Connect with us

News

Opposition consensus on root cause of issues affecting Sri Lanka

Published

on

General Secretaries of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB), Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), United National Party (UNP) and the spokesperson of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) have identified the 20th Amendment to the Constitution as the root cause of the issues faced by the country, during a webinar organised by the National Movement for Social Justice (NMSJ) recently.

The NMSJ has in a media statement, said that all political forces must work together to fulfil aspirations of the people.

The NMSJ has said that all parties agreed that the 20th Amendment to the Constitution is the root cause of the issues faced by the country. It has there been proposed to repeal the 20th Amendment and to assign full powers to the Parliament to resolve many of the issues the country is faced with.

The NMSJ says: “Speaking at the webinar, SLFP General Secretary Dayasiri Jayasekera said that the government has clearly failed and as a result, the country has also suffered dire consequences. He said that all political forces in the country should arrive at a national consensus which is why they requested to convene an All-Party Conference.

 “We presented 22 proposals to the President to get the country out of this crisis. Also, the leaders of 11 political parties affiliated to the government came together to discuss this. The whole country knows what happened after that. Two ministers were removed from their ministerial posts. However, the President decided to convene an All-Party Conference because he thought it would be possible to resolve the issues with the assistance of the SLFP in such a situation. However, we do not think so. The Governor of the Central Bank made a political statement at that conference which was ill advised. That is why an argument arose with Ranil Wickremesinghe. That should not be the case. Therefore, the time has come for us to work together. We have no issues with political parties pursuing their own agendas but if we are to come out of this crisis unscathed, we must have a national consensus.”

 “TNA spokesperson parliamentarian M.A. Sumanthiran said that Sri Lanka must seek assistance from experts if we are to find solutions to end the crisis. Considering the depth of the crisis, the TNA is prepared to extend its full support to all endeavours that aim to resolve the crisis.

 “That is why we attended the All-Party Conference. We stressed that the parliament should have full control over public finance. We can have a national consensus only if that happens,” he said.

 “SJB General Secretary Ranjith Manduma Bandara said the country is undergoing the worst crisis in recent history. Commenting on why the SJB abstained from participating at the All-Party Conference, he said that the lack of consensus within the government compelled the party to boycott the conference.

 “If the government is on the same page, then we can share our views. We do not stand by the government. We stand by the people and the country. We will work with all forces to arrive at a common programme. The parliament should take the lead in this. However, the government led by the President seems to bypass the Parliament. They do not inform the House of international agreements they enter into. They act in an arbitrary manner while trying to suppress opposition activists. In this backdrop, how do you expect us to work the government?

“At the same time, we will never hesitate to work with all political forces not associated with the government today. As such, we are prepared to come into a common agreement with all parties to resolve the crisis,” Madduma Bandara said.

 “General Secretary of the United National Party Palitha Ranga Bandara stated that the need of the hour was to unite all potent forces to reach a common consensus to save the country from the present crisis.

 “The government is conducting affairs in an arbitrary manner. The people of the country are suffering the most as a result. That is why we participated in the All-Party Conference and tried to show what needs to be done for the country. But even there, they acted in a very arbitrary manner. This was evident from the responses from the government. Our position is that all should unite to save the country from this crisis. We have always called for a common consensus. The first move should be to allow the Parliament to have full control over public finance.”

 “Commenting on the crisis, the Leader of the 43 Brigade parliamentarian Patali Champika Ranawaka stressed that although it is not difficult to overthrow this government today, a mere change of government alone will not provide solutions to the crisis.  He also said that all potent forces in the country should move towards a common programme with a clear vision.

“We have to act responsibly within a democratic framework to end the Rajapaksa family rule. We must move towards a common programme that unites all political leaders except the Rajapaksa family. If we fail to do so, this country will inevitably face catastrophic consequences.”

“The Chairman of the National Movement for Social Justice Karu Jayasuriya stressed that Sri Lanka could overcome this crisis. Pointing out that India too had faced a similar crisis, he noted that India was able to resolve it through collective and inclusive leadership.

