Editorial
Kotmale bus disaster
We do not apologize for running several articles in this week’s issue of our newspaper on the bus tragedy at Garandi Ella last week that took 23 lives and left many more injured. The survivors included a baby girl who early reports said had been protected by her mother, shielding her against the pre-dawn cold, with her own body before rescuers reached her. This was corrected with later reports clarifying that it was not the baby’s mother, but a fellow-passenger on the bus, who was responsible for this act of kindness despite suffering a dislocated shoulder herself. The scale of the latest tragedy obviously merits the most intensive coverage and, more importantly, preventive action to ensure that road fatalities that occur with frightening regularity on our roads are reduced to the barest minimum.
The articles we run today range from a deeply researched piece, replete with facts and figures over a period of many years, by an Irishman, Michael Patrick O’Leary, who has been living here with his Lankan wife since 2002. The couple, coincidentally, lived not far from the scene of a similar accident when a privately-owned bus crashed into a canyon near Passara on the Bandarawela-Poonagala Road killing 10 and injuring 18. The writer says the driver has been speeding without regard for the terrain and foggy weather, A 16-year old girl due to sit her ‘O’ Levels that December was one of the victims. The second, a letter to the editor by a regular contributor who began his working life in the then CTB, a third from an engineering don from the Peradeniya University and a final piece from a retired public servant who says he’s no engineer but has long experience driving and riding vehicles.
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake reacted quickly to the accident by ordering the payment of a million rupees each to the families of the victims. There is no need to labour the fact that the payment of any amount of monetary compensation will not recompense lives taken away. But given current challenges of living all citizen bear, they provide some relief. The CTB itself has some of its own methods of compensation which will be payable over and above the relief ordered by the president. We do not know if insurance cover for risks taken by passengers on SLTB and private buses exist. If not, some such compulsory arrangements like those covering third party risks that owners of motor vehicles must take before driving on the roads is required. But, of course, the bottom line is all such charges will eventually be included in the fares that passengers pay public transport providers.
We Lankans must live with the reality that there will be no quick fix to the present road safety problems that have been gaining momentum in recent years. Not a day passes without details of road accident being reported on evening television news bulletins and the print media the following day. Remedial action is promised, most so when a major disaster such as last week’s occur, and numerous investigative and other committees are appointed to examine ways and means of future prevention. Little results thereafter both for lack of political and bureaucratic will and resource constraints. How often do we hear promises of banishing unprotected road-rail crossing until the next accident occurs at such crossings?
The acting IGP has appointed five-member committee chaired by a Senior DIG to investigate the incident. This committee has already visited the scene of the disaster and begun what has been officially described as a “comprehensive inquiry” covering all aspects of the accident aimed at identifying key contributing factors with a view to enforcing preventive measures. We’ve already been on that route before after previous disasters without any noteworthy remedies resulting. Then comes the next accident with consequent pontification and the merry merry-go-round begins rolling all over again.
Although the driver of the death bus survived the accident itself, he had not lived long thereafter. Whether any useful information, including any possible mechanical defect on the vehicle had been obtained or not we do not know. Apparently the conductor is alive but whether he will be able to say more than surviving passengers is questionable. Yet it has long been alleged that policemen, including senior officers. run private buses. If this is in fact true, it would explain why police checks on such vehicles, many of them driving like bats out of hell to reach the next bus halt before their competitors, are not as stringent as desired.
The anecdotal evidence strongly point towards possible driver fatigue being a cause for the recent accident. Whether this factor is taken into account when drivers are assigned long distance routes is a matter requiring urgent attention. Experienced drivers with good track records are obviously not dime a dozen and depot administrators must contend with their scarcity. There is no doubt that the country is burdened with an aging public transport fleet. It is well known that many of our buses are mounted on lorry chassis. Whether this compromises their safety is a matter needing investigation.
Other factors requiring investigation is whether the physical demands of the job tend to make particularly long distance drivers dependent on intoxicants including betel chewing to handle their demanding jobs. Are they tempted by overtime and other incentives to accept responsibilities they may not be able to bear physically?
Editorial
Emergency without emergency
It is said that when the people fear the government, there is tyranny, and when the government fears the people there is liberty. However, in a bid to retain its hold on power, a government that fears the people, tends to resort to draconian measures that are deleterious to civil liberties and democracy and could lead to tyranny. Among them is the misuse of Emergency regulations on some pretext or another. Sri Lanka has spent most of its post-Independence years under a state of Emergency.
The JVP-NPP government keeps on extending emergency regulations even though several months have passed since the landfall of Cyclone Ditwah, which warranted their imposition. It drew severe criticism for an initial delay in declaring a state of Emergency, which it now cannot do without for all intents and purposes. A staunch critic of Emergency and the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), the JVP/NPP came to power, promising to abolish the PTA and use the Emergency regulations responsibly, but it has reneged on that pledge.
