Features
Nina and Frederik – the legend lives on
By Dr Nihal D Amerasekera
Nina and Frederik are names that take me back to my roots and those vibrant teenage years. They were the voice of my generation growing up in Sri Lanka. Despite a battery of important examinations, that was indeed a magical time in my life. The soft tone of Nina’s voice blended beautifully with Frederik’s husky voice striking a chord with the music loving public.
They moved effortlessly from folk to calypso and pop and remained icons well into the 1960’s. Many of those songs were popular and sung by several artistes. Their songs were also murdered ruthlessly on talent shows and karaoke bars. Yet nobody delivered the lyrics with quite the same warmth and humanity as Nina and Frederik. There was a calming Zen air and a mystique about them and their music. It was obvious then that the couple were something very special.
Frederik van Pallandt had a privileged childhood. His father was the Dutch Ambassador to Denmark. Less is known of Nina’s early life but it is believed she too had similar aristocratic connections in Denmark. Nina Moller-Hasselbalch spent her childhood in Copenhagen. They were both born in 1932. Perhaps apocryphal, the story goes that they first sang together aged four years. Living in in Trinidad he attended the University of Trinidad and Tobago. During those years Frederik and Nina had remained friends.
Nina had visited the van Pallandts in Trinidad and they began to sing together. Frederik played the guitar. They sang their kind of folk and calypso music first to friends and family and then at parties. Before long they became a popular singing duo in Trinidad. Socially too they were in great demand. Their popularity spread until in 1957 they were invited to perform at the famous Mon Coeur night club in Copenhagen. They received a rapturous reception and enjoyed critical and popular acclaim. This gave them the courage and the determination to go further with their music. Soon they had their own TV program in the UK. Love blossomed and Nina and Frederik married in 1960.
In those days I saved my pocket money to buy all their 33.3 vinyls and the 45 rpm’s. Over the years I had almost their full collection. They first made their mark in 1959 with “Mary’s Boy Child” and “Little Donkey” which were hits for Harry Bellafonte. Then came “Jamaica Farewell” and “Come Back Lisa” that hit our charts like a storm. Their two albums reached the top 10 in February 1960 and May 1961. “Long Time Boy” and “SucuSucu” came in late 1961. They had a string of hits with “Little Boxes”, “Try to Remember”, “Puff the Magic Dragon”, “Blowing in the Wind” and many more.
Nina and Frederik were a glamorous couple. They were handsome, elegant and graceful on stage. With their fine blend of music they soon became famous in Europe. Before long their popularity soon earned them international fame and acclaim. In 1963 they performed at the prestigious Savoy Hotel, the Royal Festival Hall and the Royal Albert Hall in London. The duo became a fixture in the newspapers and magazines and their popularity soared among the jet-set. In their live shows the fans experienced their innate sense of showmanship. They speak warmly of their singing and their visible attraction to each other. The duo had the wonderful ability to make those songs personal as if they sang it specially for you.
Nina and Frederik were still popular when they stopped singing. Frederik became worn out and world-weary, prematurely. Relishing the quiet life, he decided to leave his world of music. It was in 1966 Frederik abandoned the stage and the spotlight and went into retirement. Throwing away their musical life was a serious blow to the family. Sadly as a result their marriage suffered and ended in divorce in 1976. They had three children. Despite the breakup Nina and Frederik remained friends.
After their marriage ended Nina carved out a solo career for herself. In 1970 Nina was associated with Clifford Irving who was jailed for fraud. She went on to appear in several movies. In 1976 she married Robert Kirby, a South African actor in Cape Town. Nina van Pallandt wrote her memoirs and called it “Nina” but not much is known about her life beyond this.
The 70’s was a period of enormous transformation in my life. I was finding my feet in a new country, UK. Changing jobs, change in career meant further examinations that required time and enormous effort. Burgeoning family commitments brought great happiness, although a struggle at times. There was no time for reflection and my love of music was on hold. Until the children were at university I was on the treadmill of life. When I finally dusted off my vinyls I found the music industry and the technology too had moved on. Compact disks had taken over from records. The new amplifiers and speakers provided music much closer to a live performance.
As I entered the real world the big names in music too had changed. Some of my favourites had crossed the vale, some had retired and the others had lost their way in the new world. I finally recaptured the enjoyment of music. Listening to the old music brought back many memories of people, places and events. Nina and Frederick always featured high in my list of all time greats. As I hear “Listen to the Ocean” I recall the peace it brought to my soul in those turbulent teenage years. “Come back Lisa” brings home the heartaches of teenage loves lost in the rough and tumble of life. Nina and Frederik earned the applause and drew the crowds. It brings me great sadness to hear the way their lives panned out despite their many achievements and success.
Privilege, education, talent, fame and fortune, Nina and Frederik had it all. But these provide no protection from the frailties of human life and the awesome force of destiny. Frederik was an intrepid but troubled adventurer. For a time he started a farm in Ibiza. That was short lived. He later married Sussanah and moved on and settled in the Philippines. He allegedly became involved with drug trafficking. Frederik was an avid sailor and loved the sea. Tragedy struck in 1994 when Frederik and his wife were in their yacht, The Tiaping, with their young son, when they were both shot and killed. The murderer is believed to have been another member of the syndicate. Overcome with grief, Nina flew out to the Philippines and took his body back to his homeland. He was buried near his parents’ grave in the Netherlands.
My thanks to Nina and Frederik for their wonderful music. They came, entertained and faded away. The songs live on, helping us to relive memories of a simpler and less frenzied world. Still when I hear Nina and Frederik sing I’m transported back to a time of tremendous uncertainty and hard study. Their music coincided with great personal success too. I found entry into the Faculty of Medicine and then to an immensely satisfying professional career. At least for me their unique blend of music will remain timeless for evermore. Nina and Frederik are a true music icon, their legacy will live on.
May Frederik find eternal peace and may Nina now 90 be happy and have a peaceful life.
Features
‘There are no private universities in Sri Lanka’ – some considerations for higher education reform
Academics involved in education policy like to say that there is no such thing as a private university in Sri Lanka. The only ‘universities’ in the country are state universities; anything else offering degrees is a private higher education institution (HEI). This position is technically accurate. Yet, in the discourse and imagination of the public, private universities are very real – people teach in them, students register in them, families pay fees, and such degree holders enter job markets in Sri Lanka and outside.
For decades, activists concerned for public higher education have ignored or resisted looking at private HEIs, as if such scrutiny would taint them. Others have worked in both types of institutions, carrying practices from each to the other. The apex body governing state universities, the UGC, has, meanwhile, ignored the concept of conflict of interest and appointed individuals in private higher education in committees and leadership positions. It is unsurprising then that some of the ideologies informing private higher education appear in reform agendas in the state sector.
This is a good time then to consider the varying types of private HEIs around us, and to take a look at some of the issues within them in the hope that higher education reform agendas will include private, as well as state higher education.
What is a ‘private university’?
First, some clarifications. In the public imaginary, a ‘private university’ is typically an institution that provides a foreign or local degree for which the student makes a payment. But this broad classification encompasses a host of diverse institutions and types of degrees which I detail below.
The Non-State Higher Education Division (NSHE) of the Ministry of Education has recognised 295 degrees by 32 institutions. Most of these are private companies and include a handful of established, well-known private HEIs that are ‘university like’. The degrees are local degrees conferred by the institutions accredited by the NSHE Division. While private HEIs conferring local degrees must be accredited by the NSHE Division, there appears to be no legal consequence for not doing so. In addition, there are several permutations of the private degree that miss the net of this Division and the Standing Committee on Accreditation and Quality Assurance (SCAQA) that assists this Division.
For one, degrees conferred by foreign universities offered, via these same private HEIs, are not vetted by the NSHE Division. Secondly, there is a growing plethora of private HEIs which have either no physical presence locally or only a dubious presence. The University Grants Commission has notified the public, through their website, that foreign universities listed in the Commonwealth Universities Yearbook and the World Higher Education Database are recognised, but refrained from giving any other details – which degrees? Offered by what modes? These details are not known. Some of the foreign universities in the lists may be legitimate entities in their own land but the degrees conferred locally, in their name, may not adhere to curriculum or teaching specifications of the NSHE Division or the UGC.
Another troubling phenomenon is the ‘top up degree’, which appears to work on the same principle as that of a pre-paid mobile connection: if I have a Diploma or an HND of a sort, I am eligible to complete a course of study which provides me with a degree, usually from a foreign university. The idea that someone who does not initially qualify for a degree programme should be able to work their way towards one is a progressive notion. This is the concept that open and distance learning (ODL) was based on initially, but which is now sadly exploited. ODL models are expected to provide opportunity for learning for those who may be excluded from traditional learning institutions. In Sri Lanka, however, we have seen ODL become a marketplace offering easy to obtain, for-fee qualifications by institutions with little commitment to superior teaching and learning.
Finally, a perusal of the many types of private HEIs and their varied degrees bring to mind another question – how should the private degrees, provided by state institutions (that are not educational institutions), be regulated? Who should do so?
All of these create a host of problems for the public – for hopeful students and parents and trusting employers. For the higher education sector, recruitment of academic staff, too, has become difficult due to this plethora of ambiguous higher education qualifications, as I discussed in a previous Kuppi article (‘Recruiting academics to state universities’).
Some issues in private HEIs – a bellwether for change in state universities
In this second part of this article, I will discuss some aspects of work in private HEIs – albeit the more established institutions – given that such issues may appear in reform agendas in future.
Across state universities, all permanent staff of a specific category are paid according to the same criteria. The picture is not so clear when it comes to private HEIs since they are different entities legally, typically companies. Private HEIs have salary scales and financial incentives that are different to each other. The more established private HEIs reportedly have attractive renumeration packages, possibly a reason for academics of state universities migrating eagerly to such institutions during sabbatical years and on retirement. This may not of course be the case with other less established, or improperly registered HEIs of which we know little. Academic staff of these more accepted private HEIs seem to value the high financial remuneration they receive (in comparison to state universities) as something that makes their work rewarding.
Attractive remuneration is important to sustain the good life and is at times seen as the institution’s way of encouraging good work. Yet, this has implications for the future of the institution: to continue to deliver on promised financial packages, institutions must continue to have large profit margins. One strategy has been to enroll multiple cohorts of students per year, even up to three or four intakes per year. This can result in exploitative work conditions, since staff must cater to all these cohorts in that same year. If there is inadequate staff, employees are further burdened. On the other hand, if there is a sudden drop in enrolments (degrees can go out of fashion) unexpected layoffs occur. Similar to other sectors that employ short-term contract staff – including state universities – in private HEIs, too, individual teachers, who are on short term contracts that need regular renewal, can feel pressured to work under difficult or exploitative conditions.
At the same time, even in the more established private HEIs, work norms differ from those of state universities in that they include promotional work that keeps the institution’s name in the eye of the public. The Marketing (or similarly named) unit comes up in conversations as one of the most important departments. It appears to weigh in on decision-making related to the number of staff, the amount of re-sits per exams, and other pedagogically important matters. This is a worrying example of how financial rationales interfere with pedagogically or academically sound processes, resulting in problematic results in the classroom. On the plus side, junior colleagues, who had experience in both state and private HEIs, also felt that they faced less harassment in private HEIs – primarily due to the private HEIs ability to take swift action in reported cases of harassment. This is a real indictment on state institutions and their reluctance to address chronic issues of harassment in our universities.
Yet, while we hear much about problems in state universities, we hardly hear of problems that staff in private HEIs face. One rationale for a lack of public expressions by staff is that expressions of discontent might lead to trouble given the importance of reputation for private HEIs. The worry about reputational damage is a growing concern in state universities, too, as evidenced by social media policies and internal conversations on reputational damage, consequent to negative publicity. Institutional worries of reputational damage are harmful in the long run since these impact not only freedom of expression by student and staff, but also research that is possible in and about the education sector.
Some thoughts at the end…
A close look at the private higher education sector is important given its strong presence in the country. Impending reform needs to regulate this diverse array of higher education offerings in the private sector, as well as the state institutions that offer privately-funded options of higher education (a topic for a separate Kuppi on its own). It is time we carefully considered how to build a whole system of higher education out of this broken mess.
Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.
Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.
Features
Ready for solo spotlight
Singer Nish Peiris is set to take the next big step in her music journey.
The talented vocalist, who has been seen and heard in the scene here for a short while, and was also featured with the now-defunct band, Inner Vision, has announced that she will be fully committing to her solo career, after completing her degree this year.
“I’m finishing my degree this year, and after that I’ll be fully committing to my solo music career,” Nish told The Island.
“I’ve already got a few tours lined up for next year, so I’m really excited for what’s ahead.”
Fans, no doubt, will remember Nish for her smooth voice and stage presence, and the good news is that she is now ready to chart her own path and bring new music to audiences at home and abroad.
With tours already planned for 2027, the year 2026 promises to be an exciting year for the young artiste as she steps into the spotlight on her own.
We wish Nish every success in this new chapter!
Features
Exclusive musical evening for Sri Lankans in Toronto
While Sri Lankan music lovers, in Dubai, are eagerly looking forward to being a part of the action on Saturday, 25th July, with Rajiv Sebastian in the limelight, Sri Lankans, in Toronto, Canada, are equally excited and are anxiously awaiting the arrival of Sri Lanka’s famous singer/entertainer Sohan Weerasinghe.
Having done the needful with The X-Periments, the legendary performer has now embarked on an exciting new chapter – a solo career – and Toronto, Canada, will see him do the needful, on Friday, 31st July, 2026, from 8.00 pm to 12.00 am, at the Angus Glen Golf Club.
Reports indicate that it’s a ‘sold out’ event – naturally with Sohan in the spotlight.
Having built his reputation through years of unforgettable performances, and hits that became part of our musical fabric, Sohan is ready to bring his own vision, sound, and stories directly to the audience, in Toronto, Canada, backed by the phenomenal Toronto Ceymphony Live Band.
Says Gamini Hemalal, who has been instrumental in reviving the Sri Lankan entertainment scene, in that part of the world:
“The countdown begins for the most exclusive musical event of the summer! Join us for a premium night of incredible music, elite hospitality, and a lavish buffet as the legendary Sohan Weerasinghe takes the stage live in Toronto!
“This is a high-end event, designed for those who appreciate exceptional entertainment and great food.”
Gamini, who is also a member of the Toronto Ceymphony Live Band, mentioned that it’s going to be an intimate musical evening with the celebrated Sohan Weerasinghe.
From packed auditoriums to intimate shows, Sohan continues to prove why he remains one of Sri Lanka’s most beloved entertainers.
For decades, Sohan Weerasinghe has been a household name in Sri Lankan entertainment.
Known for his captivating smooth voice and charismatic stage presence, Canada will experience it all on Friday, 31st July.
Next on the list of events, Gamini Hemal is working on, is Halloween night and he says “what we plan to do will be very interesting and unique … with a surprise guest star, as well!”
-
Business3 days ago‘Giving up was never an option’: The fisherman who fought back after losing millions in SL
-
Features3 days agoTwo memorable excerpts from a former SLAF commander’s memoir
-
Latest News4 days agoDavis cup Asia/Oceania Group IV 2026 to be held in Colombo from 20th to 25th July
-
Features3 days agoErdoğan’s New Republic
-
Life style3 days agoTaste of the Swiss Alps comes to Colombo
-
Features7 days agoDirty Money
-
News4 days agoDengue outbreak gallops ahead: Infections surpasses 73,455, leaving 50 dead
-
News4 days agoEvidence recorded in money laundering case against Yoshitha Rajapaksa