“We too must tread on a similar path. The Parliament should bear the main responsibility in this regard. We are in such a situation because the government bypassed the Parliament in the decision making process. Therefore, the aim of all political forces in this country should be to stop the concentration of power on a single individual and return back to parliamentary traditions. We need a common consensus on a clear programme to resolve the crisis,” the former Speaker said.

“Senior journalist Victor Ivan said the crisis the country was facing today is not limited to the economy alone. While stressing that the crisis was a “serious blow to the economy”, he said that it was only a part of the larger socio-political crisis in the country. He also warned of serious consequences if we failed to find answers through a clear programme.

“The government has failed to state their stance on the current crisis or how they see it. Furthermore, opposition parties have also not presented their plan individually or collectively. However, only the government can provide solutions to this crisis. If the opposition parties want to execute that task, they will have to get into power. However, constitutional restraints have limited the possibility of such a move from taking place.

“This crisis was created by the political system in our country. Therefore, there is no simple answer to this crisis without a comprehensive political reform process. For that, it is vital to reach an agreement between all political parties in the country. If not, the country could fall into anarchy. If the country finds itself in such a situation, it will plunge into a constitutional crisis that couldn’t be resolved within the existing political structure. It should not be forgotten that anarchy can have far more devastating consequences than a dictatorship in a country.”

MP Ashok Abeysinghe and former MPs Navin Dissanayake and Ranaweera Pathirana also addressed the webinar.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Coal scandal: Govt. urged to release lab report

Published

on

Pubudu Jagoda

The government is under mounting pressure to release a foreign laboratory report on the controversial coal consignment imported for the Lakvijaya Power Plant, with the Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) accusing the authorities of political interference and tender manipulation.

Speaking to the media after a party meeting in Homagama yesterday, FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jagoda demanded an immediate explanation for the delay in disclosing the report from a Dutch laboratory, Cotecna, which was commissioned to test samples of the coal stocks in question after doubts were raised about an earlier local laboratory assessment. Jagoda said Cabinet media spokesperson Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa had announced that the report would be submitted by 16 January, but it had yet to be made public.

“The Sri Lankan lab confirmed the coal was substandard and could damage both the environment and power plant machinery. The foreign lab has independently verified the same results, we are told. Yet, political pressure appears to be delaying the release of the report.” He warned that any attempt to issue a false report would eventually be exposed and urged the government and the laboratory to maintain transparency.

SLPP MP D.V. Chanaka told Parliament last week that while 107 metric tonnes of coal were normally required per hour to generate 300 megawatts, but as many as 120 tonnes of newly imported coal were needed to produce the same amount of power due to its lower calorific value. Tests showed the first two shipments had calorific values of 5,600–5,800 kcal/kg, below the required minimum of 5,900 kcal/kg, said.

Jagoda accused the government of tailoring procurement rules to benefit an Indian supplier, citing a drastic reduction in reserve requirements—from one million metric tonnes in 2021 to just 100,000 tonnes in 2025—and alleged previous irregularities by the company, including a 2016 Auditor General finding regarding a rice supply contract and the 2019 suspension of a key agent of the company by the International Cricket Council over match-fixing.

He further criticised systemic manipulation of the coal tender process, including delays in issuing the tender from the usual February-March window to July, and progressively shortening the submission period from six weeks to three, giving an advantage to suppliers with stock on hand.

The Ministry of Energy recently issued an amended tender for 4.5 million metric tonnes of coal for the 2025/26 and 2026/27 periods, following the cancellation of an earlier tender. Jagoda warned that procurement delays and irregularities could trigger coal shortages, higher spot-market purchases, increased electricity costs, and potential power cuts if hydropower falls short.

Jagoda called for urgent investigations into the procurement process, insisting that any mismanagement or corruption should not be passed on to the public.Denying any wrongdoing, the government has said it is waiting for the lab report.

by Saman Indrajith ✍️

Continue Reading

News

Greenland dispute has compelled Europe to acknowledge US terrorising world with tariffs – CPSL

Published

on

Dr Weerasinghe

The Communist Party of Sri Lanka yesterday (18) alleged that the US was terrorising countries with unfair tariffs to compel them to align with its bigot policies.

