News
Pathetic situation facing public revealed during clash over power sector reforms: Kanchana questions fellow SLPPer Gevindu’s suitability as MP

‘Power minister caused dispute violating consensus on amendment’
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Power and Energy Minister Kanchana Wijesekera (SLPP) has accused dissident SLPP lawmaker Gevindu Cumaratunga of hindering much needed reforms meant to improve the electricity sector.The Matara District lawmaker alleged that the National List MP simply repeated unsubstantiated claims on the basis of false information that had been provided by various interested parties hell-bent on disrupting the proposed reforms.
Minister Wijesekera regretted the inclusion of the leader of ‘Yuthukama’ civil society organisation among SLPP National List MPs. At the last general election, the SLPP secured 17 National List slots at the last parliamentary polls conducted in August 2020.
Minister Wijesekera and MP Cumaratunga recently clashed in Parliament over similar issues, including the recently gazetted Electricity Bill and the unprecedented discontinuation of electricity supply to consumers by the CEB and LECO (Lanka Electricity Company) over their failure to settle outstanding bills due to dire economic situation.
Minister Wijesekera alleged that MP Cumaratunga pursued a personal agenda at the expense of electricity sector reforms that were meant to address challenging developments in the expanding electricity sector.
During the heated exchange of words over the power sector issues, MP Cumaratunga emphasized that Minister Wijesekera acted contrary to a consensus reached between the government and the Opposition. Had Minister Kanchana as agreed included an amendment meant to ensure regulatory mechanism in respect of power generation, the ongoing dispute could have been avoided, MP Cumaratunga told The Island.
Referring to the adoption of ‘Sri Lanka Electricity Amendment Bill’ without a specific amendment on June 09, 2022 during the tail end of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s presidency, MP Cumaratunga said that the original Electricity Act subjected power generation regardless of the size/capacity of particular project to tender process. Minister Wijesekera did away with that thereby creating an environment for corruption, MP Cumaratunga said, adding that the Opposition pressed for a regulatory mechanism.
“Following talks with concerned parties, an agreement was reached on an amendment to address our concerns,” MP Cumaratunga said. In accordance with that, the Minister agreed to free generation of up to 10 megawatts of tender procedures while generation of 10 to 100 megawatts was to be subjected to tenders, MP Cumaratunga said. The projects meant to generate 100 megawatts or more were to be subjected to parliamentary approval, MP Cumaratunga said, declaring that was the most important provision proposed by the Opposition. “Minister Wijesekera simply discarded the consensus on the agreement.”
Responding to another query, MP Cumaratunga said that in spite of the importance of the bill before the parliament, quite a number of MPs skipped the vote. Had there been any intervention by an external party to discourage MPs from voting against the bill.
Following the debate on the second reading of the bill, the Opposition called for a vote. According to MP Cumaratunga 120 votes were cast in favor and 36 were cast against. 13 Members of Parliament abstained from casting their vote. Thereby, the second reading was passed by a majority of 84 votes, he said.
Cumaratunga questioned Minister Wijesekera in parliament as to why he increased electricity tariffs having repeatedly promised that the new Amendment was meant to prevent further hikes in electricity. In addition to that the moves were afoot to privatize the CEB in the name of restructuring, MP Cumaratunga alleged, pointing out contrary to his assurances the state enterprise and the consumers were not safe today.
MP Cumaratunga urged Minister Wijesekera to review his power sector strategy anew and take tangible measures to reassure the CEB and the consumers as well.
Responding to MP Cumaratunga’s criticism of the electricity amendment bill, Wijesekera said that those who had painted an extremely negative picture of that initiative alleged that the enactment would swiftly lead to privatization of the CEB. “They expressed fears that the CEB would be abolished. Did such a thing happen following the introduction of the Amendment Bill? Scare stories and lies were propagated at the expense of the national economy.”
Minister Wijesekera challenged MP Cumaratunga to reveal just one instance the government accepted an unsolicited bid outside the laid down procedures in terms of the Electricity Amendment Act. Minister Wijesekera declared that the government hadn’t cleared a single project outside the procedures in place since the enactment of the new law. “What we really did was to rectify faults that had been caused at the time the government amended the Act in 2014. The 2022 enactment of the Electricity Amendment bill allowed the launch of projects that were held up since 2014. As a result of measures taken by the current dispensation, people were encouraged to invest in the renewable energy sector.”
Minister Wijesekera said that investors couldn’t be attracted unless the government was in a position to pay them.
