Connect with us

News

New anti-terrorism law a threat to political dissent, civil disobedience: NPC

Published

on

The National Peace Council (NPC) has warned that the Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) may allow the government to categorise acts of dissent and civil disobedience as terrorism. The NPC made its assessment pointing out that the broad definition of terrorism under the draft law may allow disproportionate and excessive responses by the state. Such provisions replicate the logic of the PTA rather than mark a clear break from it, the civil society group said.

The following is the text of the statement issued by the NPC: “The National Peace Council welcomes the government’s decision to allow a two-month period of public consultation on the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act, intended to replace the Prevention of Terrorism Act. Given Sri Lanka’s long and painful experience with national security legislation, this consultation period will provide a valuable opportunity to prevent the repetition of past mistakes. Meaningful public engagement prior to the enactment of a new anti-terrorism law is essential if the promise of system change is to be realised and if Sri Lanka is to avoid entrenching yet another draconian law whose consequences may be felt for decades to come.

 When in opposition and in their election manifesto, the JVP and NPP pledged to repeal repressive laws such as the PTA, citing its repeated misuse against ethnic and religious minorities, political activists and journalists. The continued application of the PTA, where individuals have been detained for prolonged periods even for non-terrorism related reasons, such as in the Eastern Province in Valachchenai over alleged forest land encroachment demonstrates how easily exceptional powers are extended to ordinary disputes.

A preliminary review of the draft PSTA indicates that it retains core features of the PTA that have enabled serious abuse over decades. These include provisions permitting detention for up to two years without a person being charged before a court of law. In addition, the broad definition of terrorism under the draft law allows acts of dissent and civil disobedience to be labelled as terrorism, thereby permitting disproportionate and excessive responses by the state. Such provisions replicate the logic of the PTA rather than mark a clear break from it.

The PTA itself was enacted as a temporary law, intended to operate for only six months, yet it has remained in force for forty six years. This history shows how difficult it is to remove national security laws once they are enacted. For this reason, special care needs to be taken with regard to the new law on two counts. The first is the observation that power corrupts.  The second is that laws must protect citizens from future governments, not only the current one. Institutions and laws are designed to endure beyond the lifespan of any one government and need to safeguard the public interest when political circumstances change.

The two month consultation period on the PSTA therefore carries special responsibility. The National Peace Council urges civil society organisations, the legal community and in particular the Bar Association of Sri Lanka to study the draft law carefully, to draw on Sri Lanka’s experience and international standards, and to place their considered views before the government to incorporate in a well-balanced law. These would include provisions for speedy judicial actions to release those improperly and unfairly arrested under its provisions and compensation to those who are discharged without legal action after many months or years.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Courtesy call by the Heads of Mission- Designate on Prime Minister

Published

on

By

The heads of mission designate to Sri Lanka paid a courtesy call on Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya on 26th of March at the Prime Minister’s office.

The delegation comprised Dharshana M. Perera, High Commissioner – designate of Sri Lanka to Malaysia, Ms. Dayani Mendis, Ambassador and PRUN – designate of Sri Lanka to Austria, Ms. N.I.D. Paranavitana, Ambassador – designate of Sri Lanka to Ethiopia & African Union, Prof. (Ms.) M.I. Fazeeha Azmi,Ambassador – designate of Sri Lanka to Iran,  Saman Kumara Chandrasiri, Ambassador – designate of Sri Lanka to Israel, and  M. Farook M. Fawzer, Representative – designate of Sri Lanka to Palestine.

The Prime Minister, Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, extended her best wishes to the Heads of Mission–designate and underscored the importance of their forthcoming assignments in advancing Sri Lanka’s national interests emphasizing their collective role in contributing towards the socio-economic upliftment of Sri Lanka.

The Prime Minister further highlighted the importance of projecting a positive and credible image of Sri Lanka internationally, through consistent, professional, and strategic engagement in their respective host countries and multilateral platforms.

She encouraged the Heads of Mission to actively identify and facilitate high-quality investment opportunities, particularly in sectors aligned with Sri Lanka’s development priorities, with a focus on sustainability, innovation, and long-term value addition.

Particular emphasis was placed on the promotion and diversification of Sri Lanka’s exports, including the exploration of new markets and strengthening trade linkages.

The meeting was attended by the Secretary to the Prime Minister, Additional Secretary to the Prime Minister Ms. Sagarika Bogahawatta and heads of mission-designate.

[Prime Minister’s Media Division]

Continue Reading

News

SC finds Keheliya, others, guilty of violating FRs of public through corrupt drug procurement deal

Published

on

The Supreme Court yesterday held former Health Minister Keheliya Rambukwella and several senior health officials liable for violating the fundamental rights of the public over a controversial drug procurement carried out under the 2022 Indian Credit Line.

Delivering the judgment, a three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena, and comprising Justice Kumudini Wickremasinghe and Justice Janak de Silva, found that the procurement of medical supplies from an unregistered company, in breach of established procedures, had resulted in a serious infringement of public rights.

The Court ruled that the granting of a Waiver of Registration by the authorities was “wrongful, arbitrary and capricious,” and held that the direct procurement carried out on an unsolicited basis was unlawful. The transaction was accordingly declared null and void.

In a significant order, the Court directed Rambukwella to pay Rs. 75 million in compensation to the State from his personal funds.

The then Health Ministry Secretary Janaka Chandragupta and former Chairman of the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA), Prof. S. D. Jayaratne, were each ordered to pay Rs. 50 million.

The Court further directed NMRA Chief Executive Officer Dr. Wijith Gunasekara and former Director of the Medical Supplies Division Dr. Thusitha Sudarshana to pay Rs. 50 million each as compensation.

The ruling followed the hearing of a fundamental rights petition filed by Transparency International Sri Lanka and two other parties.

The Court also instructed the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption to initiate appropriate action under the Anti-Corruption Act against those found responsible.

Senior Counsel Senany Dayaratne, with Nishadi Wickramasinghe, Lasanthika Hettiarachchi, Janani Abeywickrema and Maheshika Bandara, appeared for the petitioners.

Continue Reading

News

Sajith nudges govt. to follow India’s example in giving relief to consumers by slashing taxes on fuel

Published

on

Sajith

Opposition and SJB Leader Sajith Premadasa yesterday urged President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to reduce taxes on fuel, just as the Indian government has done.

He said in a post on X that “Modi government has decided to reduce the Special Additional Excise Duty on petrol and completely remove it for diesel in order to cushion the hardship on the Indian consumer. High time for Anura Kumara Dissanayake to keep up to his election promise and follow suit.”

Meanwhile foreign media reported that India has slashed excise duties on petrol and diesel to protect consumers and rein in a potential spike in inflation, while imposing windfall taxes on aviation fuel and diesel exports, amid volatile global oil markets, as a result of the Iran war.

Global oil prices have surged past $100 per barrel after the near closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which serves as a conduit for 40% of India’s crude oil imports, since the US and Israel first struck Iran on February 28.

In a government order, released late on Thursday, India’s Finance Ministry reduced the special excise duty on petrol to three Indian rupees ($0.0318) per litre from 13 Indian rupees earlier. It also cut the duty on diesel to zero from INR 10 rupees per litre.

The government did not say how much the duty cuts would cost. The move comes ahead of elections next month in four Indian states and one federal territory, with Indian voters known to be extremely sensitive to higher prices.

“Government has taken a huge hit on its taxation revenues to ensure very high losses of oil companies, approximately 24 rupees a litre for petrol and 30 rupees a litre for diesel, at this time of sky high international prices, are reduced,” Indian Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said in a post on X.

Continue Reading

Trending