CPSL General Secretary Dr. G. Weerasinghe said so responding to The Island query regarding European countries being threatened with fresh tariffs over their opposition to proposed US take-over of autonomous Danish territory Greenland.

US President Donald Trump has declared a 10% tariff on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands and Finland with effect from 1 February but could later rise to 25% – and would last until a deal was reached. Targeted countries have condemned the US move.

Dr. Weerasinghe pointed out that none of the above-mentioned countries found fault with the US imposing taxes on countries doing trade with Russia and Iran. Now that they, too, had been targeted with similar US tactics, the CP official said, underscoring the pivotal importance of the world taking a stand against Trump’s behaviour.

Referring to the coverage of the Greenland developments, Dr. Weerasinghe said that news agencies quoted UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as having said that the move was “completely wrong”, while French President Emmanuel Macron called it “unacceptable.

Dr. Weerasinghe said that Sri Lanka, still struggling to cope up with the post-Aragalaya economic crisis was also the target of discriminating US tariff policy. The top CPSL spokesman said that the recent US declaration of an immediate 25% increase in tariff on imports from countries doing business with Iran revealed the prejudiced nature of the US strategy. “Iran is one of our trading partners as well as the US. Threat of US tariffs on smaller countries is nothing but terrorism,” Dr. Weerasinghe said, stressing the urgent need for the issue at hand to be taken up at the UN.

Responding to another query, Dr. Weerasinghe cited the US targeting India over the latter’s trade with Russia as a case in point. He was commenting on the recent reports on India’s Reliance Industries and state-owned refiners sharply cutting crude oil imports from Russia. The CPSL official said that the EU wouldn’t have even bothered to examine the legitimacy of US tariff action if they hadn’t been targeted by the same action.

Perhaps, those who now complain of US threats over the dispute regarding Greenland’s future owed the world an explanation, Dr. Weerasinghe said. The reportage of the abduction of Venezuela’s President and the first lady underscored that the US intervened because it couldn’t bear the Maduro administration doing trade with China and other countries considered hostile to them, Dr. Weerasinghe said.

The CPSL official said that the NPP couldn’t turn a blind eye to what was happening. Just praising the US wouldn’t do Sri Lanka any good, he said, adding that the Greenland development underscored that the US under Trump was not concerned about the well-being of any other country but pursued an utterly one-sided strategy.

The US dealings with the NPP government, particularly the defence MoU should be examined taking into consideration US tariffs imposed on Sri Lanka at the onset of the second Trump administration and ongoing talks with the US, Dr. Weerasinghe.

By Shamindra Ferdinando ✍️

Continue Reading

News

MPs’ Pension Repeal Bill challenged in Supreme Court

Published

on

 Two petitions have been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the proposed Parliamentary Pensions (Repeal) Bill, which seeks to scrap pensions for legislators.

The Bill, presented to Parliament on 7 January by the Minister of Justice and National Integration, has drawn strong opposition from retired parliamentarians who argue that it undermines the rights of former lawmakers and their dependents.

One petition has been filed by former MPs M. M. Premasiri, Nawarathne Banda, Nishantha Deepal Gunasekara, and Saman Siri Herath, who served in Parliament from 2004 to 2010. The other petition is by former MPs Piyasoma Upali (1988–2004) and Upali Sarath Danstan Amarasiri (1988–2000).

The petitioners argue that former MPs, many of whom dedicated decades of service to the nation, often sacrificed careers and business prospects for public duty. They contend that retired MPs and some widows rely solely on their pensions, which range between Rs. 60,000 and Rs. 80,000, amounts they say are insufficient to cover basic living and medical expenses.

The petitions seek a declaration that the Bill requires approval by the people through a referendum and a two-thirds majority in Parliament, citing constitutional safeguards.

The petitions were filed through Attorney-at-Law Sanath Wijewardane and are to be supported by Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe PC.

 By AJA Abeynayake ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending