Features

From donkeys to tarts, to drafting and drafts

Published

3 years ago

2023/04/2

Thilina Walpola

Legal Draftsman's Department today

BP Peiris

(Excerpted from Memoirs of a Cabinet Secretary)
(Continued from last week)

Mervyn’s first question on my reporting to him in response to his letter (offering a job in the Legal Dratsman’s Department) was, “Have I taught you at Royal?” Owing to an accumulation of work in his department, he had wanted a draftsman urgently and, as there was no time to call for applications, had gone to Attorney-General Ilangakoon and examined his file of applications for the post of Crown Counsel. He selected T. S. Fernando (at the time of writing, 1967, the Senior Puisne justice).

T. S. could not stand the drudgery and the painful silence of drafting for more than two weeks and asked to be relieved of his duties because he did not find the work congenial. I was then sent for. There was no money in the votes of the Legal Draftsman to pay my salary and I was gazetted as an acting Crown Counsel and paid from the votes of the Attorney-General.

Mervyn Fonseka believed that a classics man made a better draftsman than a mathematics man, a view with which R. B. Naish, a Civil Servant temporarily attached to the department for drafting a new Merchant Shipping Ordinance, and P. C. Villavarayan, a classical scholar from Oxford who was the Senior Assistant Draftsman, agreed. Naish was also a classics man – hence the selection of myself.

Naish was a serious man, intellectual, and very careful and correct in his drafting. Nihal Gunasekera, a charming and cultured man, who had been Crown Counsel and died early after he had reverted to the Bar, told me this story about Naish. There was a case in the Magistrate’s Court of Chilaw which, because of local feeling, the Magistrate was unwilling to hear and the Crown Proctor was unhappy about prosecuting. E. H. T. Gunasekera was asked to prosecute, Nihal was for the defence.

Counsel travelled by train. A white man got into the next compartment. All three got down at Chilaw and went to the rest house. At dinner, the white man sat at a table adjoining that occupied by the two advocates. Naturally, the conversation turned to a discussion of this peculiar silent, white man and in referring to him, the advocates who were speaking in Sinhala, used the would ‘Booruwa’, meaning ‘donkey’.

Next day, when the case was called in court, the ‘donkey’, who had been specially gazetted to try the case, came on the Bench. On the journey back after the day’s work, all three found themselves in the same compartment and E. H. T. tactfully veered the conversation to the subject of languages, Latin and Greek, Sanskrit and Pali, and finally, Sinhala and Tamil. The ‘donkey’ had said that he knew the classical languages and his Sinhala but found Tamil a little difficult. He had added “Some people might think I’m a donkey” and repeated it several times. The donkey was Naish.

Nihal told me of another incident which took place at the Kandy Assizes when he was Crown Counsel prosecuting before Chief Justice MacDonnell, a very polite man who bowed for the slightest thing from the Bench. The case was one of abduction and rape. The “complainant” in the case was the leading prostitute in the town, a woman in the roaring forties with all the hallmarks of her dwindling trade stamped on her person and her features – the enormous hairbun, the bangles on her wrists, the crow’s feet under her eyes, the sallow skin and the powdered face, a woman well known to every individual in the town except Chief Justice MacDonnell.

At the end of the tart’s evidence, the Chief gave a polite bow and said “Thank you, Madam”, which the Interpreter Mudliyar interpreted as “bahapiya”. A literal translation of this word will not convey the Mudaliyar’s meaning to English readers. Freely I would say ‘Get out’. Nihal had pointed out to the Mudaliyar that was not a correct translation of what the judge had said and the Mudaliyar had replied that he had a reputation to maintain in the town.

From donkeys and tarts let me get back to drafting and drafts. My father had often asked me, when I was at the Bar, to call on Mervyn in Chambers, and I had always refused. I preferred to stand on my merits and did not want them to feel that his old pupil, now advocate, was calling on his old teacher, now Head of a Department, to scrounge a favour. Naish told me later that I had been chosen because I had won the George Wille Greek Prose prize in school. I also learned later that the man who had been pressing my case, unasked, with Mervyn was E. H. T. Gunasekera, a fact which he always denied.

After I joined the Department, E. H. T. and I worked in adjoining rooms and we became good friends. I always went to him when I was in need of advice, and he always gave his advice straight from the shoulder, not shaping it to please the other party.

Mervyn was an excellent draftsman, a kind man, but a strict disciplinarian. He insisted on thoroughness and used to stress that a draftsman must know all the law and could not be heard to say that he had made a mistake. He had a fancy for clocks and watches. There were more than a dozen clocks in his house, one showing local time, one Greenwich, one Rome and so on. He also had one of the best collections of classical records, card indexed, and standing on shelves like books.

The Governor, Sir Andrew Caldecott, used to visit him to relax and listen to the records over a whisky and soda. On those days, there was always a policeman at the gate and no one was allowed to enter, neither Mervyn nor Sir Andrew being willing to be disturbed while listening to Mozart, Brahms, Beethoven, Chopin and other musical celebrities.

He used to have Saturday morning ‘classes’ for his staff officers. He would collect on paper, points that had struck him on our drafts and then we would discuss the several points of law rising on the drafts. These meetings were most helpful to his assistants and we learned a great deal from the discussions. The ‘classes’ were held at 9 a.m. On one occasion H. N. G. Fernando was about two minutes late. As H. N. G. entered the room Mervyn looked at the office clock and told H. N. G. that his watch was not keeping correct time.

H. N. G. was punctual after that. With his interest in clocks, watches, and gramophone records, Mervyn was sometimes a bit absent-minded. He always had a bottle of smelling salts on his table, and one day, absent-mindedly, instead of the bottle, put his fountain pen to his nostril, sniffed, and appeared to have received the same stimulation as if he had smelt the salts.

On October 1, 1936, I was appointed a temporary Assistant Legal Draftsman and made responsible for some of the subsidiary legislation of the island. This included Proclamations, Notices, By-laws of local authorities, Rules, Regulations and Orders – approximately 6,000 for the year. No file was supposed to pass out of the office until Mervyn had run his eyes over the outgoing letter and draft.

Very soon I was in trouble. Drafting is an art which is acquired by experience, and I had no experience at all. I was asked to draft a set of by-laws relating to the traffic lights installed, for the first time, at the Galle Road-Turret Road junction. I looked up the law. The Municipal Councils Ordinance, under which the by-laws were to be drafted, and prepared a set of by-laws using always the word “vehicle”, e.g., the green light means that the vehicle may proceed, the red light means that the vehicle shall stop, adding at the end, a by-law which said that where a vehicle is driven in contravention of the bylaws, the driver of the vehicle shall be guilty of an offence and liable to the prescribed penalty.

My draft passed through the office without Mervyn scrutinizing it. It was approved by the Minister and by the Governor and was, in due course, published in the Gazette and became law. The police then, for a period of about two months, began to instruct motorists in the new rules of traffic control by the use of light signals, after which they started instituting prosecutions.

One day Mervyn phoned me asking me to see him with the Traffic Lights By-laws file. This was unusual, and I knew that I had gone wrong somewhere. I have never, in my life, had such a grilling as I had from him that day. First, he asked me what I had read before I started drafting the by-laws. Did I read the whole of the Municipal Councils Ordinance? This dealt with streets, drainage, markets etc., and I told him that I did not consider it necessary to read the whole of the Ordinance.

After about half an hour of this grilling (I was almost going to call it ‘bullying’ in view of the fact that at some moments I was almost on the point of breaking into tears), he said “Turn to the Interpretation section. Did you read that?” I had not. In that same angry tone, he continued “Read the definition of vehicle”; and like a whipped school boy, I read. ‘Vehicle’ was defined to mean any vehicle other than a mechanically propelled vehicle.

“And,” he continued, after having had a sniff at his bottle of smelling salts, “are you aware of the rule of interpretation that where a word is defined in a statute and that word is used in a by-law made under that statute, then that word had the same meaning as defined in the statute?” Of course, I was not aware. “Well” he finally asked, “What is the effect of your by-laws?” I said I was sorry. I appeared to have caught up every type of vehicle except the motor vehicles. He now spoke in a lower key. To be sorry was one thing. To make him look a fool was an entirely different thing, and he did not want to be made to look a fool. Draftsmen cannot afford to make mistakes etc. etc.

“Lord,” I thought, “will this talking never come to an end?” Suddenly, he was all sweetness. “Don’t misunderstand me. We learn by making mistakes and I have been talking in the privacy of my room. We must put this matter to right.” He spoke in the plural. He phoned the Superintendent of Police dealing with traffic offences and found that there were over 100 cases pending. He told the Superintendent, “All these cases must be withdrawn. I have made a mistake in the drafting and in the circumstances, the Crown does not wish to go on with the prosecution.”

