Sports
Over $350,000 paid to players in the last 60 days – USAC Director Ajith Bhaskar
USA Cricket Director Ajith Bhaskar has expressed utter disbelief over reports of player payments being delayed and cites ‘malicious propaganda’ to create an anti-incumbency factor in the ongoing elections for the post of Club Director and Independent Director. Bhaskar himself is contesting to be re-elected as the Club Director while another incumbent Suraj Vishwanathan is running again for the post of Independent Director.
“USA Cricket and ACE have jointly made player payments of over $350,000 in the last 60 days. Each and every player has been paid up to date barring the U19 as we seek to work out those special financial arrangements directly with their parents. It is shocking to see such malicious propaganda being played out in the open to discredit us by some of our very own in the board with misleading facts surrounding board operations,” said Bhaskar.
Cricbuzz learns that most of the player salaries have now been restored to pre-pandemic levels with at least nine players from the current squad earning upwards of $75,000 per annum on their contracts while maintaining the minimum salary threshold to $50,000.
Bhaskar goes onto state that the contract payments have also been backdated to January, meaning all the players who were subjected to around $2000 a month due to ‘covid impact’ have now been additionally paid for the months January to June to meet their new monthly salaries.
Bhaskar expressed his regret over the timing of the controversy in the wake of the men’s team being on the cusp of a T20 World Cup berth and the U19 women’s triumph in the Rising Stars T20 competition, locking horns against the West Indies domestic women U19 sides.
“We are only a game away from the country’s biggest cricketing moment in the history and with our U19 women’s spectacular championship run, it’s an unnecessary distraction for the entire USA cricket fraternity, let alone the players. The Minor league is bigger and better this year. It almost feels like people with ulterior motives do not want to pay heed to all the development work that’s been carried out here and indulge in petty gimmicks” added Bhaskar.
In a lawsuit levelled by Individual Director Venu Pisike and Male Player Director Srini Salver over an alleged illegal constitutional amendment which sought the removal of Marathe as the chairman of the board, Bhaskar was among one of the defendants along with Suraj Vishwananthan, then CEO Iain Higgins, interim chairman Parag Marathe, League Director Sushil Nadkarni and independent director Catherine Carlson. The lawsuit was withdrawn after over a year, post which Marathe decided to abdicate his post after a suitable candidate is found. (Cricbuzz)
Latest News
Pakistan seek revenge, Sri Lanka eye another Asia Cup final
Will the Women’s T20 Asia Cup semi-final against Sri Lanka be a full-circle moment for Pakistan ?
Sri Lanka beat Pakistan in the semi final 9f the 2024 edition to qualify for their first Asia Cup final since 2008. Now Pakistan enter this contest having not been at an Asia Cup final since 2016. Moreover, the two teams played a bilateral series only last month. So there is enough familiarity.
Sri Lanka are unbeaten in this tournament, notching up easy wins over UAE and Indonesia before being pushed hard by Bangladesh.Chamari Athapaththu has topped the wickets tally, this time, her seven-for against Indonesia providing a reminder of what she can do in spin-friendly conditions at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium. Her pairing with Imesha Dulani at the top of the batting order has given Sri Lanka a close-to-ideal combination. Nilakshika Silva’s half-century from a tricky spot against Indonesia, and Harshitha Samarawickrama’s composure in a tight chase against Bangladesh have instilled confidence in their batting order.
Pakistan, on the other hand, are slightly short on batting confidence. They posted 119/9 against Thailand and were bowled out for 55 against India. It was only thanks to their bowlers that they could brush Tailand aside. Pakistan also lost the three-match bilateral series against Sri Lanka last month, though they did not have Fatima Sana’s services then.
Shawaal Zulfiqar’s presence at the top allows them to start at a higher gear, and Muneeba Ali’s experience only adds to the heft. Both are yet to fire together in this tournament, and Pakistan would hope it comes in the semi-final in order to end their finals drought.
Being Sri Lanka’s trailblazer, there is so much focus on Athapaththu that it is easy to miss that Harshitha Samarawickrema, still only 28, has already completed a decade in international cricket. She is the vice-captain, and almost the captain-in-waiting when Athapaththu decides to relinquish the role. Samarawickrama has grown in consistently winning games for Sri Lanka. Her unbeaten 48 off 37 against Bangladesh on Sunday is a case in point. Moreover, that knock has also highlighted her versatility. Primarily a top-order bat, she was moved down to No. 5 in order to accommodate Vishmi Gunaratne in the middle-order. She batted in that spot at home against Pakistan last month and finished the chase. Expect Samarawickrama to sit easy under the spotlight against Pakistan in a win-or-go-home contest.
Fatima Sana’s 407 T20I runs in 2026 have come at a strike rate of 150.74, the fourth best this year (minimum 300 runs). There were calls for her to bat higher up than her usual Nos. 7 and 8. Add to it, she has picked up 23 wickets, the most for Pakistan. While she has taken five wickets in the Asia Cup thus far, she is yet to show off her batting might. That is partly down to the surfaces in Dubai. Sri Lanka, though, would be a little wary of her considering she can bash spin, and strikes at 143.24 against them.
