Connect with us

News

Media survey ahead of Prez poll: Vital recommendations made

Published

on

The Federation of Media Employees Trade Unions (FMETU) and the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) have released a survey outlining extensive recommendations for a new national media policy in Sri Lanka.

The survey, which reflects input from 250 media representatives across the country, including journalists, academics, and media heads, aims to foster a robust and independent media landscape that upholds professional standards and serves the public with integrity.

The survey underscores the necessity of enhancing press freedom and ensuring the public’s right to quality information. It envisions a media environment that supports democratic values, strengthens national development, and advances Public Service Journalism (PSJ) to produce ethical and engaging journalism.

Key recommendations from the survey include:

Establishment of an Independent Media Commission:

A proposed Independent Media Commission should be formed through multi-stakeholder dialogue to oversee media freedom, prevent ownership concentration, and ensure accountability. The Commission would be tasked with advising on media development, monitoring government advertisement distribution, and fostering media literacy among citizens.

Media Governance and Legal Reforms:

The survey advocates for the overhaul of existing laws, including the Press Councils Law of 1973 and the Online Security Act of 2024, to support media freedom. It calls for improved legal frameworks that align with international standards, promote media pluralism, and safeguard journalists’ rights.

Ethical Standards and Regulation:

Emphasis is placed on reinforcing self-regulation and ethical practices within print, broadcast, and digital media. This includes strengthening the Press Complaints Commission and establishing an independent regulator for electronic media.

Rights and Welfare of Media Workers: The recommendations highlight the need for fair labour practices and improved welfare measures for media employees. This includes ensuring adequate compensation, job security, and safety measures for journalists, particularly those in risky situations.

Support for Media Development and Training:

Investment in professional training and development is crucial. The survey recommends supporting journalists through training in various specializations, including investigative reporting and digital journalism.

Promotion of Investigative Journalism:

The creation of grants and legal protections for investigative journalists is recommended to support in-depth reporting on critical issues such as corruption and human rights.

Gender Equality in Media:

Training programmes and support mechanisms are proposed to encourage gender-sensitive reporting and increase the participation of women in journalism.

Broadening State-Owned Media:

Recommendations include bringing state-owned media under the Independent Media Commission’s oversight to enhance professionalism and profitability.

Strengthening Right to Information (RTI):

Enhancing the RTI process and increasing public awareness is crucial for ensuring transparent access to information on state functions.

Digital Media Innovations:

The survey calls for regulations to ensure transparency in digital media, support for digital startups, and measures to balance free speech with protections against harmful content.

Media and Cyber Literacy:

Investing in media literacy programmes, particularly for youth, is vital for promoting critical thinking and understanding of the media’s role in democracy.

Innovation and Research:

Encouraging research into emerging media trends and supporting innovative media projects are key to adapting to new technologies and formats.

International Collaboration:

The survey recommends facilitating exchange programmes and participating in global media forums to align Sri Lankan media practices with international standards.



News

US$ 2.5 mn cyber heist exposes system failures

Published

on

COPF final report on USD 2.5 mn cyber fraud recommends action against all responsible

The US$2.5 million loss incurred during Sri Lanka’s foreign debt repayment to Australia was a clear case of a cybercrime and theft, Committee on Public Finance (COPF) Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva told Parliament yesterday.

Presenting the COPF final report on the cyber fraud, Dr. de Silva said the incident amounted to a serious financial crime and called for a comprehensive investigation, by law enforcement authorities, to identify and prosecute all those responsible.

The report revealed serious governance, procedural and operational failures that enabled the fraudulent transfer of public funds, while recommending sweeping reforms to strengthen cybersecurity, financial controls and public debt management systems.

According to the report, officials of the Treasury and the Central Bank bore responsibility for governance lapses that contributed to the failures. It also highlighted the fact that the Ministry of Finance was operating an outdated Microsoft Exchange Server after security support had ended, while basic safeguards, such as multi-factor authentication, had not been implemented.

The COPF said suspicious payment instructions linked to debt repayments involving India, the United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium had also been detected, preventing further losses. However, the US$ 2.5 million fraud materialised only in the repayment transaction involving Australia.

The report has noted that officials had failed to verify lender email domains, relied on unverified email communications and lacked adequate internal controls, allowing the fraud to continue for months.

Although the investigation uncovered system-wide weaknesses across several institutions, only four mid-level Finance Ministry officials had been suspended so far, the report said.

The COPF has recommended a special audit of the foreign debt repayment process, strengthened cybersecurity measures across state institutions, updated financial regulations and improvements to public debt management systems.

by Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Opposition signs no-confidence motion against Justice Minister for dereliction of duty over Negombo Prison deaths

Published

on

Opposition and SJB leader Sajith Premadasa signing the no-confidence motion against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara in the presence of Opposition MPs at the Parliamentary complex yesterday

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, together with Opposition MPs, yesterday signed a No-Confidence Motion (NCM) in Parliament against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara.The move comes in response to the unrest at the Negombo Prison, where both prison officers and inmates were killed.

Opposition members said the Minister had failed to fulfill his responsibility and accountability regarding their safety.According to the Opposition group, the NCM seeks to hold the Minister directly accountable for lapses in ensuring protection within the prison system.

Continue Reading

News

AG informs SC of e-visa agreement review  

Published

on

The Attorney General yesterday informed the Supreme Court that the government has decided to review the legality of agreements entered into by the previous administration to hand over the country’s electronic visa issuance operations to private companies.

Additional Solicitor General Viveka Siriwardena, appearing for the Attorney General, made the submission when the Supreme Court took up the fundamental rights petitions filed by former MPs President’s Counsel M.A. Sumanthiran, Patali Champika Ranawaka, and Rauff Hakeem, challenging the previous Cabinet’s decision to outsource the e-visa system.

The petitions were heard before a three-judge bench, comprising Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena and Justices Achala Wengappuli and Arjuna Obeyesekere.

The Additional Solicitor General informed court that the current Cabinet had appointed a subcommittee to examine the legality of the agreements with the private companies and requested time to report on its findings, stating that the review was still underway.

President’s Counsel Sumanthiran, appearing as one of the petitioners, told the court that although the present government had indicated its intention to cancel the transaction, the petitioners wished to proceed with the case.

He noted that members of the current Cabinet had been named as respondents in the petitions.The Supreme Court directed the petitioners to issue notice on the members of the current Cabinet, named as respondents, and fixed September 29 for further proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending