News
NMSJ asks for postponement of debate on Online Safety Bill, fresh consultations

Sajith says govt.’s impending electoral defeat cannot be reversed through constitutional means
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The National Movement for Social Justice (NMSJ) has urged the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government to put off the two-day debate on the proposed Online Safety Bill scheduled for January 23 and 24th.
The NMSJ, led by former Yahapalana speaker Karu Jayasuriya, has warned that the Bill, if enacted, will severely hinder freedom of expression and have a negative impact on the digital as well as the overall economy.
On behalf of the NMSJ, its General Secretary Sunil Jayasekera issued the warning on Monday (15) in the wake of the Committee on Parliamentary Business announcing that the debate on the Second Reading of the Bill is on January 23 and 24.
Secretary General of Parliament Kushani Rohanadeera said that the Committee on Parliamentary Business met on January 12, under the leadership of Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena.
Public Security Minister Tiran Alles presented the Online Safety Bill to Parliament on Oct 03, 2023. The Bill seeks to “establish the Online Safety Commission; to make provisions to prohibit online communication of certain statements in Sri Lanka; to prevent the use of online accounts and inauthentic online accounts for prohibited purposes; to make provisions to identify and declare online locations used for prohibited purposes in Sri Lanka; to suppress the financing and other support of communication of false statements of fact and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.”
Referring to a spate of statements issued by local and foreign organizations, in respect of the controversial Bill, Jayasekera alleged that the new law would suppress freedom of expression.
Declaring that the Supreme Court determination of the Bill was solely based on the examination of its constitutionality, Jayasekera said that the Online Safety Bill, or its provisions, weren’t inconsistent with the Constitution and could be passed by a simple majority, following committee stage amendments on certain clauses.
Speaker Abeywardena announced the Supreme Court determination on the Bill on Nov 07, 2023. The Speaker said that the Supreme Court determined that a series of clauses must be passed by a special majority, but if those clauses were amended in the committee stage, the Bill could be passed by a simple majority.
Jayasekera said that the government should consult relevant experts, other stakeholders, and the public, regarding the proposed Bill though the Supreme Court gave its conditional consent.
Dissident SLPP lawmaker Prof. G. L. Peiris said that the Online Safety Bill and the Anti-Terrorism Bill seemed to be key segments of the overall government political strategy in view of the impending national polls.
The former External Affairs Minister said that the government was bent on overwhelming the Opposition in the run-up to the scheduled elections. The world renowned academic said that all members of Parliament, regardless of their party affiliations, should recognize the threat posed by the two laws.
“Obviously, government strategists view social media platforms as quite a threat and sought to reverse their deteriorating popularity by suppressing the democratic Opposition. Bringing the media, particularly the social media, under government control, is one of their primary objectives,” Prof. Peiris said.
Referring to statements issued by various parties opposed to the Online Safety Bill, Prof. Peiris warned the government that the growing public resentment couldn’t be crushed by enactment of repressive laws.
Samagi Jana Balwegaya (SJB) and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa said that his party would vote against the hotly disputed Bill.
The former UNP deputy leader said that the government was in a bind and the recent increase in almost all consumer goods, in the wake of the Value-Added Tax (VAT) increase, intensified the protest campaign. Declaring that the Online Safety Bill, a seriously flawed law, lawmaker Premadasa said that the impending defeat at the presidential and parliamentary polls couldn’t be reversed through constitutional means.
News
FSP asks govt. to pull out of defence deal with India

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday demanded an immediate termination of what it called a “secretive and dangerous” defence agreement signed between Sri Lanka and India, during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 05 April visit.
Addressing a press conference at the party’s headquarters in Nugegoda, FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jagoda described the agreement as a “betrayal of the nation” and a “crime against the people,” urging the government to invoke Article 12 of the deal and exit it with the required three months’ notice.
Jagoda said the document, which surfaced on social media after being published by a news portal, appears to be the actual agreement signed between the two countries. “The government has not denied its authenticity. That silence is telling,” he said.
Jagoda added that the agreement bears the signatures of Sri Lanka’s Defence Ministry Secretary Sampath Thuiyakontha and Indian High Commissioner Santosh Jha.
“What’s most troubling,” Jagoda warned, “is that both governments attempted to keep the agreement under wraps. Unlike the 1987 Indo-Lanka Accord, which was made public with all annexures, this agreement was hidden from the people, and even now, we don’t know how many other agreements exist between India and Sri Lanka.”
Jagoda said that a Right to Information request made on 04 April was met with a reply from the President’s Office stating that it had no copies of the agreement—raising serious concerns about transparency, even at the highest level. “One could question whether the President has seen it because his office does not have it,” Jagoda said.
The 12-clause of agreement reportedly covers areas such as exchange and training of military personnel, defence industry collaboration, classified information protection, and military medical services, including battlefield healthcare and telemedicine.
Jagoda said the definition of “classified information” in Clause 7 was alarmingly broad. “It allows India to label virtually anything as secret. Even weapons or military assets transferred under this agreement cannot be revealed—not even after the agreement ends,” he said, citing Clause 7.3.
Clause 10 prohibits either country from taking disputes to international courts or involving third-party mediators. “It’s like asking a rabbit to negotiate with a tiger,” Jagoda quipped, drawing parallels to the complications of the 1987 accord, which eventually saw Indian peacekeeping troops refusing to leave until a change in the Indian government.
Jagoda accused the NPP-led government of hypocrisy, pointing out that the JVP, the main component of the current regime, had vehemently opposed Indo-Lanka Accord in 1987. “Now they’ve gone and signed an even more dangerous deal,” he said.
Citing Clause 12, which allows either party to withdraw with three months’ notice, the FSP called on the government to act immediately to exit the pact. “We urge the people to unite and defeat these underhanded, sovereignty-eroding deals. The FSP stands ready to lead that fight,” Jagoda said.
News
Police crush protest, arrest student activists

The police yesterday arrested a group of students, including the Convener of the Inter-University Students’ Federation (IUSF), Madushan Chandradith, during a protest held by the Allied Health Science Graduates’ Union in front of the Health Ministry yesterday.
The police obtained an order from Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court, earlier in the day, to prevent protesters from invading the Colombo Hospital Square and the Health Ministry.
News
Deshabandu faces misconduct probe on Monday

Inspector General of Police T.M.W. Deshabandu Tennakoon is set to face formal questioning on Monday (19 May) over serious allegations of misconduct and abuse of power, parliamentary sources said yesterday.
A special Committee appointed to investigate the claims will commence formal proceedings next week, following several rounds of preliminary discussions held within the parliamentary complex in recent weeks.
The IGP has been officially notified to appear before the Committee and is expected to face the inquiry for the first time at 2:00 PM in Committee Room No. 8.
The Committee, which met again on Thursday (15) to finalise arrangements, is investigating allegations that Tennakoon misused his official powers in a manner deemed severe and improper.
-
Features6 days ago
SAITM Graduates Overcome Adversity, Excel Despite Challenges
-
Opinion6 days ago
Drs. Navaratnam’s consultation fee three rupees NOT Rs. 300
-
News6 days ago
Destined to be pope:Brother says Leo XIV always wanted to be a priest
-
Sports6 days ago
ASBC Asian U22 and Youth Boxing Championships from Monday
-
Features5 days ago
Championing Geckos, Conservation, and Cross-Disciplinary Research in Sri Lanka
-
Business6 days ago
Dilmah – HSBC future writers festival attracts 150+ entries
-
Midweek Review3 days ago
Bronze statue for P’karan, NPP defeat in the North and 16th anniversary of triumph over terrorism
-
Business6 days ago
Bloom Hills Holdings wins Gold for Edexcel and Cambridge Education