MP Cumaratunga exchanged words with Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapaksa who had been on the chair at the time the parliament took up the electricity sector reforms.
Minister Wijesekera again challenged MP Cumaratunga to reveal one unsolicited bid. MP Cumaratunga emphasized that the issue at hand was the creation of an environment to engage in corrupt practices.Minister Wijesekera assured that under no circumstances could procedures be violated as every project required the approval of the Public Utilities Commission.
News
Bid to include genocide allegation against Sri Lanka in Canada’s school curriculum thwarted

Dr. Neville Hewage yesterday said that the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada had determined that alleged Tamil genocide hadn’t taken place in Sri Lanka.
The academic, who successfully moved the Canadian courts, said that, therefore, the much-touted Tamil Genocide Education Week Act (TGEWA), in terms of the ruling given by the Ontario Court of Appeal and confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada, is not within provincial Jurisdiction Education under Canada’s Constitution. Dr. Hewage said so in response to The Island query.
Declaring that the Canadian ruling was a huge victory for Sri Lanka, constantly harassed by various interested parties over unsubstantiated war crimes allegations, Dr. Hewage emphasised that alleged Tamil genocide couldn’t be in the school curriculum.
The Canadian parliament in May 2022 declared May 18 as Tamil Genocide Remembrance Day, thereby recognising the massacre of Tamils during the last phase of the war.
Responding to another query, Dr. Hewage valued the legal action at approximately $350,000 while denying any backing from the Sri Lankan government. “I haven’t received any funding from the government,” Dr. Hewage said, appreciating the backing provided by the Canadian legal team.
Adjunct Professor of the Law and Justice Department Laurentian University. Sudbury, Ontario, Canada Hewage said: “I did my own legal work which cost me only time and the expenses for filing.”
Dr. Hewage dismissed attempts made by the pro-LTTE lobby to propagate the lie that the Supreme Court of Canada had dismissed the challenge to Bill 104 aka TGEWA, thereby allowing education and commemorative events/efforts.
Asked to explain, Dr. Hewage pointed out that although the Ontario Superior Court of justice, the Ontario Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada had determined that Tamil genocide did not take place in Sri Lanka, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice had ruled that TGEWA is valid under the Constitution Act, 1867, s 93 Education. Recalling that the first application had been filed against the Attorney General of Ontario on June 06, 2021, Dr. Hewage said that he had moved the Ontario Court of Appeal on July 22, 2022 and that court ruled that the TGEWA was not in line with the relevant Act.
The Appeal Court had concluded that TGEWA was not within the provincial jurisdiction as outlined in the Constitution Act, 1867, s. 93 Education, Dr. Hewage said.
The bottom line was that Tamil genocide couldn’t be included in their school curriculum, Dr. Hewage said. The Canadian verdict couldn’t have come at a better time for Sri Lanka, troubled by UK sanctions on Admiral of the Fleet Wasantha Karannagoda, retired Generals, Shavendra Silva and Jagath Jayasuriya as well as one-time LTTE Ampara-Batticaloa commander Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan alias Karuna over war crimes allegations.
Dr. Hewage said that he had appealed to the Supreme Court on Nov 11, 2024 as he feared that the Ontario Court of Appeal could be reversed in case some other pro-LTTE party moved court and may declare plausible Tamil genocide. The academic stressed that throughout their campaign, the Sri Lankan government had not extended any help.
At the time, Dr. Hewage initiated the legal process Gotabaya Rajapaksa was the President. By the time Dr. Hewage appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, the National People’s Power (NPP) had gained power.
The development with regard to TGEWA has taken place in the wake of Jaffna-born Gary Anandasangaree receiving appointment as Justice Minister and Attorney-General of Canada and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Minister. He has been campaigning against alleged war crimes in Sri Lanka.
Dr. Hewage said that some media and other interested parties had been working overtime to deceive the people by misinterpreting the Canadian Supreme Court decision.
The Supreme Court had confirmed the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision, and no further inquiries were required, Dr. Hewage said, adding that the pro-LTTE lobby was quite upset as both the Superior Court of Justice and the Appeal Court of Ontario had determined that Tamil genocide did not take place in Sri Lanka. “Therefore, the Supreme Court of Canada will not further inquire into the Tamil genocide claim and as such the Appeal court decision will stand,” Dr. Hewage said.
by Shamindra Ferdinando
News
UK sanctions on former military top brass biased, unjustifiable: Ex-PM

Former Prime Minister and leader of the Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP) Dinesh Gunawardena has alleged that the UK sanctioning retired top brass and ex-LTTE commander is biased, unjustifiable and a blatant interference in an internal affair of Sri Lanka.
