Connect with us

Latest News

Google must pay €4.1bn fine for using Android to ‘block’ rivals

Published

on

Europe’s top court has ruled Google must pay a €4.1bn (£3.5 bn) fine handed down for using its Android mobile operating system to block rivals.

The European Commission had originally handed out a €4.3 bn (then £3.9 bn) fine in 2018, but this was trimmed to €4.1 bn in 2022. An appeal brought by the tech giant has now been dismissed.

It is the largest penalty the Commission has ever imposed against Google,

A Google spokesperson said the judgement “fails to recognise” the firm’s “significant investment to ensure Android remains open, interoperable and free”.

“In any event, we adapted our agreements to comply with the initial decision back in 2018 and we remain focused on continued innovation and openness for our users, partners and developers,” they continued.

When the fine was first announced in 2018, it was alleged there were three ways in which Google had acted illegally:

  • requiring Android handset and tablet manufacturers to pre-install the Google Search app and its own web browser Chrome as a condition of allowing them to offer access to its Play app store
  • making payments to large manufacturers and mobile network operators that agreed to exclusively pre-install the Google Search app on their device.
  • preventing manufacturers from selling any smart devices powered by alternative “forked” versions of Android by threatening to refuse them permission to pre-install its apps.

It was acknowledged that Google’s version of Android does not prevent device owners downloading alternative web browsers or using other search engines.

Google’s chief executive Sundar Pichai blogged in response  at the time to the original fine that the decision “rejects the business model that supports Android, which has created more choice for everyone, not less.”

This is not the first case brought against Google and its parent company Alphabet by the European Commission.

In September 2024 it ruled Google must pay a £2bn fine handed down for abusing the market dominance of its shopping-comparison service.

Then in September 2025, it fined the search giant €2.95bn (£2.5bn), finding it had breached competition laws by favouring its own products for displaying online ads, to the detriment of rivals.

The fine is not the largest ever imposed on Google, however.

In October 2024 a charge was brought against the firm by a Russian court  for restricting Russian state media channels on YouTube.

The fine was for two undecillion roubles – more than the world’s total GDP.

(BBC)



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Petrol to cost less from midnight today (30)

Published

on

By

The Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CEYPETCO) has announced a  reduction in the prices of Petrol 92 and Petrol 95, effective from midnight today (30).

The price of Petrol 92 has been reduced by Rs. 15 per litre, from Rs. 414 to Rs. 399 while  the price of Petrol 95 Octane has been reduced by Rs. 20 per litre, from Rs. 495 to Rs. 475

There will be no change in the prices of diesel, Super Diesel and kerosene under the latest revision.

 

 

Continue Reading

Latest News

UPDATE: Seven killed and 23 missing after boat capsizes off northern Cyprus, says Turkish Cypriot PM

Published

on

By

Footage from the scene shows the boat on its side with passengers standing on top in life jackets. [BBC]

Seven people have died after a passenger boat capsized near northern Cyprus, the Turkish Cypriot PM says. Search and rescue operations are under way to find 23 people missing, says Ünal Üstel, the prime minister of the self-declared territory

He says 267 people were on board the vessel when it capsized, and 237 have been rescued

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Iceland votes against restarting talks on joining EU

Published

on

By

Iceland's Prime Minister Kristrún Frostadóttir voted in the referendum in Reykjavik on Saturday [BBC]

Iceland has voted against resuming talks on joining the European Union 13 years after they were broken off.

Public broadcaster RUV reported that 52.8% of 225,031 voters rejected the government’s proposal, while 47.2% had said yes. Some 12,600 votes separated them.

Prime Minister Kristrún Frostadóttir’s centre-left government promised to hold a referendum by 2027, but brought it forward because of international tensions, including US President Donald Trump’s threats against Greenland.

However, debate in this island nation of almost 400,000 people centred more on its fishing industry rather than security concerns.

With some 270,000 people eligible to vote, RUV reported the turnout of 82.5% was the highest in any election in Iceland since 2009.

Already part of the EU’s single market and Schengen border-free zone, EU membership would bring Iceland into the customs union and eventually the euro.

Iceland began its application to join the EU in 2009 in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis and the collapse of Iceland’s banking system.

Its application was already well advanced when a eurosceptic government came to power in 2013 and put talks on hold. Fishing rights was the biggest obstacle then – as it remains today.

Fish and marine industries account for almost 40% of Iceland’s exports and many No voters feared they would cede some control of their lucrative fishing grounds under the EU’s common fisheries policy.

The referendum campaign fuelled debate about Iceland’s place in the world, Kristrún said after casting her ballot in the capital on Saturday.

“This is a great day, we’ve been waiting for this for years to be able to have a vote,” Kristrún said, adding that her government would continue its work regardless of the outcome.

The question on the ballot was: “Should Iceland resume accession negotiations with the European Union?”

A Yes vote would not have been a final decision on joining the EU, but a move towards an accession agreement, which would then have to be approved by a second referendum.

Equally, the No vote does not rule out the chance of Iceland resuming talks in the future.

While economic issues dominated the referendum campaigns, security concerns also featured.

Iceland is a founder member of Nato but it has no military and relies on its allies for defence.

The country has backed Ukraine during Russia’s full-scale invasion and officials have been alarmed by Russia’s increased maritime manoeuvres near the island.

Trump’s expressed interest in taking over Greenland has also raised concerns.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Trending