On Thursday, Parliament voted to extend the State of Emergency under the Public Security Ordinance. There were 137 ayes and 27 nays. Members of the SJB, the ITAK, the NDF, the SLPP and Jaffna District Independent MP Dr. Ramanathan Archchuna opposed the government motion seeking the extension of Emergency. A vote was held after ITAK MP Shanakiyan Rasamanickam called for division. Worryingly, only 165 MPs, including the Speaker, were present in the 225-member House at the time of voting. Where were the other 60 MPs? Among the absentees were 21 government MPs and 33 Opposition members, according to media reports. At least the Opposition, which called for a division on the motion, should have ensured that all its MPs were present in the House. So much for the commitment of the MPs to their legislative duties and functions. They often haul state employees over the coals for dereliction of duty. First of all, they should put their own house in order.
A state of Emergency is no doubt a legitimate constitutional tool, but it must be used responsibly and sparingly strictly in response to genuine crises. Its extension for political reasons risks undermining democratic institutions, civil liberties and, most of all, public trust in democratic governance.
The deplorable practice of keeping a country under Emergency regulations for extended periods leads to the weakening of democratic culture, public distrust in government, corruption, lack of transparency, the debilitation of civil society and media freedom, an authoritarian drift, and economic and social uncertainty. The misuse of Emergency regulations could create a climate of instability, driving investors away at a time when Sri Lanka is emerging from its worst-ever economic crisis and desperately seeking foreign direct investment to build its forex reserves.
Political leaders currently in the Opposition wax eloquent in Parliament on the ill-effects of a prolonged state of Emergency. But their parties cannot absolve themselves of the blame for the culture of Emergency; the UNP, the SLFP and the JVP are prominent among them. There have been numerous instances where Emergency regulations were invoked in this country. In 1953, a UNP government imposed an emergency rule to restore order during a countrywide hartal. The SLFP did so in 1958 to suppress communal riots. Thereafter, the UNP used Emergency regulations to suppress a Tamil civil disobedience campaign. The SLFP and its leftist allies started the practice of extending Emergency regulations to consolidate its power after crushing the JVP’s first uprising in 1971. The situation took a turn for the worse under the UNP governments after 1977, and the country was under a state of Emergency during the Eelam war, which ended in 2009. The main Tamil political parties backed the LTTE both in and outside Parliament. In the post-war period, an anti-Muslim riot, the Easter Sunday terror attacks, the beginning of the current economic crisis, a mass uprising and natural disasters also led to the imposition of Emergency regulations.
Emergency has been more abused than used in this country. The incumbent government is now emulating the SLFP, the UNP and the coalitions led by them where all bad practices are concerned, while pontificating on the virtues of good governance.
Editorial
Govt. drops fig leaf
Saturday 11th April, 2026
The JVP-NPP government has dropped the fig leaf of good governance and defended Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody allegedly involved in a coal procurement scam, which has cost the state coffers billions of rupees and caused a huge drop in the national power supply. It went so far as to defeat a no-faith motion against him in Parliament yesterday. In 2023, the JVP/NPP vehemently condemned the then SLPP-UNP government for defending Minister Keheliya Rambukwella allegedly involved in a pharmaceutical procurement scandal. It has just done what it vilified its predecessor for.
The SLPP-UNP government at least allowed legal action to be taken against Rambukwella, who was arrested, remanded and prosecuted, but the incumbent administration has ensured that Jayakody remains above the law.
The no-faith motion was a smart move by the Opposition. It caused the government to make a mockery of its commitment to upholding the rule of law and accountability. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake himself defended his friend, Jayakody, in Parliament on Tuesday, sending a clear signal to the NPP parliamentary group; they had to vote en bloc against the no-faith motion on Friday. It is now clear that the JVP-NPP government has no qualms about defending tainted politicians.
The coal scam will not go away simply because the no-faith motion against Jayakody has been defeated. Governments abuse their parliamentary majorities to defend their members and protect their interests. Now, the Opposition will take the coal issue to the streets and flog it hard to gain political mileage. It held a demonstration near Parliament yesterday. It has got hold of something to beat the government with.
There is no way the government can prove its claim that there has been no wrongdoing on its part where the low-grade coal imports are concerned. The National Audit Office itself has pointed out serious procurement irregularities related to coal imports. Power tariffs will have to be increased again to meet the additional cost of operating oil-fired power plants to make up for the generation shortfall at Norochcholai. It has been reported that Sri Lanka’s household electricity tariffs are among the highest in South Asia, and further power tariff hikes will make the situation far worse, and Sri Lanka will have its work cut out to attract foreign investors who factor in power prices before parking their money in any investment destination. Ordinary Sri Lankans are struggling to make ends meet, and their patience is wearing thin, and this will make the task of mobilising popular support easier for the Opposition. It was people’s economic hardships and public protests that made the JVP’s meteoric rise to power possible in 2024.
