News
Hakeem commends new contempt law for legal clarity
SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem told Parliament that the contempt law presented by the Government attempts to codify common law principles established through previous judgments, providing a statutory foundation for these legal principles.
Participating in the second reading debate on the Bill, the SLMC leader said that ‘Contempt of a Court, Tribunal or Institution Bill’ aimed at establishing a comprehensive legal framework for contempt of court, addressing both the specific laws on contempt and the procedures to be followed in contempt cases. The need for such legislation has been a subject of debate, with arguments surrounding the existence of constitutional provisions and other enactments penalizing contempt of court in various forms.
He said that the controversy surrounding the enactment of a specific law on contempt was reminiscent of a similar situation in India, which was resolved with the introduction of the Contempt of Courts Act in 1971. In August 2023, when the Bill was under consideration by the Supreme Court, a key argument raised was whether there was a necessity for a distinct law on contempt when constitutional provisions and other laws already addressed the issue. Notable cases, involving individuals such as Ranjan Ramanayake and SB Dissanayake, who faced consequences under Article 105(3) of the Constitution, emphasized the existing legal measures against contempt. “Apart from the constitutional provisions, there are other separate enactments that provide for contempt against individuals, for example Civil Procedure Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, Primary Courts Act, Partition Law, the Judicature Act etc,” he said.
Hakim said that despite the argument that the Parliament lacked legislative competence to enact separate legislation on contempt, the Supreme Court pointed to the Reserved List of the Constitution, which preserves the right to pass specific laws on contempt. This constitutional provision has been in place since the enactment of the 13th Amendment, allowing for subsequent legislation in the realm of contempt of court.
Moving beyond the legal intricacies, the Bill seeks to bring clarity to the offense of contempt, which has historically been surrounded by uncertainty. Past cases, such as that of Armond de Soza in 1914, highlighted the ambiguity in determining what constitutes contempt. The offence of contempt has always been in a state of uncertainty, while some acts amount to contempt, others did not do so. We remember the old case where an editor of a newspaper was summoned and punished for contempt for writing about judges spending in their time in Nuwara Eliya.
He captioned his article as ‘Justice on holiday.’ He pointed out in public spirit, as he claimed, that judicial time was being wasted. But the judges of yesteryears would not let him go scot-free, I remember the case in the matter of Armond de Soza, Editor of Ceylon Morning Leader in 1914, reported in 18 NLR 33. This judgment presents one important aspect of the law of contempt of court. I quote here: “There is no doubt to the right of the members of the public to criticize and to criticize wrong judicial decisions or judicial work and to bring to the notice of proper authorities any charge whatsoever of any alleged misconduct of the part of the judge.”
The Bill attempts to codify common law principles established through previous judgments, providing a statutory foundation for these legal principles.
One notable aspect addressed by the Bill is the definition and prohibition of acts amounting to contempt, such as willful disobedience to court orders and breach of undertaking given to the court. By doing so, the legislation aims to formalize and standardize the criteria for contempt of court. The Bill now provides for some acts to be of contempt of court such as willful disobedience to any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ or other processes of court will amount to contempt of court.
The SLMC leader said that the inclusion of the offense of scandalizing judicial authorities has raised concerns. While the Supreme Court has upheld its constitutional validity, critics argue that the vague contours of this provision leave individuals at the mercy of judges’ discretion. The potential for abuse and the subjective nature of determining what constitutes scandalization prompt a call for a reevaluation of this particular provision.
Hakeem said that the historical context provided through Lord Denning’s anecdote highlights the importance of judges exercising leniency and not using contempt powers to uphold their own dignity. The Bill acknowledges the need to define proper contours for the offense of contempt, aligning with constitutional provisions that restrict freedom of speech to prevent contempt of court.
He said that Bill aims to address the longstanding need for a comprehensive legal framework on contempt of court. While it codifies existing legal principles, concerns regarding the provision on scandalizing judicial authorities warrant careful consideration and potential revision. The legislation acknowledges the delicate balance between preserving freedom of speech and safeguarding the authority of the judiciary.
“This freedom cannot be the freedom of wild ass. Article 15 (2) of our Constitution specifically states that we cannot exercise freedom of speech to commit contempt of court. This was a long-felt need to have defined proper contours of the offence of contempt. I thank the Minister for bringing this law,” Hakeem said.
