Connect with us

Business

Flexibility within limits – the underlying premise driving the NBFI sector

Published

on

By Niroshan Udage

Council Member of The Finance Houses Association of Sri Lanka

As an integral part of the Country’s financial system, Licensed Finance Companies (LFCs) and registered leasing companies play a vital role in the development of the national economy. Collectively known as the Non-Bank financial (NBFI) sector, they offer a gamut of financial solutions to cater to individuals, proprietors, partnerships, corporates or business conglomerates. Most NBFI’s have also invested in developing an extensive island-wide presence that allows them to reach all sectors, social backgrounds and economic levels. Their ability to serve a wider cross section of the market makes the NBFI sector a key contributor towards the development of the SME and Micro enterprise segment in Sri Lanka. Leveraging on the expertise gained by serving the local SME and Micro segment, a few NBFI’s have even ventured outside Sri Lanka to set up operations overseas.

Regulatory supervision, governance and compliance

Dealing with the SME / Micro segment has resulted in NBFI’s being subject to increasing regulatory controls in the past few years.

As the words ‘Licensed Finance Companies’ denote LFCs are licensed and regulated by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL).

LFCs conduct their business in conformity with the provisions of the Finance Business Act No.42 of 2011, Finance Leasing Act No.56 of 2000, Directions, Rules and Guidelines issued the said Acts, Consumer Credit Act, No.29 of 1982, Financial Transactions Reporting Act No.6 of 2006 and Prevention of Money Laundering Act, No.5 of 2006, under the direct supervision of CBSL and other applicable Statutes. Through these Statutes and regulations CBSL regulates the finance business and the finance leasing business to ensure the orderly function of the financial system.

In addition, LFC’s are required to abide by the Corporate Governance Directions issued by the CBSL. This helps to create an environment of trust, transparency and accountability, which is required to foster long-term investment, financial stability and enhance the business integrity of LFCs.

Another Direction noteworthy of mention is the Financial Customer Protection Framework outlined in Finance Business Act Direction No.01 of 2018 and the detailed Guidelines thereon. This direction provides the platform for customers of LFCs to assert their rights and to ensure that their rights are safeguarded. The key objective of the said Direction is to safeguard the interests of the customers and build trust in order to strengthen customer confidence in the sector. Since being introduced in 2018, the Financial Customer Protection Framework has become an integral part of the corporate governance culture and strategic decision making of the Boards of LFCs.

To ensure compliance with the applicable laws and regulations, LFCs have established a very strong and robust Compliance function, which is subject to regular reporting and monitoring by the CBSL.

The Challenge

Despite the stringent business and regulatory environment governing the NBFI’s, it is unfortunate that there is still a segment of the general public who have a negative perception towards the sector. Such unfounded perceptions appear to have arisen primarily due to the lack of awareness regarding the pricing mechanism and the foreclosure process followed by the NBFI sector. The purpose of this article is to provide some much needed clarity on these topics.

The Pricing Mechanism adopted by the NBFI sector

It is no secret that compared to the banking sector, the pricing structure of the NBFI sector for similar products is relatively higher. There are several fundamental reasons for this. Firstly, it is important to understand that the NBFI caters mainly to the SME and Micro segment of the market. Based on their profiles, SME and Micro segment customers fall into the high-risk category.

The typical SME / Micro customer who is often overlooked by the banking system due to their lack of credentials and financial sophistication, is then motivated to approach the NBFI sector with the expectation that their credit applications will be processed expeditiously even without necessary documentary proof or credentials. This puts NBFI’s in a tough spot. On the one hand NBFI’s are expected to be more flexible in their decision making process in order to secure their customer, while on the other hand they need to comply with established risk appetite limits in order to safeguard the business. Amidst this backdrop, the only rational way for NBFI’s to strike a balance is by building in a higher risk premium into their pricing structure. And with SME / Micro customers also likely to be more vulnerable to economic shocks, especially given their position at the lower end of the pyramid, NBFI’s are compelled to factor-in additional risk premiums into their pricing structure. Meanwhile being in the high-risk category, the cost of managing SME / Micro customers is also comparatively higher. From the additional background checks to site visits and managerial oversight to encourage customers to adopt proper financial control and discipline, NBFI’s incur significantly higher operational costs per customer, which leaves these companies with no option but to build cost buffers into their pricing structure.

