Connect with us

Features

Fresh, welcome accent on regional cooperation

Published

on

Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar, who is on a three-day official visit to Sri Lanka, called on President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. Dr. Jaishankar is in Sri Lanka to attend the 5th BIMSTEC

Before Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar arrived in Sri Lanka a couple of days ago to participate in the BIMSTEC Summit, he paid a visit to the Maldives where he finalized a range of India-Maldives bilateral cooperation agreements. This was a fresh underscoring of the high importance the countries attach to both bilateral and regional cooperation, since some of the agreements which were finalized have a close bearing on the wellbeing of South Asia as well.

Among these agreements security and defense cooperation took top priority. For instance, there is the Coastal Radar System, comprising 10 radar stations, which was handed over by India to the Maldives. It is reported that this system would enhance the security of the Maldives and that of the region. There is also the National College for Policing and Law Enforcement of the Maldives, which was inaugurated by the Indian External Affairs Minister. This is said to be one of India’s largest grant-funded projects in the archipelago. It too has the potential to contribute significantly to the security of the region.

The above and many more cooperative ventures point to the pragmatic accent in the regional policy of the Maldives. There is no evidence here that the archipelago too is suffering from the ‘Big Brother’ fixation, which tends to get in the way of some of India’s smaller neighbours relating to her cordially with a degree of consistency. Besides, the importance of interacting amicably with India has been apparently impressed on the Maldivian public by the country’s political leadership quite effectively. This is because there is no evidence thus far of a widespread anti-India phobia among Maldivians.

Unfortunately, in the collective psyche of some of India’s smaller neighbours there is this subconscious resentment towards India which surfaces time and again even while sections of their political and social elites claim ‘kinship’ with India in the most flowery terms. Apparently, the roots of these contradictory pulls in minds could only be disclosed and made sense of by the psychiatrist.

The Indian External Affair’s Minister’s next stop-over was Sri Lanka and here too, a number of bilateral cooperative agreements in a range of areas were finalized, with the accent falling on economic assistance, security, energy and fisheries issues. Since Sri Lanka is today in dire need of financial and material help, the economic assistance project has not proved controversial but the same could not be said of some of the accords which come under the category of security.

For example, there are the MOUs relating to the setting up with Indian grant assistance of a Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre, the launching of a Unique Digital Identity program for Sri Lanka and the carrying out of hybrid power projects in some islands off Jaffna, which are being seen as controversial by sections of Sri Lankan opinion.

There may or may not be grounds for the airing of these reservations but it is up to the Sri Lankan side to ensure through skilled and foresightful diplomacy that vital local interests are not compromised through the finalization and implementation of these agreements. If some harm happens to be inflicted on Sri Lankan interests in the working out of these programs, Sri Lankan negotiators would have only themselves to blame for it. However, perceived pitfalls in these agreements should not be seen by the Sri Lankan side as calling in question the validity of the principles of bilateral and regional cooperation. These are matters that should be kept entirely separate from each other.

Fortunately, for the South Asian region and those adjacent to it, the BIMSTEC process is being carried forward. It is up to the states concerned to ensure that the regions figuring in the grouping gain substantially from their interactions. A BIMSTEC Charter is being formulated and it is vitally important to ensure through this document that thorny bilateral political issues in particular are not allowed to negatively impact the cooperation effort.

Unfortunately, the SAARC Charter and its institutions have proved incapable of insulating the cooperative process from vexatious bilateral political questions and this has led to the near incapacitation of SAARC. Hopefully, BIMSTEC would be spared this unhappy situation. However, there is no denying the importance of rejuvenating SAARC, considering its potential to contribute towards the general wellbeing of South Asia. BIMSTEC and SAARC need to be seen as complementing each other and should not be perceived as mutually exclusive processes.

It is important to note that the basic vision informing the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) and kindred groupings, such as the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar Forum for Regional Cooperation (BCIM), is the need for increasing economic connectivity and complementarity among the Asian countries concerned, which are mainly geographically contiguous. The relevant regions are seen as rich in resources, such as oil and petroleum, hydro power, forest products, horticulture and floriculture, besides being attractive to the tourist. It will be in the best interests of the regions and countries concerned for these resources to be explored and tapped collectively and cooperatively, with an eye on the equitable distribution of the economic benefits that these initiatives yield. Such efforts are central to the BIMSTEC vision.

Moreover, there is a growing consumer market in the areas in focus. Researchers point out, for instance, that, ‘A market of 400 million people is emerging, including neighbouring countries, such as Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, Myanmar and Nepal which can be tapped.’ (‘India, China and Sub-regional Connectivities in South Asia’, edited by D. Suba Chandran and Bhavna Singh, a SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. work).

Tapping the development potential outlined above hinges of course on continued cooperative efforts by groupings such as BIMSTEC. This is an exacting challenge, considering that the regions and countries concerned are lacking in some major infrastructure facilities that could facilitate trade, investment and people-to-people contact. Accordingly, a strong, ready coming together of states to address these problems emerges as an imperative at this juncture.

