Features
Ghostwriters
This type of writer, OK author, has, I presume, been thrust into prominence with the publication
of Prince Harry’s Spare. The first question asked when the book was sensationally out was: Who wrote the supposed-to-be autobiography? Prince Harry made no pretense he was the author who actually wrote his memoir with all its revelations. And in double quick time it was out that J. R. Moehringer had written the book for him and thus he was Prince Harry’s ghostwriter.
The name ghost writer is defined as “A person whose job it is to write material for someone else who is the named author”. He is Ghost because his name is not mentioned; not as co-author. He remains un-named on title page and elsewhere. Sometimes ghost writing is outsourced and this because getting a person to write in India or the Philippines may be cheaper for a British or American. Ease and cheapness of international communication facilitates this outsourcing. In some cases ghost writers are allowed to share credit. For example, a common method is to insert the client/author’s name on a book cover as the main byline and then have the ghostwriter’s name underneath it with the word ‘with’ added on.
This could be done in lieu of payment: fame instead of money paid. For nonfiction books, the ghostwriter could be credited as a ‘contributor’ or ‘research assistant’. Sometimes the ghostwriter is asked to sign a nondisclosure contract that legally forbids any mention of the actual writer’s role in the publication. Payments vary. The New York Times reported, according to an article I read, the payment made to the ghostwriter for Hillary Clinton’s memoirs was about $500,000. The amount promised by her publisher being 48 million. We read Harry paid his ghost an advance of $1 m.
Ghosting Spare
I was keenly interested in the article by Moehringer published in the New Yorker May 15, 2023 issue, titled Notes from Prince Harry’s Ghostwriter as a Personal History contribution. It was all about how he was approached to ghost-write Prince Harry’s tell all memoir. He traveled to their home in California and found Harry easy to talk with. One fact that made him agree was that there was no deadline set for completion of the book. The article details how they set about the job and the reception that ‘Spare’ earned.
The project was kept under strict wraps but the book was leaked in a bookshop in Madrid a week before it was officially launched. Criticism of the negative kind far exceeded any kudos. It was not only the fact that Harry ‘betrayed’ his family by describing squabbles and all but that in spite of the statement that facts stated had been scrupulously researched. “Within days,” as Moehringer writes, “the amorphous campaign against Spare seemed to narrow to a single point of attack that Harry’s memoirs rigorously fact-checked was rife with errors.
“I cannot think of anything that rankles quite like being called sloppy by people who routinely trample facts in pursuance of their royal prey, and this now happened every few minutes to Harry and by extension to me.” It was about a sale that had Harry going to, to buy at cheaper rates. The sharp criticism was that that particular retail outlet never had sales. However, Moehringer proves this was wrong, the sale had been on as noted in the book.
However, Spare won mention in the Guinness World Records by being certified as the fastest selling non-fiction book in the history of the publishing world. People were actually reading the book. Common comment was that Harry’s candour about family dysfunction and losing a parent gave solace to readers.
At a party to celebrate the book, a very confident Harry had thanked all involved and the ‘ghost’ too and said he was greatly encouraged by the ghost to continue with setting down his memoirs by ‘trusting the book’ which he did. “Harry first felt liberated when he fell in love with Meghan, and again when they fled Britain, and what he felt now, for the first time in his life, was heard. That imperious Windsor motto, ‘Never complain, never explain’ is really just a prettified omerta which my wife suggests might have prolonged Harry’s grief, His family actively discouraged talking, a stoicism for which they’re loudly lauded, but if you don’t speak your emotions you serve them, and you don’t tell your story you lose it – or, what might be worse, you get lost inside it. Telling is how we cement details, preserve continuity, stay same. We say ourselves into being every day, or else.”
Moehringer goes on to ask the question why writers take to ghost writing, which carries no school certification nor a degree of higher education. “No one ever says his ambition is to be a ghost writer. Writing under no name is safe; writing under someone else’s name is hedonic – a kind of hiding and seeking.” He details how he came to write Harry’s book. He ends his essay with a heart-warming family incident. His five year old daughter at breakfast had looked up from her cinnamon toast and asked what ghostwriting was. To the author and his wife it sounded like asking Who is God. Then he had said she loved art and hoped to be an artist. “Imagine if one of your classmates wanted to express something, but could not draw. Imagine if she asked you to draw a picture for her.” The little girl promptly said she would do it. “That’s ghost writing” he had succinctly proclaimed, but added: “Don’t paint other’s pictures, paint your own, sweetheart.”
The Ghostwriter – J. R. Moehringer
John Joseph Moehringer writes under the name J R Moehringer. He seems to have had a hard childhood growing up in Long Island with a father too fond of his alcoholic drinks. He was often comforted by the bar keeper. His mother was very ambitious for him and dreamed of and encouraged a Harvard education. He rewarded her by earning his degree in Yale.
He started his professional life as a journo in the New York Times, then moved West to write for the Rocky Mountain News, which paper, he says, still seemed to cater to the reading tastes of gold diggers, from its first issue in 1859. He was often called to write for a gossip columnist who was wont to taking it easy in a bar. That was when he discovered he wrote best when he substituted for another writer – the start of ghost writing. In 2000, he won the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Writing while on the staff of the Los Angeles Times. He authored his first novel in 2005– Tender Bar: a memoir – which was autobiographical.
A successful film directed by George Clooney starring Ben Affleck resulted. Affleck won a Golden Globe Award for his portrayal of the protagonist. Then came the call on behalf of tennis star Andre Agassi who wanted him to ghost write his autobiography. He met Agassi in Los Angeles and they clicked: Agassi not literary at all and Moehringer not into sports even in school. Agassi’s wife, Stefanie Graf, approved of the plan. And thus came to completion in 2009, Open, the very shy tennis champ Andre Agassi’s ghost written life story. In April 2016 he ghost wrote the autobiography of Phil Knight – creator of Nike shoes. The book was titled Shoe Dog.
JRM was now a well-known ghost writer and offers poured in. But he was choosy; avoided politicians and businessmen. When the offer came on behalf of Prince Harry his interest was rekindled. Discussions continued for a while and then the writing began, leading to his name and fame as a ghost writer spreading wide. He says he too was hounded by papparazi.
Personal tidbit
The offer to ghost write came my way twice. One was from an associate of a businessman, son of the entrepreneur who started a very paying enterprise. Work started with discussion of terms of the project. Being an utter novice I asked for a very small fee. I met the big man – very genial – and wrote an outline or skeleton of the book. A son asked me whether I was writing about the boardroom or bedroom! The work was taxing and I made the gross mistake of doing an Oliver Twist, this time for money. I was thrown out but my detailed outline was retained.
A second misadventure was being invited to ghost write the very remarkable life of a mercantile head. Given an elephantine pile of personal files, I asked for a literary friend as help. Permitted. The initial bit of writing was to be. The big man said – put it on or lay it on thick. So I compared him to Julius C as a colossus under whom lesser mortals cringed. Laughed at by two of his critics. We suggested that instead of ghost writing, he write his life story and we would edit and improve sections done, if necessary. I was, for some reason, getting cheesed off. Maybe I am not fit to ghost write, I surmised. Illness of the biographee intervened and the project was shelved, but my detailed notes again retained. The book was completed by a professional writer. My pal and I got thanks and a bottle of wine each. Enough of attempting ghosting, I decided.
Features
A long-running identity conflict flares into full-blown war
It was Iran’s first spiritual head of state, the late Ayatollah Khomeini, who singled out and castigated the US as the ‘Great Satan’ in the revolutionary turmoil of the late seventies of the last century that ushered in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The core issue driving the long-running confrontation between Islamic Iran and the West has been religious identity and the seasoned observer cannot be faulted for seeing the explosive emergence of the current war in the Middle East as having the elements of a religious conflict.
The current crisis in the Middle East which was triggered off by the recent killing of Iranian spiritual head of state Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a combined US-Israel military strike is multi-dimensional and highly complex in nature but when the history of relations between Islamic Iran and the West, read the US, is focused on the religious substratum in the conflict cannot be glossed over.
In fact it is not by accident that US President Donald Trump resorts to Biblical language when describing Iran in his denunciations of the latter. Iran, from Trump’s viewpoint, is a primordial source of ‘evil’ and if the Middle East has collapsed into a full-blown regional war today it is because of the ‘evil’ influence and doings of Iran; so runs Trump’s narrative. It is a language that stands on par with that used by the architects of the Iranian revolution in the crucial seventies decade.
In other words, it is a conflict between ‘good’ and ‘evil’ and who is ‘good’ and who is ‘evil’ in the confrontation is determined mainly by the observer’s partialities and loyalties which may not be entirely political in kind. It should not be forgotten that one of President Trump’s support bases is the Christian Right in the US and in the rest of the West and the Trump administration’s policy outlook and actions should not be divorced from the needs of this segment of supporters to be fully made sense of.
