Connect with us

News

India’support sought in UNHRC

Published

on

by P. K. Balachandran

Sri Lanka is in discussion with India and other countries for support in the March session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva when Western nations bring an intrusive and punitive resolution against it for alleged war crimes.

A top source in the Lankan government said on Sunday (31) that the support of about 15 members of the 47-member UNHRC is being sought to counter the Core Group’s move to bring a resolution that is expected to call for targeted sanctions, asset freezes and travel bans among other intrusive measures. The High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet has even recommended that the Lankan case be taken to the International Criminal Court.

The Core Group comprises Canada, Germany, North Macedonia, Montenegro and the UK. The US, which is the prime factor in the anti-Sri Lankan move but is not a UNHRC member, is using the Core Group to push its anti-Lankan agenda. The Core Group is now working a “consensual resolution”. But given the radical difference between the stands of the Core Group and Sri Lanka, chances of a consensus emerging appear to be slim.

According to the government source, Sri Lanka approached India first and India had said that it would consider the Lankan request. China and Russia have already publicly stated that they would support Sri Lanka in international forums. Sri Lanka is also counting on African countries to support it, as in their case especially, the Black Lives Matter movement in America is of special significance.

Sri Lanka is bringing to the fore the fact that the US has much to account for in terms of human rights violations before it points an accusing finger at Sri Lanka. Recent incidents of gross violations of the basic rights of the Blacks and other minorities in the US, and the unbridled assaults and vandalism against established democratic institutions, will be highlighted.

The government also pointed out that the one-sided indictment of the High Commissioner of Human Rights will only exacerbate Sinhala-Buddhist majoritarianism.

It will also push Sri Lanka further into the arms of China, which the West has been trying hard to prevent.

Colombo is pointing out that the US and the Core Group are ignoring the political reality in Sri Lanka which is that the majority detests Resolution 30/1 of 2015 which had called for unconstitutional accountability mechanisms.

The source said that the Western nations must take into account that the co-author of the co-sponsored 2015 resolution, viz.,the previous government of Sri Lanka, lost face among the people and was voted out in the 2019 and 2020 elections.

The resolution’s prime movers lost their seats in parliament. Therefore, Colombo sees no logic in the US and Core Group’s current bid to bring in an even stronger resolution.

The Pathfinder Foundation (PF), a Lankan think tank close to the government, issued a statement on Saturday warning: “Sri Lankan and like-minded member States will be obliged to press such resolutions to a highly divisive vote in the Council. Even if the resolution is adopted by a slim majority, Sri Lanka is most likely to ignore it and pitch her bilateral ‘economic tents’ with countries that vote in its favor.”

The PF asked as to whether the Core-Group on Sri Lanka expects to get its job done by resorting to confrontation and browbeating a member state, instead of cooperating and engaging in consultation?

“If the answer is yes, then those countries representing the South in the HRC will think deeply before they cast their vote in support of another meaningless and intrusive resolution,” the PF said.

PF said that Resolution 30/1 of 2015 is probably “the first instance in the history of the HRC, a supposedly sovereign and independent country co-authored a UN Resolution containing an array of highly intrusive, unconstitutional and un-implementable demands directed at itself. It probably scores another first in that the self-authored Resolution touches upon a range of governance matters, which are generally considered the exclusive preserve of the domestic jurisdiction of the authoring member state itself viz, Sri Lanka.”

“The resolution of 2015 may be unique as well, for the reason that in no other democratic country a HRC resolution had been so instrumental in delivering so massive an electoral defeat to the incumbent government that cosponsored the resolution,” PF said.

“The HRC and the fellow internationals that generally get busy exploring how to ‘helpfully intervene’ in Sri Lanka about this time every year, must understand the reality that it is a function of the free franchise in one of the two oldest democracies in South Asia. There was a groundswell of opinion in this country against the resolution, which was initiated by a group of countries, who had only a limited understanding of Sri Lanka. It was seen as a blatant interference in a small sovereign nation, by virtually forcing it to ‘out-source’ the oversight of and judgment on many governance matters to a secretariat in distant Geneva,” the statement added.

It pointed out that the provisions of Resolution 30/1 were a ‘bad template’ for HRC to promote international cooperation on human right because that template had failed elsewhere (example the so-called Hybrid Courts in Cambodia).

Some of the recommendations were unconstitutional/un-implementable (example appointment of foreign judges). A watching brief on governance matters was to be conferred on a Secretariat based in Geneva and a dedicated UN office in Colombo was proposed for the oversight of these activities.

“That all these were at variance with the UN Charter, was of no concern to the ill-advised Core- Group on Sri Lanka,” PF pointed out. “Instead, the Council would have been well-advised to develop and propose robust and independent domestic accountability processes, supported where necessary, by international cooperation in technical assistance, advisory services, best practices etc.,” it added.

The Pathfinder Foundation said that it believes such an approach, which is “advisory”, rather than “retributive” in nature will: (1) work within normal national and international legal norms (2) serve as a model for other countries needing such services, to cooperate with the UN and (3) not function as a dis-incentive for countries that are willing to voluntarily cooperate.

The PF said that some of the HRC’s recommendations sound “bizarre” as they refer to now familiar Western parlance of ‘targeted measures, assets freeze’ and so on.

“These are counterproductive as far as addressing the real issues of cooperation were concerned, for no country will accept such invasive measures, pathfinder states. Such actions will face hugely divided votes in the UN General Assembly and definite vetoes in the Security Council,” it argued.

The think tank recalled that President Gotabaya Rajapaksa said that Sri Lanka will not rule out the possibility of walking out of any entity that does not respect the accepted principles of sovereignty and independence of countries. But he did affirm that his government is fully committed to international cooperation including with the UN on SDGs, which of course include human rights, peace and justice related matters. The PF pointed out that Sri Lanka has continued to work effectively with various Special Procedure Mandates or Rapporteurs of the UNHRC.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Switzerland to vote on plan to cap population at 10 million

Published

on

By

A yes-vote poster paints the planned cap (L) as a way of protecting Switzerland, but opponents call it a "chaos initiative"[BBC]

Can a country put a fixed limit on its population? That is the question Switzerland will be answering on Sunday when voters go the polls to decide on a proposal to cap their population at 10 million, a move that has exposed divisions about immigration in the Alpine nation.

The move is backed by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party, which describes it as a “sustainability initiative” aimed at easing pressure on housing, public services and the environment. However some voters see this as the party’s latest anti-immigration move.

Dubbing it a “chaos initiative”, the government, other political parties, business leaders and trade unions argue it will deprive hospitals and hotels of much needed staff, and damage hard-won relations with the European Union, leaving non-EU member Switzerland isolated in a very risky world.

Switzerland’s population has grown rapidly since 2002, when it stood at 7.3 million. Now it is 9.1 million, 27% of whom are Swiss residents who were born abroad.

Switzerland’s system of direct democracy means all major decisions are taken via the ballot box. Campaigners simply have to gather 100,000 signatures to ensure a nationwide vote.

Many voters are concerned by overcrowded trains, expensive apartments and rising health costs.

The latest opinion polls indicate this could be a very close vote.

They suggest voters are inching towards a no vote by a wafer thin margin, with 52% opposed – but polls remain divided, with 45% saying they are in favour of the proposal and a significant number of voters still undecided.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

News

Court orders former Atamasthanadhipathi to provide blood sample for DNA testing

Published

on

Anuradhapura Chief Magistrate, Siyapath Sasindu Wickramaratne, on Friday (12) ordered former Atamasthanadhipathi Pallegama Hemarathana Thera, who stands accused in a case involving the alleged serious sexual abuse of a minor girl, to provide a blood sample for DNA testing.

Accordingly, the court directed the suspect monk to appear before the Government Analyst’s Department on June 16 and provide a blood sample to the Government Analyst.

The order was issued after considering a further report submitted to court by the Nittambuwa Police.

Police informed the court that, pursuant to an earlier court order, certain case material had been forwarded to the Government Analyst on May 4, 2026, for DNA examination.

