News
Former Foreign Secretary outlines enormity of Indian poaching in Lankan waters depriving our fishermen’s livelihood
By Rathindra Kuruwita
There are about 3,500 trawlers operated by Indian fishermen operating around South India, out of which about 2,000 poach in Sri Lankan territorial waters, Bernard Goonetilleke, Chairman of the Pathfinder Foundation, said.
He said that Indian fishermen arrive about 500 meters from Sri Lanka’s shores three days a week, adding that a few years ago, it was estimated that Sri Lanka lost about 80 million U.S. dollars due to poaching and that the number should have increased significantly by now.
In the first few decades, following independence, Sri Lankan and Indian fishermen operated without boundary restrictions, Goonetilleke said.
However, agreements signed in 1974 and 1976 demarcated sea boundaries, the retired Foreign Secretary said. The 1974 Agreement was regarding historic waters between Sri Lanka and India in the Palk Strait and Palk Bay. This agreement also formally confirmed Sri Lanka’s sovereignty over the Kachchativu Island.
Article 5 of the 1974 Agreement states that “subject to the foregoing, Indian fishermen and pilgrims will enjoy access to visit Kachchativu as hitherto, and will not be required by Sri Lanka to obtain travel documents or visas for these purposes.”
Article 6 of the Agreement states that “vessels of India and Sri Lanka will enjoy in each other’s waters such rights as they have traditionally enjoyed therein.”
In this article, only the navigational rights of the vessels of both Sri Lanka and India over each other’s waters have been preserved.
An Agreement between Sri Lanka and India on the Maritime Boundary between the two countries in the Gulf of Mannar and the Bay of Bengal and related matters was signed in 1976.
The Agreement said “each party shall have sovereign rights and exclusive jurisdiction over the Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) as well as over their resources, whether living or non-living, falling on its side of the aforesaid boundary,” it said adding that “each Party shall respect rights of navigation through its territorial sea and exclusive economic zone in accordance with its laws and regulations and the rules of international law.”
The 1974 and 1976 Agreements, taken together with the Exchange of Letters, that was signed between Kewal Singh, the then Foreign Secretary to the Government of India, and W.T. Jayasinghe, then Secretary to the Ministry of Defence and Foreign Affairs of Sri Lanka, has put the question of fishing rights beyond doubt. Paragraph 1 of the Exchange of Letters very clearly rules out any fishing rights for the fishermen of the two States in the waters of the other state which reads as follows; “fishing vessels and fishermen of India shall not engage in fishing in the historic waters, the territorial sea and the EEZ of Sri Lanka, nor shall the fishing vessels and fishermen of Sri Lanka engage in fishing in the historic waters, the territorial sea and the EEZ of India, without the express permission of Sri Lanka or India, as the case may be.”
While Indians lost access to Sri Lankan waters, local fishermen lost access to Pedro Bank, and Wadge Bank, the continental shelves off Cape Comorin at the southern tip of India, which had been profitable commercial fishing grounds since the 1920s for both Indian and Sri Lankan boats.
Goonetilleke said that although these agreements were signed, Sri Lankan fishermen were absent from the seas off the country’s north for about 30 years due to the war with the LTTE.
“We had to restrict the movement of Sri Lankan fishing boats. During that time, Indian fishermen operated in our waters freely. They still come to our waters based on that habit,” he said.
The Chairman of the Pathfinder Foundation said that Indian trawlers are large and numerous. Because of this, they have managed to compel Sri Lankan fishermen to stay home for three days of the week.
“Usually they operate on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday. They ask our fishermen not to operate on those days. Our boats are usually under 23 feet. When they lay the nets and wait, and if large Indian trawlers engage in bottom trawling or pair trawling, they can drag away our nets, our catch and even our boats. When this happens, there is often conflict,” he said.
Indians, for the past few decades, have been asking Sri Lanka to issue permits to their fishermen to operate in Sri Lankan waters, the Chairman of the Pathfinder Foundation said. However, there is stiff opposition to this among the Sri Lankan fishermen, he said.
“Sri Lanka has banned bottom trawling in 2017/18. Earlier, circa 2010, Indian fishermen, during a discussion with Sri Lankan counterparts, agreed to stop bottom trawling by 2012. The 2018 regulations note what steps are to be taken against Indians who poach in our waters.
