Connect with us

News

Party leaders gun for Deputy Speaker

Published

on

Ajith Rajapkashe

By Saman Indrajith

When sittings re-commenced yesterday party leaders took turns to find fault with Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapkashe for having suspended sittings until some Ministers, who were on their way to Parliament, reached there.

Chief Opposition Whip and Kandy District MP Lakshman Kiriella said that the decision to suspend sittings on the grounds of absence of speaker for the debate was irrational and against Standing Orders. “We have an agreement to debate a Bill and regulations by the government and put them to vote at 4 pm. It is the duty of the government to ensure that their speakers listed for the debate are present. This is government business, it is their responsibility to conduct the debate,” Kiriella said.

JVP/NPP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake said that neither the debate could recommence nor the vote should be taken as both were against the Standing Orders and the traditions. “The tradition is that the Chair should adjourn the House if there are no MPs for debate. The Chair cannot suspend sittings till some Ministers arrive in Parliament to take part in the debate. This would set a wrong precedent,” he said.

Matara District MP Dullas Alahapperuma said that to the best of his knowledge no such thing as suspending sittings for want of Speakers had happened in the House since the 1988-1990 period. The Chair should have rung the quorum bell if the quorum was not there the debate should have been stopped and the House adjourned,” Alahapperuma said.

Deputy Speaker Rajapakshe said that there had been 21 MPs from the Opposition and 11 MPs from the government listed for the debate. The Bill could not be put to a vote as there was no Cabinet Minister in the chamber.

Anura Kumara Dissanayake: That is the crux of the problem. How come a Cabinet Minister was not present? This is a government Bill and it comes from the Ministry of Finance of which the President is the Minister. If there was no Cabinet Minister, then the Chair should have adjourned the House without suspending it until a Minister came.

MP Weerasumana Weerasinghe said that his privileges had been breached as he lost the opportunity to speak in the debate. “My name was the last on the list. I was at a committee meeting when the House was adjourned,” he said.

The Deputy Speaker said that the MPs should give priority to the Chamber business.

SLPP dissident MP Prof. Charitha Herath said that Sections 139, 140 and 140 (2) of the Standing Orders did not give discretion to the Chair to put off a debate.

MP Gamini Waleboda and Minister Susil Premajayantha said that on hearing that MPs listed for the debate were not there, they rushed to the Chamber, but the sittings had been suspended at the time of their arrival.

Kiriella demanded that all Opposition MPs should be given time to speak and sittings should continue till 6 pm.

After the government agreed to continue sitting till 5 pm, SJB MP Dr. Harsha de Silva resumed the debate from the Opposition side.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Sangha reform drives stymied from within: CBK

Published

on

Chandrika

Former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga has called for a comprehensive reform programme within Sri Lanka’s Buddhist clergy, warning that repeated efforts to strengthen the Sasana have in the past been derailed by opposition from within sections of the Sangha itself.

In a statement addressed to the Mahanayake Theras of the three Buddhist chapters, Kumaratunga stressed that the long-term preservation of Buddhism depends on safeguarding both the Dhamma and Vinaya, or disciplinary code, and urged urgent internal reform to address what she described as deep-rooted structural weaknesses.

She noted that Buddhist history has consistently demonstrated that periods of institutional crisis were addressed through reform processes, citing precedents from the First Buddhist Council to reforms during the Kandyan era under Welivita Sri Saranankara Thera.

Referring to post-independence efforts, Kumaratunga said initiatives taken during the 1956 Bandaranaike administration to strengthen Buddhism were left incomplete following the assassination of former Prime Minister S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike.

She further stated that during her own presidency, plans to convene a Buddhist Council under the guidance of the late Madihe Pannasiha Mahanayake Thera had received government backing but were ultimately abandoned due to resistance from certain sections within the clergy.

The former President alleged that, on both occasions, vested interests benefiting from existing weaknesses within the Buddhist establishment had worked to obstruct meaningful reform efforts.

Warning that Buddhism in Sri Lanka is currently facing serious challenges, she called for a broad internal dialogue within the Sangha to identify root causes and implement both short- and long-term corrective measures.

Kumaratunga urged the Mahanayake Theras to take the lead in convening a Dharma Sanghayana, or Buddhist Council, and said she was prepared to work with senior lay Buddhist leaders to support such an initiative.

