Connect with us

Sports

Novak Djokovic back on top Down Under, win Australian Open

Published

on

MELBOURNE, Australia — Novak Djokovic found this trip to Australia far less complicated, and far more successful, than that of a year ago.

Unable to enter his best event in 2022 after being deported from the country because he was not vaccinated against COVID-19, Djokovic accomplished all he could have wanted in his return: He resumed his winning ways at Melbourne Park and made it back to the top of tennis.

Only briefly challenged in the final on Sunday night, Djokovic was simply better at the most crucial moments and beat Stefanos Tsitsipas 6-3, 7-6 (4), 7-6 (5) for a record-extending 10th Australian Open championship and record-tying 22nd Grand Slam title overall. As a bonus, Djokovic will vault from No. 5 to No. 1 in the ATP rankings, a spot he already has held for more weeks than any other man.

“He’s the greatest that has ever held a tennis racket,” Tsitsipas said.

Djokovic stretched his unbeaten streak in Melbourne to 28 matches, the longest run at the tournament for a man in the Open era, which dates to 1968. He adds trophy No. 10 there to the seven from Wimbledon, three from the U.S. Open — where he also was absent last year because of no coronavirus shots — and two at the French Open, to match rival Rafael Nadal for the most by a man in tennis history.

Margaret Court, with 24, Serena Williams, with 23, and Steffi Graf, with 22, have the most among women.This was also the 93rd ATP tour-level title for Djokovic, allowing the 35-year-old from Serbia to break a tie with Nadal for the fourth-most. Jimmy Connors holds that mark, at 109.

Djokovic was participating in his 33rd major final, Tsitsipas in his second — and the 24-year-old from Greece’s other one also ended in a loss to Djokovic, at the 2021 French Open.

He was superior throughout against Tsitsipas, but especially so in the two tiebreakers. He took a 4-1 lead in the first and after it was 4-all, pulled off three points in a row. He led 5-0 in the closing tiebreaker and, when it finished, he pointed to his temple then climbed into the stands, pumped his fist and jumped with his coach, Goran Ivanisevic, and other members of the entourage, and collapsed, crying.

Little doubt this is of no solace to Tsitsipas, but there is no shame in failing to defeat Djokovic in Melbourne. Challenging his dominion on those blue hard courts is every bit the monumental task that taking on Nadal on the red clay at Roland Garros is.

Perhaps surprisingly, Tsitsipas was willing to engage in the kind of leg-wearying, lung-searing back-and-forths upon which Djokovic has built his superlative career. How did that work out? Of points lasting at least five strokes, Djokovic won 43, Tsitsipas 30,

Then again, on those rare occasions that Tsitsipas did charge the net, he likely regretted the choice, because Djokovic often conjured up a passing shot that was too tough to handle.

One of Djokovic’s many other strengths is his return game, and he accumulated three break points within 17 minutes, converting the last for a quick 3-1 lead when Tsitsipas double-faulted.

The trophy for which they were playing was displayed on a pedestal near a corner of the court, and both men would get within reach of it whenever wandering over to towel off between points at that end.So close, yes, but for Tsitsipas, never truly close enough.

It’s not as though Tsitsipas played all that poorly, other than a rash of early miscues that seemed to be more a product of tension than anything.

It’s that Djokovic was, put simply, too good. Too accurate with his strokes — making merely 22 unforced errors, 20 fewer than his foe — and anticipation. Too speedy and flexible chasing shots (other than on one second-set point, when, running to his left, Djokovic took a tumble). Too dangerous with his returns and damaging enough with his serves.

Djokovic pushes and pushes and pushes some more, until it’s the opponent who is something less than perfect on one shot, either missing or providing an opening to pounce.There has been more than forehands and backhands on Djokovic’s mind over the past two weeks.

There was the not-so-small matter of last year’s legal saga — he has alternately acknowledged the whole thing served as a form of motivation but also said the other day, “I’m over it” — and curiosity about the sort of reception he would get.He heard a ton of loud support, but also dealt with some persistent heckling while competing, including applause after the faults Sunday.

There was the sore left hamstring that has been heavily bandaged for every match — until the final, that is, when only a single piece of beige athletic tape was visible — and had worried him at the beginning of Week 1, prompting him to turn to what he said was “a lot” of pain-killing pills and other treatments he didn’t detail.

And then there was the more complicated matter of his father, Srdjan, being filmed with a group of people with Russian flags — one with an image of Vladimir Putin — after Djokovic’s quarterfinal victory. The tournament banned spectators from bringing in flags of Russia or Belarus, saying they would cause disruption because of the ongoing invasion of Ukraine. Both Djokovic and his father said it was a misunderstanding, based on Srdjan thinking he was with a group of Serbian fans.

Because of that episode, Srdjan Djokovic did not attend his son’s semifinal victory over Tommy Paul on Friday, and was not seen in the Djokovic guest box on Sunday.No matter any of it, Djokovic managed to excel as he so often does, winning 17 sets in a row after ceding one in the second round last week.

(ESPN)



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Ahmedabad to host IPL 2026 final on May 31

Published

on

By

The final will be held on May 31 [BCCI]
The schedule for the IPL 2026 playoffs has been announced, with matches set to be held in Dharamshala, New Chandigarh (Mullanpur) and Ahmedabad. The BCCI has stated that, owing to certain operational and logistical considerations, the Playoffs will be held across three venues “as a special case”.
Qualifier 1 will be played at the HPCA Stadium, in Dharamsala, between the top two ranked teams from the group stages of the points table. The winner will be ensured a direct place in the final.
The Eliminator will be held in New Chandigarh, where the third and fourth ranked teams will feature. The same venue will host Qualifier 2, which will feature the winner of the Eliminator and the loser of Qualifier 1.
The final will be held at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad.[Cricbuzz]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Samson, Kartik, spinners set up Chennai Super King’s clinical win

Published

on

By

Delhi Capitals get into a huddle at the start of the chase [Cricinfo]

Chennai Super Kings came into IPL 2026 with a dodgy look about their bowling attack. They lost three games straight where their bowlers picked up 10 for 588 at an economy rate of 11.37. Since then, there has been an absolutely stunning turnaround. Over the last seven games, CSK’s bowlers have scooped up 51 wickets – only Gujarat Titans (52) have more – at an economy rate of 8.15 – which no-one can match.

Given first use of a slow pitch, Akeal Hosein (4-0-19-1) and Noor Ahmad (3-0-22-2) took charge of proceedings. Delhi Capitals could only put up 155 for 7, which proved too little as the surface got better to bat on in the second innings. Sanju Samson,  who has contributed 24% of CSK’s runs this year, finished things off with 87 not out off 52 balls. Kartik Sharma, growing in confidence, was alongside him, with 41 off 31.

Both captains expected the pitch to be slow. The scoring pattern of the first four overs confirmed it. Fifteen dot balls. Six boundaries. Three singles and a wicket with the batter trying to force the pace. In conditions where the ball comes onto the bat, KL Rahul and Pathum Nissanka might have been able to hit the gap with the shots they played off good length balls. On this one, as much as they tried, they just found the fielder. Worse, they found themselves having to hold their shape for longer and even that didn’t always work.

With two right-handed openers, CSK had no hesitation in handing the ball to Hosein. When Nissanka fell though, DC sent Nitish Rana out in an effort to either hit Hosein out of the attack or prevent him from coming on. This is how much of a no-no matching a left-arm spinner with a left-handed batter is. But CSK bucked tradition. They gave Akeal a third over. He provided Rahul’s wicket and in the end Rana got to face only one ball from Akeal. A dot ball. DC came out of the powerplay 37 for 2. Akeal finished with figures of 4-0-19-1, which is exceptional considering he bowled only one over outside the field restrictions.

Axar Patel has 33 runs this season. Twenty-six of those came in one innings. And his strike rate is 97. It is a massive drop. The DC captain was one of the bright spots last season, their fourth-highest scorer with 263 at a very healthy strike rate of 157. He was in the middle when his team needed to rebuild and his wicket – the third that CSK took in a space of 19 balls between overs 8 and 11 – had an impact on the total they put up.

DC’s first five wickets scored 69 off 66. Sameer Rizvi,  Impact Player-ed in because this was definitely an emergency, and Tristan Stubbs together put on 65 off 42 balls. Stubbs seemed to be factoring in the slowness of the pitch into his movements much better, handling Noor’s mystery spin and Gurjapneet Singh’s extra bounce with ease. Rizvi at the other end showed how batters could play against Anshul Kamboj, one of the season’s best death bowlers. He knew Kamboj liked to come around the wicket and target the wide line with yorkers. So he moved across his stumps a little bit, sweeping, slicing and smashing him down the ground.

One part of this plan was premeditation – the movement across his stumps – the other was instinct. Rizvi consciously tried to keep his shot options open, and not just target leg side. Until this match, Kamboj from around the wicket in this IPL has been box office: 63 balls, 93 runs, three sixes, eight wickets. In this game, he struggled: 12 balls, 34 runs, five sixes, no wickets. Meanwhile, Jamie Overton, one of CSK’s best bowlers, bowled only one over and spent time off the field as well.

