Connect with us

Business

Iranian warship saga: Weerawansa points finger at India, raises questions over U.S. role

Published

on

A fierce political storm erupted in Colombo on Saturday after former minister and National Freedom Front leader Wimal Weerawansa accused India of drawing Sri Lanka into the unfolding crisis involving Iranian naval vessels in the Indian Ocean.

Speaking to the media on March 7, Weerawansa claimed that the attack on the Iranian naval vessel IRIS Dena had taken place with the knowledge of India’s external intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), raising questions about how the visiting Iranian ships were allowed to sail into danger after participating in India’s recent fleet review.

“We all know how agile India’s RAW intelligence is,” Weerawansa said. “It warned Sri Lanka about the Easter Sunday attacks two days in advance. So how could it not know that Iranian ships invited by India were going to be attacked?”

The Iranian vessels had travelled to India at New Delhi’s invitation to take part in the international fleet review. However, he alleged that after the event concluded the ships were allowed to depart despite what he suggested may have been prior knowledge of an impending U.S. naval strike.

“Morally speaking, the first fault lies with India,” he said. “It was India that got Sri Lanka embroiled in this Iranian ship issue. India shouldn’t be trusted for five cents”, he said.

The attack on IRIS Dena has since triggered a chain of developments that placed Sri Lanka unexpectedly at the centre of a rapidly widening geopolitical confrontation.

Following the incident at sea, Sri Lanka evacuated more than 200 crew members from a second Iranian naval vessel, IRIS Bushehr, which had sought assistance while anchored near Colombo. The rescued sailors were brought ashore for humanitarian assistance before the vessel was escorted towards Trincomalee.

Iran’s Foreign Minister later thanked Sri Lanka for the rescue operation.

Now, Washington has urged Sri Lankan authorities to limit the possibility of Iran using the rescued sailors for propaganda purposes while urging Sri Lanka to not execute the repatriation of the Iranian crew.

Weerawansa alleged that the episode revealed how Sri Lanka was being pulled into the strategic calculations of larger powers.

“When the second Iranian ship first sought permission to enter Sri Lankan waters, our authorities consulted the U.S. Embassy in Colombo,” he said. “They were told that if the vessel entered Sri Lanka, it could face an air attack.”

According to his account, Sri Lanka initially informed Iranian diplomatic representatives that the ship could not be allowed to dock.

Weerawansa claimed that the decision was later reconsidered following appeals made through political intermediaries and subsequent discussions between Sri Lankan authorities and the U.S. Embassy.

“But now we see a ‘no repatriation’ stance emerging from Washington,” he said. “Why? Because the United States is looking for a way to become a direct stakeholder in this conflict from Sri Lankan territory.”

He further argued that the crisis had exposed the risks associated with Sri Lanka’s undisclosed defence arrangements with India.

Sri Lanka had recently signed a defence cooperation agreement with India, though its contents have not yet been presented to parliament.

“The country does not know what is in that agreement,” Weerawansa said. “The Foreign Minister himself said it cannot be shown without India’s permission.”

He also noted India’s strategic alignment with the United States through defence agreements and its participation in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD), arguing that Sri Lanka could inadvertently become entangled in those broader alliances.

“In such a backdrop Sri Lanka has now landed in a Catch-22 situation,” he said.

The controversy gained further attention on the international stage during the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi on March 7, where India’s External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar was questioned about whether the sinking of a visiting warship during a U.S.-Iran confrontation undermined India’s claim to be a “net security provider” in the region.

Jaishankar dismissed the question as “non-serious,” saying he would respond only to queries that took the “ground situation” into account.

With shipping lanes under threat and military operations intensifying, analysts say smaller states situated along critical maritime routes are increasingly being forced to deal with the competing strategic interests of major powers.

For Sri Lanka, the rescue of the Iranian sailors may have been a humanitarian gesture.

But according to Weerawansa, the episode could be only the beginning of a much larger geopolitical drama.

“Don’t rush to say this was handled in a statesman-like manner,” he warned. “What we are seeing may only be the interlude. The next episode may still be ahead,” Weerawansa warned.

According to a Hiru TV news report yesterday, the channel contacted the US State Department. In response, the State Department’s media office has stated that, under the circumstances, the US respects Sri Lanka’s sovereignty. It also has noted that it expects Sri Lanka to act in accordance with international laws while ensuring security, following its acceptance of the Iranian sailors from the IRIS Bushehr.

By Sanath Nanayakkare



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Seylan Bank well-positioned for growth as core performance strengthens

Published

on

Seylan Bank PLC has delivered a resilient financial performance for 2025, surpassing market forecasts and signaling a steady recovery in its underlying credit profile, according to a recent equity research update by First Capital Holdings PLC.

The bank recorded a net profit of LKR 12.2 billion for the full year 2025, marking a significant 20.3% year-on-year increase. Performance in the final quarter was particularly notable, with net profit reaching LKR 3.8 billion, a 9.4% rise compared to the same period in 2024. This result exceeded analysts’ expectations by 5.4%, underscoring the bank’s strengthening fundamentals.

Core banking operations remained a primary driver of growth. Net interest income (NII) expanded by 18.3% year-on-year to LKR 11.3 billion in 4Q2025. This was supported by an 8.3% increase in interest income and a marginal contraction in interest expenses, reflecting highly favorable funding dynamics.

Total operating income surged by 51.1% in the final quarter, a sharp jump largely attributed to the absence of International Sovereign Bond (ISB) restructuring losses that had impacted the previous year’s performance. Fee and commission income also saw robust growth of 21.8%, fueled by increased activity in cards, remittances, and international trade.