I quickly changed my opinion of the man and thought “What a fine gentleman!” The order for the withdrawal of all the cases had to be given by the Inspector General himself. My mistake (no one knew it was mine) was put right the following week by an amending by-law which said “In these bylaws, ‘Vehicle’ includes a mechanically propelled vehicle.” How simple the whole thing looks now. This happened many years ago. As I type this in 1967, in the privacy of my room, the atmosphere is

heated, my feet are cold and perspiration is pouring down my back.

I had, perforce, to be more careful now. I studied the Draftsman’s Bible, Allison Russell on Legislative Drafting, and if I had the slightest doubt, consulted one of my three seniors, Villavarayan, Wendt or H. N. G., who were always of the greatest assistance. A set of market by-laws for Kurunegala Urban Council was sent to me for revision. The Ordinance gave the Council power to lease the right to collect the rents and fees due in respect of the stalls. Instead of doing this, the Council had leased the entire market to one person and the bylaws were intended to provide for this.

I deleted all the objectionable portions of the draft and returned it to the Council certifying it to be in due form as amended in red ink. After some time, the draft was sent back to me by the Council with an opinion by E. J. Samarawickrema, K. C. stating that the original by-laws were perfectly in order and within the law and requesting that the by-laws as originally sent be certified to be in due form. I could not sit in judgement on my own matter. I accordingly wrote a nine page report to the Legal Draftsman pointing out, with all respect, that Samarawickrema was wrong and that the by-laws as amended by me should stand.

Mervyn sent for me and said, “So. You disagree with Samarawickrema? You had better pass the draft on the K. C.’s opinion.” I requested him to make that order on the file and he hesitated. He then had a conference with the Attorney General, the Solicitor, and five Crown Counsel, with himself, Villavarayan and me for our department and the meeting, after discussion, agreed with me.

All News Advertisement

Features

New mediation law for smarter dispute resolution of civil and commercial disputes – I

Published

2 hours ago

2026/06/16

Sahan Weerasooriya

The Mediation (Civil and Commercial Disputes) Bill was passed by the Parliament on Thursday, June 11, 2026. Harshana Nanayakkara, Minister of Justice and National Integration, introduced the Bill, and explained its provisions and value for Sri Lanka and global developments in the use of mediation. Encouragingly, it was passed unanimously.

Sri Lanka’s commitment to provide legislative support for the use of mediation is timely and most welcome. Given that the backlog of cases pending before courts is over a staggering 1.1 million, it is clear that Sri Lanka is yet another country that remains challenged to find responses to make dispute resolution more efficient. The impact of laws delays is serious and damaging not only to the disputants personally, but also for businesses and the economic development of the country. The delays in concluding cases impacts the economy adversely, both directly and indirectly, but are often seen only as an access to Justice concern. This is unfortunate. In many jurisdictions across the globe, alternative dispute resolution processes (ADR), such as mediation, have been introduced to alleviate laws delays. While Sri Lanka enacted legislation (1988) to provide for mediation in respect of minor community disputes of a low monetary threshold, the enactment of the new law heralds a commitment to provide for the recognition of a disciplined regime for its use for higher value civil and commercial disputes.

The new law provides for the recognition of mediation as a dispute resolution option that can be voluntarily selected by parties, and for a governance regime to ensure that mediations are conducted in compliance with certain standards which are globally accepted. It provides statutory recognition to the principle that a mediated settlement agreement that has been signed by the disputants, is valid in law. It does not provide for any management control by government or establish entities. In addition to the voluntary reference by parties, a court can also refer a dispute in an action before it, to mediation, at its discretion, after considering all circumstances and if considered appropriate. The voluntary nature of the process is not affected because, while the court can refer the dispute to mediation and the parties must then engage in the mediation, there is no compulsion for the parties to settle against their will.

The law sets out the obligations of Mediators, disputants and the Service Provider. Certain categories of disputes cannot be referred to mediation. These are disputes the settlement of which requires the inclusion of terms that can be given effect to, only on a decree of court, such as the termination of a marriage or a declaration of nullity of marriage or the adoption of a child or the partition of land to obtain rights in rem. A schedule sets out eleven (11) categories of actions that cannot be settled by mediation. However, matters relevant to such disputes may be mediated for the purpose of submitting terms of settlement to court for consideration of incorporation in a judgement, decree or order in compliance with applicable law.

The new law also provides that in a mediation, certain key principles of the process must be complied with. These include the confidentiality and the without prejudice rule in respect of matters discussed at the mediation; the rule that Mediators must be neutral and impartial; the party centric nature of the process that provides primacy to the wishes of the disputants including that it is they that determine the outcome and that a settlement is reached only if all disputants agree to the terms; the noncoercive role of the mediator whose duty is to facilitate and manage the process using mediation specific skills and techniques, but is debarred from imposing a decision. Although a settlement agreement is valid in law, provision is included to obtain a decree of court, based on the terms of the settlement. A mediated settlement agreement can be set aside on an application made to court, on specific limited grounds which are provided for, including that it is offensive to the public policy of the country. If the parties are unable to agree on a settlement, a certificate of non-settlement is issued. The provisions of the law are based on international best practices and principles articulated in the 1988 UN Mediation Convention (the Singapore Convention) and the UNCITRAL model law.

The popularity of mediation has grown for its value in being time efficient, cost effective and party centric. Parties have control over the outcome and have the space to discuss their concerns, fears and interests and need never agree to settle unless fully satisfied that settlement terms address their interests. Disputants are free to walk out of a mediation process at any time, if dissatisfied with the progress. The discussions are confidential and a valuable feature is that the process offers an opportunity to reduce acrimony which is prevalent in most disputes, and to restore fractured relationships which is very important in family and business related disputes. This benefit and the prospects for governments to reduce the cost of the administration of justice, by using mediation, is articulated in the preamble to the 2018 UN Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (2018) which states that the use of mediation results in significant benefits.

Pursuant to the interest generated within the country regarding the value of using Mediation for commercial dispute resolution, and heralding what we like to see as the initial steps of a Mediation boom in the country, several positive advancements have taken place –

* Parties have opted to include mediation in the dispute resolution clause in contracts;

* Given that mediating disputes requires very specialised techniques and skills, many professionals, including predominantly Lawyers, have engaged in training programmes offered by international training bodies that offer accreditation;

* Trained Mediators are engaged in an effort to form themselves as a professional Organisation;

* Mediation Advocacy training programmes have been held to train Lawyers on their niche role in the mediation process. That role is distinctly different to that of a court Lawyer who’s obligations are centred on an adversarial approach where the dispute is adjudicated in terms of the law alone. Hence lawyers need training to be useful within a non-adversarial process which is party centric and has a focus on reaching a settlement, based on the interests of disputants.

* Sri Lanka enacted the Recognition and Enforcement of International Mediated Settlement Agreements Act No. 5 of 2024 (the UN Mediation Convention Act) and ratified the Convention becoming the 14th country to do so. Sri Lanka will be seen as an investor friendly country in respect of dispute resolution where mediation is used, since it offers an enforcement regime which is recognised universally.

* The landmark determination of the Supreme Court (SC SD 22 of 2025) in the challenge by the Bar Association to the constitutionality of the Mediation (Civil and Commercial Disputes) Bill, found that none of the provisions of the Bill were unconstitutional and gave a judicial sign off to statutory provisions that seek to ensure that mediation services are provided in this country, in a disciplined manner in compliance with universally accepted standards.

* Perhaps, inspired by the statutory obligation imposed on judges to attempt pretrial settlement of disputes, in terms of the Small Claims Court Act and the Small Claims Court Procedure Act (both of 2022) and the Civil Procedure Code provisions on Pretrial Conference and Pretrial Orders, 125 District Judges were recently trained (with support from the ADB) in Mediation. The training provided a dual benefit – it provided training in skills that are required to settle disputes and equally importantly, provided a comprehensive understanding of how mediation will function when judges themselves refer disputes for settlement by private mediators.

* Trained Mediators are already conducting mediations with success.

* A not-for-profit guarantee company, the International ADR Centre – www.iadrc.lk ) was established in 2018 as a joint venture of the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce and the Institute for the Development of Commercial Law & Practice (ICLP) to promote ADR and is actively engaged in promoting mediation through training, disseminating information and creating awareness among stakeholders, including the business sector. In addition to the International ADR Centre, “Udecide” is a project that promotes training of mediators and other activities that enrich the mediation culture.

* Commercial Mediation has been included in the Masters level programme at the Colombo University;

* The Sri Lanka Law College offers a component on Mediation in the Post Attorney Diploma programme, which commenced recently.

The private sector was actively engaged in the drafting of the Mediation Bill under the leadership of the International ADR Centre, which held many stakeholder consultations to obtain feedback from those that were conversant with the subject. The Centre had previously assisted the government to draft the UN Mediation Convention Act (Act No. 5 of 2024).

