Connect with us

News

Govt. to receive USD 780 mn via IMF SDR facility to get over COVID difficulties

Published

on

State Minister Ajith Nivard Cabraal says Sri Lanka will receive USD 780 mn in terms of Special Drawing Rights (SDR) in support of efforts to meet difficulties caused by the Covid-19 crisis. Asked whether the government had agreed to a programme, the former Governor of the Central Bank Cabraal said that the funds were made available to all countries regardless of a programme.

Pointing out that the total IMPF allocation was about USD 650 bn, Sri Lanka was entitled to USD 780 mn.

Top SJB spokesman Dr. Harsha de Silva, MP said that  every IMF member nation would get their share of the USD 650b new allocation to be used in any manner they wished but mostly for Covid-related expenses.

The MP said: “These allocations have taken place several times in the past as well. This time the proposal was stuck during the Trump administration but cleared by Biden.

Going to the IMF or not to resolve our debt issue is a separate matter. That is the decision of the government.

But the reality is that we are now on very thin ice because even with this windfall our official reserves will be around USD 3b at the end of August. And once the gold is removed, reserves will be around USD 2.5b. Then even if the reserves of all private banks and entities are added, at a national level usable reserves would be around USD 4.5b by the end of the month. But we have, both government and private sector, close to USD 7b in debt payments alone in the coming 12 months.

As we just saw last week the import ban is not working and the trade deficit is ballooning while remittances are falling and tourism is stuck. This means we will run a deficit in the current account of the balance of payments.

The result is additional requirements for reserves to meet imports.

Now I heard the Minister saying to CNBC that he expects USD 400m from India and USD 250m from Bangladesh. But these swaps are all very short term loans. A few months max. Maybe some additional money may come from China Development Bank etc. He said he expects anywhere from USD 400m to USD 1b from ‘utilizing underutilized assets’ in other words privatisation. This is I presume via Selendiva, but I am at a loss to figure out what would need to be sold to get that amount. That is still a one off inflow. Beyond that the much talked about FDI to Port City and elsewhere has not materialised and even if it does only a fraction would go to reserves as most would be spent on imports.

So even they have been harping on an ‘alternative’ no one has explained what it is.

So yes, I don’t see any other option but to approach the IMF to work out a facility to bail Sri Lanka out of the hole this government has put us into, starting from the unwise tax cuts in December 2019 and multiple blunders since, besides the pandemic. If they went to the IMF in late 2020 we could have settled at around LKR 190 to the dollar. If they go now perhaps around Rs 215 to Rs 220 and if we delay further then at a further depreciated rate. The choice is theirs but given the situation they have put us all into there is no way we can come out of this without the help of the IMF either now or 6 months down the road.

The MP said that instead of keeping the country open and letting thousands die because of their logic of the need to keep the economy moving, what they need to do is enter into a program with the IMF to restructure the debt and get a breather and close the country based on medical expert advice.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Prez seeks Harsha’s help to address CC’s concerns over appointment of AG

Published

on

Chairman of the Committee on Public Finance (CoPF), MP Dr. Harsha de Silva, told Parliament yesterday that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake had personally telephoned him in response to a letter highlighting the prolonged delay in appointing an Auditor General, a vacancy that has remained unfilled since 07 December.

Addressing the House, Dr. de Silva said the President had contacted him following the letter he sent, in his capacity as CoPF Chairman, regarding the urgent need to appoint the constitutionally mandated head of the National Audit Office. During the conversation, the President had sought his intervention to inform the Constitutional Council (CC) about approving the names already forwarded by the President for consideration.

Dr. de Silva said the President had inquired whether he could convey the matter to the Constitutional Council after their discussion. He stressed that both the President and the CC must act in cooperation and in strict accordance with the Constitution, warning that institutional deadlock should not undermine constitutional governance.

He also raised concerns over the Speaker’s decision to prevent the letter he sent to the President from being shared with members of the Constitutional Council, stating that this had been done without any valid basis. Dr. de Silva subsequently tabled the letter in Parliament.

Last week, Dr. de Silva formally urged President Dissanayake to immediately fill the Auditor General’s post, warning that the continued vacancy was disrupting key constitutional functions. In his letter, dated 22 December, he pointed out that the absence of an Auditor General undermines Articles 148 and 154 of the Constitution, which vest Parliament with control over public finance.

He said that the vacancy has severely hampered the work of oversight bodies such as the Committee on Public Accounts (COPA) and the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE), particularly at a time when the country is grappling with a major flood disaster.