Governments with supermajorities succumb to the arrogance of power and ruin things for themselves. The best way out of the current coal imbroglio would have been for the JVP-NPP government to ask Minister Jayakody to step down and let the national anti-graft commission and the police institute legal action against him. Such a course of action would have helped the government convince the public that it was serious about fulfilling its pledge to eliminate bribery and corruption and send a clear message to the corrupt elements in its ranks that they would not be protected.
The JVP/NPP is now without any moral right to be critical of former Presidents who defended their cronies involved in corrupt deals. A fish is said to rot from the head down.
Editorial
Corrupt vs Corrupt
Friday 10th April, 2026
A motion of no confidence against Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody is scheduled to be taken up in Parliament, today. The JVP-NPP government, which came to power promising to eliminate bribery and corruption and cleanse Parliament, finds itself in an unenviable position. It assured the public that its members would be above suspicion, but it is now in the dock over a corrupt deal. It has chosen to defend Minister Jayakody indicted of corruption and allegedly involved in a corrupt coal procurement deal. The only way the JVP/NPP can extricate itself from the current imbroglio is to ask Minister Jayakody to step down.
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake badly dented his good governance credentials on Tuesday by claiming in Parliament that the low-quality of coal imports had caused a drop in electricity generation at the Norochcholai power plant, but there had been no irregularities in the coal procurement process. He sought to fix the blame squarely on the coal supplier. He was obviously defending his friend, Jayakody, caught in a cleft stick. Interestingly, no sooner had he made that claim than the National Audit Office released its report on the coal procurement process revealing very serious irregularities therein. This official document has helped knock the bottom out of the government’s argument in defence of Minister Jayakody.
Keheliya Rambukwella and several Health Ministry panjandrums who served under him were arrested, remanded and prosecuted for their involvement in the procurement of substandard medicines which caused huge losses to the state coffers. So, why Minister Jayakody and his officials have not been dealt with in a similar manner over the coal scam defies comprehension. There is a prima facie case against them. The JVP-NPP government has made a mockery of its commitment to upholding the rule of law and accountability. The SLPP-UNP government ruined its chances of winning elections by defending Rambukwella and defeating a no-faith motion against him in 2023. The JVP-NPP administration is doing something similar.
The worst is yet to come where the adverse impact of the coal scam is concerned. Electricity tariffs will have to be increased again to recover the additional cost of burning diesel to produce more than 150 MW of electricity a day to make up for the Norochcholai generation shortfall caused by low-grade coal imports, independent experts have pointed out, warning of power cuts in a few months. The Opposition has stated that unofficial load shedding is already on. It has produced documentary proof in support of its claim.
More information about the Health Ministry procurement rackets came to light after the defeat of the no-faith motion against Rambukwella. Similarly, the magnitude of the coal procurement scam is yet to be determined. JVP/NPP politicians are known for their glib tongue, but they will not be able to pull the wool over the eyes of the resentful public battered by the soaring cost of living.
Two-thirds parliamentary majorities are apparently accursed in this country. Governments with such steamroller majorities indulge in corruption, succumb to the arrogance of power, which blinds them to reality, and dig their own political graves. They remind us of Lord Acton’s words of wisdom about the corruptive nature of power. One may recall that the SLFP-led United Front government, which abused its two-thirds majority, had a Humpty-Dumpty-style fall in 1977.
The Mahinda Rajapaksa government, which had a razor-thin majority, defeated the LTTE, developed the economy, implemented many development projects and lived up to the people’s expectation, but it failed pathetically after securing a second term and mustering a two-thirds majority in 2010. It became a metaphor for corruption, and suffered a catastrophic fall. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa government also became a victim of its two-thirds majority, so to speak. The JVP-NPP government is moving in the same direction, defending corrupt politicians and covering up crooked deals.
Ironically, many key Opposition figures who are flaying the JVP-NPP government for corruption and trying to engineer its ouster are themselves facing allegations of corruption. The people seem to have little option but to set thieves to catch thieves.
-
News2 days agoCEB orders temporary shutdown of large rooftop solar systems
-
News7 days agoLankan-origin actress Subashini found dead in India
-
News5 days agoAG: Coal procurement full of irregularities
-
Business4 days agoIsraeli attack on Lebanon triggers local stock market volatility
-
Business5 days agoHayleys Mobility introduces Premium OMODA C9 PHEV
-
News7 days agoUN Regional Director launches SL’s first Country Gender Equality Profile during official visit
-
News7 days agoDialog Launches ‘GanuDenu QR’, Making Cashless Transfers Free for All with eZ Cash and Dialog Finance
-
Business4 days agoHNB Assurance marks 25 years with strategic transformation to ‘HNB Life’
