prisms: Plastics, consolidating decades of research on the impacts of plastic pellet pollution.
Plastic pellets are small, lentil-sized (2–5 mm) particles made from virgin or recycled plastic and used to manufacture a vast range of plastic
products. Scientists say that spills occur frequently during handling and transport, both on land and at sea. Once released into the ocean, pellets persist for decades, spreading across vast distances and entering marine food chains.
Dr. Jennifer Lavers, who studies pollutants in seabirds, warned that the scale of plastic ingestion has reached crisis levels.
“Today the volumes of plastic pellets entering the marine environment are enough to ‘feed’ millions of young seabirds,” she said. “In some areas we are seeing nearly a 100% rate of plastic ingestion, with pellets being particularly problematic.”
Beyond physical harm such as digestive blockages in wildlife, pellets also pose chemical threats. According to Dr. Sinja Rist of DTU Aqua, they are far from inert materials.
“Pellets are persistent, widely dispersed, readily ingested by wildlife, and capable of transporting hazardous chemicals,” she explained, noting that they can absorb and release toxic substances across oceans.
Sri Lanka’s experience with the X-Press Pearl disaster, in 2021, highlighted these dangers on an unprecedented scale. The burning container ship released vast quantities of chemicals and billions of plastic pellets into the sea, causing widespread marine contamination and severe economic losses to coastal communities.
Hemantha Withanage, Chairperson of the Centre for Environmental Justice in Sri Lanka, said the disaster exposed major gaps in international maritime regulation.
“After studying the aftermath of the X-Press Pearl disaster, it is impossible to argue that plastic pellets are harmless cargo,” Withanage stressed. “The impacts in Sri Lanka were immediate, widespread, and long-lasting. Stronger international regulation is essential to prevent this from happening again.”
Under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), the intentional discharge of plastics is banned. However, scientists argue that current rules are inadequate when it comes to preventing or responding to accidental spills, especially those involving container ships.
The researchers are urging the IMO to assign plastic pellets a specific United Nations classification number. Such recognition would formally acknowledge their environmental hazard potential and trigger stricter requirements for packaging, labelling, and emergency notification during shipping.
Dr. Therese Karlsson, lead author of the commentary and Science Advisor for the IPEN, said the scientific case is clear.
“There are decades of studies highlighting threats from plastic pellets released into the oceans, including risks to marine animals and the food chain,” she said. “Plastics contain thousands of chemicals, many known to cause harm to the environment and human health. It is past time for global regulations to protect our oceans.”
The European Union has recently introduced measures aimed at preventing pellet losses throughout the supply chain, and in 2021 the IMO committed to addressing pellet pollution as part of broader efforts to reduce marine plastic litter. Yet experts warn that without binding global action, pellet spills will continue.
For Sri Lanka, still recovering from one of the worst maritime environmental disasters in its history, the international call carries particular urgency.
Scientists say the message from the island nation’s experience is unmistakable: plastic pellets must no longer be treated as ordinary cargo, but as hazardous materials demanding strict global oversight.
By Ifham Nizam
News
Foreign Minister Herath decries deadlock in global disarmament
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Vijitha Herath, has underscored the urgent global need for enduring peace, security, and strengthened multilateral cooperation, warning that rising geopolitical tensions have created deadlocks in global disarmament efforts and posed serious challenges to international humanitarian law.
The Minister said so while addressing the High-Level Segment of the Conference on Disarmament (CD) in Geneva on Monday (23 Feb), reaffirming Sri Lanka’s firm commitment to global disarmament and multilateral cooperation.
Minister Herath said that safeguarding the future of humanity must be treated as a paramount priority, stressing that trust and mutual respect are essential foundations for effective decision-making in multilateral forums. He reaffirmed that Sri Lanka remains committed to ensuring a secure and stable world for future generations.
Highlighting Sri Lanka’s longstanding role in nuclear disarmament, he recalled the country’s contribution to the 1964 Non-Aligned Movement Summit in Cairo, which called for the establishment of nuclear-free zones. He reiterated that Sri Lanka continues to strongly support such initiatives, particularly in the Middle East, and emphasiSed that total elimination and non-proliferation remain the only guarantees against the use of nuclear weapons.
Sri Lanka also urged that non-nuclear-weapon states must receive unconditional, non-discriminatory, legally binding security assurances, achievable through the work of the Conference on Disarmament.
On humanitarian demining, Minister Herath noted that Sri Lanka remains an active partner in that effort and currently serves as a senior member of the victim assistance committee of the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention. He further reaffirmed Sri Lanka’s continued commitment to the Cluster Munitions Convention, which the country presided over in 2019.
Recognising the rapidly evolving threat landscape, the Minister warned of the impact of emerging technologies that have already reshaped the global disarmament architecture while putting international humanitarian law at significant risk. In this context, he said Sri Lanka has been advocating for the early start of negotiations on a legally binding instrument to prohibit lethal autonomous weapon systems.
He also addressed growing threats to outer space security, stressing that Sri Lanka, long a supporter of disarmament in outer space, continues to back negotiations on a legally binding instrument to prevent an arms race beyond Earth.
Minister Herath concluded by affirming Sri Lanka’s readiness to work with all nations to ensure global efforts toward a safer world are accelerated and achieved at the earliest opportunity.
News
CoPF orders officials to establish legal framework for Rs. 200 for estate workers daily attendance allowance
The Parliamentary Committee on Public Finance has directed officials to establish a proper legal framework for the Rs. 200 daily attendance allowance provided by the Government to estate workers.
During the Committee meeting on February 17, 2026, chaired by MP Dr. Harsha de Silva, members emphasised that while there is no objection to increasing estate worker wages, the current payment mechanism lacks a formal legal basis. The allowance is being distributed under a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with private plantation companies without gazette notification, leaving the arrangement vulnerable to termination and excluding contributions to the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees’ Trust Fund (ETF), according to parliament sources.
Officials noted that the MoU with plantation companies was valid for three years, and thereafter a policy decision would be required to continue the payments. The Committee stressed that public funds should not be used to pay salaries in private institutions without proper financial discipline, despite the allowance being approved under the 2026 Budget as a “development subsidy.” The Deputy Secretary to the Treasury suggested the payment would be more appropriately classified as a “production incentive,” though existing payments and MoUs did not specify such requirements.
The Committee also reviewed disaster relief efforts for those affected by Cyclone Ditwah. Officials reported that approximately Rs. 24.4 billion had been disbursed under various relief programs, including allowances for house cleaning, household purchases, and school assistance. Delays in housing reconstruction and rental support were attributed to damage assessments and land identification, with Committee members urging faster delivery of housing aid.
Officials from the National Insurance Trust Fund (NITF) highlighted reinsurance claims of around Rs. 11 billion following Cyclone Ditwah, noting that although NITF had not reinsured its exposure internationally since 2023, it was capable of settling existing claims.
-
Features4 days agoWhy does the state threaten Its people with yet another anti-terror law?
-
Features4 days agoReconciliation, Mood of the Nation and the NPP Government
-
Features4 days agoVictor Melder turns 90: Railwayman and bibliophile extraordinary
-
Features3 days agoLOVEABLE BUT LETHAL: When four-legged stars remind us of a silent killer
-
Features4 days agoVictor, the Friend of the Foreign Press
-
Latest News5 days agoNew Zealand meet familiar opponents Pakistan at spin-friendly Premadasa
-
Latest News5 days agoTariffs ruling is major blow to Trump’s second-term agenda
-
Latest News5 days agoECB push back at Pakistan ‘shadow-ban’ reports ahead of Hundred auction