Much will depend on India and China resolving their differences quickly and working consensually to take the ‘Asian Century’ to its logical conclusion. There are strong economic complementarities between, for example, India’s Northeast and the Southwest of China. While these positives must be judiciously tapped by these Asian giants, groupings such as BIMSTEC need to explore as to how they could make good use of these synergies.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

‘There are no private universities in Sri Lanka’ – some considerations for higher education reform

Published

on

Academics involved in education policy like to say that there is no such thing as a private university in Sri Lanka. The only ‘universities’ in the country are state universities; anything else offering degrees is a private higher education institution (HEI). This position is technically accurate. Yet, in the discourse and imagination of the public, private universities are very real – people teach in them, students register in them, families pay fees, and such degree holders enter job markets in Sri Lanka and outside.

For decades, activists concerned for public higher education have ignored or resisted looking at private HEIs, as if such scrutiny would taint them. Others have worked in both types of institutions, carrying practices from each to the other. The apex body governing state universities, the UGC, has, meanwhile, ignored the concept of conflict of interest and appointed individuals in private higher education in committees and leadership positions. It is unsurprising then that some of the ideologies informing private higher education appear in reform agendas in the state sector.

This is a good time then to consider the varying types of private HEIs around us, and to take a look at some of the issues within them in the hope that higher education reform agendas will include private, as well as state higher education.

What is a ‘private university’?

First, some clarifications. In the public imaginary, a ‘private university’ is typically an institution that provides a foreign or local degree for which the student makes a payment. But this broad classification encompasses a host of diverse institutions and types of degrees which I detail below.

The Non-State Higher Education Division (NSHE) of the Ministry of Education has recognised 295 degrees by 32 institutions. Most of these are private companies and include a handful of established, well-known private HEIs that are ‘university like’. The degrees are local degrees conferred by the institutions accredited by the NSHE Division. While private HEIs conferring local degrees must be accredited by the NSHE Division, there appears to be no legal consequence for not doing so. In addition, there are several permutations of the private degree that miss the net of this Division and the Standing Committee on Accreditation and Quality Assurance (SCAQA) that assists this Division.

For one, degrees conferred by foreign universities offered, via these same private HEIs, are not vetted by the NSHE Division. Secondly, there is a growing plethora of private HEIs which have either no physical presence locally or only a dubious presence. The University Grants Commission has notified the public, through their website, that foreign universities listed in the Commonwealth Universities Yearbook and the World Higher Education Database are recognised, but refrained from giving any other details – which degrees? Offered by what modes? These details are not known. Some of the foreign universities in the lists may be legitimate entities in their own land but the degrees conferred locally, in their name, may not adhere to curriculum or teaching specifications of the NSHE Division or the UGC.

Another troubling phenomenon is the ‘top up degree’, which appears to work on the same principle as that of a pre-paid mobile connection: if I have a Diploma or an HND of a sort, I am eligible to complete a course of study which provides me with a degree, usually from a foreign university. The idea that someone who does not initially qualify for a degree programme should be able to work their way towards one is a progressive notion. This is the concept that open and distance learning (ODL) was based on initially, but which is now sadly exploited. ODL models are expected to provide opportunity for learning for those who may be excluded from traditional learning institutions. In Sri Lanka, however, we have seen ODL become a marketplace offering easy to obtain, for-fee qualifications by institutions with little commitment to superior teaching and learning.

Finally, a perusal of the many types of private HEIs and their varied degrees bring to mind another question – how should the private degrees, provided by state institutions (that are not educational institutions), be regulated? Who should do so?

All of these create a host of problems for the public – for hopeful students and parents and trusting employers. For the higher education sector, recruitment of academic staff, too, has become difficult due to this plethora of ambiguous higher education qualifications, as I discussed in a previous Kuppi article (‘Recruiting academics to state universities’).

Some issues in private HEIs – a bellwether for change in state universities

In this second part of this article, I will discuss some aspects of work in private HEIs – albeit the more established institutions – given that such issues may appear in reform agendas in future.

Across state universities, all permanent staff of a specific category are paid according to the same criteria. The picture is not so clear when it comes to private HEIs since they are different entities legally, typically companies. Private HEIs have salary scales and financial incentives that are different to each other. The more established private HEIs reportedly have attractive renumeration packages, possibly a reason for academics of state universities migrating eagerly to such institutions during sabbatical years and on retirement. This may not of course be the case with other less established, or improperly registered HEIs of which we know little. Academic staff of these more accepted private HEIs seem to value the high financial remuneration they receive (in comparison to state universities) as something that makes their work rewarding.

Attractive remuneration is important to sustain the good life and is at times seen as the institution’s way of encouraging good work. Yet, this has implications for the future of the institution: to continue to deliver on promised financial packages, institutions must continue to have large profit margins. One strategy has been to enroll multiple cohorts of students per year, even up to three or four intakes per year. This can result in exploitative work conditions, since staff must cater to all these cohorts in that same year. If there is inadequate staff, employees are further burdened. On the other hand, if there is a sudden drop in enrolments (degrees can go out of fashion) unexpected layoffs occur. Similar to other sectors that employ short-term contract staff – including state universities – in private HEIs, too, individual teachers, who are on short term contracts that need regular renewal, can feel pressured to work under difficult or exploitative conditions.

At the same time, even in the more established private HEIs, work norms differ from those of state universities in that they include promotional work that keeps the institution’s name in the eye of the public. The Marketing (or similarly named) unit comes up in conversations as one of the most important departments. It appears to weigh in on decision-making related to the number of staff, the amount of re-sits per exams, and other pedagogically important matters. This is a worrying example of how financial rationales interfere with pedagogically or academically sound processes, resulting in problematic results in the classroom. On the plus side, junior colleagues, who had experience in both state and private HEIs, also felt that they faced less harassment in private HEIs – primarily due to the private HEIs ability to take swift action in reported cases of harassment. This is a real indictment on state institutions and their reluctance to address chronic issues of harassment in our universities.

Yet, while we hear much about problems in state universities, we hardly hear of problems that staff in private HEIs face. One rationale for a lack of public expressions by staff is that expressions of discontent might lead to trouble given the importance of reputation for private HEIs. The worry about reputational damage is a growing concern in state universities, too, as evidenced by social media policies and internal conversations on reputational damage, consequent to negative publicity. Institutional worries of reputational damage are harmful in the long run since these impact not only freedom of expression by student and staff, but also research that is possible in and about the education sector.

Some thoughts at the end…


A close look at the private higher education sector is important given its strong presence in the country. Impending reform needs to regulate this diverse array of higher education offerings in the private sector, as well as the state institutions that offer privately-funded options of higher education (a topic for a separate Kuppi on its own). It is time we carefully considered how to build a whole system of higher education out of this broken mess.

Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.

Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.

Continue Reading

Features

Ready for solo spotlight

Published

on

Nish Peiris: Excited about future plans

Singer Nish Peiris is set to take the next big step in her music journey.

The talented vocalist, who has been seen and heard in the scene here for a short while, and was also featured with the now-defunct band, Inner Vision, has announced that she will be fully committing to her solo career, after completing her degree this year.

“I’m finishing my degree this year, and after that I’ll be fully committing to my solo music career,” Nish told The Island.

“I’ve already got a few tours lined up for next year, so I’m really excited for what’s ahead.”

Fans, no doubt, will remember Nish for her smooth voice and stage presence, and the good news is that she is now ready to chart her own path and bring new music to audiences at home and abroad.

With tours already planned for 2027, the year 2026 promises to be an exciting year for the young artiste as she steps into the spotlight on her own.

We wish Nish every success in this new chapter!

Continue Reading

Features

Exclusive musical evening for Sri Lankans in Toronto

Published

on

Toronto Ceymphony Live Band, with Sri Lankans doing the needful

While Sri Lankan music lovers, in Dubai, are eagerly looking forward to being a part of the action on Saturday, 25th July, with Rajiv Sebastian in the limelight, Sri Lankans, in Toronto, Canada, are equally excited and are anxiously awaiting the arrival of Sri Lanka’s famous singer/entertainer Sohan Weerasinghe.

Having done the needful with The X-Periments, the legendary performer has now embarked on an exciting new chapter – a solo career – and Toronto, Canada, will see him do the needful, on Friday, 31st July, 2026, from 8.00 pm to 12.00 am, at the Angus Glen Golf Club.

Sohan Weerasinghe: In Canada, and ready to do the needful on 31st July

Reports indicate that it’s a ‘sold out’ event – naturally with Sohan in the spotlight.

Gamini Hemalal: Creating all the excitement for Sri Lankans in Toronto

Having built his reputation through years of unforgettable performances, and hits that became part of our musical fabric, Sohan is ready to bring his own vision, sound, and stories directly to the audience, in Toronto, Canada, backed by the phenomenal Toronto Ceymphony Live Band.

Says Gamini Hemalal, who has been instrumental in reviving the Sri Lankan entertainment scene, in that part of the world:

“The countdown begins for the most exclusive musical event of the summer! Join us for a premium night of incredible music, elite hospitality, and a lavish buffet as the legendary Sohan Weerasinghe takes the stage live in Toronto!

“This is a high-end event, designed for those who appreciate exceptional entertainment and great food.”

Gamini, who is also a member of the Toronto Ceymphony Live Band, mentioned that it’s going to be an intimate musical evening with the celebrated Sohan Weerasinghe.

From packed auditoriums to intimate shows, Sohan continues to prove why he remains one of Sri Lanka’s most beloved entertainers.

For decades, Sohan Weerasinghe has been a household name in Sri Lankan entertainment.

Known for his captivating smooth voice and charismatic stage presence, Canada will experience it all on Friday, 31st July.

Next on the list of events, Gamini Hemal is working on, is Halloween night and he says “what we plan to do will be very interesting and unique … with a surprise guest star, as well!”

Continue Reading

Trending