Connect with us

Features

Peradeniya, President of the Students Council and kidnapping Sir. Ivor Jennings

Published

on

(Excerpted from The Jetwing Story and the life of Herbert Cooray by Shiromal Cooray)


Herbert Cooray joined the University of Ceylon in 1946. The university, then graduating its second generation of students, had had a slow start. Approved by the colonial government in 1912, it had not opened its doors until 1921, and still operated as a single college in Colombo. Herbert was among the first batch of students to be transferred to its new campus, recently opened at Peradeniya, by Queen Elizabeth II.

The schoolboy rebel found in the open atmosphere of university life a more appropriate theatre for his periodic confrontations with authority. Students, unlike schoolboys, are nominal adults whose right to speak out on matters of adult concern is assumed. Herbert, who had always chafed under the restraints of authority and convention, was quickly swept up by the nationalist, anti-imperial feeling then prevalent among young Ceylonese intellectuals.

His natural aversion to colonial customs and traditions flourished in this friendly soil. Soon, he was a highly visible campus activist and a candidate for president of the Students’ Council. He was also a member of the Lanka Sama Samaja Party, a Trotskyite movement which he joined in 1952.

The election campaign for the presidency was Herbert Cooray’s baptism into the public eye.

It was an era of firebrands – A.E. Goonasinha, the trade-union boss and populist demagogue, set the pattern and Herbert soon showed himself as incendiary as any that came before him. By then it was 1948, and Ceylon had already gained its independence, yet nationalist sentiment was, if anything, more fervent than ever. Education and education policy became battlegrounds of ideology, and university intellectuals saw themselves as being in the forefront of the struggle. Yet the pace of change was too slow for young Herbert Cooray; his presidential campaign was founded on a platform of ‘out with the old, in with the new’.

He and his supporters worked hard, even frantically, to get him elected. While the committees he appointed set about the tasks of manifesto writing, canvassing and propaganda, Herby talked himself hoarse on platforms and in lecture halls. His funds were scanty, and he could only afford to serve tea without milk a brew whose astringency complemented his fiery speechmaking at his meetings. But people came anyway, and when the election was held and the results tallied, Herbert Cooray was found to have won the presidency of the Student’s Council of the University of Ceylon.

Thus began a difficult time for Sir Ivor Jennings, Vice-Chancellor, a man who might be thought to have had enough on his plate already. In addition to cajoling politicians, acting as a peacemaker between wrangling bureaucrats and fielding brickbats from the popular press, Sir Ivor now became the hapless object of Herbert’s unionist demands and protest campaigns. On one occasion, he was actually taken hostage by the youthful unionist and his colleagues.

Doubtless the incident was memorable for all concerned; certainly Herbert loved to regale his friends in later years with stories of how he waited in ambush with his fellow activists, followed the VC’s car down the drive, intercepted the poor man as he alighted from the vehicle and escorted him to the room where he was to be (albeit briefly) incarcerated.

Herbert also took great pride in having organized the first student strike at the university. The action earned him the wrath of his father, but by this time Herbert was well accustomed to the rebukes of his elders. His father often worried what new scrape his son would get into. In his own mind Herbert was certain of the rightness of his cause; moreover, his fellow activists and students admired and looked up to him. Many remained his firm friends for life, even as they built their own eminent and influential careers in business, politics and public service.

Amidst all this revolutionary ferment, Herbert Cooray never forgot the lesson he had learnt, many years before, from a caustic Christian Brother. He remained a dedicated student of sociology, displaying a talent for the subject that led one of his professors, James Bryce, to enlist his assistance in researching material for a monograph on the Ceylonese caste system. The book, when it appeared, carried a generous acknowledgment of Herbert’s contribution. The experience also sparked an interest in Herbert himself, who would continue to be intrigued by caste for the rest of his life.

He then dropped out of University, just before his final exams. This was followed by a brief spell at Law College, notable mostly in that it was here he first met the Perera family consisting of three brothers and a sister, with whom he forged lifelong friendships. Fellow Catholics hailing from Kotahena, the Pereras treated Herbert as a member of their own family. The second-oldest brother, Lucien, would later become his lawyer, confidante and business partner.