Another key element that drives up the NBFI’s pricing structure is their high cost of funding. Unlike Banks, which have access to low cost funds through their CASA (Current and Savings Accounts) base, NBFI’s are funded largely by public deposits and often have to pay higher rates in order to attract deposits away from the banking system. On average more than 50% of the total interest costs of NBFI’s go towards servicing deposits. Lowering these cost elements is an extremely difficult task since NBFI’s do not have access to free funds such as current accounts.

Despite these challenges however, some NBFI’s have adopted dynamic pricing strategies in line with their business model and risk appetite, enabling them to offer very competitive rates, often on par with the banks. In this manner, the NBFI sector has remained firm in its commitment to nurture the SME / Micro segment – the “infants” of the economy, to the level of bankable customers, thereby contributing towards improving the Country’s overall credit culture over time.

Regulated foreclosure process

In the interest of protecting the rights of both Lessees and Lessors, NBFI’s follow a highly regulated foreclosure process for the repossession of assets. They cannot deviate from the repossession guidelines set out under the Finance Leasing Act, No.56 of 2000. The Finance Leasing Act was enacted in the year 2000 to provide for the regulation and monitoring of finance leasing businesses, to specify the rights and duties of Lessors and Lessees and suppliers of equipment and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. It is mandatory that all NBFI’s strictly adhere to the provisions of the Finance Leasing Act when engaging in the business of leasing.

Accordingly, a repossession notice can be issued only if the installments are in arrears more than the limit of substantial failure. However as directed by the Act, repossession is sought only as the last resort for the recovery of outstanding installments. Repossession orders are issued only after sending reminders, notices and notices of termination to Lessees and Guarantors according to the Act, within the stipulated timelines.

During the period leading up to the issue of a repossession order, NBFI’s are expected to make every endeavor to collect the installments in arrears, by visiting the customer, through telephone calls etc. The Act further states that if the Lessee is genuinely in a difficulty due to an unforeseen event, they are always welcome to visit the respective NBFI and make a formal request for deferment of recovery action. At this point NBFI’s are required to look into every avenue to offer relief to the customer including granting of concessions / deferment, whenever they are warranted.

Meanwhile if the leased property is repossessed, it is disposed of quickly in order to recover the outstanding according to the auction procedure that is laid down in the Act. Once the vehicle is repossessed, the final notice is sent to the Lessee giving a further 14 days for settlement. A newspaper advertisement is published in all 3 languages advertising the sale. At the same time, another letter is sent to the Lessee allowing a further 7 days for settlement of the outstanding. Finally, when the time period lapses, the repossessed vehicle is sold through tender process or at a public auction. Prior to the public auctions another paper advertisement is published which is the end point of the auction procedure.

Conclusion

It is hoped that this article provides some reasonable clarity regarding the framework within which NBFI’s operate, while also helping to alleviate some of the persistent misconceptions that have plagued the sector. Going forward, it is imperative that NBFI’s continue to serve the target market in utmost good faith. It is equally important that all players collaborate with the regulatory authorities to uphold the integrity of the NBFI sector at all times.

The writer is an Executive Director of LB Finance PLC with 30 years of experience in the Finance industry.

 

 



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

How middle powers cooperate to achieve shared goals

Published

on

Australian H.C. to Sri Lanka Matthew Duckworth (Left) addressing the round table. Pathfinder Foundation Chairman Ambassador (Rtd.) Dr. Bernard Goonathilake is next to him.

‘Australia’s engagement with institutions, such as the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) and “minilateral” platforms, including the Quad and the Combined Maritime Force, are practical examples of middle powers working together to address shared challenges ranging from ocean piracy to humanitarian assistance, Australia High Commissioner to Sri Lanka Matthew Duckworth said at a recent round table forum featuring the media and other important sections, held at the Colombo Club of the Taj Samudra Hotel on the topic ‘Middle Power Diplomacy.’

The forum was organized and conducted by the Pathfinder Foundation of Sri Lanka under the moderation of the latter’s Chairman, Ambassador (Rtd.) Dr. Bernard Goonathilake.

High Commissioner Duckworth underscored that such cooperation is not directed against any particular country but aims to preserve an open, inclusive, and rules-based regional order.

H.C. Duckworth acknowledged the reality of major power competition while stressing that Australia seeks stable and respectful relations with all countries, including Sri Lanka, cooperating where possible and disagreeing where necessary, without compromising core national interests.

Further, the H.C. focused on India’s evolving role in the Indian Ocean, the trajectory of China’s rise, the durability of the current global order, alliance dynamics, and Sri Lanka’s positioning in the Indian Ocean.