Several international Organisations that previously provided for resolution of disputes by arbitration, have provided for institutional rules to provide mediation services. These include WIPO and the ICC. Specifically, in relation to Investor State dispute resolution (ISDR), the International Bar Association (IBA) adopted its Mediation Rules in 2012 and ICSID (of the World Bank group) adopted its Mediation Rules in 2022. UNCITRAL, which is currently working on reforming ISDR, promotes mediation, observing that the use of mediation could reduce the costs of ISDS and also preserve relationships between the investor and the State. UNCITRAL has formulated provisions on and Guidelines for, Mediation for investor state dispute resolution.

(To be continued)

by Dhara Wijayatilake
Attorney-at-Law; Former Secretary to the Ministry of Justice; Director and Secretary General of the International ADR Centre.

Features

A Testament to the Sri Lankan family

Published

2 hours ago

2026/06/16

Sahan Weerasooriya

The passing of Dr. Devanesan Nesiah a few days ago brought back memories that spanned more than four decades. Devanesan signed the witness register at my marriage in 2002. It was a year of hope. The Ceasefire Agreement between the government and the LTTE had brought a respite from a war that had devastated the country for nearly two decades. The possibility of peace seemed real. It was fitting that Devanesan should be present on that occasion because his entire life was dedicated to building bridges across divides and seeking rational and humane solutions to conflict. He was a friend, mentor, and guide whose life embodied values that Sri Lanka, indeed the world, needs today.

In reflecting on Dr. Nesiah’s life, we need to be reminded that the forces that unite us as a people in Sri Lanka are stronger than those that divide us, and that the bonds of human affection can transcend even the deepest divisions of ethnicity, history and politics. I first met him in 1984. I had just had my very first newspaper article published in the Jaffna-based Saturday Review. The editor was Gamini Navaratne, a Sinhalese. This was a reminder that even during the darkest period of ethnic conflict, the bonds between communities remained strong. The article I had written was based on my encounters with the anti-Tamil violence of July 1983.

At that time, Dr Nesiah was the Government Agent of Jaffna. Tens of thousands of Tamil people who had fled violence in the south had been transported to the north by a government that had failed to protect them. He came up to me at an event, introduced himself, and told me that he liked what I had written. He also said that he would soon be leaving for Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and that we could meet there. Over the next three years, Devanesan and his wife Anita adopted me into their family. I used to visit them two or three times a week, not only to be given meals by Anita but to discuss matters with Devanesan. These included the academic papers and newspaper articles that were written. Later, Anita earned her PhD in religion and served on the boards of many civic organisations, including the National Peace Council.

Practical Solution

In 1992, we had both returned to work in Sri Lanka when Devanesan invited me to accompany him to Jaffna to celebrate the eightieth birthday of his father, K Nesiah, the distinguished educationist affectionately known as Professor Nesiah. The older Nesiah had been a leading member of the Jaffna Youth Congress. This remarkable movement championed complete independence from British rule, national unity, and the eradication of social inequalities based on caste and communal identity.

At a time when many feared that independence would lead to majoritarian domination, the leaders of the Youth Congress chose instead to place their faith in a shared Sri Lankan future. They believed that people from different communities could build a common nation while preserving their distinctive identities. So did Devanesan. This vision remains relevant today. It needs to be actualized.

The tragedy of Sri Lanka’s post-independence history is not that diversity exists. Diversity exists in every society. The tragedy is that we often allow diversity to become a source of fear, though we share many of the same values of family, hospitality, respect for elders and compassion towards others. During our visit to Jaffna in 1992, we met representatives of the LTTE administration, including Raheem. The discussion turned to the controversial issue of merging the Northern and Eastern Provinces. Dr Nesiah argued that if the merger could not be achieved due to political opposition, it might be more rational to seek greater powers for provincial councils instead. Raheem disagreed. Devanesan was interested in finding practical ways to achieve justice and coexistence. That was characteristic of him.

Devanesan Nesiah was a student of conflict and strategy. He became a doctoral student of Professor Thomas Schelling, who would later receive the Nobel Prize for his pioneering work on conflict and cooperation. Schelling’s insight was that even in the midst of conflict, there are usually common interests that adversaries share. Even adversaries locked in a struggle usually depend on each other for the outcome they each want. The challenge is to identify those common interests and build upon them. Conflict is not simply a contest between enemies. It is also a search for ways to coexist. Together as students and peace practitioners, we applied those theories to the Sri Lankan context to understand what was going on and to share that understanding with the Sri Lankan people.

