News
Hakeem commends new contempt law for legal clarity
SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem told Parliament that the contempt law presented by the Government attempts to codify common law principles established through previous judgments, providing a statutory foundation for these legal principles.
Participating in the second reading debate on the Bill, the SLMC leader said that ‘Contempt of a Court, Tribunal or Institution Bill’ aimed at establishing a comprehensive legal framework for contempt of court, addressing both the specific laws on contempt and the procedures to be followed in contempt cases. The need for such legislation has been a subject of debate, with arguments surrounding the existence of constitutional provisions and other enactments penalizing contempt of court in various forms.
He said that the controversy surrounding the enactment of a specific law on contempt was reminiscent of a similar situation in India, which was resolved with the introduction of the Contempt of Courts Act in 1971. In August 2023, when the Bill was under consideration by the Supreme Court, a key argument raised was whether there was a necessity for a distinct law on contempt when constitutional provisions and other laws already addressed the issue. Notable cases, involving individuals such as Ranjan Ramanayake and SB Dissanayake, who faced consequences under Article 105(3) of the Constitution, emphasized the existing legal measures against contempt. “Apart from the constitutional provisions, there are other separate enactments that provide for contempt against individuals, for example Civil Procedure Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, Primary Courts Act, Partition Law, the Judicature Act etc,” he said.
Hakim said that despite the argument that the Parliament lacked legislative competence to enact separate legislation on contempt, the Supreme Court pointed to the Reserved List of the Constitution, which preserves the right to pass specific laws on contempt. This constitutional provision has been in place since the enactment of the 13th Amendment, allowing for subsequent legislation in the realm of contempt of court.
Moving beyond the legal intricacies, the Bill seeks to bring clarity to the offense of contempt, which has historically been surrounded by uncertainty. Past cases, such as that of Armond de Soza in 1914, highlighted the ambiguity in determining what constitutes contempt. The offence of contempt has always been in a state of uncertainty, while some acts amount to contempt, others did not do so. We remember the old case where an editor of a newspaper was summoned and punished for contempt for writing about judges spending in their time in Nuwara Eliya.
He captioned his article as ‘Justice on holiday.’ He pointed out in public spirit, as he claimed, that judicial time was being wasted. But the judges of yesteryears would not let him go scot-free, I remember the case in the matter of Armond de Soza, Editor of Ceylon Morning Leader in 1914, reported in 18 NLR 33. This judgment presents one important aspect of the law of contempt of court. I quote here: “There is no doubt to the right of the members of the public to criticize and to criticize wrong judicial decisions or judicial work and to bring to the notice of proper authorities any charge whatsoever of any alleged misconduct of the part of the judge.”
The Bill attempts to codify common law principles established through previous judgments, providing a statutory foundation for these legal principles.
One notable aspect addressed by the Bill is the definition and prohibition of acts amounting to contempt, such as willful disobedience to court orders and breach of undertaking given to the court. By doing so, the legislation aims to formalize and standardize the criteria for contempt of court. The Bill now provides for some acts to be of contempt of court such as willful disobedience to any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ or other processes of court will amount to contempt of court.
The SLMC leader said that the inclusion of the offense of scandalizing judicial authorities has raised concerns. While the Supreme Court has upheld its constitutional validity, critics argue that the vague contours of this provision leave individuals at the mercy of judges’ discretion. The potential for abuse and the subjective nature of determining what constitutes scandalization prompt a call for a reevaluation of this particular provision.
Hakeem said that the historical context provided through Lord Denning’s anecdote highlights the importance of judges exercising leniency and not using contempt powers to uphold their own dignity. The Bill acknowledges the need to define proper contours for the offense of contempt, aligning with constitutional provisions that restrict freedom of speech to prevent contempt of court.
He said that Bill aims to address the longstanding need for a comprehensive legal framework on contempt of court. While it codifies existing legal principles, concerns regarding the provision on scandalizing judicial authorities warrant careful consideration and potential revision. The legislation acknowledges the delicate balance between preserving freedom of speech and safeguarding the authority of the judiciary.
“This freedom cannot be the freedom of wild ass. Article 15 (2) of our Constitution specifically states that we cannot exercise freedom of speech to commit contempt of court. This was a long-felt need to have defined proper contours of the offence of contempt. I thank the Minister for bringing this law,” Hakeem said.
News
CEBEU warns of operational disruptions amid uncertainty over CEB restructuring
The Ceylon Electricity Board Engineers’ Union (CEBEU) yesterday warned that uncertainty surrounding the ongoing restructuring of the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) had forced many employees to refrain from performing their regular duties, raising concerns about potential disruptions to electricity sector operations.
The engineers’ union said the current situation had arisen due to what it described as either deliberate actions or extreme negligence in implementing the restructuring process, which has created significant confusion among staff who previously served under the CEB.
According to the union, although the state power utility has been formally restructured and new companies established, a large majority of former CEB employees have yet to receive official appointment letters, confirming their positions in the newly formed entities.
“The reality is that the institution, previously known as the Ceylon Electricity Board, no longer exists in its earlier form, yet most employees, who served under it, have not been issued proper appointment letters, or related documentation, assigning them to the newly established companies,” the CEBEU said.
The union said that while some workers had been issued “assignation letters”, those documents merely indicate the institution to which an employee has been attached and do not clearly define employment conditions, responsibilities, authority, or reporting structures.