Continue Reading

News

Court orders arrest of Basil

Published

on

The Colombo Fort Magistrate’s Court on Friday ordered the arrest of former Minister Basil Rajapaksa, Tourism Promotion Bureau Chairman Bhashwara Gunaratne, Managing Director Rumi Jauffer and several others over the alleged misuse of Rs. 7.8 million belonging to the Tourism Promotion Authority during the 2014 Uva Provincial Council election campaign.

Magistrate Pasan Amarasena directed the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) to arrest and produce the suspects before court, after it was informed that they would be named under the Public Property Act on the advice of the Attorney General.

The CID told court that attempts to take the suspects into custody from their residences had been unsuccessful as they were not present.

The Magistrate also imposed an overseas travel ban on the suspects and ordered that the Controller of Immigration and Emigration be notified.

Investigations have reportedly revealed that the funds were used to print 12,000 T-shirts bearing an image of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa on one side and the name of a political party on the other.

According to the CID, the T-shirts were later distributed at a political event held in the Monaragala District.

Continue Reading

News

Dayasiri raises alarm over ‘coal cartel’, flags national security risks

Published

on

Dayasiri

Kurunegala District SJB MP Dayasiri Jayasekera last week lodged a detailed submission before the Special Presidential Commission probing coal imports, alleging that Sri Lanka’s power sector is being exposed to serious national security risks due to irregularities, collusion and sanctions-related vulnerabilities in the coal procurement process for the Norochcholai Lakvijaya Power Plant.

In a dossier submitted last week, the MP called for a comprehensive investigation into the ongoing 2026/2027 tender for 2.28 million metric tonnes of coal, warning that the awarding of contracts to certain bidders could jeopardise the stability of the country’s electricity supply and trigger risks reminiscent of the 2022 power crisis.

The Lakvijaya Power Plant, Sri Lanka’s largest coal-fired power station, contributes nearly 40 percent of the national electricity generation.

Jayasekera alleged that the procurement process has been compromised by what he described as a “network of disreputable international commodity traders” and urged the Commission to examine patterns of alleged corruption, collusion and sanctions circumvention linked to coal supply chains.

Among the companies flagged in his submission was Potencia LLC-FZ, which he claimed is involved in ongoing legal proceedings against the Lanka Coal Company (LCC) while simultaneously participating in the current tender process. The MP questioned the propriety of such participation and further warned that the company’s alleged links to Russian supply networks could expose Sri Lanka to secondary sanctions risks, potentially affecting letters of credit, shipping arrangements and marine insurance coverage.

Jayasekera also called for the immediate exclusion of Taranjot Resources from the tender, citing its reported suspension by India’s state-owned NTPC Limited since March 2024. He further alleged that the company has a track record of supplying coal with sub-standard calorific value in previous shipments, which he said had contributed to operational disruptions in power generation.

Raising further concerns over possible bid rigging, the MP pointed to what he described as corporate interlinkages between Mohit Minerals and Taranjot Resources through a common associated entity, Trona Minerals. According to his submission, shared directorships and corporate overlaps suggested coordinated participation in the tender process, which he claimed could amount to a breach of national procurement guidelines.

The dossier also referred to several other international suppliers, raising concerns over their past records. These included allegations relating to shipping practices, arbitration disputes, quality certification issues and exposure to sanctioned supply chains. The MP cited instances involving alleged “dark shipping” practices, quality disputes in past deliveries, and contractual disputes that had led to arbitration proceedings in international forums.

Jayasekera also urged the Commission to revisit the Trident Chemphar coal procurement controversy of 2025/2026, alleging that a contract had been signed prior to obtaining Attorney General clearance. He claimed the episode had resulted in significant shortfalls in power generation, estimating a loss of around 250 gigawatt-hours.

Describing the matter as one of “national security rather than a commercial dispute”, the MP warned that any compromise in coal procurement could destabilise the country’s power supply, particularly at a time when Sri Lanka remains under an IMF-supported economic reform programme.

He urged the Commission to take a firm stance on procurement integrity and ensure that only credible and compliant suppliers are considered in future tenders.

The Commission is expected to examine the submissions as part of its wider inquiry into coal procurement practices dating back to 2009.

Continue Reading

Trending