Uncertain about what career to follow, Herbert left Law College and took up a position teaching English at Gurukula Vidyalaya, Kelaniya. But the job lacked stimulation, so he decided to give the mercantile sector a try. Along with two similarly-placed friends, he joined Harrison & Crossfield’s as an Insurance Executive- essentially a salesman who received an inadequate salary eked out with commissions on the policies he sold.

He enjoyed the work and the freedom of having an income of his own, but what impressed him most was the clear link between effort and reward – the better and harder you worked, the more you earned. An instinctive meritocrat from childhood onward, Herbert had found his metier. The year was 1956, and the transformation from student socialist to successful entrepreneurial capitalist had begun.

With his first salary and commission Herbert bought a Rolex watch, which he lovingly wore for over 40 years before handing it on to his son Hiran. The watch, which cost him Rs.750, was recently valued in Switzerland; the appreciation in it was phenomenal. It was the first of many canny investments by the former campus radical.

To his parents, eager to see their restless son settle down, even a salesman’s job must have seemed like relative stability. At any rate, the job made their gainfully employed son a suitable marital prospect. In those days, Sri Lankans usually married by arrangement, and Herbert had already received several proposals. One of these bore fruit just before his 28th birthday, at All Saint’s Church, Borella, on January 17, 1957, Herbert Cooray wed Josephine Perera, a pretty 21-year old, whose father was a landowner and businessman with interests that included a bus company, coir milling and brick manufacturing. An appropriate match for the son of a building contractor!

The wedding was followed by a reception at Galle Face Hotel, after which the newlyweds began their life together at Herbert’s parents’ home in Ragama. By this time Neville- the sedate, steady elder brother who had graduated as a doctor, was married and had left the family home, leaving his parents and his younger sister Lilian. However, the family was soon to be augmented by the birth of Herbert’s first daughter, Shiromal. Needing more space, the couple moved into a house of their own at Dankotuwa in 1959, a gift from Josephine’s father. There they would stay until Herbert built his own home at Mattumagala, Welisera in 1962.

Gone were the days of rebellion and confrontation. Newly settled, Herbert now channeled his restless spirit into a penchant for travel and adventure. As a member of the LSSP, he had already visited Moscow as a youth delegate to the Annual Party Conference in 1956. Now he wanted to see more of the world. His wife, newly delivered of a baby girl, could not travel with him; instead, his traveling companions were two former university colleagues, Bandu Manukulasuriya and Sanath Saparamadu. They, too, were newly married with young families, but the prospect of a Grand World Tour was irresistible.

The trio bought one-way tickets to the UK, arriving there in early 1959. They toured the British Isles, afterwards taking the ferry to France. In Paris Herbert bought himself a brand new Peugeot 203, which became their conveyance for the rest of the tour. The doughty Peugeot carried them faithfully through many adventures and escapades along a route that took in Eastern Europe, the USSR, Afghanistan and finally India, whence a second ferry carried them to Jaffna and home.

The long journey forged a lasting bond between car and driver; though he owned many other cars (Peugeots, mainly!), the old 203 was used occasionally until the late 1980s. It even helped him start his first business, being offered as collateral to secure a bank loan in order to fulfill a building contract, in 1963.

Whatever the make of Herbert’s cars, they tended to be red. His fondness for the colour was a memento of his Bolshevik years perhaps- and also, perhaps a private, ironic comment on how far he had traveled in life since those early, idealistic days.

His father continued to worry about his younger son and wished he would settle down soon. He confided to a friend, “One day he will do me proud!”. Unfortunately his father passed away in 1964, just two years after Herbert had set up his first company, N J Cooray Builders Ltd. Herbert’s mother, a woman of great substance and courage, whom he adored and took great care of until her death, just two months prior to his own demise, believed in her son and was a constant support throughout his life. Herbert would recall the many escapades that got him into trouble with his father and then the mother coming into rescue him from further wrath.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Arctic link discovered: Lankan scientists trace 8,000 km seabird migration route

Published

on

By Ifham Nizam

Sri Lankan scientists have uncovered a remarkable long-distance migration route used by seabirds, linking the island’s shores with the Arctic—an achievement that is expected to reshape global understanding of bird movement and highlight Sri Lanka’s importance in the natural world.