News
Plans to open underutilised state land for new investment opportunities
A discussion between President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and the Circular Revision Committee appointed to review and update circulars issued under the State Lands Ordinance and the Land Development Ordinance was held on Tuesday (16) afternoon at the Presidential Secretariat. The Committee has been mandated to recommend to the Cabinet the cancellation of out-dated circulars, the issuance of new circulars, and the revision of existing circulars to ensure alignment with current requirements.
The Committee is chaired by the Secretary to the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation, D.P. Wickramasinghe. Its other members include the Senior Additional Secretary to the President (Constitutional and Statutory Affairs Division), Legal Adviser to the Presidential Secretariat, an Additional Solicitor General from the Attorney General’s Department, the Additional Secretary (Lands) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation, the Additional Director General of the National Budget Department, the Western Province Land Commissioner, the Divisional Secretary of Nuwaragampalatha East, the Deputy Chief Valuer of the Valuation Department and the Director (Lands) of the Mahaweli Authority.
The Commissioner General of Lands serves as the Convener of the Committee.
The Committee’s responsibilities include establishing a reliable, uniform and regularised system of land taxation within the existing legal framework, ensuring state revenue optimisation without prejudice to lessees. This includes reviewing annual lease rentals charged on long-term leases and grants, aligning related circulars with current requirements, and amending or formulating new provisions and directives where necessary.
During the meeting, detailed discussions were held on the proposals submitted by the expert committee in relation to the revision of these circulars.
The President emphasised that a new, time-appropriate policy should be formulated to address the underutilisation of State lands and to ensure their more efficient use.
Deputy Minister of Lands and Irrigation Aravinda Senarath, Secretary to the President Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, Legal Adviser to the President, Senior Attorney-at-Law J.M. Wijebandara, Secretary to the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation D.P. Wickramasinghe, Additional Solicitor General of the Attorney General’s Department, President’s Counsel Ravindra Pathiranage, Commissioner General of Lands Chandana Ranaweraarachchi, Director General (Institutional Affairs), Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development J.G.L.S. Jayawardena, Additional Director General (National Budget Department) D.A. Asantha Gunasekara, and Commissioner of Lands (Leasing Division) P.K.C. Nilani Mahindaganamage, together with members of the Committee, were also present.
Senior officials from the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands and Irrigation also attended the meeting.
(PMD)
Business
National Export Development Plan (2026–2030) presented to the President
Marking an important milestone in Sri Lanka’s economic development, the National Export Development Plan (NEDP) for the period 2026–2030 was presented to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on Tuesday morning (16) at the Presidential Secretariat.
The 2026–2030 National Export Development Plan (NEDP) is a key national programme formulated in line with the Government’s policy direction under the 2025 Budget. It aims to strengthen the country’s export sector and achieve export-led sustainable economic growth.
The strategic plan has been developed under the guidance of the Ministry of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development and the leadership of the Sri Lanka Export Development Board (EDB), with technical assistance provided through the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) Policy-Based Lending (PBL) programme. It is the result of an extensive consultative process carried out in close collaboration with key government institutions, private sector stakeholders, and development partners.
The proposal submitted by the Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development to recognise the “Sri Lanka National Export Development Plan 2026–2030” as the official strategic framework for export development and promotion in Sri Lanka was approved by the Cabinet of Ministers on 4 May 2026. The Plan reflects a broad consensus among government institutions, private sector experts, and international development partners.
In line with the national vision of “A Thriving Nation – A Beautiful Life”, the Plan has been formulated to enhance Sri Lanka’s export competitiveness and achieve an export revenue target of USD 36 billion by 2030.
The core vision of the Plan is to transform Sri Lanka into a competitive logistics and knowledge-based export hub serving regional and global markets. The strategy is based on two key interconnected pillars: “horizontals” and “verticals”, which together provide the foundation for strengthening export competitiveness, diversification, and sustainable growth.
The horizontal enablers, which support the growth and expansion of all priority sectors, include logistics and integrated hub operations, trade facilitation, trade finance and reforms in the business and investment environment, trade promotion and market linkages, quality management, standards, environmental, social and governance (ESG) capacity development, as well as entrepreneurship and innovation.
The Plan also identifies eight priority export sectors to enhance export diversification and value addition, and to position Sri Lanka more competitively in global markets. These include automotive components, mineral-based industries, rubber-based industries, maritime industries (including boat and shipbuilding), spices and concentrates, digital products and services, electrical and electronic equipment, and processed food and beverages.
The preparation of the Plan involved contributions from over 300 stakeholders, including government institutions, the private sector, civil society organisations and international development partners. Broad consensus was achieved through consultations held from October to December 2025 and workshops conducted in January 2026.
The Government expects that, with implementation supported by strong governance and monitoring framework, the Plan will elevate local products to international standards and ensure long-term economic stability and growth. It is further anticipated that the National Export Development Plan will serve as a key driver of Sri Lanka’s economic progress in the years ahead.
Minister of Labour and Deputy Minister of Finance and Planning Dr. Anil Jayantha Fernando, Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development Sunil Handunnetti, Senior Additional Secretary to the President and Secretary to the Ministry of Energy Russell Aponso, Secretary to the Ministry of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development Thilaka Jayasundara, and Chairman of the Sri Lanka Export Development Board Mangala Wijesinghe were also present at the event.
[PMD]
News
Complaint of custodial deaths and torture submitted to UN
The Committee for Protecting Rights of Prisoners (CPRP) has complained to the UN regarding custodial deaths.
Executive Director of the Committee, Attorney-at-Law Senaka Perera told The Island that they had submitted written submissions to the visiting UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) on Monday (15). “We are confident that they’ll take up the issues at hand with the government and take tangible measures to improve the conditions in prisons and detention facilities,” Perera said.
The SPT is here from 15 to 24 June. The visiting delegation consists of Aisha Shujune Muhammad, Head of Delegation (Maldives), Jakub Julian Czepek (Poland), Nika Kvaratskhelia (Georgia), Anica Tomsic (Croatia) and two human rights officers from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Claiming that there had been 184 prison deaths in 2024, the Committee asserted that though there was a drop in the number of cases, the deaths caused by underlying health complications and systemic issues weren’t available at the moment.
According to a copy of the submissions made to the SPT, received by The Island, there had been seven custodial deaths this year alone, reported from various parts of the country.
The Committee took a very critical position, while Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath assured the visiting delegation that the government didn’t tolerate torture at all.
The Ministry statement Monday night quoted Herath as having described the government response as zero tolerance policy.
The Committee for Protecting Rights of Prisoners also dealt with several other contentious issues, including special treatment granted to those with political connections and privileged backgrounds. Perera alleged that in spite of a change of government, in 2024 September, the much anticipated improvements failed to materialise and the continuing custodial deaths highlighted the crisis in the prisons and detention facilities.
According to the Committee, the situation was so bad and further deteriorating in overcrowded prisons, the national overcrowding rate has reached an unsustainable 286.6%, with some facilities, like the Vavuniya Remand Prison, exceeding capacity by 300%.
A significant portion of this population (65.4%) consists of persons not convicted awaiting trial, the Committee said, urging the SPT to look into the pathetic situation.
The Committee also complained of torture and ill-treatment at some detention facilities. There had been cases of lawyers, visiting detention centres at Welisara and Boossa, been subjected to degrading and humiliating searches, including forced removal of clothing.
The Committee also brought to the SPT’s notice how the Supreme Court, on 14 December, 2023, held the former Inspector General of Police (IGP), Deshabandu Thennakoon, personally responsible for torture. The failure on the part of prison authorities to grant inmates a fair hearing during internal investigations, too, has been raised by the Committee.
Among the other issues that had been raised were enforced disappearances, health and medical conditions, food, water and sanitation, corporal punishments and the operation of detention facilities within military bases.
Referring to the enforced disappearance of Gonapinuwala Kapila Kumara de Silva on 27 March, 2024, the Committee alleged that the Attorney General failed to take action against the perpetrators, believed to be members of the Special Task Force (STF)
The Committee alleged that in spite of them submitting formal complaints and an urgent letter to the Attorney General demanding prosecution under the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearances Act, No. 5 of 2018, the AG took no meaningful action.
Consequently, CPRP filed a Writ of Mandamus petition in the Court of Appeal (CA/WRIT/185/26) against the Attorney General and other officials, seeking judicial intervention to compel investigation and prosecution. The case remains pending
by Shamindra Ferdinando
-
News5 days agoCIABOC summons Yoshitha over his participation in British Navy training programme
-
Sports2 days agoTharanga set for high-profile javelin clash in Ostrava
-
News5 days agoJustice Minister responds to social media claims he represented Easter Sunday ringleader
-
Features3 days agoPolitics of protected species
-
News4 days agoCommonwealth lawyers urge Lanka to uphold rule of law
-
News2 days agoTheft of USD 2.5 mn from Treasury: CoPF accused of complicity in NPP cover-up
-
News2 days agoRelease of 2025 O/L results likely to be delayed
-
News1 day agoBeijing Capital Airlines to resume flights to Colombo signalling boost to tourism