The reasons for the strong policy tie-up between Rightist administrations in the US in particular and Israel could be better comprehended when the above religious backdrop is taken into consideration. Israel is the principal actor in the ‘Old Testament’ of the Bible and is seen as ‘the Chosen People of God’ and this characterization of Israel ought to explain the partialities of the Republican Right in particular towards Israel. Among other things, this partiality accounts for the strong defence of Israel by the US.
For the purposes of clarity it needs to be mentioned here that the Bible consists of two parts, an ‘Old’ and ‘New Testament’ , and that the ‘New Testament’ or ‘Message’ embodies the teachings of Jesus Christ and the latter teachings are seen as completing and in a sense giving greater substance to the ‘Old Testament’. However, Judaism is based mainly on ‘Old Testament’ teachings and Judaism is distinct from Christianity.
To be sure, the above theological explanation does not exhaust all the reasons for the war in the Middle East but the observer will be allowing an important dimension to the war to slip past if its importance is underestimated.
It is not sufficiently realized that the Iranian Islamic Revolution of 1979 utterly changed international politics and re-wrote as it were the basic parameters that must be brought to bear in understanding it. So important is the Islamic factor in contemporary world politics that it helped define to a considerable degree the new international political order that came into existence with the collapsing of the Cold War and the disintegration of the USSR .
Since the latter developments ‘political Islam’ could be seen as a chief shaping influence of international politics. For example, it accounts considerably for the 9/11 calamity that led to the emergence of fresh polarities in world politics and ushered in political terrorism of a most destructive kind that is today disquietingly visible the world over.
It does not follow from the foregoing that Islam, correctly understood, inspires terrorism of any kind. Islam proclaims peace but some of its adherents with political aims interpret the religion in misleading, divisive ways that run contrary to the peaceful intents of the faith. This is a matter of the first importance that sincere adherents of the faith need to address.
However, there is no denying that the Islamic Revolution in Iran of 1979 has been over the past decades a great shaper of international politics and needs to be seen as such by those sections that are desirous of changing the course of the world for the better. The revolution’s importance is such that it led to US political scientist Dr. Samuel P. Huntingdon to formulate his historic thesis that a ‘Clash of Civilizations’ is upon the world currently.
If the above thesis is to be adopted in comprehending the principal trends in contemporary world politics it could be said that Islam, misleadingly interpreted by some, is pitting a good part of the Southern hemisphere against the West, which is also misleadingly seen by some, as homogeneously Christian in orientation. Whereas, the truth is otherwise. The West is not necessarily entirely synonymous with Christianity, correctly understood.
Right now, what is immediately needed in the Middle East is a ceasefire, followed up by a negotiated peace based on humanistic principles. Turning ‘Spears into Ploughshares’ is a long gestation project but the warring sides should pay considerable attention to former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami’s memorable thesis that the world needs to transition from a ‘Clash of Civilizations’ to a ‘Dialogue of Civilizations’. Hopefully, there would emerge from the main divides leaders who could courageously take up the latter challenge.
It ought to be plain to see that the current regional war in the Middle East is jeopardising the best interests of the totality of publics. Those Americans who are for peace need to not only stand up and be counted but bring pressure on the Trump administration to make peace and not continue on the present destructive course that will render the world a far more dangerous place than it is now.
In the Middle East region a durable peace could be ushered if only the just needs of all sides to the conflict are constructively considered. The Palestinians and Arabs have their needs, so does Israel. It cannot be stressed enough that unless and until the security needs of the latter are met there could be no enduring peace in the Middle East.
Features
The art and science of communicating with your little child
The two input gateways of communication, sight and sound, are quite well developed at birth. In fact, the auditory system becomes functional around 24 weeks in the womb, and the normal newborn can hear quite well after birth. However, the newborn’s vision is a little blurry at birth, and the baby sees the world in shades of grey, while being able only to focus on things 20 to 30 cm (8–12 inches) away. Coincidentally, this is perhaps the exact distance to a mother’s face during breastfeeding. By 2-3 months, there are colour vision capabilities and the ability to track. By 5-8 months, there is depth perception, and by 12 months, there is adult clarity of vision.
By the time a child turns five, his or her brain has already reached 90% of its adult size. This astonishing physical growth is not just happening on its own; it is, to a certain extent, fuelled by experience, and the most vital experience a young child can have is communication with his or her parents.
Modern developmental neuroscience has shifted our understanding of how children learn. We used to think babies were passive sponges, slowly absorbing the world. We now know they are active characters from day one, constantly seeking interaction to build the architecture of their minds. This architecture is not built by apps, vocabulary flashcards, or educational television. It is built through simple, loving, back-and-forth interactions with anyone they come across, but mostly their parents.
The Foundation: Serve and Return (0–12 Months)
Communication with an infant from birth to one year of age begins long before they speak their first word. In the first year, the goal is to master a phenomenon called Serve and Return. This is a basic scenario picked up from the game of tennis. At the start of each game of a set in tennis, a player serves, and the opponent returns the serve. Just imagine a tennis match, where a baby “serves” by making a sound, making eye contact, reaching for a toy, or crying. The job of anyone in the vicinity, who very often are the parents of the baby, is to “return” the ball. If they babble, you babble back. If they point at a cat, you look and say, “Yes, that’s a furry cat!” This simple act does two things. The first is Brain Building, which creates and strengthens neural pathways in the language and emotional centres of the brain. The other is Emotional Security, a thing which teaches a baby that he or she has some help in the learning processes. The baby absorbs the notion that when he or she signals a need, his or her world will respond. This forms the basis of a secure attachment. Scientists have advocated that during this stage, people, especially the parents of a baby, should embrace what is called ‘parentese’. It is the use of a somewhat high-pitched, exaggerated voice. Research has shown that babies pay more attention to parentese than to regular adult speech, helping them to map the sounds of their native language more quickly.
The Language Explosion: Toddlers (1–3 Years)
When a child starts speaking words, the game changes considerably and quite profoundly. This period is defined by a rapid increase in his or her vocabulary and the beginning of grammar. It is very important to narrate everything. The people around, especially the parents, need to become kind of sports commentators for your life. While dressing them, one could say, “First we put on the red sock. After that, we put the other red sock on your left foot.” What we are doing by this is to give them the labels for the world they see.
It is also important to expand, but not truly correct, whatever the child says. If a toddler points to a car and says “Car!”, don’t just say “Yes.” Expand on it: “Yes, that is a big, fast, red car!” You are adding a new vocabulary and grammatical structure through a natural process. If the child says “Me go,” respond with, “Yes, you are going!” rather than correcting and saying “No…, you should say ‘I am going’.”
Toddlers love reading the same book, even one hundred times. While it may be tedious for those around the baby, it is important to realise that such repetition is vital for their learning. They are predicting what comes next, which is a core cognitive skill.
The Preschooler: Building Stories and Logic (3–5 Years)
By age three, the focus shifts from “what” to “why.” Preschoolers are beginning to understand complex emotions, time, and causality. This is the age at which it is best to ask questions which require thought and understanding. Such indirect open-ended questions would sound like “What was the best part of the park today?” or “How do you think that character in the story is feeling?“
A preschooler’s world is full of “big feelings” they cannot yet manage. When they are upset because they cannot have a cookie, avoid saying “Don’t cry over nothing.” Instead, name the emotion: “Don’t cry, you can have a cookie after dinner“. This teaches them emotional literacy. Parents and others around in the home could share stories about when they were little, or make up fantasy tales together. Storytelling teaches sequential logic (beginning, middle, end) and strengthens their imagination.
The Absolute Master Class: Learning Through Play
If communication is the fuel for brain development, play is the engine. For a child under five, play is not a break from learning; play is learning. It is how they explore physics (stacking blocks), mathematics (sorting shapes), social dynamics (sharing toys), and language (pretend play). We can boost their development exponentially by weaving communication into their play.
When a child is playing with blocks, dough, or puzzles, they are building fine motor skills and spatial awareness. It is also useful to use three-dimensional words: “Can you put the blue block on top of the red one?” “The puzzle piece is next to your knee.” One could also ask them to describe the texture: “Is the dough soft or hard?“
Pretend play, such as acting as a doctor, an engineer, a chef, or a superhero, is one of the most cognitively demanding things a child can do. It requires them to understand symbolic thought and to take on another person’s perspective. Join their world as a supporting character, not the director. If they are the doctor, ask, “Doctor, my teddy bear’s tummy hurts. What should I do?” This encourages them to use vocabulary relevant to the scenario and practice complex social problem-solving.
Playing with water, sand, slime, or safe food products allows children to process sensory information. This is the perfect time for descriptive vocabulary. Use contrasting words: wet/dry, hot/cold, sticky/smooth, loud/quiet.
A few special words for parents. You do not need an expensive degree or specialised toys to build your child’s brain. The most powerful tool you have is your own responsiveness. Modern science tells us that the basic recipe for a thriving child is simple: Look at them when they signal you. Respond with warmth and words. Narrate their world and Join their play.
You are not just talking to your child; you are building his or her future, even via just one conversation at a time. So, go on talking to your child and even make him or her a real-life chatterbox.