As Chair of the Committee responsible for overseeing the National Audit Office, Dr. de Silva stressed that a swift appointment was essential to safeguard transparency, accountability and financial oversight.

In a separate public statement, he warned that Sri Lanka was operating without its constitutionally mandated Chief Auditor at a critical juncture. In a six-point appeal to the President, Dr. de Silva emphasised that an Auditor General must be appointed urgently in the context of ongoing disaster response and reconstruction efforts.

“Given the large number of transactions taking place now with Cyclone Ditwah reconstruction and the yet-to-be-legally-established Rebuilding Sri Lanka Fund, an Auditor General must be appointed urgently,” he said in a post on X.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Govt. exploring possibility of converting EPF benefits into private sector pensions

Published

on

The NPP government was exploring the feasibility of introducing a regular pension, or annuity scheme, for Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) contributors, Deputy Minister of Labour Mahinda Jayasinghe told Parliament yesterday.

Responding to a question raised by NPP Kalutara District MP Oshani Umanga in the House, Jayasinghe said the government was examining whether EPF benefits, which are currently paid as a lump sum at retirement, could instead be converted into a system that provides regular payments throughout a retiree’s lifetime.

“We are looking at whether it is possible to provide a pension,” Jayasinghe said, stressing that there was no immediate plan to abolish the existing lump-sum payment. “But we are paying greater attention to whether a regular payment can be provided throughout their retired life.”

Jayasinghe noted that the EPF was established as a social security mechanism for private sector employees after retirement and warned that receiving the entire fund in a single installment could place retirees at financial risk, particularly as life expectancy increases.

He also cautioned that interim withdrawals from the EPF undermined its long-term sustainability. “Even the interim payments that are given from time to time undermine the ability to give security at the time of retirement,” he said, distinguishing the EPF from the Employees’ Trust Fund, which provides more frequent interim benefits.

Addressing concerns over early withdrawals, the Deputy Minister explained that contributors have been allowed to withdraw up to 30 percent of their EPF balance since 2015, with a further 20 percent permitted after 10 years, subject to specific conditions and documentary proof.

Of 744 applications received for such withdrawals, 702 had been approved, he said.

The proposed shift towards an annuity-based system comes amid broader concerns over Sri Lanka’s ageing population and pressures on retirement financing. While state sector employees receive pensions funded by taxpayers, including EPF contributors, the EPF itself has been facing growing strain as it is also used to finance budget deficits.

Jayasinghe said the government’s focus was to formulate a mechanism that would ensure long-term income security for private sector employees, placing them on a footing closer to a pension scheme rather than a one-time retirement payout.

Continue Reading

News

Sajith accuses govt. of exacerbating people’s suffering to please IMF

Published

on

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa yesterday strongly criticised proposals to increase electricity tariffs, warning that the move would deepen the hardships faced by the public already reeling from disasters and rising fuel costs.

Premadasa, who is also the leader of the SJB, told Parliament that the government was considering an electricity price hike at a time when people were struggling to recover from recent crises, while coping with higher fuel prices. He accused the administration of acting contrary to its own election pledges and the expectations of suffering people.

Making a special statement, the Opposition Leader recalled that the government had come to power promising to reduce electricity bills by 30 percent, within three years, by shifting from fuel-based power generation to cheaper renewable sources, such as solar, wind and hydropower. Instead, he said, those commitments had been abandoned.

Premadasa pointed out that the CEB has sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for an 11.57 per cent tariff increase for the first quarter of 2026 to cover its losses. He questioned whether the government had assessed the impact of such an increase on low- and middle-income households, as well as state institutions.

He also asked why the government had failed to honour its promise to cut electricity tariffs by one-third through a transparent pricing mechanism.

The Opposition Leader further criticised the limited time allocated for public consultations on the proposed new energy policy, saying it was unfair and should be extended, particularly given the prevailing national crises.

Premadasa warned that the removal of competitive tariff structures for industries would be unjust to large-scale consumers using more than five million units of electricity, and called for comparative reports before any subsidies are withdrawn.

He added that despite earlier assurances to reduce electricity bills by 33 percent, the government has once again increased fuel prices, even as global fuel prices decline, continuing, what he described as, a pattern of broken election promises.

Accusing the government of being constrained by International Monetary Fund (IMF) conditions, Premadasa said the simultaneous increases in fuel and electricity prices were exacerbating the economic burden on the public.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

Trending