“As a result, employees currently lack the necessary legal framework confirming their employment status, their duties, the authority under which they operate, and who they are accountable to within the new institutions,” the CEBEU said.
The engineers’ union emphasised that the current crisis was not created by employees but was the direct result of, what it called, shortsighted and questionable actions taken by those responsible for implementing the reforms.
It also expressed concern that the relevant Minister, appointed through the National List, had failed to hold meaningful discussions with employees, despite having previously advocated strongly for workers’ rights.
The union said trade union action had been launched only after months of unsuccessful attempts to resolve the issues through verbal requests and written communication with the authorities.
“Despite repeated appeals made over several months, there has been no satisfactory response. Decisions appear to have been taken under the assumption that a government with a strong mandate can proceed without proper consultation,” the union said.
However, the CEBEU stressed that employees engaged in essential operations—including power generation, transmission, and distribution—continue to work in order to ensure electricity supply to the public.
“These staff members are continuing their duties under considerable risk to prevent major disruptions to the electricity supply,” the union noted.
Nevertheless, the union warned that the prevailing uncertainty could affect certain operational activities, and restoration work following breakdowns may take longer than usual.
The CEBEU appealed to the public to understand the situation and expressed regret for any inconvenience that may arise.
“We request the public to understand the situation and cooperate with us during this difficult period. We sincerely regret any inconvenience that may be caused,” the union added.
By Ifham Nizam
News
Remittances up compared to last year before outbreak of war, but the economic picture is not rosy
Sri Lanka Bureau of Foreign Employment (SLBFE) yesterday said that foreign remittances, during January and February this year, had been 32% higher than the corresponding period in the previous year.
According to a press release issued by the SLBFE, Sri Lanka received Rs 1,480.1 mn during January and February this year, whereas in 2025 the country received Rs1,121 mn during the corresponding period. During the first two months of this year, 47,819 Sri Lankans had left the country for employment abroad.
However, Prof. Priyanga Dunusinghe has warned that Sri Lanka could face a catastrophic situation due to a rapid and sharp drop in revenue caused by the escalating Gulf war. Fighting erupted on February 28 following a joint US-Israel attacks on Iran.
Appearing on Derana ‘Big Focus’ on Monday, the Professor in Economics in the Department of Economics, and Head – Department of Information Technology, University of Colombo, Dunusinghe said that that the drop in remittances from the Middle East, as well as exports, should be examined against the backdrop of runaway oil prices.
News
The Netherlands alleges Russian Embassy interfering in World Press Photo Exhibition
The Netherlands Embassy in Colombo has accused the Russian Embassy of trying to limit freedom of expression and right to know in Sri Lanka. The Embassy yesterday issued the following statement: “The Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands’ attention has been drawn to the attempts by the Russian Embassy in Colombo to deny the people of Sri Lanka’s right to information and freedom of expression by demanding photos related to “Russia’s war of aggression” on Ukraine be removed from the World Press Photo exhibition, currently on display in Sri Lanka.
The 2025 edition of the World Press Photo Exhibition was officially opened by Dr Kaushalya Ariyaratne, Deputy Minister of Mass Media, and Wiebe de Boer, Ambassador of the Kingdom of the Netherlands on February 27, 2026, at One Galle Face. The same exhibition will be held in Kandy from 13 to 17 March 2026 at Sahas Uyana.
The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Sri Lanka visited the exhibition during the weekend of March 7 and 8 and demanded the photographs, related to “Russia’s war of aggression on Ukraine,” be removed from the exhibition, and threatened to stage a protest if the organisers failed to do so.
The exhibition is jointly organised by the Netherlands Embassy, along with the Sri Lanka Press Institute, and the World Press Photo Foundation in the Netherlands.
Continuing the same demand, the Russian Embassy has now approached the Sri Lankan Ministry of Foreign Affairs to remove the said photos from the exhibition in Kandy. The same exhibition is currently underway in the USA and Germany and is showing all around the world in dozens of countries with freedom of expression.
The photos, including the photos that the Russian Embassy in Colombo wanted to hide from the Sri Lankan citizens, are also available online on the World Press Photo website for free for anyone to access them.
The Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands deplores the attempts by any party to compromise people’s right to know and right to freedom of expression. It also amounts to a violation of the host country’s sovereignty if an Embassy attempts to decide what and which content its citizens should see and not. While we, as the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, assure the Sri Lankan public that as our commitment to protect press freedom and respect for editorial integrity, we will continue the exhibition in Kandy with its full content without censoring any photos of the exhibition.
The exhibition is open to the public, free of charge, from 10.30am on Friday, March 13, till March 17, at Sahas Uyana in Kandy.”
-
News6 days agoUniversity of Wolverhampton confirms Ranil was officially invited
-
News7 days agoLegal experts decry move to demolish STC dining hall
-
News6 days agoFemale lawyer given 12 years RI for preparing forged deeds for Borella land
-
News5 days agoPeradeniya Uni issues alert over leopards in its premises
-
News3 days agoRepatriation of Iranian naval personnel Sri Lanka’s call: Washington
-
Business7 days agoCabinet nod for the removal of Cess tax imposed on imported good
-
News6 days agoLibrary crisis hits Pera university
-
News5 days agoWife raises alarm over Sallay’s detention under PTA
