News
Govt. and Opposition Whips go-toe-to toe on rights of MPs under present and previous Speakers

by Saman Indrajith
Chief Opposition Whip Kandy District SJB MP Lakshman Kiriella told Parliament yesterday that the Speaker was not there to protect the interests of either the President or the government but to safeguard the interests of the MPs.
Kiriella said that while he was out of the Chamber his counterpart Chief Government Whip had made remarks against him for raising the issue of MP Rishad Bathiudeen being held on detention orders.
Chief Government Whip Highways Minister earlier in the day said that Chief Opposition Whip Kiriella had raised the issue of MP Bathiudeen in the presence of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. “The Chief Opposition Whip spoke for MP Bathiudeen, while his party leader Sajith Premadasa in public disowned Bathiudeen stating that Bathiudeen was not a member of SJB. The Chief Opposition Whip and the Opposition Leader do not see eye to eye on this matter. The Chief Opposition Whip raised the issue with the intention of causing an embarrassment to the government while President Rajapaksa was in the Chamber,” Minister Fernando said.
The Chief Opposition Whip later after obtaining time from the Chair said: “In my absence the Chief Government Whip mentioned my name and said that my opinion on this issue of MP Bathiudeen was different from the Opposition Leader’s. I must remind the government that it is my duty under the British parliamentary tradition to raise the issues pertaining to the safety and the rights of the MPs in the Opposition. It does not matter whether they are from the SJB or the TNA or any other party, If there is an issue pertaining to an MP in the opposition, I am duty bound to take it up here. That is the tradition of the British parliament. It is sad that there are people who are not aware of these traditions. Under the same traditions the Speaker is duty bound to protect the rights of the MPs whether they are from government or the opposition.
Chief Government Whip Minister Fernando: “You state something else while your leader holds another opinion. Where were those traditions when Karu Jayasuriya was the Speaker? Incumbent Speaker ensures the democratic rights of all and gives us all equal time to speak. You are slinging mud at him.”
News
FSP asks govt. to pull out of defence deal with India

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday demanded an immediate termination of what it called a “secretive and dangerous” defence agreement signed between Sri Lanka and India, during Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 05 April visit.
Addressing a press conference at the party’s headquarters in Nugegoda, FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jagoda described the agreement as a “betrayal of the nation” and a “crime against the people,” urging the government to invoke Article 12 of the deal and exit it with the required three months’ notice.
Jagoda said the document, which surfaced on social media after being published by a news portal, appears to be the actual agreement signed between the two countries. “The government has not denied its authenticity. That silence is telling,” he said.
Jagoda added that the agreement bears the signatures of Sri Lanka’s Defence Ministry Secretary Sampath Thuiyakontha and Indian High Commissioner Santosh Jha.
“What’s most troubling,” Jagoda warned, “is that both governments attempted to keep the agreement under wraps. Unlike the 1987 Indo-Lanka Accord, which was made public with all annexures, this agreement was hidden from the people, and even now, we don’t know how many other agreements exist between India and Sri Lanka.”
Jagoda said that a Right to Information request made on 04 April was met with a reply from the President’s Office stating that it had no copies of the agreement—raising serious concerns about transparency, even at the highest level. “One could question whether the President has seen it because his office does not have it,” Jagoda said.
The 12-clause of agreement reportedly covers areas such as exchange and training of military personnel, defence industry collaboration, classified information protection, and military medical services, including battlefield healthcare and telemedicine.
Jagoda said the definition of “classified information” in Clause 7 was alarmingly broad. “It allows India to label virtually anything as secret. Even weapons or military assets transferred under this agreement cannot be revealed—not even after the agreement ends,” he said, citing Clause 7.3.
Clause 10 prohibits either country from taking disputes to international courts or involving third-party mediators. “It’s like asking a rabbit to negotiate with a tiger,” Jagoda quipped, drawing parallels to the complications of the 1987 accord, which eventually saw Indian peacekeeping troops refusing to leave until a change in the Indian government.
Jagoda accused the NPP-led government of hypocrisy, pointing out that the JVP, the main component of the current regime, had vehemently opposed Indo-Lanka Accord in 1987. “Now they’ve gone and signed an even more dangerous deal,” he said.
Citing Clause 12, which allows either party to withdraw with three months’ notice, the FSP called on the government to act immediately to exit the pact. “We urge the people to unite and defeat these underhanded, sovereignty-eroding deals. The FSP stands ready to lead that fight,” Jagoda said.
News
Police crush protest, arrest student activists

The police yesterday arrested a group of students, including the Convener of the Inter-University Students’ Federation (IUSF), Madushan Chandradith, during a protest held by the Allied Health Science Graduates’ Union in front of the Health Ministry yesterday.
The police obtained an order from Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court, earlier in the day, to prevent protesters from invading the Colombo Hospital Square and the Health Ministry.
News
Deshabandu faces misconduct probe on Monday

Inspector General of Police T.M.W. Deshabandu Tennakoon is set to face formal questioning on Monday (19 May) over serious allegations of misconduct and abuse of power, parliamentary sources said yesterday.
A special Committee appointed to investigate the claims will commence formal proceedings next week, following several rounds of preliminary discussions held within the parliamentary complex in recent weeks.
The IGP has been officially notified to appear before the Committee and is expected to face the inquiry for the first time at 2:00 PM in Committee Room No. 8.
The Committee, which met again on Thursday (15) to finalise arrangements, is investigating allegations that Tennakoon misused his official powers in a manner deemed severe and improper.
-
Features6 days ago
SAITM Graduates Overcome Adversity, Excel Despite Challenges
-
Opinion6 days ago
Drs. Navaratnam’s consultation fee three rupees NOT Rs. 300
-
News6 days ago
Destined to be pope:Brother says Leo XIV always wanted to be a priest
-
Sports6 days ago
ASBC Asian U22 and Youth Boxing Championships from Monday
-
Features5 days ago
Championing Geckos, Conservation, and Cross-Disciplinary Research in Sri Lanka
-
Business6 days ago
Dilmah – HSBC future writers festival attracts 150+ entries
-
Midweek Review3 days ago
Bronze statue for P’karan, NPP defeat in the North and 16th anniversary of triumph over terrorism
-
Business6 days ago
Bloom Hills Holdings wins Gold for Edexcel and Cambridge Education