Connect with us

News

NPP can’t sidestep Anti-Corruption Act:Ex-Justice Minister

Published

on

Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe

Former Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, PC, says the National People’s Power (NPP) government cannot sidestep Anti-Corruption Act No 09 of 2023.

The former parliamentarian said that the Act made it mandatory for the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) to disclose the asset declarations of all, regardless of their standing.

The disclosure of NPP Minister Wasantha Samarasinghe having assets worth Rs 275 mn wouldn’t have happened if not for the new Anti-Corruption Act approved by Parliament on July 19, 2023, Rajapakshe said.

The ex-Minister said that the main Opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) had, in writing, already requested the CIABOC to ascertain how several NPPers amassed so much wealth. According to the SJB letter, addressed to Director General of CIABOC, Ranga Dissanayake, they had named Ministers Wasantha Samarasinghe, Sunil Handunetti, Bimal Rathnayake, Nalinda Jayatissa and Punyasiri Jayakody and Deputy Minister Sunil Watagala. “The NPP will have to live with it. CIABOC will also have to ensure that all are treated alike”

Asked to explain the circumstances the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government introduced that Act, Rajapakshe said that in spite of opposition within the parliamentary group, Wickremesinghe gave him the go ahead to introduce three new Acts, namely the Anti-Corruption Act, Regulation of Election Expenditure Act and the Proceeds of Crime Act.

“We have to discuss the enactment of those Acts, taking into account the pathetic state of the economy and the persistent accusations that the executive and the legislature caused the economic crisis against the backdrop of the failure on the part of the Central Bank at that time,” Rajapakshe said. Th proposed new laws facilitated our talks with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as the latter emphasised the responsibility on our part to instill financial discipline across board, Rajapakshe said, adding that they decided to first introduce the Regulation of Election Expenditure Act.

All political parties, regardless of whatever differences they had with regard to other issues at hand, could have unanimously approved the Regulation of Election Expenditure Bill, Rajapakshe said. But, consensus among political parties couldn’t be achieved, the ex-Minister said, adding that finally only 97 voted for the Bill whereas 36 voted against when it was taken up on 19 January, 2023. Among those who opposed that vital piece of legislation were NPP parliamentary group leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake, SJB leader Sajith Premadasa and veteran politician Lakshman Kiriella.

The former Minister pointed out a staggering 92 lawmakers skipped that important vote. Then, the Parliament, on 19 July, without a vote, approved the Anti-Corruption Act but, regardless of determined efforts, the Proceeds of Crime Bill couldn’t be enacted during Wickremesinghe tenure as the President.

Rajapakse appreciated the NPP after having won both presidential and parliamentary polls in 2024 enacted the Proceeds of Crime Bill on April 8, 2025. Responding to another query, the PC said that the three laws could make significant and fundamental changes in the political scene.

The former Minister said that the UNDP has got involved in the anti-corruption fight here with an unprecedented USD 2.5 mn Japanese funding made available for the high profile project, whereas the CIABOC held talks with the World Bank on how the latter could support Sri Lanka’s efforts with the focus on action taken in line with the Proceeds of Crime Act.

Rajapakshe said that Sri Lanka initiated, during President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga’s presidency in 2004, and signed and ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). According to Rajapakshe, in terms of the UNCAC, Sri Lanka had to introduce an Anti-Corruption Act but with the change of government in 2005, that initiative was discarded. Rajapakshe said that following the change of government in 2015, an effort was made to take tangible measures in this regard but the project suffered again when he lost the Justice Ministry portfolio over his opposition to the deal on Hambantota port.”

Rajapakshe said that the Anti-Corruption Act may never have been enacted if not for the Aragalaya that brought Wickremesinghe to power in July 2022.

Former Minister Rajapakshe emphasised the importance of the enactment of 21st Amendment to the Constitution on 21 Oct., 2022, before the passage of three previously discussed Acts. The 21st Amendment received 179 votes in favour and one against while 45 abstained, Rajapakshe recalled declaring that it was aimed at restoring and strengthening the balance of powers among the executive, legislature, and judiciary, sharply eroded by the enactment of the 20th Amendment that expanded the powers of the presidency.

Rajapakshe alleged that the then Premier Dinesh Gunawardena made a last minute bid to put off the vote by compelling Wickremesinghe to come to Parliament for a meeting. “I steadfastly refused to join that meeting,” Rajapakshe said, asserting that whatever the shortcomings and faults of the post-Gotabaya administration, it enacted critically important laws that had brought immense pressure on those in power today.