The discovery, led by Professor Sampath S. Seneviratne of the University of Colombo, shows that Heuglin’s Gulls travel nearly 8,000 kilometres from Sri Lanka to breeding grounds in northern Russia, following a carefully chosen path that combines coastal travel with long inland journeys.

Prof. Seneviratne told The Island that the finding challenges the long-standing belief that seabirds depend mainly on ocean routes.

“For a long time, we assumed seabirds would stay close to the sea throughout their migration. What we are seeing here is very different. These birds are moving across land as well, using a route that connects Sri Lanka directly with the Arctic,” he said.

Brown headed gull- migrating from Himalayas to Mannar

The birds begin their journey from the northwestern coast of Sri Lanka, especially around Mannar—an area known for its rich birdlife and coastal habitats. From there, they cross over to India and move along the western coastline before turning inland.

Their journey then takes them through Pakistan and Afghanistan, across parts of Central Asia, and onwards to the Arctic region, where they breed during the northern summer.

What has drawn particular attention from scientists is the route chosen by the birds.

Instead of attempting to cross the world’s highest mountain ranges, or taking a much longer path over the open ocean, the gulls appear to follow a middle course that allows them to avoid harsh conditions while still maintaining a steady journey.

Map 1 &2 birds moving through the continent to reach the Artctic

“They are not simply taking the shortest distance,” Prof. Seneviratne explained. “They are choosing a route that gives them the best chance of survival. Along this path, they are able to find food, rest, and avoid extreme environments.”

The birds travel long distances each day, covering hundreds of kilometres, but they do not do it all in one stretch. Their journey depends heavily on stopovers—places where they pause to rest and rebuild energy.

“These stopovers are critical,” Prof. Seneviratne said. “If the birds cannot find suitable places to feed and recover, they will not be able to complete the journey.”

Co-researcher Dr. Gayomini Panagoda said the discovery sheds light on a route that had remained largely hidden until now.

“We always knew these birds were leaving Sri Lanka during certain times of the year, but we did not fully understand where they were going or how they got there,” she said. “Now we have a much clearer picture of their journey.”

Awareness among schoolchildren

She added that the findings show how closely connected different parts of the world are through nature.

“A bird that spends part of its life in Sri Lanka ends up in the Arctic. That tells us how linked these ecosystems really are,” she said.

The findings also underline the importance of Sri Lanka’s coastal areas, which serve as vital feeding and resting grounds for migratory birds before they begin their long journey north.

Veteran ornithologist , Professor Emeritus Sarath Kotagama said these habitats are of international importance and must be protected.

“These coastal regions, especially places like Mannar, provide the food and shelter these birds need before migration. If those areas are damaged, it will affect bird populations far beyond Sri Lanka,” he said.

Professor Seneviratne with Dr. Gayomini Panagoda

Kotagama warned that increasing pressure on coastal ecosystems—from development, pollution, and climate change—could pose serious risks.

“We are already seeing changes in many of these birds. If we are not careful, we could lose habitats that are essential not just for local wildlife, but for species that travel across continents,” he said.

The discovery also draws attention to the wider network of migration routes that connect countries across Asia and beyond. Birds do not recognise national borders, and their survival depends on conditions in many different places along their journey.

Prof. Seneviratne stressed that protecting these birds will require cooperation between countries.

“These birds travel across several regions, and each of those regions plays a role in their survival. Conservation cannot be done by one country alone,” he said.

A GPS tagged Crab Plover

He added that more work is needed to understand how other species use similar routes and how changes in climate and land use may affect migration patterns in the future.

“There is still much we do not know. This is just one piece of a much larger picture,” he said.

Environmentalists say the findings should encourage stronger action to protect wetlands and coastal ecosystems in Sri Lanka, many of which are under increasing threat.

“These areas are not just important for birds,” Dr. Panagoda said. “They support fisheries, protect coastlines, and are part of our natural heritage. Protecting them benefits both people and wildlife.”

She noted that conserving these habitats will also help ensure that future generations can continue to witness the arrival and departure of migratory birds.

