News
May 09 violence: Explanation sought from State Defence Minister over security lapses
National security oversight committee head slams HRC, questions US Ambassador’s conduct
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Chairman of Parliamentary Sectoral Oversight Committee on National Security retired Rear Admiral Sarath Weerasekera, MP, has alleged that flaws in the government’s defence strategy particularly security lapses contributed to the unprecedented crisis that forced President Gotabaya Rajapaksa out of office on 13 July 2022.
In a letter to State Defence Minister Pramitha Bandara Tennakoon, former Public Security Minister has called for a thorough inquiry with the focus on incidents at Rambukkana on 19 April 2022. Prasanna Ranatunga served as the Public Security Minister at the time of Rambukkana protests.
The then government’s response to Rambukkana violence and particularly the decision to take punitive measures against the police for opening fire at a mob that tried to set two fuel bowsers ablaze on a railway track may have had a detrimental impact on law enforcement officers and the military, MP Weerasekera has said.
The former Navy Chief of Staff has underscored the need to investigate whether irresponsible handling of the Rambukkana violence discouraged police and the military men from taking tangible measures to counter unruly mobs. Rambukkana erupted the day after Prasanna Ranatunga took over as the Public Security Minister following Weerasekera’s resignation from that post on April 03.
According to MP Weerasekera, the killing of SLPP MP Amarakeerthi Atukorale by a gang led by serving Army commando and an Army deserter on May 09, last year in Nittambuwa should be examined taking into consideration the total mishandling of Rambukkana incidents. In the run-up to May 09 violence, Weerasekera resigned as Public Security Minister. The MP alleged that a group of fully armed troops including two officers who had been witness to the violence taking place had refused point blank to intervene in support of the police regardless of the Nittambuwa OIC personally requesting their support.
MP Weerasekera told The Island that he expected the State Minister to take up the issues raised by him at the highest level. “I have copied the letter to the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, service chiefs and the IGP,” the former minister said, underscoring the responsibility on the part of the government to bring investigations to a successful conclusion. The Colombo District MP noted that Public Security Minister Tiran Alles is on record as having said that the police were conducting a fresh inquiry into May 09 incidents.
Responding to another query, MP Weerasekera said that Minister Alles made that declaration after a group of lawmakers withdrew a court case filed against the failure on the part of the government to protect their property. The issues at hand were taken up with the State Defence Minister after the Sectoral Oversight Committee under his chairmanship discussed the entire gamut of issues with the participation of Secretary Defence and service commanders in parliament.
MP Weerasekera dealt with the Rambukkana incident with the focus on courageous effort made by police to bring the situation under control in the absence of active support from the Army as well as the Special Task Force (STF), highly irresponsible statement made by US Ambassador Julie Chung that encouraged mobs and the irresponsible stand taken by the Human Rights Commission.
According to MP Weerasekera, a mob that caused damage to public property at Rambukkana had taken control of two fuel bowsers and parked them across a railway track around noon that day. The mob had tried to set the two fuel bowsers ablaze after the then senior officer at the scene SSP K.B. Keerthiratne declared that petrol couldn’t be sold at a cheaper rate than the market price following the latest price revision, MP Weerasekera said.
SSP Keerthiratne ordered the police to fire in the air and shoot the person about to set fire to one of the fuel bowsers below the knee around 4.30 pm after all their efforts to control the crowd failed, MP Weerasekera said alleging that the Army and Special Task Force in spite of being present at the scene declined to assist the police.
Twenty police officers, including Keerthiratne, received injuries during clashes with protesters. Referring to the Judicial Medical Officer’s report on the death of the person due to gunshot injuries received at Rambukkana on April 19, MP Weerasekera said that the JMO stated that the bullet that entered the body of the victim ricocheted from a steel advertising board. The military veteran said that if not for the timely action taken by Keerthiratne, Rambukkana would have experienced a catastrophe and he could have been held responsible for the loss of life and major damage to private and public property in case of a major fire.
Regardless of them saving Rambukkana, the SSP and three constables were arrested and produced in court, the MP said, questioning why those in uniform who risked their lives had to meet legal expenses on their own.
MP Weerasekera has asked the State Minister whether the police and the military did nothing on May 09 when mobs killed eight persons, including one MP and set 150 houses ablaze due to mishandling of Rambukkana or special directive given prohibiting intervention at any level by a particular interfering diplomat in the internal affairs of this country that allowed mob rule.
MP Weerasekera also questioned the failure on the part of the Attorney General’s Department to represent SSP Keerthiratne in court. The former minister has explained the legal provisions under which SSP Keerthiratne could have taken appropriate measures to quell Rambukkana riots.
Weerasekera has strongly recommended that police should reimburse the SSP and the constables who had been forced to spend their own funds for their defence.
The ex-minister in his capacity as Chairman of the Sectoral Oversight Committee on National Security flayed the Human Rights Commission over its one-sided report on the incident. Weerasekera said that the HRC approach undermined national security by discouraging law enforcement authorities and the Defence Ministry should challenge HRC’s flawed report.
News
Geneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations
The government has chosen not to respond to questions raised by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) regarding the detention of retired Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay in connection with the ongoing investigations into the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks.
The Criminal Investigation Department (CID) arrested the ex-official in late February this year. The Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health and the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers have jointly raised the issue on 20 July, 2026.
Drawing attention of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to what they called alleged arbitrary detention of Sallay, former Director General of the State Intelligence Service (SIS) and former Director of Military Intelligence (DMI), under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), as well as allegations of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment while in custody, resulting in the grave deterioration of his health, and imminent risks of retaliation through further torture and ill-treatment resulting in irreparable harm, should he be released from hospital and returned to custody, the UN sought the government explanation with a 60-day period.
The UN has stated: “This communication, and any response received from your Excellency’s Government, will be made public via the communications reporting website at the 60 days mark. Should your Excellency’s Government respond within 60 days, both the communication and the response, may be published before the 60 days mark. The communications and responses
will also be made available in the subsequent periodic report to be presented to the Human Rights Council.”
In the absence of the government’s response, the UN posted the letter, dated 20 July, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake. The full letter can be accessed https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadPublicCommunicationFile?gId=31125
News
Section of wartime KKS High Security Zone vacated to facilitate economic development in the area
The Army, last week, vacated an area, within the wartime high security zone in the Jaffna peninsula. The Defence Ministry said that an extent of 187.56 acres of land, belonging to the Cement Corporation in Kankesanthurai, Jaffna, has been released by the military. The released land, located in Grama Niladhari Division J/233, Kankesanthurai West, within the Valikamam North (Tellippalai) Divisional Secretariat Division, had been utilised by the Sri Lanka Army since the middle of 1997.
The release of the 187.56-acre extent forms part of the initiative to make State land available for the proposed investment zone in Kankesanthurai, thereby facilitating future investment and economic development in the area.
News
Lawyer lodges complaint against Govt. Printer, Media Ministry Secy.
A complaint has been lodged with the Colombo Fraud Investigation Bureau against the Government Printer and the Secretary to the Ministry of Media regarding the online release of falsified documents bearing a forged Speaker’s certificate.
Attorney-at-Law Aruna Laksiri has lodged a complaint with the Colombo Fraud Investigation Bureau requesting legal action against the Government Printer of the Department of Government Printing (No. 118, Dr. Danister de Silva Mawatha, Colombo 08), Prasanna Jayaratne, and the Secretary to the Ministry of Mass Media (Asidisi Medura, 163, Kirulapone Mawatha, Polhengoda, Colombo 05), Dr. Anil Jasinghe.
The complaint alleges the commission of offences by forging and uploading falsified documents online using a forged Speaker’s certification, failure to perform statutory duties, and misappropriation of public property.
The complaint states that a copy of the English translation of the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was downloaded and printed from the official website of the Government Printing Department (www.documents.gov.lk), which operates under the Ministry of Mass Media. On its outer cover and on page 1, the text “certified on 25th of September, 2026” is inscribed inside brackets.
The complaint pointed out that the Speaker has certified an English translation. Under Articles 23, 79, 83, and 80 of the Constitution, Parliament enacts laws and the Speaker certifies bills strictly in the Sinhala and Tamil languages; under the Constitution, therefore the Speaker cannot apply such certification to an English translation.
-
Latest News5 days agoGold winner Tharanga gets brand-new Honda Vezel from SLAAJ
-
Features6 days agoWhy Sri Lanka needs an Inclusive Civic Nationalism – urgently
-
News5 days agoUS-assisted ‘Ice’ detection: NPC to examine IGP’s move to transfer drug-busting team
-
Features7 days agoThailand’s biggest new global star …
-
News7 days agoFirst cases taken up by SC after enactment of 22A dismissed
-
News6 days agoCivil society activist accuses govt. of favouring Ven. Gnanasara
-
Editorial4 days agoColombo Port drug bust: The plot thickens
-
Editorial7 days agoAftershocks of 22A
