News
NDF constituents, SJB in continuing NL dilemma
‘Appalling practice of accommodating rejected contestants should be done away with’
By Shamindra Ferdinando
National Democratic Party (NDF) Secretary Sharmila Perera said that the delay on the part of other constituents of the political grouping that contested on the NDF ticket to reach a consensus on the remaining National List slot couldn’t be blamed on her.
Attorney-at-law Perera said that as soon as she received their nomination, it would be forwarded to the Election Commission. The NDF Secretary said so in response to The Island query whether she caused a crisis by allocating one of the two NL slots secured by the party to Ravi Karunanayake.
“Absolutely not,” the NDF official said, emphasizing the right to name a person of their choice from the NL in line with an agreement with all political parties which contested under the ‘Gas cylinder’ symbol couldn’t be challenged.
Dismissing the continuing media furor over UNPer Karunanayake’s appointment as irrelevant, Perera said that the issue at hand is the coalition partners’ failure to reach agreement on the other NL slot. They are Podujana Eksath Nidahas Peramuna (‘Cup’ symbol), Podujana Eksath Peramuna (‘Chair’), Nava Sandhanaya, consisting of former SLPPers and the UNP.
The NDF’s working committee decided on Karunanayake’s appointment as the EC wanted the NL appointees named by Nov. 18th, Perera said. The crux of the matter is as the Front managed to secure just two NL slots, the agreements among coalition members couldn’t be fulfilled, Perera said, reminding the UNP leadership of how the NDF always stepped in when its help was sought. Perera was referring to the UNP-led coalitions fielding General Sarath Fonseka, Maithripala Sirisena and Sajith Premadasa at the presidential elections in 2010, 2015 and 2019, respectively through the NDF.
Former Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena and Sharmila Perera had been number one and two NL nominees in their list, whereas Karunanayake was the 10th out of 29 contenders.
Independent candidate, UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, contested the presidential election under the NDF’s ‘Gas cylinder’ symbol. Wickremesinghe polled 2.2 mn votes whereas the party could muster only 500,000 votes at the general election, hence the two NL slots.
The 29 NL slots have been distributed among eight political parties, namely NPP (18), SJB (05), NDF (02), SLPP (01), ITAK (01), Sarvajana Balaya (01) and SLMC (01).
Perera said that the NDF’s coalition members could decide on their representative as soon as Wickremesinghe returned from India. The former President, amidst the NL controversy, left for India to attend an event at Sri Sathya Sai Vidya Vihar, university, Indore. He was accompanied by wife Maithree.
At the previous general election, the UNP won one NL slot. In the new Parliament, the UNP wouldn’t be represented by a single elected or appointed MP.
The NDF official said that there was no point in appointing a committee to probe Karunanayake’s appointment as the EC and Parliament accepted the former Minister’s nomination. Karunanayake attended the inauguration of the new Parliament on Nov. 21. At a meeting chaired by Wickremesinghe, on November 20, the grouping appointed a three-member committee, headed by Attorney-at-Law Kumar Dunusinghe,and was asked to hand over the report within three weeks.
SJB, the breakaway faction of the UNP, too, hadn’t been able to resolve the dispute over NL slots, political sources said. Of the five NL slots that had been secured by the SJB, four remained to be filled as constituents fought for the slots in the wake of SJB General Secretary Ranjith Madduma Bandara filling one of the five vacancies.
Sources said that three coalition members were demanding one slot each. Among the former Ministers and State Ministers in the fray for SJB NL slots are SJB Chairman Imthiaz Bakeer Markar, Eran Wickremaratne, Hirunika Premachandra, Sujeewa Senasinghe, Mano Ganesan, Prof. G. L. Peiris and Dullas Alahapperuma. In addition, the All Ceylon Makkal Congress (ACMC), too, had demanded a NL slot, while the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) insisted that it should receive two out of available four slots in terms of the pre-general election agreement.
SJB and NDF sources said that they were hopeful of reaching a consensus on NL slots before the Parliament meets again on Dec. 03. A former Minister said that obviously agreements/understandings had been reached without taking into consideration the results of the general election. According to him, they never anticipated the drop of SJB and NDF vote received at the presidential election from 4.3 mn and 2.2 mn, respectively, to a pathetic 1.9 and 500,000 votes at the general election, just a couple of weeks later.
The NPP obtained a staggering 159 seats, including 18 NL slots whereas the SJB tally dropped to 40 m from 54 it had at the previous election.
Attorney-at-law Chrishmal Warnasuriya told The Island that political parties that represent the new Parliament, EC and other interested parties should revisit the NL issue without further delay. First of all they should discontinue the appalling practice of accommodating defeated candidates on their respective NLs, the civil society activist said, alleging that the appointment of political rejects was one of the major causes for the overall deterioration of, what he called, political culture.
Of the 225 members, 29 are appointed through the NL. Warnasuriya said that like in the past, several defeated candidates had been accommodated on the NL, contrary to the wishes of the electorate. The very basis of parliamentary democracy was being brazenly violated by such appointments, Warnasuriya said, underscoring the urgent need to address this issue.
Among the rejected contestants in the new Parliament are two from the ruling party.
Warnasuriya recalled how the then JVP, following the 2015 general election, deprived him and former Auditor General S.C. Mayadunne promised NL slots and instead accommodated two defeated JVPers, Bimal Ratnayaka and Sunil Handunnetti.
Warnasuriya also referred to former Minister D.E.W. Gunasekera’s declaration that the 14th Amendment that inserted Article 99A into the Constitution in May 1988 provided for the appointment of defeated candidates though it was not in the original Bill approved by the relevant Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) headed by then Premier Ranasinghe Premadasa. The activist also pointed out that Section 64(5) of the Parliamentary Election (Amendment) Act also passed in 1988 also paved the way for party leaders to appoint anyone of their choice as a NL MP.
Latest News
Sun directly overhead Kokkuvil, Nallur, Kodikamam and Nagar Kovil at about 12.11 noon today (28)
The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka during 28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.
The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (28) are Kokkuvil, Nallur, Kodikamam and Nagar Kovil about 12.11 noon.
News
Eight politicians in drug kingpin probe
Police to arrest and question four former ministers, others over links to Basik
By Norman Palihawadane
Police are investigating alleged links between suspected major drug trafficker Shiran Basik and a number of prominent politicians, with eight of them due to be arrested and questioned as investigators widen their probe into his financial dealings and network of associates, police headquarters, according to a senior police officer.
Among those set to face questioning include a sitting MP, four former ministers, and at least one of them is a female. Police are also investigating allegations that Basik provided large sums of money to politicians during election campaigns and extended other financial and material benefits to political figures.
Investigators are also looking into claims that two politicians were provided with facilities to construct houses and hotels, while efforts are under way to establish the extent of political support and assistance allegedly provided to Basik.
The Colombo Central Crime Investigation Bureau (CCIB) is expected to question the politicians based on information reportedly disclosed by Basik during interrogation. Two electoral organisers are also expected to be taken into custody as part of the ongoing investigation, according to police sources.
Meanwhile, statements are being recorded from managers and employees of several businesses allegedly linked to Basik, while investigators continue to examine information and records recovered from his mobile phone.
Basik, 48, was brought back to Sri Lanka on August 14 after being arrested in Dubai and deported. He was taken into custody by officers of the Criminal Investigation Department’s Airport Unit at Bandaranaike International Airport and subsequently handed over to the CCIB for further investigation.
Police initially obtained a 72-hour detention order to question Basik before securing approval to detain him for 90 days.
Basik, a resident of Dehiwala, is facing investigations over alleged large-scale drug trafficking as well as firearms, and unlawful assembly of weapons-related offences. Police are also examining whether he had any involvement in recent prison-related incidents and have said information has emerged linking him to the 2012 Welikada Prison riot.
The investigation has also expanded to Basik’s alleged assets and business interests in Sri Lanka and overseas.
Police have said information uncovered during questioning indicates that Basik had claimed ownership of five hotels along Colombo’s Marine Drive. Investigators have also identified two houses and two mobile phone shops in Boralesgamuwa allegedly linked to him.
A court has ordered a comprehensive examination of bank accounts linked to Basik, with the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka to conduct a review of his financial accounts. A separate investigation into his wealth and properties is being conducted by the Illegal Assets Investigation Division.
Investigators are also examining claims that Basik owns properties, including hotels and vehicles, in several European countries, as well as a high-value vehicle in Dubai. These claims remain subject to further investigation.
Basik had left Sri Lanka for Dubai in 2018, where police said he lived a lavish lifestyle while operating businesses. He was arrested by UAE authorities before being deported to Sri Lanka.
During initial questioning, Basik told investigators that Dubai police had stopped and searched him at a shopping mall and examined his mobile phone. He claimed that footage relating to Iranian missile and drone attacks was found on the device and that he was subsequently questioned over alleged links to Iran.
Police are continuing to examine the circumstances surrounding his arrest and deportation, as well as the information contained in his mobile phone and other evidence gathered during the investigation.
The ongoing probe is being conducted under the supervision of Senior DIG Ranmal Kodituwakku and SSP Kamal Ariyawansa.The allegations against Basik and the politicians named in connection with the investigation have not been established in court, and the investigations remain ongoing.
News
CJ first SC judge to benefit from 22A, if enacted: BASL
The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has opposed the proposed “Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution”, saying it raises serious concerns over judicial independence and the rights and interests of the public.
In a statement signed by BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya and Secretary Nalin De Silva, the association said it had challenged the constitutionality of the proposed amendment before the Supreme Court.
The BASL noted that the Chief Justice would be the first Supreme Court judge to benefit from the proposed amendment if it becomes law. It also referred to widespread speculation that the amendment was being expedited to facilitate an extension of the incumbent Chief Justice’s tenure, which is due to end on December 1, 2026.
Full text of the statement:
“The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has taken a principled position opposing the Bill titled the “Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution” on the basis that it raises serious concerns regarding the independence of the Judiciary and the rights and interests of the people. Accordingly, the BASL has challenged the constitutionality of the proposed amendment before the Supreme Court.
“It is observed that it will be the Honourable Chief Justice who will be the first Judge of the Supreme Court who will benefit from the 22nd Amendment, if this Bill is enacted into Law.
There is widespread belief that this amendment is being rushed to facilitate the extension of the tenure of the Honourable Chief Justice which would otherwise complete on 1st December 2026. In this backdrop, in the recent past, we have witnessed allegations being made in Parliamentary Proceedings as well as on Social Media concerning the Judiciary including the incumbent Chief Justice.
“During this period, the BASL has also been subjected to unfounded attacks on social media and other platforms.
“The Judiciary, like every other institution exercising public power, must remain subject to legitimate scrutiny and accountability. Judgments, judicial conduct and the administration of justice may properly be subjected to fair, informed and responsible criticism. Where credible concerns or allegations arise regarding any member of the Judiciary, including the Chief Justice, they should be examined objectively and addressed through the appropriate constitutional and parliamentary processes which are in place, with due regard to fairness and due process.
“At the same time, everyone must exercise responsibility when making allegations concerning individual judges, lawyers and others. Personal attacks based upon unsubstantiated allegations can undermine public confidence in the administration of justice and affect the independence and integrity of the judicial process and the system of justice
“Judicial independence is not intended to shield any individual from legitimate scrutiny or accountability. It is a safeguard for the people, ensuring that disputes are determined impartially and that individual rights, the Rule of Law and the constitutional order are protected.
“The BASL therefore calls upon all organs of the State, all parties concerned and the media to respect the role of the Judiciary and the system of administration of justice, while ensuring that any genuine concerns are addressed fairly, responsibly and through the procedures established by the Constitution and the law.”
-
Business7 days agoSriLankan Airlines makes ShakthiSAT Mission possible for talented Sri Lankan student
-
Features6 days agoMy secondary schooling after Royal Primary
-
Features6 days agoFrom the First to the 22nd: A short history of Amendment Politics and Reform Frustrations
-
News4 days agoMissing doctor’s body found in Mahiyanganaya
-
Latest News7 days agoTharanga edges out Chopra in 88m javelin battle
-
Features6 days agoHow Shelton Kodikara became first Professor of International Relations
-
Features6 days agoHow St. John’s College Shaped Panadura for 150 Years
-
News4 days agoAustralia declines to release Finance Secy Suriyapperuma’s citizenship details