Team news
With both teams coming off wins, they are likely to go in with the same teams. Sri Lanka might be tempted to play slinger Mithali Ayodhya since it is a knockout match
Sri Lanka (probable): Imesha Dulani, Chamari Athapaththu (capt), Sanjana Kavindi, Vishmi Gunaratne, Harsthitha Samarawickrama, Kavisha Dilhari, Nilakshika Silva, Kaushini Nuthyangana (wk), Sugandika Kumari, Chethana Vimukthi/Mithali Ayodhya, Chamudi Praboda
Pakistan (probable): Muneeba Ali (wk), Shawaal Zulfiqar, Gull Feroza, Ayesha Zafar, Sadaf Shamas, Fatima Sana (capt), Umm-e-Hani, Eyman Fatima, Tuba Hassan, Nashra Sandhu, Sadia Iqbal
(Cricinfo)
Foreign News
Protesters mistake Pakistan’s U-19 team for asylum seekers in Portsmouth
A Pakistan Under-19 cricket team suddenly became the centre of focus when it was mistaken for a group of asylum seekers in Portsmouth. A group of protesters gathered outside the Marriott Hotel in Portsmouth after reports that asylum seekers were staying there. The situation had to be later diffused when it was ascertained that the hotel was hosting the Pakistan Under-19 team.
According to the Guardian, the situation became tense when a crowd gathered outside the Marriott hotel after reports that about 40 men who did not seem to be English arrived at the hotel. George Madgwick, a Reform councillor, called the hotel to mediate between the Pakistan Under-19 staff and the assembled crowd, following which the crowd dispersed.
“I spoke to the coach of the team, who was very understanding,” Madgwick told the Guardian. “I went out to the protesters and told them, ‘You’ve got it wrong guys, it’s a cricket club.’ They left within a couple of minutes. It was a massively unfortunate incident.
“From the perspective of the people of Portsmouth who are already on high alert, this was a coach from the same company which was turning up with about 40 foreign men.”
The ECB has been in touch with the Pakistan management following the incident and is reviewing security arrangements.
The Pakistan Under-19 team played a four-day game against England Under-19 in Arundel from September 2 to 5, which they lost by ten runs. The two teams faced off in a Youth ODI on September 9, with Pakistan winning by 177 runs. Pakistan’s senior men’s team are also playing the third and final Test against England at Edgbaston.
[Cricinfo]
Sports
Selectors play it safe, perhaps too safe
by Rex Clementine
Sri Lanka’s Chairman of Selectors Kapila Wijegunawardene held his first media briefing yesterday since assuming office four months ago, a period in which several decisions have left the cricketing fraternity scratching their heads.
To his credit, the Chief Selector admitted that picking Lahiru Kumara for the tour of the Caribbean without first proving his fitness had been a mistake. It proved a costly one too, with the fast bowler breaking down after sending down just one over.
The former medium pacer was considerably more guarded when confronted with other contentious issues, including Dhananjaya de Silva’s defensive captaincy and the decision to recall Niroshan Dickwella after more than three years in the wilderness.
“We learned a tough lesson after what happened in the Caribbean with Lahiru Kumara and now we have made it mandatory for players to prove their fitness in domestic cricket when they come back from injuries,” Wijegunawardene told reporters.
That perhaps summed up the philosophy of this selection panel. Having burned their fingers once, caution appears to be the watchword. There seems little appetite for bold calls – the sort Duleep Mendis made when he gave Sanath Jayasuriya and Romesh Kaluwitharana licence to tear into attacks during the field restrictions, or Sidath Wettimuny when he entrusted the vice-captaincy to a 22-year-old Mahela Jayawardene.
Ironically, as Wijegunawardene addressed the media, NCC were taking on Moors in a domestic T20 quarter-final right in front of his eyes at the SSC. One of those making an impression was seam bowling all-rounder Milan Rathnayake, who dismissed Dickwella for a second ball duck.
Wijegunawardene was duly asked why Milan had not been considered for the forthcoming tour of England.
Until now, the impression had been that the selectors were investing in Milan, giving the all-rounder sufficient international exposure with an eye on next year’s World Cup in South Africa. Suddenly, however, it appears to be back to square one, with Wijegunawardene indicating that the selectors have turned again to Dasun Shanaka for the all-rounder’s slot.
Shanaka has not played an ODI for more than two and a half years and has earned his recall largely on the strength of his T20 form. Yet he has repeatedly struggled to convince in the 50 over format, particularly if the selectors view him primarily as a batting all rounder.
This is where the selectors appear to have failed to do their homework. A proper analysis of Shanaka’s record would tell them that his batting has seldom been reliable enough in ODI cricket. The numbers tell that story quite clearly.
What the numbers will not tell you is that Dasun has instigated more bloodless coups than General Zia-ul-Haq and General Pervez Musharraf put together.
-
News6 days agoNamal remanded until Sept. 18 over Airbus deal investigation
-
Latest News5 days agoTharanga creates history with Diamond League crown in Brussels
-
News5 days agoDispute which triggered listed company director being detained at BIA resolved
-
Features4 days agoAfter the parade: What a traffic OIC’s walk-out tells us
-
Opinion7 days agoIn Memory of Dr Upatissa Pethiyagoda
-
Editorial6 days agoPower vs Equality
-
Editorial4 days agoArrests as theatre
-
Latest News6 days agoSLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa arrested by CIABOC