The following is the text of statement issued by former parliamentarian Gunawardena: “The United Kingdom Government recently imposed sanctions on former head of the Sri Lankan Armed Forces Shavendra Silva, former Navy Commander Wasantha Karannagoda, former Commander of the Sri Lankan Army Jagath Jayasuriya and Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan alias Karuna Amman.
The imposition of sanctions on three former commanders of Sri Lankan armed forces over alleged human rights violations during the conflict between the terrorist outfit Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and the armed forces by the UK is biased, unjustifiable action and a blatant interference on an internal affair of Sri Lanka.
It is most regrettable that the UK thought it fit to impose sanctions that are not based on any transparent investigation or legal proceedings. Instead, they reflect the selective application of international pressure on Sri Lanka, targeting those who played key roles in Sri Lanka’s military victory against the most ruthless terrorist organization, which is banned by many countries, including the UK.
I wish to reiterate that the people of Sri Lanka have the highest respect for the sacrifices made by the military and the Commanders of armed forces and they would always stand by them against any unjustified attempts of prosecution or slander as their valiant fight against terrorists have ensured long-lasting peace in Sri Lanka.
We urge the United Kingdom to withdraw the one-sided sanctions in the interest of our long-standing bilateral relations and norms.”
News
Modi’s visit: TN poaching issue on the agenda

Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri has said that the arrest of Indian fishermen by the Sri Lankan Navy would be taken up at the forthcoming Indian Premier Narendra Modi’s visit to Colombo.Responding to a query posed at a special media briefing held in New Delhi on March 28 on Modi’s visits to Thailand and Sri Lanka in the first week of April, Misri said: We have throughout been in very close contact with Sri Lankan authorities at all levels and in practically every meeting with Sri Lanka, this issue is taken up very, very forcefully by our side. And our central message has always been that these are issues that should really be seen from the humanitarian and the livelihood concerns lens.”
Misri said: “On the fishermen’s issue, this is something that is a long-standing issue. It is also something whose origin lies in certain arrangements that were arrived at many years ago, in the mid-70s when the international maritime boundary line between India and Sri Lanka was agreed by the then authorities, both at the central and the state level. And, there were formal agreements that were signed with regard to respective rights in this particular area.
Since then, of course, on grounds of alleged crossing of this line by fishermen from our side, there are arrests on the Sri Lankan side and then a process has to be gone through.
We have throughout been in very close contact with Sri Lankan authorities at all levels and in practically every meeting with Sri Lanka, this issue is taken up very, very forcefully by our side. And our central message has always been that these are issues that should really be seen from the humanitarian and the livelihood concerns lens.
There are agreements that have been arrived at from time to time between Indian and Sri Lankan authorities on how to handle this issue. There is a formal mechanism as well of a joint working group on fisheries between the two sides. I think the most recent meeting was held in October last year. There is also a mechanism for fishermen’s associations from the two sides to work.
Our effort is to continue to resolve these issues, find mutual agreement on these issues. Of course, our Mission in Colombo and our Consulate in Jaffna remain very closely involved with these issues. Anytime there are people who are affected, we extend legal as well as other kinds of assistance to them. Sometimes there is medical assistance that is required. We also facilitate the repatriation as early as possible of released fishermen from Sri Lanka to India.
One other thing that we have always focused on with regard to this issue in our discussions with Sri Lanka is the need to avoid the use of force under all circumstances. Therefore, we feel that both sides understand the need to continue our ongoing dialogue, our constructive engagement to eventually achieve long lasting and mutually acceptable solutions to the issue. I have no doubt that the Prime Minister will raise issues related to the welfare of our fishermen during his meeting with the Sri Lankan President.”
-
Foreign News7 days ago
Buddhism’s holiest site erupts in protests over Hindu ‘control’ of shrine
-
Features5 days ago
Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence: The Silver Jubilee of SLIIT – PART I
-
Business3 days ago
AIA Higher Education Scholarships Programme celebrating 30-year journey
-
Business5 days ago
CEB calls for proposals to develop two 50MW wind farm facilities in Mullikulam
-
Features5 days ago
Notes from AKD’s Textbook
-
News2 days ago
Gnanasara Thera urged to reveal masterminds behind Easter Sunday terror attacks
-
News1 day ago
ComBank crowned Global Finance Best SME Bank in Sri Lanka for 3rd successive year
-
Features6 days ago
Nick Carter …‘Who I Am’ too strenuous?