Being in the form of his life is one thing, but to go out there knowing he is his team’s best hope for runs and managing risk accordingly is something else. Samson has always had aura. Now he has the output. For the first three games this season, he made 22 runs at an average of 7.33 and a strike rate of 116. The next seven, he’s made 380 at an average of 95 and strike rate of 172.

The six he hit first ball against Axar highlighted that the pitch was no longer a problem. A little bit of rain while the match was going on had freshened it up, making the ball come onto the bat better. Even so, DC had threats. Lungi Ngidi returning from a head injury aced his match-up against Ruturaj Gaikwad, dismissing him for a third time in 17 balls for just 10 runs in T20 cricket.

Samson held fire initially. He was 22 off 22 at the eighth over. Ten balls later, he was on fifty. Eventually, he was even entertaining thoughts of a hundred. A highlight of his game was the way he took down spin – 12 off 10 against Axar with one six and 25 off 9 against Kuldeep Yadav with three sixes and a four. CSK won a 12 vs 11 game – because they didn’t even need the impact player – with 15 balls remaining and got a net run-rate boost that could be vital as the season nears the playoffs.

Brief scores:
Chennai Super Kings 159 for 2in 17.3 overs  (Sanju Samson 87*, Urvil Patel 17, Kartik Sharma 41*; Axar Patel 1-25, Lungi Ngidi 1-30) beat Delhi Capitals 155 for 7 in 20 overs (Pathum Nissanka 19, KL Rahul 12, Nitish Rana 15, Karun Nair 13, Tristan Stubbs 38, Sameer Rizvi 40, Ashutosh Sharma 14; Akeal Hosein 1-19, Mukesh Choudhari 1-31, Noor  Ahamed 2-33, Gurjapneet Singh 1-29, Jamie Overton 1-05) by eight wickets

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Sports

Dayasiri swings wildly without sighting the ball

Published

on

Dayasiri Jayasekara served as Sports Minister in Maithripala Sirisena’s government.

Former Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekara doesn’t appear to be a great admirer of the recently appointed Cricket Interim Committee. During a television interview with Derana TV, he said that the current government must take responsibility if the newly-appointed panel failed to deliver.

MP Jayasekara has long been known as a man who shoots from the hip and at times, as a doomsday prophet, if his scathing criticism of the Hambantota Port project in the past is anything to go by.

In 2015, retired judge the late Prasanna Jayawardene formulated a comprehensive restructuring plan for Sri Lankan cricket, modelled along South African lines and SLC sought time from the ICC to implement these sweeping changes.

However, powerful cricketing figures within the government at that time sensed danger and convinced President Maithripala Sirisena to effect a Cabinet reshuffle. The Sports Ministry was shifted from the UNP to the SLFP.

Having switched his political alliance to the ruling party yet again, Dayasiri was brought in as Minister of Sports.

At his first interaction with the media, he left a strong impression. There was genuine optimism as he answered questions intelligently, spoke of the bigger picture and explained the legal framework required to drive reforms with striking clarity. Those present walked away convinced that he was the right man to take sports forward.

However, under his watch, reforms were stalled, fresh elections were called and SLFP strongmen returned to the helm of SLC. It was, without doubt an opportunity missed. Soon, the Minister of Sports found himself a prisoner of his own SLFP colleagues within government ranks.

From thereon, Dayasiri made a series of blunders. He became embroiled in a running battle with fast bowler Lasith Malinga, with their public spats repeatedly going viral across social media platforms.

Sri Lanka were touring India in 2017 and the limited-overs squad was preparing to fly to Delhi for the second leg of the tour. Dayasiri raised a storm, insisting that the Sports Minister’s approval had not been obtained before the team’s departure. Despite SLC apologising for the oversight, he demanded that the players return home and follow protocol. Appeals were made to the Minister over the phone by the players, but he refused to budge. The players were ordered to disembark. Those who doubt this episode can verify it with Thisara Perera, who captained the white ball team.

During his recent television interview, Dayasiri came out with a range of conspiracy theories, including claims of intervention by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi before Shammi Silva was asked to step down. With the world grappling with a crisis in the Gulf region, the leader of the world’s largest democracy surely has bigger fish to fry than meddling in another nation’s cricketing affairs.

The former Minister also questioned how newly appointed head coach Gary Kirsten would function alongside the Interim Committee, while casting aspersions on Justice Chithrasiri – whose recommendations on cricket governance are expected to come into force soon – branding him a government loyalist.

No government is without fault and criticism is both necessary and healthy. But Dayasiri, in this instance, appears to be swinging wildly without sighting the ball and his words are best taken with a pinch of salt.

by Rex Clementine

Continue Reading

Trending