Connect with us

News

National assets in the power sector

Published

on

The Yugadhanavi Power Plant in Kerawalapitiya is much in the news at present. There is an allegation that 40% of the shares of this national asset are to be sold to an American Company and there are those who insist that this National Asset must not be sold to the private sector.

It is interesting to examine the facts first as to how the Yugadhanavi Power Plant became a National Asset.

In 2005, when the new government was elected to office, it was apparent that a serious power crisis was looming, and that immediate action was required. The government decided to call for proposals from a subsidiary of Lanka Transformers Ltd, Lakdhanavi Ltd which had already constructed two power plants at that time in the country. The CEB owns 63% of the shares of Lanka Transformers Ltd.

Lakdhanavi Ltd gave a proposal to build and hand over a 300MW Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kerawalapitiya. Two related companies from Japan and China also gave similar proposals.

A CANC was appointed to evaluate the proposals and the CANC was divided on the matter. Lakdhanavi Ltd had given the cheaper offer, but had not done a similar project before.

After the intervention of the then Secretary, Ministry of Power, sanity prevailed, and the government took a decision to award the contract to the local party.

Thus, the present Yugadhanavi Power Plant was designed and built by local engineers of Lakdhanavi Ltd, in less than three years, proving their capability. If not for the intervention of the then Secretary to the Ministry of Power, this Sri Lankan Asset would have been a Chinese Asset.

In 2016, tenders were called for the construction of a 350MW Combined Cycle Power Plant at Kerawalapitiya and the lowest evaluated tender was from Lakdhanavi Ltd.

Then the Secretary of The Ministry of Power at that time, with the support of the minister, decided to award the contract to a Chinese company who had submitted the second highest bid. Lakdhanavi had to battle this matter in the Courts for 04 years. Unfortunately, persons who are now raising several issues about the disposal of National Assets were silent at that critical time.

Again in 2020, on the intervention of Gotabaya Rajapakse the contract was awarded to Lakdhanavi Ltd. Now Lakdhanavi Ltd is in the process of building the power plant. Thus, for the second time, a Sri Lankan Asset is being created instead of a Chinese one – history is repeating itself!

LTL Holdings (PVT) Ltd Staff Union



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

US$ 2.5 mn cyber heist exposes system failures

Published

on

COPF final report on USD 2.5 mn cyber fraud recommends action against all responsible

The US$2.5 million loss incurred during Sri Lanka’s foreign debt repayment to Australia was a clear case of a cybercrime and theft, Committee on Public Finance (COPF) Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva told Parliament yesterday.

Presenting the COPF final report on the cyber fraud, Dr. de Silva said the incident amounted to a serious financial crime and called for a comprehensive investigation, by law enforcement authorities, to identify and prosecute all those responsible.

The report revealed serious governance, procedural and operational failures that enabled the fraudulent transfer of public funds, while recommending sweeping reforms to strengthen cybersecurity, financial controls and public debt management systems.

According to the report, officials of the Treasury and the Central Bank bore responsibility for governance lapses that contributed to the failures. It also highlighted the fact that the Ministry of Finance was operating an outdated Microsoft Exchange Server after security support had ended, while basic safeguards, such as multi-factor authentication, had not been implemented.

The COPF said suspicious payment instructions linked to debt repayments involving India, the United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium had also been detected, preventing further losses. However, the US$ 2.5 million fraud materialised only in the repayment transaction involving Australia.

The report has noted that officials had failed to verify lender email domains, relied on unverified email communications and lacked adequate internal controls, allowing the fraud to continue for months.

Although the investigation uncovered system-wide weaknesses across several institutions, only four mid-level Finance Ministry officials had been suspended so far, the report said.

The COPF has recommended a special audit of the foreign debt repayment process, strengthened cybersecurity measures across state institutions, updated financial regulations and improvements to public debt management systems.

by Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Opposition signs no-confidence motion against Justice Minister for dereliction of duty over Negombo Prison deaths

Published

on

Opposition and SJB leader Sajith Premadasa signing the no-confidence motion against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara in the presence of Opposition MPs at the Parliamentary complex yesterday

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, together with Opposition MPs, yesterday signed a No-Confidence Motion (NCM) in Parliament against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara.The move comes in response to the unrest at the Negombo Prison, where both prison officers and inmates were killed.

Opposition members said the Minister had failed to fulfill his responsibility and accountability regarding their safety.According to the Opposition group, the NCM seeks to hold the Minister directly accountable for lapses in ensuring protection within the prison system.

Continue Reading

News

AG informs SC of e-visa agreement review  

Published

on

The Attorney General yesterday informed the Supreme Court that the government has decided to review the legality of agreements entered into by the previous administration to hand over the country’s electronic visa issuance operations to private companies.

Additional Solicitor General Viveka Siriwardena, appearing for the Attorney General, made the submission when the Supreme Court took up the fundamental rights petitions filed by former MPs President’s Counsel M.A. Sumanthiran, Patali Champika Ranawaka, and Rauff Hakeem, challenging the previous Cabinet’s decision to outsource the e-visa system.

The petitions were heard before a three-judge bench, comprising Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena and Justices Achala Wengappuli and Arjuna Obeyesekere.

The Additional Solicitor General informed court that the current Cabinet had appointed a subcommittee to examine the legality of the agreements with the private companies and requested time to report on its findings, stating that the review was still underway.

President’s Counsel Sumanthiran, appearing as one of the petitioners, told the court that although the present government had indicated its intention to cancel the transaction, the petitioners wished to proceed with the case.

He noted that members of the current Cabinet had been named as respondents in the petitions.The Supreme Court directed the petitioners to issue notice on the members of the current Cabinet, named as respondents, and fixed September 29 for further proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending