News
March 12 Movement calls on voters not to elect misfits at polls
The March 12 Movement for Clean Politics, a collective of civil society organizations, last week called on people not to vote for any candidate who fails to declare his or her assets prior to the forthcoming local council polls.
In a statement issued subsequent to a press conference in Colombo on Tuesday, the organization said that people who had voted in the previous elections to elect governments in the past were the main responsible party for the present crisis in the economy and the breakdown of law and order. The first accused for the crisis in our society is the voter. The electors have not used their vote wisely to promote policies that could uphold democracy and other social values. It is clear that they had voted and cast their preferences without giving due consideration to the policies of the candidates. Time has come to understand that every single vote is a step towards taking the country back on the path towards the right direction. The electors must not fall prey to the candidates asking for their votes in return of promises of this and that. The electors must critically review whether such parties or candidates could deliver those promises.
“We hope that the electors would be prudent enough not to vote for any candidate who fails to declare his or her assets prior to the elections. Before you mark your ballot card, think whether the person of your choice could safeguard public funds and be able to uplift the community and village to greater heights from the present crisis. It is your citizenry duty,” the statement said.
The forthcoming elections to select members for the local government bodies is the 75th election Lankan people face after their gain of universal franchise. The electors are frustrated with politics and prevailing political culture. One of the main reasons for the present plight was the consequence of electing corrupt and dishonest candidates to govern the country, the statement said.
The March 12 movement also called on political parties to inform the public of the criterion they would use to select their candidates. It is also a duty incumbent upon the political parties to get their candidates to declare their assets. The majority of those who had been elected so far were proven to be persons irresponsible of their duty. The majority of candidates the parties had placed before the public were wasters of public funds, said the March 12 movement’s statement.
At the press conference Convener of the March 12 Movement Rohana Hettiarachchi appealed to political parties to take into consideration the criteria issued by them on March 12, 2015 when selecting candidates for the LG polls. The criteria by the movement demand political parties to adhere to eight preliminary principles in selecting their candidates for elections. The eight preliminary principles of concern are: The persons nominated by the political parties as the candidates in the forthcoming parliamentary election;
1. Should not be a person who had served a jail sentence for a crime, or a person who has received a suspended sentence by the courts of law
2. Should not be a person who had been proven guilty for bribery and/or corruption, and should be acceptable to society as a person of good character (be cautious when considering people who are widely alleged of bribery and/or corruption charges)
3. Should not be a person who is engaging or had engaged in the past in the trades such as alcohol, drugs, gambling, casinos and prostitution, that are detrimental to the wellbeing of the society and country
4. Should not be a person who is engaging or had engaged in trades, which destroys the ecological life support systems and the environment
5. Should not be a person who has abused political power
6. Should not be a person who had entered into financial agreements prejudicial to the country before becoming a people’s representative; who has abused power as a people’s representative and entered into such financial agreements with the government; or has been a party to such agreements
7. The candidate should be either a resident or have an amiable relationship with the residents of the area that he represents
8. The political party should provide adequate opportunities for women and youth representation when nominating the candidates.
News
Merchant Shipping Secretariat probes bribery scandal
… bribe giver departs Colombo port
The Merchant Shipping Secretariat (MSS) is investigating a complaint received from the Captain of an Indonesian flagged vessel Sensho that he had to pay an official USD 5,000 bribe to facilitate what our sources called port state control inspection.
Sources said that the cement carrier arrived at the Colombo Port, on Friday, and departed after having passed the rigorous inspection. Responding to queries, sources said that after paying the bribe, the vessel’s Captain has lodged complaints with MSS and the Commission to Investigate Allegation of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).
In spite of the government’s high profile anti-corruption drive there seemed to be fresh cases, sources said, adding that MSS had received a comprehensive complaint. The vessel had departed Colombo for Jeddah, sources said.
“The issue at hand is whether there have been unreported cases of MSS personnel receiving bribes,” sources said, acknowledging that the Captain, instead of immediately bringing the demand for USD 5,000 bribe to the MSS, had paid it and departed Colombo. (SF)
News
Theft of USD 2.5 mn: Dinana Dakuna claims COPF trying to protect mastermind
An opposition political group, styled as Dinana Dakuna, has accused the Committee of Public Finance (COPF) of protecting the masterminds behind the USD 2.5 mn theft from the Treasury.
Commenting on the recent COPF report on the theft, the group has alleged that the all-party parliamentary grouping made an attempt to shift the blame to the Central Bank as part of a cover-up. It has described the COPF report as a deliberate attempt to suppress the truth.
The group said that the COPF conveniently asserted that the theft took place due to the inexperience of officers concerned, thereby diverting the attention from those who perpetrated it.
An alleged attempt to portray the collapse of the administrative set-up that led to the USD 2.5 mn theft as a human resource problem, has also been questioned by Dinana Dakuna.
News
COPF chief slams security sticker scam
The country was losing so much revenue due to the controversial liquor bottle security sticker scam that if tangible measures were taken to stop the fraud, they could fund about eight projects on the scale of the Suwaseriya ambulance service, Chairman of the Committee on Public Finance (COPF) and Colombo District MP Dr. Harsha de Silva said on Saturday.
Addressing the media in Colombo, Dr. de Silva described the security sticker, introduced for alcoholic beverages, as a “major scam” and called on the government to act responsibly when the current tender is renewed in 2027.
The former State Minister said the security sticker system had originally been introduced with the legitimate objective of improving tax compliance and preventing excise duty evasion in the liquor industry. However, he alleged that the manner in which the programme is currently being implemented was resulting in significant losses to the State.
According to Dr. de Silva, the government pays an Indian company US$8 for the digital printing of every 1,000 security stickers, although the actual cost of printing the same quantity is only about 12 US cents.
“The money being lost through this scheme is sufficient to finance around eight Suwaseriya-type projects,” he said, highlighting, what he described as, the excessive cost burden borne by the State.
Dr. de Silva noted that the high taxes imposed on alcoholic beverages had created incentives for manufacturers, distributors and liquor outlet owners to evade taxes, making a security sticker mechanism a necessary regulatory tool.
He said the proposal to introduce security stickers was first put forward during the Yahapalana administration in 2016.
The tender process commenced in 2017, was concluded in 2018 and the system was eventually implemented in 2023. The COPF Chairman said his Committee had recently undertaken an extensive review of excise revenue and the operation of the security sticker programme.
During the inquiry, it emerged that the Excise Department still lacked a computerised system capable of recording and managing data, related to the stickers, despite their importance to government revenue collection.
Dr. de Silva further said that Excise Department officials, who appeared before the Committee on Public Finance, had maintained that no fraud was taking place in relation to the sticker programme.
However, he expressed concern over the subsequent seizure of a stock of security stickers, in Malabe, only days after those assurances had been given.
He questioned whether stickers recovered during raids were genuine labels, legally obtained from the authorised supplier, or counterfeit versions, printed illegally, arguing that either possibility pointed to serious shortcomings in a system intended to guarantee security and traceability.
Dr. de Silva also referred to media reports concerning the company awarded the security sticker tender and allegations of fraudulent activities linked to the firm in several other countries.
He urged authorities to ensure greater transparency and accountability in the management of the programme and to carefully scrutinise the tender process when it comes up for renewal next year.
-
Business1 day ago‘Giving up was never an option’: The fisherman who fought back after losing millions in SL
-
Features1 day agoTwo memorable excerpts from a former SLAF commander’s memoir
-
Latest News2 days agoDavis cup Asia/Oceania Group IV 2026 to be held in Colombo from 20th to 25th July
-
Features1 day agoErdoğan’s New Republic
-
Life style1 day agoTaste of the Swiss Alps comes to Colombo
-
Features5 days agoDirty Money
-
News2 days agoDengue outbreak gallops ahead: Infections surpasses 73,455, leaving 50 dead
-
News2 days agoEvidence recorded in money laundering case against Yoshitha Rajapaksa