“However, given that most of the Indians arrested do now own the boats and Sri Lanka’s recognition that these fishermen are compelled to take these jobs due to poverty, the 2018 law has a number of humanitarian provisions. For example, when we arrest Indian fishermen, we have to tell the Indian consulate, legal action has to be taken within 30 days, and we do not harass them while in custody. However, we only arrest a handful of them when they come to our waters three days a week and in fleets of thousands,” he said.
News
X-Press Pearl disaster fuels global call to classify plastic pellets as hazardous
Nearly five years after the catastrophic sinking of the X-Press Pearl, off Sri Lanka’s western coast, the environmental scars remain visible — from contaminated beaches to disrupted fisheries. Now, that tragedy has become a rallying point for an international coalition of scientists, demanding urgent reforms to global maritime law.
A group of leading researchers and environmental experts is calling on the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to formally recognise plastic pellets — commonly known as nurdles — as hazardous to the marine environment. They argue that existing international shipping regulations fail to adequately address the environmental devastation caused by pellet spills.
Their appeal comes through a newly accepted scientific commentary, published in Cambridge Prisms: Plastics, consolidating decades of research on the impacts of plastic pellet pollution.
Plastic pellets are small, lentil-sized (2–5 mm) particles made from virgin or recycled plastic and used to manufacture a vast range of plastic
products. Scientists say that spills occur frequently during handling and transport, both on land and at sea. Once released into the ocean, pellets persist for decades, spreading across vast distances and entering marine food chains.
Dr. Jennifer Lavers, who studies pollutants in seabirds, warned that the scale of plastic ingestion has reached crisis levels.
“Today the volumes of plastic pellets entering the marine environment are enough to ‘feed’ millions of young seabirds,” she said. “In some areas we are seeing nearly a 100% rate of plastic ingestion, with pellets being particularly problematic.”
Beyond physical harm such as digestive blockages in wildlife, pellets also pose chemical threats. According to Dr. Sinja Rist of DTU Aqua, they are far from inert materials.
“Pellets are persistent, widely dispersed, readily ingested by wildlife, and capable of transporting hazardous chemicals,” she explained, noting that they can absorb and release toxic substances across oceans.
Sri Lanka’s experience with the X-Press Pearl disaster, in 2021, highlighted these dangers on an unprecedented scale. The burning container ship released vast quantities of chemicals and billions of plastic pellets into the sea, causing widespread marine contamination and severe economic losses to coastal communities.
Hemantha Withanage, Chairperson of the Centre for Environmental Justice in Sri Lanka, said the disaster exposed major gaps in international maritime regulation.
“After studying the aftermath of the X-Press Pearl disaster, it is impossible to argue that plastic pellets are harmless cargo,” Withanage stressed. “The impacts in Sri Lanka were immediate, widespread, and long-lasting. Stronger international regulation is essential to prevent this from happening again.”
Under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), the intentional discharge of plastics is banned. However, scientists argue that current rules are inadequate when it comes to preventing or responding to accidental spills, especially those involving container ships.
The researchers are urging the IMO to assign plastic pellets a specific United Nations classification number. Such recognition would formally acknowledge their environmental hazard potential and trigger stricter requirements for packaging, labelling, and emergency notification during shipping.
Dr. Therese Karlsson, lead author of the commentary and Science Advisor for the IPEN, said the scientific case is clear.
“There are decades of studies highlighting threats from plastic pellets released into the oceans, including risks to marine animals and the food chain,” she said. “Plastics contain thousands of chemicals, many known to cause harm to the environment and human health. It is past time for global regulations to protect our oceans.”
The European Union has recently introduced measures aimed at preventing pellet losses throughout the supply chain, and in 2021 the IMO committed to addressing pellet pollution as part of broader efforts to reduce marine plastic litter. Yet experts warn that without binding global action, pellet spills will continue.
For Sri Lanka, still recovering from one of the worst maritime environmental disasters in its history, the international call carries particular urgency.
Scientists say the message from the island nation’s experience is unmistakable: plastic pellets must no longer be treated as ordinary cargo, but as hazardous materials demanding strict global oversight.
By Ifham Nizam
News
Foreign Minister Herath decries deadlock in global disarmament
Minister of Foreign Affairs, Vijitha Herath, has underscored the urgent global need for enduring peace, security, and strengthened multilateral cooperation, warning that rising geopolitical tensions have created deadlocks in global disarmament efforts and posed serious challenges to international humanitarian law.
The Minister said so while addressing the High-Level Segment of the Conference on Disarmament (CD) in Geneva on Monday (23 Feb), reaffirming Sri Lanka’s firm commitment to global disarmament and multilateral cooperation.
Minister Herath said that safeguarding the future of humanity must be treated as a paramount priority, stressing that trust and mutual respect are essential foundations for effective decision-making in multilateral forums. He reaffirmed that Sri Lanka remains committed to ensuring a secure and stable world for future generations.
Highlighting Sri Lanka’s longstanding role in nuclear disarmament, he recalled the country’s contribution to the 1964 Non-Aligned Movement Summit in Cairo, which called for the establishment of nuclear-free zones. He reiterated that Sri Lanka continues to strongly support such initiatives, particularly in the Middle East, and emphasiSed that total elimination and non-proliferation remain the only guarantees against the use of nuclear weapons.
Sri Lanka also urged that non-nuclear-weapon states must receive unconditional, non-discriminatory, legally binding security assurances, achievable through the work of the Conference on Disarmament.
On humanitarian demining, Minister Herath noted that Sri Lanka remains an active partner in that effort and currently serves as a senior member of the victim assistance committee of the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention. He further reaffirmed Sri Lanka’s continued commitment to the Cluster Munitions Convention, which the country presided over in 2019.
Recognising the rapidly evolving threat landscape, the Minister warned of the impact of emerging technologies that have already reshaped the global disarmament architecture while putting international humanitarian law at significant risk. In this context, he said Sri Lanka has been advocating for the early start of negotiations on a legally binding instrument to prohibit lethal autonomous weapon systems.
He also addressed growing threats to outer space security, stressing that Sri Lanka, long a supporter of disarmament in outer space, continues to back negotiations on a legally binding instrument to prevent an arms race beyond Earth.
Minister Herath concluded by affirming Sri Lanka’s readiness to work with all nations to ensure global efforts toward a safer world are accelerated and achieved at the earliest opportunity.
News
CoPF orders officials to establish legal framework for Rs. 200 for estate workers daily attendance allowance
The Parliamentary Committee on Public Finance has directed officials to establish a proper legal framework for the Rs. 200 daily attendance allowance provided by the Government to estate workers.
During the Committee meeting on February 17, 2026, chaired by MP Dr. Harsha de Silva, members emphasised that while there is no objection to increasing estate worker wages, the current payment mechanism lacks a formal legal basis. The allowance is being distributed under a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with private plantation companies without gazette notification, leaving the arrangement vulnerable to termination and excluding contributions to the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees’ Trust Fund (ETF), according to parliament sources.
Officials noted that the MoU with plantation companies was valid for three years, and thereafter a policy decision would be required to continue the payments. The Committee stressed that public funds should not be used to pay salaries in private institutions without proper financial discipline, despite the allowance being approved under the 2026 Budget as a “development subsidy.” The Deputy Secretary to the Treasury suggested the payment would be more appropriately classified as a “production incentive,” though existing payments and MoUs did not specify such requirements.
The Committee also reviewed disaster relief efforts for those affected by Cyclone Ditwah. Officials reported that approximately Rs. 24.4 billion had been disbursed under various relief programs, including allowances for house cleaning, household purchases, and school assistance. Delays in housing reconstruction and rental support were attributed to damage assessments and land identification, with Committee members urging faster delivery of housing aid.
Officials from the National Insurance Trust Fund (NITF) highlighted reinsurance claims of around Rs. 11 billion following Cyclone Ditwah, noting that although NITF had not reinsured its exposure internationally since 2023, it was capable of settling existing claims.
-
Features4 days agoWhy does the state threaten Its people with yet another anti-terror law?
-
Features4 days agoReconciliation, Mood of the Nation and the NPP Government
-
Features4 days agoVictor Melder turns 90: Railwayman and bibliophile extraordinary
-
Features3 days agoLOVEABLE BUT LETHAL: When four-legged stars remind us of a silent killer
-
Features4 days agoVictor, the Friend of the Foreign Press
-
Latest News5 days agoNew Zealand meet familiar opponents Pakistan at spin-friendly Premadasa
-
Latest News5 days agoTariffs ruling is major blow to Trump’s second-term agenda
-
Latest News5 days agoECB push back at Pakistan ‘shadow-ban’ reports ahead of Hundred auction