For Sri Lanka, the discovery is both a moment of pride and a reminder of responsibility.

It highlights the role the island plays in supporting wildlife that travels across vast distances and connects different parts of the world.

It also shows that even a small country can have a big impact when it comes to global biodiversity.

As Prof. Seneviratne put it, “What happens in Sri Lanka does not stay in Sri Lanka. These birds carry that connection across continents.”

The discovery is expected to encourage further research into bird migration in the region, as scientists continue to explore how different species move across landscapes and adapt to changing conditions.

It also reinforces the need to protect the natural environments that make such journeys possible.

In the end, the story of these birds is not just about distance. It is about survival, connection, and the delicate balance of nature.

From the shores of Sri Lanka to the frozen Arctic, their journey is a powerful reminder that the natural world is far more connected than we often realise—and that protecting one part of it helps protect the whole.

Continue Reading

Features

Why the promotion of drone warfare is unconscionable

Published

on

A drone strike on an oil facility in the Middle East in the current war.

For the morally-conscious, the tendency among some sections in Sri Lanka to promote the production of drones for national defence purposes could be deeply worrying. Besides, this proposition flies in the face of common sense and disregards the relentlessly increasing harsh economic realities coming in the wake of the current wars that could push many a southern country into beggary. In fact even the West is facing an economic recession.

To begin with the latter issues, it is a proved reality that the majority of Southern countries are descending further into poverty at present. The FAO has the ‘bleeding statistics’ . For instance, food insecurity in Asia is of such disquieting proportions that the region accounts for ‘ approximately half of the world’s 370.7 million undernourished people’.

It is against such a bleak economic backdrop that countries of the South are being called on to pump money into the production or importing of drones. Pointed reference needs to be made here to the South because drones are peddled as cutting-edge defence systems that are comparatively economical to acquire and relatively easy to operate. It is even voiced that with time drones could enable even smaller countries of the South to acquire ‘strategic parity’ with the major powers of the North and middle level powers.

Meanwhile, no thought is spared for the poor of the South who would sink steadily into poverty and powerlessness. Because more defence spending by southern countries only entrenches the ruling classes of those countries, and in some cases their military high commands, further in the systems of governance and repression.

This has essentially been the experience of the majority of post-colonial states. As aptly phrased by economic and political analyst Susan George in the seventies, it has always been a case of ‘The Other Half Dying’.

Accordingly, it cannot be perceived as to how more defence spending by the South on drones could help alleviate the latter’s principal problem of deepening poverty. As for the perceived escalating insecurities of the South, these problems are of such complexity that drones could never be seen as offering a quick fix for them. They need patient, multi-pronged managing, mainly at the negotiating table with the powers that matter. These are long- gestation projects that need to be compulsorily undertaken in view of the fact that the alternative could be indefinite conflict and war.

Since Sri Lanka too is mentioned as one of those countries that needs to look at the drone proposition with some seriousness, it is relevant to underscore that Sri Lanka is second in a list of countries that are described as facing acute material hardships at present in the wake of the economic instability bred by the Hormuz crisis. The source of such information is no less than the respected Kiel Institute for the World Economy. The first 10 such gravely affected countries are: Zambia, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Pakistan, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Bangladesh, Vietnam, the Philippines and Thailand.

It is thought-provoking that among the above countries are not only those that have been traditionally seen as experiencing severe underdevelopment but also up-and-coming middle income countries that have been hitherto described as being on a fast track to development. The interesting mix proves that no country at present could consider itself immune to current economic shocks originating mainly in the Middle East that could plunge it dramatically into acute poverty virtually overnight.

We are left to conclude that ‘Bread’ or the economic well being of people could in no way be sacrificed for ‘Drones’ in democratic countries whose governments are obliged to be accountable to the people. Considering the phenomenal hardships that could be waiting to happen worldwide, the world could very well do without more ‘Guns’ or ‘Drones’.

However, if southern governments in particular opt for ‘Drones’ or an accumulation of ‘Guns’, the chances are that there could be overwhelming tides of social discontent in their countries, bred by economic want, that could then ignite indefinite war and repression. That is, a ‘No-Win’ situation for all concerned.

Ukraine has been spiritedly and admirably taking the fight back to the invading Russian forces over the past few years but its skillful use of sophisticated drones of its own making has in no way decreased the human costs the war has been incurring for itself. Ukraine has no choice but to continue with all the weaponry at its command to beat back the Russian invader but sooner rather than later it would need to take into account the immense suffering the war has been inflicting on its people and focus on the fact that the Russians are not backing down but using equally lethal weaponry against it.

The above are some of the dilemmas of the present wars that call for urgent resolution. Warring countries are obliged to address on a priority basis the misery and destruction their actions incur for their publics and consider deploying diplomacy, preferably under the aegis of the UN, to work out peaceful solutions to their enmities and differences. Considering the futility of their war Russia and Ukraine are obliged to think on these lines.

No less a power than the US should be considering deeply right now the advisability of continuing with its military interventions in the South in particular to achieve its self interests. The rising loss of American lives and the economic costs of war in the Middle East will be weighing heavily with the Trump administration and it shouldn’t come as a surprise if negotiations are given a serious try, going ahead. Ground realities in the region moreover indicate that the US ‘has bitten off more than it could chew’ and that Iran is remaining hostile and unyielding despite being bloodied.

For both sides to the war what should be inescapable is the harsh reality of continuing human suffering on a chilling scale. Sophisticated and increasingly destructive weaponry such as drones and missiles are being used but they have not brought either side any closer to victory. Instead human misery is being perpetrated mindlessly with a steady deadening of consciences and a flagrant abandoning of reason.

Accordingly, what perceived legitimate aims could drone warfare, for instance, help achieve? It is quite some time since sections of the world community came to realize the futility of violence and war. There is no choice but for humans to recognize and revere the principle of the sacredness of life. A return to fundamentals is imperative.

Continue Reading

Features

Unforgettable experience …

Published

on

The committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK, who made Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance a total success (Photographs by: Praneeth Hettiarachchi)

Singer Rajiv Sebastian has the unique ability to woo an audience and he did just that on his recent trip to London, performing at the Funky ’70s Bash Dinner Dance.

This particular event of music, nostalgia, and celebration, was organised by the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya Old Girls’ Association – UK, and held at the DoubleTree by Hilton London Elstree, in Borehamwood, on 28th February.

They say the success of the evening was made possible through the dedication and hard work of President Devika Arrawwalage and the committed committee members of the Ananda Balika Vidyalaya OGA – UK.

Rajiv Sebastian was in top form, delivering an engaging performance that took the audience on a nostalgic musical journey through the iconic sounds of the’70s.

Doing the first set in full suit, with a fan joining in the action

He did three sets, appearing in three different outfits – suit, the normal shirt and trouser, and the sarong – and the crowd loved it.

Adding to the energy of the event, I’m told, was the music provided by the band Hasthi, made up of Sri Lankan musicians based in the UK.

At the end of a truly enjoyable and memorable event, the organisers had this to say about Rajiv Sebastian’s performance:

“On behalf of the entire team, I want to extend our heartfelt thanks to you for travelling all the way from Sri Lanka to perform at our first ever ABV dinner dance in the UK.

“Your performance was truly the highlight of the night. You have a superb talent for captivating an audience; from the moment you took the stage, your vibrant energy and incredible vocal range completely transformed the atmosphere.

“It was wonderful to see how effortlessly you engaged the crowd, keeping the dance floor packed and everyone in high spirits throughout the evening. You have graced the stage as a guest artiste on three separate occasions, delivering exceptional performances that set you apart from your peers.

“We feel incredibly privileged to have had an artiste of your calibre and charisma join us. You didn’t just provide music; you created an unforgettable experience that people are still talking about.

Surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, as well

“Thank you for sharing your immense gift with us. Hope to see you back on a UK stage very soon!”

Yes, and it’s happening soon; Rajiv says he is off to London again, in mid-April, and will be performing at four different venues.

He also mentioned that he has some surprises for his fans in Sri Lanka, when he and his band, The Clan, present their 35th Anniversary concert … in June, this year.

Continue Reading

Trending