By Shamindra Ferdinando



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Prison rules to be revised over monks’ attire

Published

on

Harshana

Appointment of committee eyewash, says UNP

The government is considering changes to prison regulations pertaining to the treatment of Buddhist monks serving jail terms, including their right to wear monastic robes when taken outside prison.

Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara announced the proposed changes yesterday (14) following the submission of an interim report by a committee appointed to review the rules and procedures governing prisons.

The report was handed over to Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake at the Presidential Secretariat.

One of the key recommendations is to amend Prison Standing Order 356 by introducing a new provision, 356(A). The proposed revision would require prison authorities to consult the Department of Buddhist Affairs on the removal of a monk’s robes upon admission to prison. The Commissioner of Prisons would be allowed 10 days to notify the department and take the necessary steps.

A separate amendment to Departmental Order 550 would allow Buddhist monks to wear their robes whenever they are taken outside prison, unless their respective Nikaya formally requests that the privilege be withdrawn.

The committee has also recommended extending similar arrangements, with suitable modifications, to members of other religious clergy who are imprisoned.

The proposals follow concerns raised over the treatment of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera after he was taken into custody. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake subsequently held discussions with representatives of the three main Buddhist Nikayas and appointed the committee to examine the existing legal framework.

Nanayakkara said the interim report had been forwarded to the Acting Commissioner General of Prisons, along with instructions to revise the relevant standing orders in accordance with its recommendations.

The proposed amendments have yet to be confirmed as formally implemented.

Meanwhile, the UNP yesterday criticised the government’s decision to appoint a committee to make recommendations on the attire to be worn by imprisoned Buddhist monks and other religious leaders when taken outside prison, describing the move as unnecessary.

In a statement issued yesterday (14), the UNP said the procedures governing the matter were already clearly set out in the Department of Prisons’ Standing Orders, making the appointment of a separate committee unwarranted.

The party cited remarks by Professor G.L. Peiris, Convenor of the Janathawadi Joint Opposition, who had described the committee’s appointment as a

“complete eyewash” and questioned the need for such a move.

Referring to Standing Order 550 of the Prisons Department, the UNP said convicted prisoners appearing before court for legal proceedings should not be required to wear prison uniforms.

It further stated that the regulations allowed prisoners to wear civilian clothing consistent with what they wore before imprisonment, including attire appropriate to their cultural and religious backgrounds.

The UNP accused the government of unnecessarily prolonging the issue by appointing a committee, despite the existence of regulations governing prisoners’ attire.

The party also called on the government to seek forgiveness from the Mahanayake Thera and the Sangha Council of the Kotte Sri Kalyani Samagri Dharma Maha Sangha Sabha of the Siyam Maha Nikaya over the decision concerning the religious attire of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera.

Continue Reading

News

AC President recuses himself from hearing prison attire case pertaining to Gnanasara Thera

Published

on

Court of Appeal President Justice Rohantha Abeysuriya yesterday withdrew from the bench hearing petitions challenging the decision by prison authorities to require Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire following his imprisonment.

The decision was announced when the petitions seeking to invalidate the prison authorities’ decision were taken up for consideration on October 14.

Following his withdrawal, a three-judge bench was appointed to hear the petitions.

The petitions relate to the prison authorities’ decision to require Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire after he was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his sentence for contempt of court.

In September this year, the Supreme Court annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by former President Maithripala Sirisena in May 2019.

Following the ruling, the Court of Appeal directed the Commissioner General of Prisons to take the necessary steps to enforce the remainder of the monk’s prison sentence.

Gnanasara Thera had originally been sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for contempt of court but had served only around nine months before receiving the presidential pardon in 2019.

Continue Reading

News

Court orders steps to obtain INTERPOL Red Notice against Basil

Published

on

Basil

The Fort Magistrate’s Court yesterday issued an arrest warrant for former Minister Basil Rajapaksa over the alleged misuse of funds belonging to the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau during the 2014 Uva Provincial Council election.

The Magistrate also directed the CID Illegal Assets Investigation Division to take necessary steps to obtain a Red Notice through Interpol.

The orders were issued following submissions made by the CID in connection with the alleged financial irregularities.

The CID’s Illegal Assets Investigation Unit informed the court that Rs. 7.8 million allocated to the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau in 2014 had allegedly not been used for the Bureau’s promotional activities.

Instead, the funds had allegedly been used to provide 12,000 T-shirts during the Uva Provincial Council election, causing a financial loss to the government, the CID told court.

Continue Reading

Trending