Rational Empathy

Dr Nesiah spoke his mind, truth to power. He was a man of logic, rationality, and principle. His integrity came at a cost. His public service career experienced many ups and downs because he refused to accommodate irrational or corrupt demands. There were periods when he was sidelined into that administrative limbo known as the “pool” and assigned no substantive responsibilities for refusing to give in to political demands. Like the rest of his larger family, most notably the Hoole family of Jaffna, he would not abandon his principles. In 2018, to protest the action of President Maithripala Sirisena in sacking the then government he returned his Deshamanya Award (Pride of the Nation) national civil honourn which was soon thereafter overturned by the Supreme Court as being unconstitutional. His commitment was not to personal advancement, but to what he believed was right.

My wife Sumadhu recalls a story he told her. One day, while travelling on official duty, he told her how he had seen a thalagoya, a monitor lizard, trussed up and being taken away for slaughter. The sight of the creature’s suffering affected him deeply. He said he saw tears in its eyes and described the moment of awakening. From that day onwards, he gave up eating meat.

The story brings to mind the biblical story of the conversion of St Paul on the road to Damascus and the Buddhist exhortation, “May all living beings be well and happy.” But the deeper significance lies not in religious comparison. It lies in the awakening of empathy.

That was the essence of Dr Devanesan Nesiah’s worldview. The prejudices that society often imposes through ethnicity, religion, caste, or gender had little hold on him. He saw them as human constructs that often served to privilege some while excluding others. Such were his values that made him an extraordinary human being. Dr. Nesiah lived according to that understanding. He showed that integrity can survive amidst conflict. He reminded us that reason and compassion are not opposites but partners, that what unites us as Sri Lankans inhabiting our common island home has always been greater than what divides us, and we need to build our institutions accordingly.

I am proud that he was my friend. I am grateful that he was my mentor.

by Jehan Perera

Features

City of Dreams …Heartbeat of Colombo

Published

2 hours ago

2026/06/16

Sahan Weerasooriya

Enroute

If Colombo’s nightlife had a pulse, you’d find it 23 floors up, at Gatz, City of Dreams, Cinnamon Life.

The entertainment lounge has shed its old skin and stepped out supper-club style — think dim lights, clinking glasses, and live music that doesn’t ask you to choose between dinner and a show. You get both.

What’s more, at the new look Gatz the music never stops and it’s all happening seven nights a week … with live entertainment, and this is the scene, beat by beat:

Monday and Tuesday: Top Hats with Daniella/Naomi, from 7.00 pm onwards.

Sohan, Kamal Munasinghe (GM, Cinnamon Life) and Imran of
Funtime Entertainments

One of Colombo’s most sought-after bands is now a Monday-Tuesday ritual.

With a super repertoire, Top Hats can swing from lounge jazz to dancefloor fire. Big venues love them. Now Gatz gets to claim them.

Wednesday: Enroute with Gananath & Debbie – from 7.00 pm onwards.

Want New York at sunset? This is it. Gananath & Debbie transport you straight to the heady days of Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, and Ray Charles …old-school cool, live and unfiltered.

Thursday to Sunday: Terry & the Big Spenders – from 8.00 pm onwards.

Terry & The Big Spenders

The crowd favourite. A super big band sound that owns the 70s, 80s and 90s.

If you’ve been waiting for horns, harmonies, and nostalgia with volume, Terry & the Big Spenders deliver it nightly. No wonder they’re a huge hit.

Gatz is now an entertainment lounge, in Supper Club style, with Happy Hour very day, from 6.00 pm to 8.00 pm because the night, they say, should start with a toast.

And, from July, weekends at the Gatz go global. Local and foreign guest stars will be around to entertain you. Gatz is certainly booking big.

Wow! That would be another exciting experience for those patronising the most talked about venue in town.

In charge of the new setup is our legendary entertainer/singer Sohan Weerasinghe, along with Imran of Funtime Entertainment.

The twosome, with invaluable assistance from the General Manager, Kamal Munasinghe, and the entire team at Cinnamon Life, have built Gatz into more than a venue. They have turned it into the “Heartbeat of the City.”

So come for happy hour. Stay for Terry’s horns, Sing-along with Enroute and Dance with Top Hats, all on the 23rd floor, and while Colombo sparkles below the bands will take you higher.

Remember, the heartbeat is loudest at Gatz.