A standout highlight for the period was the aggressive expansion of the bank’s loan book, which grew by 29.6% year-on-year to reach LKR 599.8 billion by the end of 2025. The deposit base also grew by 13.3%.

Asset quality showed marked improvement as the bank successfully navigated the tail-end of the economic recovery. The Stage 3 loan ratio, a key indicator of credit risk, fell to 1.03% in 4Q2025, down significantly from 2.10% a year earlier. This was further bolstered by a 95.1% contraction in impairment charges on loans and advances, reflecting a move toward more stable provisioning.

Seylan Bank’s capital and liquidity positions remain a source of strength, staying comfortably above regulatory requirements. The bank’s Total Capital Ratio stood at a healthy 17.89%, while the liquidity coverage ratio remained elevated at nearly 230%, providing ample buffers to support future lending.

Looking ahead, First Capital projects a more moderated pace of growth as the broader economic momentum eases and the monetary easing cycle reaches its trough. Nevertheless, analysts remain optimistic, projecting net profits to rise to LKR 15.9 billion in 2026 and LKR 18.4 billion in 2027.

While the bank’s estimated fair value for 2026 has been revised to LKR 140 per share to reflect market re-rating trends, the stock still offers a compelling total return of approximately 37%. A newly introduced 2027 fair value of LKR 155 implies an even higher potential return of 52%. Citing these strong fundamentals and the significant upside potential, the First Capital report maintains a “Buy” recommendation on Seylan Bank.

By Sanath Nanayakkare

Continue Reading

Business

Bank of Ceylon reinforces national economic vision with 2025 Annual Report presentation

Published

on

In a significant moment reflecting renewed confidence in Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and forward-looking national strategy, the Bank of Ceylon (BOC) formally presented its 2025 Annual Report to His Excellency President Anura Kumara Dissanayake. The occasion reaffirmed the Bank’s role as the nation’s leading financial institution and a key pillar of economic stability.

The report was officially handed over by Chairman Mr. Kavinda De Zoysa and General Manager/Chief Executive Officer Mr. Y. A. Jayathilaka, who outlined the Bank’s performance, resilience, and strategic direction during a pivotal phase for Sri Lanka’s financial sector.

BOC’s 2025 Annual Report highlights a strong financial performance, with PBT reaching Rs. 120.8 billion, reinforcing its position as one of the most profitable single entities in the country. Beyond profitability, the Bank made a substantial contribution to the national economy, remitting approximately Rs. 77 billion in taxes underscoring its vital role in supporting fiscal stability and national development.

Continue Reading

Business

Govt. assures policy consistency in energy sector

Published

on

Minister Anura Karunathilake assumes duties.

Despite a reshuffle at the helm of energy sector, the government has moved swiftly to reassure markets, investors, and industry stakeholders that policy continuity—not disruption—will define the road ahead.

Newly appointed Power and Energy Minister Anura Karunathilake, assuming duties at a moment of heightened scrutiny, made it clear that the administration’s core commitment remains unchanged: uninterrupted supply of electricity and fuel, regardless of political transitions.

His remarks come at a critical juncture for the country’s energy economy—still recovering from past volatility, navigating global price pressures, and attempting to build investor confidence in long-term infrastructure and generation projects.

Addressing journalists following his appointment, Karunathilake struck a notably measured tone, signaling stability rather than reformist disruption.

“The national energy policy is anchored in long-term objectives. There is no shift in direction,” he said, in what analysts interpret as a deliberate message to both domestic and foreign investors wary of policy reversals.

Energy economists note that Sri Lanka’s power and fuel sectors remain deeply sensitive to political signals. Even minor uncertainty can ripple through procurement cycles, independent power producer (IPP) negotiations, and fuel hedging strategies.

By emphasizing continuity, the government appears intent on avoiding the stop-start policy cycles that have historically plagued the sector.

The transition follows the resignation of former Minister Eng. Kumara Jayakody and Ministry Secretary Prof. Udayanga Hemapala on April 17, a move widely viewed as an attempt to ensure the independence of an ongoing Presidential Commission probing coal procurement processes.

From a governance perspective, the resignations may serve to reinforce institutional credibility—particularly at a time when transparency in energy procurement is under intense public and political scrutiny.

Karunathilake acknowledged opposition criticism regarding transparency but responded with a firm challenge: present concrete evidence to investigative authorities rather than litigating issues through media narratives.

Perhaps the most market-sensitive assurance came in the Minister’s outright rejection of imminent power cuts.

Energy supply stability remains a cornerstone of economic recovery. From export manufacturing to tourism and digital services, uninterrupted electricity is non-negotiable.

Karunathilake indicated that groundwork laid by his predecessors—including generation planning and fuel supply arrangements—has already mitigated immediate risks.

“If those plans are implemented effectively, there will be no need for power cuts,” he said, positioning his role as one of policy support and execution oversight rather than structural overhaul.

Industry observers point out that this continuity is crucial. Any disruption in electricity supply could directly impact industrial output, SME operations, and investor sentiment—particularly as Sri Lanka courts foreign direct investment in energy-intensive sectors.

On the fuel front, the minister acknowledged the reality that global price movements—exacerbated by geopolitical tensions in the Middle East—remain beyond Sri Lanka’s control.

For businesses, especially logistics operators, fisheries, and agriculture, fuel price predictability is as critical as supply continuity. Sudden spikes can erode margins and disrupt planning cycles.

Karunathilake’s assurance that supply will remain uninterrupted, regardless of external shocks, is therefore likely to be welcomed by key economic sectors.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Trending