News
Lawyers’ Collective expresses concern over Commission of Inquiry on Electoral Process
The Lawyers’ Collective in a release yesterday expressed its profound concern about President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s recent appointment of a Commission of Inquiry, with retired Chief Justice Priyasath Dep PC as its chair. This commission’s mandate is to examine all existing election laws and regulations, ostensibly “to suit current needs” and make necessary recommendations for their amendment.
The Lawyers Collective highlights that, according to the Constitution, the Elections Commission is already mandated to issue guidelines to the media and political parties for the proper conduct of elections. It has also prepared numerous reports on many of the matters outlined in the Gazette Notification. The notice published in the Gazette outlines several objectives, many of which fall within the purview of the Elections Commission, the constitutionally mandated body responsible for ensuring the conduct of free and fair elections.
This has led to concerns about the motives behind the Commission’s appointment. The ostensible objectives of this Commission of Inquiry include: • Formulating an electoral system that blends the first-past-the-post system and the proportional representation system. • Increasing representation for women and youth. • Reducing the time between the declaration of an election and the release of results. • Exploring opportunities for electronic voting. • Facilitating voting for Sri Lankans overseas. • Expanding the use of postal voting. The notification also charges the Commission with making recommendations for the formulation of media standards for the appropriate use of media by political parties and independent groups and introducing a code of conduct for political parties, independent groups, and their membership in performing political and public affairs.
Additionally, the Commission is tasked with suggesting ways to strengthen laws and regulations related to the registration and operations of political parties, ensuring public trust and accountability. The Lawyers’ Collective notes with deep concern that the notification specifically calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of allowing an individual to contest two elections for the selection of people’s representatives and to hold positions in both institutions simultaneously if elected. The Collective is of the view that such a provision completely undermines the electoral process in a democracy.
The Lawyers Collective underscores that the Commission of Inquiry has been appointed without any prior consultation, even with recognized political parties in Parliament. While electoral reforms are indeed imperative, we know that there have been Select Committees and other entities previously appointed to make recommendations to change the system. No action has been taken on these proposals for decades. The Lawyers’ Collective is very concerned about the timing of this particular proposal. There is an apprehension that these appointments might be intended to stall the electoral process in the country, especially when, according to the Constitution, the Presidential Election is just 11 months away and is set to be conducted between September and October 2024.
The Lawyers’ Collective also notes that, prior to the President withholding funds for the Local Authorities Elections, the Prime Minister appointed a purported delimitation committee, ostensibly to reform the electoral process for Local Authorities. Following this and despite a specific order of the Supreme Court preventing the treasury from withholding the funds for the holding of the Local Elections, the President and the Government continues to withhold funds for the election. In light of the above considerations the Lawyers’ Collective calls upon the President not to use this Commission as a pretext to delay constitutionally mandated electoral processes. It also calls on the President to ensure that by legal design and for political advantage there is no further interference with elections and democracy at large.
The statement has been signed by Rienzie Arsecularatne PC, Prof Savitri Goonesekere, Upul Jayasuriya PC, Dr. Jayampathy Wickramaratne PC, Geoffrey Alagaratnam PC, Dinal Phillips PC, M.M. Zuhair PC, Anura Meddegoda PC, Saliya Pieris PC, S.T. Jayanaga PC, Prof Camena Guneratne, Upul Kumarapperuma AAL, K.W. Janaranjana AAL, Srinath Perera AAL, Ermiza Tegal AAL and Manoj Nanayakkara AAL.
Latest News
USS Canberra makes port call in Colombo
The United States Navy’s USS Canberra (LCS 30) arrived at the port of Colombo for replenishment purposes on 12 Jun 26.
The visiting ship was welcomed by the Sri Lanka Navy
in compliance of naval traditions.
USS Canberra, a Littoral Combat Ship, is commanded by Commander J McLaughlin.
News
Complete the Proposed Education Reform Policy Framework Within One Month – President
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has instructed officials to complete work on the proposed Education Reform Policy Framework within one month.
The President issued these instructions during a discussion held on Wednesday (10 June) at the Presidential Secretariat on the education policy concept paper presented by the National Education Commission.
At the meeting, the Chairman of the National Education Commission stated that the current education reforms are being undertaken across several pillars: early childhood education, general education (primary, secondary and tertiary), higher education, vocational education, technological education, digital education and non-formal education.
Attention was also given to Sri Lanka’s education system to date, the various education reforms implemented over the years, and the social changes brought about by those reforms. The President instructed officials to review previous education reforms and to take into account the key lessons emerging from them when formulating the new education policy framework.
Members of the Education Commission noted that, since the establishment of the National Education Commission in 1991, education policies have been formulated from time to time. They pointed out that a significant portion of the 1997 policy had been applied to primary education.
It was further observed that although a policy was formulated in 2016 for general education, it was not implemented accordingly. Likewise, while an education policy was prepared in 2023, it was not adopted as the national education policy. Attention was also drawn to the fact that previous education reform efforts had often been based on programmes developed according to the functions of education-related institutions, rather than on a clearly established policy framework guiding educational change.
Describing the present moment as a significant opportunity, the President emphasised that education reforms should be implemented in a manner that does not disrupt the continuity of the existing education process. Rather than creating a separate policy framework and attempting to operate independently through it, reforms should be integrated carefully into the functioning education system.
The President stated that this represents a considerable challenge for the National Education Commission. He also noted that it would be inaccurate to conclude that either the previous education system or the current one is entirely successful or entirely unsuccessful.
He stressed the importance of carefully identifying both the strengths and weaknesses of the existing system. He further observed that it is not possible to determine in the short term whether an education reform is successful or unsuccessful, as its impact must be assessed over the long term through the changes it brings about in society. For this reason, he emphasised that education reforms require greater caution and consideration than many other types of reforms.
Discussions also focused on the need to conduct an in-depth review of anticipated future social challenges and to incorporate into the new policy framework the elements necessary for developing citizens suited to a changing society.
Special attention was given to the need for a policy framework to regulate all sectors of education that are currently not subject to proper regulation, as well as to the adverse consequences arising from the lack of regulation of private education.
The importance of conducting research into university education reform and the regulation of private universities was also discussed.
Among those present were Prime Minister Dr Harini Amarasuriya, Deputy Minister of Education and Higher Education Dr Madhura Seneviratne, Deputy Minister of Vocational Education Nalin Hewage, Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, Senior Additional Secretary to the President Kapila Janaka Bandara, Secretary to the Ministry of Education, Higher Education and Vocational Education Nalaka Kaluwewa, Chairman of the National Education Commission Professor A. Sarath Ananda, and other members of the National Education Commission.
(PMD)
Business
Committee appointed for restructuring SriLankan Airlines
The Cabinet of Ministers has approved the appointment of a Committee, chaired by Senior Presidential Advisor on Digital Economy Dr. Hans Wijayasuriya, to conduct a strategic review and restructuring of SriLankan Airlines.
The other members of the committee are as follows:
• Senior Presidential Economic Advisor Duminda Hulangamuwa
• Financial and corporate strategy expert Deshal De Mel
• Transaction and investment banking, mergers and acquisitions expert Dumith Fernando
• The Secretary to the Ministry of Finance or his Representative
• The Secretary to the Ministry of Transport, Highways and Urban Development / a representative of the Civil Aviation Authority
• The Chairman of SriLankan Airlines
• Legal experts with specialised knowledge in corporate, aviation and public law
• Aviation industry experts to be appointed
The Government has recognised the urgent priority of undertaking a comprehensive strategic review of SriLankan Airlines, taking into account the broader macroeconomic context.
The main objective of this exercise is to establish a financially sustainable and commercially efficient national carrier, while reducing the long-term fiscal burden on the Government.
Accordingly, it has been deemed appropriate to establish a dedicated committee to carry out the strategic review and restructuring process in collaboration with the International Finance Corporation (IFC), which is serving as the Transaction Advisor.
The committee will be responsible for:
• Conducting an independent review and assessment of the airline’s strategic direction and future course of action
• Recommending restructuring requirements and possible restructuring models
• Evaluating specific strategic options and identifying the most suitable course of action aligned with the Government’s overall objectives
• Providing oversight, guidance and support for the implementation of the selected strategy and execution framework determined by the Government
The committee will function for the duration of the strategic review and restructuring process, or until it is formally dissolved by the Government of Sri Lanka.
(PMD)
-
News6 days agoWomen’s T20 World Cup 2026 warm-up: Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helps Sri Lanka beat Pakistan
-
News6 days agoLankan-Canadian inducted to Toronto Sports Hall of Fame
-
News7 days agoAsst. Manager, security officer arrested over Rs 30 mn snatch at Horana PB branch
-
Editorial5 days agoProbe Sallay’s complaint
-
News3 days agoLocal firms move millions of dollars overseas for phantom imports: Govt.
-
Editorial6 days agoPrez in the dock
-
Features6 days agoEntering MIT for my Ph.D program, coping with harsh Boston winter and breasting the tape
-
News7 days agoNo blanket ban on musical performances; only those promoting LTTE