According to police, the material consisted of clothing allegedly stained with blood, which had been buried and concealed by the girl and later recovered during investigations.

Police further informed the court that the Government Analyst’s report had confirmed the presence of DNA evidence on the clothing.

Investigators told court that it was necessary to obtain a biological sample from the suspect monk in order to compare it with the DNA evidence recovered from the garments.

Police therefore requested an order compelling the suspect to provide a blood sample so that it could be determined whether the DNA evidence found on the girl’s clothing matched that of the suspect.

Having considered the submissions, the Magistrate ordered the suspect monk to provide the blood sample. The court also directed the Government Analyst to submit the report of the subsequent DNA examination.Pallegama Hemarathana Thera was previously remanded in connection with the case and was later released on stringent bail conditions.

Continue Reading

News

High fuel prices spark outrage in transport sector, services halved

Published

on

(Asiatimes) From this week, those using private buses in Sri Lanka may face severe transport disruption, as operators in the sector have decided to cut services by 50%. Among the reasons for the protest are mounting losses, rising fuel costs and the government’s failure to grant fare concessions. At a press conference held on 7 June, Gemunu Wijeratne, president of the Sri Lanka Private Bus Owners’ Association, explained that “the authorities have not responded positively to requests for a review of bus fares and support measures regarding fuel”.

Meanwhile, around 25% of private transport vehicles have already voluntarily ceased operations due to financial difficulties. According to the majority of owners, “the decision comes after ongoing disputes with the authorities regarding fare adjustments and financial relief, which have not been met to date, despite numerous requests made over a long period”. Commuters, especially in Colombo and the surrounding areas, risk facing delays and overcrowding as the reduced fleet operates under the new directive.

According to Wijeratne, “the association will continue to provide a reduced service until the government approves a revised bus fare, in line with the rise in fuel prices”. The alternative for the government, he continues, is to provide “a direct subsidy to operators, as recent fuel price increases have placed considerable pressure on daily transport operators”.

During peak hours such as the morning, school finishing times and the evening rush hour, only essential services will be guaranteed. During these times, instead of four journeys, only three will be made. Overall, operations will be reduced to around 50%. “The government,” the chairman clarifies, “must take responsibility for this situation, as the majority of students and employees use private buses for their daily commutes, particularly to and from Colombo to various parts of the country.”

Operators in the sector point out that although they requested a temporary exemption to guarantee bus services for one month, neither the National Transport Commission nor the Minister of Transport responded positively. The annual fare review is due to be implemented during the first week of July, adding that they have the “legal authority” to “apply the revised fares”. On 5 June, Wijeratne continues, “we held discussions that were unsuccessful. Diesel prices are expected to rise by the end of this month. In view of all this, we are proceeding with the fare review. This year’s fare adjustment will be difficult for the public to bear, as all costs have risen by around 20–25%”.

The president of the Association of Private Bus Owners concludes by noting that “we cannot continue to operate at a loss. For this reason, we have asked the authorities for some concessions on diesel within the regulatory framework, but these measures have not been implemented. We have therefore decided to step up our industrial action. This week we will intensify our action by changing timetables and limiting operations. The decision was taken – he notes – due to the lack of a positive response to the request for a fare review following the recent rise in fuel prices”.

Recently, the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) increased fuel prices in accordance with its monthly pricing formula. Among the changes, the price of a litre of petrol was increased by 15 rupees, rendering the current tariff structures unsustainable. To grasp the scale of the emergency and understand the impact on the population, AsiaNews spoke to Akalanka Punchihewa, Senuli Amrasekara and Dunesh Mayadunne, commuters from various parts of the country who travel to the capital every day for work. “We struggle,” they confirm, “to get to work from Kandy, Kurunegala and Galle. The recent decision by private bus operators is a severe blow, as we have to spend several hours in long queues just to get on a bus. The service provided by buses run by the Sri Lanka Transport Board (SLTB) is inferior to that of private buses. And we cannot,” the commuters conclude, “afford to travel to work by car or motorbike, as we are unable to bear the increased cost of fuel.”

by Arundathie Abeysinghe

Continue Reading

Trending