Dr B. J. C. Perera
MBBS(Cey), DCH(Cey), DCH(Eng), MD(Paediatrics), MRCP(UK), FRCP(Edin), FRCP(Lond), FRCPCH(UK), FSLCPaed, FCCP, Hony. FRCPCH(UK), Hony. FCGP(SL)
Specialist Consultant Paediatrician and Honorary Senior Fellow, Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Features
Promoting our beauty and culture to the world
Tourism is very much in the news these days and it’s certainly a good sign to see lots of foreigners checking out Sri Lanka.
With this in mind, Ruki’s Model Academy & Agency recently had a spectacular event to select Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka in order to promote Sri Lanka in the international scene.
Nimesha Premachandra was crowned Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026.
She says she owes her success to Ruki (Rukmal Senanayake), the National Director and model trainer, and personality and advocacy trainer Tharaka Gurukanda.
Nimesha is a school teacher by profession, an actress and TV presenter by passion, and an entrepreneur by spirit.
She believes in balancing grace with purpose, and using her platform to inspire women, while promoting the beauty and culture of Sri Lanka to the world. And this is how our Chit-Chat went:

Nimesha Premachandra: Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026
01. How would you describe yourself?
I am a passionate, disciplined, and people-oriented person. I love learning, performing, and guiding others, especially young minds, through education.
02. If you could change one thing about yourself, what would it be?
I would probably try to be less self-critical and allow myself to celebrate achievements more often.
03. If you could change one thing about your family, what would it be?
Nothing major. I am grateful for my family’s love and support, which has shaped who I am today.
04. Is Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka your very first pageant?
No. I have been part of pageants before, but Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka is very special because it represents purpose, culture, and global representation.
05. What made you take part in this contest?
I wanted to represent Sri Lanka internationally and use this platform to promote tourism, culture, and women’s empowerment.
06. Obviously, you must be excited about participating in the grand finale, in Vietnam; any special plans for this big event?
Yes, I am extremely excited. My focus is to showcase Sri Lankan elegance, hospitality, and authenticity, while building meaningful connections with participants from around the world.
07. How do you intend promoting tourism, in Sri Lanka, during your rein?
I plan to highlight Sri Lanka’s diverse experiences in culture, heritage, wellness, nature, and local hospitality through media appearances, digital storytelling, and tourism collaborations.
08. School?
Kaluthara Balika. School life played a big role in shaping me. I actively participated in sports and performing arts, which later helped me build confidence as an actress and presenter.
09. Happiest moment?
Being crowned Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026 and seeing the pride in my family’s eyes – definitely one of my happiest moments.
10. What is your idea of perfect happiness?
Peace of mind, good health, and being surrounded by the people I love while doing work that has meaning.
11. Which living person do you most admire?
I most admire Angelina Jolie because she beautifully balances her work as an actress with meaningful humanitarian efforts. She uses her global platform to support refugees, advocate for human rights, and inspire women to be strong, compassionate, and independent.
12. Which is your most treasured possession?
My memories and experiences because they remind me how far I’ve come, and keep me grounded.
13. Your most embarrassing moment?
Like everyone, I’ve had small on-stage mishaps, but they always taught me to laugh at myself and move forward confidently.
14. Done anything daring?
Participating in pageants while balancing teaching, media work, and family life has been one of the boldest and most rewarding decisions I’ve made.

Keen to use her title to promote Sri Lanka globally
15. Your ideal vacation?
A peaceful destination surrounded by nature; somewhere I can relax, reconnect, and experience local culture.
16. What kind of music are you into?
I enjoy soft, soulful music because it helps me relax and stay inspired.
17. Favourite radio station:
I enjoy stations that blend good music with meaningful conversation and positive energy.
18. Favourite TV station:
Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation. It’s where it all began for me. It played a significant role in my journey as a TV presenter and helped shape my confidence and passion for media.
19 What would you like to be born as in your next life?
Someone who continues to inspire others because making a positive impact is what matters most.
20. Any major plans for the future?
I hope to expand my work in media and entrepreneurship while continuing my role as an educator and using my title to promote Sri Lanka globally.
-
Features3 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more
-
Opinion6 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features6 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Opinion3 days agoSri Lanka – world’s worst facilities for cricket fans
-
Business6 days agoAn efficacious strategy to boost exports of Sri Lanka in medium term
-
Features4 days agoOverseas visits to drum up foreign assistance for Sri Lanka
-
Features4 days agoSri Lanka to Host First-Ever World Congress on Snakes in Landmark Scientific Milestone
-
Features3 days agoA life in colour and song: Rajika Gamage’s new bird guide captures Sri Lanka’s avian soul