Responding to a question about India, the High Commissioner affirmed that Australia expects all major powers—India, China, and the United States—to act transparently and to respect the sovereignty of smaller states. On whether the current emphasis on middle-power diplomacy is a temporary shift or a long-term trend, the High Commissioner stated that middle powers must now play a more visible and proactive role in sustaining international norms and institutions.

H.C. Duckworth added that Australia invests in Sri Lanka in sectors, such as, minerals, renewable energy, textiles and education services. The High Commissioner reiterated Australia’s support for open trade and deeper regional economic integration, emphasizing the importance of economic resilience in a contested global environment.

The Pathfinder Foundation is a Colombo-based think tank dedicated to fostering informed dialogue on foreign policy, economic development and strategic affairs.

By Hiran H Senewiratne

Continue Reading

Business

Green Minds: A new platform to rethink environmental governance in Sri Lanka

Published

on

The Ministry of Environment yesterday launched a new knowledge-sharing platform titled Green Minds, aimed at strengthening environmental thinking and institutional capacity among public sector officials, at a time when Sri Lanka is facing mounting ecological stress and climate-related challenges.

The inaugural session of the monthly programme was held on February 12, 2026, at the Ministry auditorium under the patronage of Secretary to the Ministry of Environment, K. R. Uduwawala, with the participation of senior officials from the Ministry and its affiliated institutions.

Addressing the gathering, Secretary Uduwawala said that Green Minds was designed not merely as another training initiative, but as a thinking space for public officials to critically engage with emerging environmental concepts and global best practices.

“Environmental governance today is no longer limited to regulations and enforcement. It requires new ways of thinking, interdisciplinary approaches and continuous learning. Green Minds is intended to become a platform where officials can reflect, debate and update themselves on these evolving realities,” Uduwawala said.

He stressed that Sri Lanka’s environmental institutions must move beyond routine administrative practices and embrace knowledge-driven policy making, particularly in areas such as climate adaptation, biodiversity conservation, sustainable resource management and environmental justice.

The keynote lecture at the inaugural session was delivered by Senior Professor Siri Hettige, who spoke on the role of social sciences in achieving sustainable development in Sri Lanka. He highlighted the often overlooked social dimensions of environmental problems.

“Environmental issues are not purely scientific or technical. They are deeply social. Human behaviour, consumption patterns, inequality and governance structures all shape environmental outcomes,” Prof. Hettige said.

“If we want sustainability, we must understand society as much as we understand nature.”

He pointed out that many environmental policies fail because they do not adequately consider community realities, livelihoods and social power relations.

“You cannot conserve forests without understanding people. You cannot manage waste without understanding urban lifestyles. Sustainability is fundamentally a social project,” he added.

Following the keynote, a high-level panel discussion on strengthening environmental awareness brought together Prof. Hettige, Dr. Herath Vidyaratne, environmental policy analyst, Ravindra Kariyawasam, Adviser to the Minister of Environment, and S. C. Palamakumbura, Conservator General of Forests.

Kariyawasam said Sri Lanka was at a critical juncture where environmental decision making must be aligned with national development priorities.

“We can no longer treat the environment as a separate sector. It has to be integrated into economic planning, infrastructure development and social policy. Green Minds offers a space for officials to think beyond institutional silos,” he said.

Dr. Vidyaratne stressed that environmental literacy among state officials was essential in responding to complex challenges such as climate change, water scarcity and ecosystem degradation.

“The problems we face today are interconnected. Climate change is linked to food security, public health and migration. Officers need systems thinking, not just subject knowledge,” he said.

Meanwhile, Palamakumbura highlighted the importance of translating environmental awareness into institutional action.

“We have knowledge, laws and policies. What we need is consistent implementation and a shared environmental ethic across all institutions. Platforms like Green Minds can help build that collective responsibility,” he said.

He noted that forest conservation, wildlife protection and ecosystem restoration could not succeed without inter-agency cooperation and informed decision makers.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Business

Third quarter financials highlight 30% PBT growth for Aitken Spence in FY 2025/26

Published

on

Ms. Stasshani Jayawardena Chairman / Chairperson Aitken Spence PLC / Dr. Parakrama Dissanayake Deputy Chairman and Managing Director Aitken Spence PLC

Spanning tourism, maritime and freight logistics, strategic investments and services, with operations across the region, Aitken Spence PLC, with a legacy of over 157 years, continues to pursue excellence. The Group recorded revenue of Rs. 67 billion for the nine months ending 31st December 2025, underscoring a robust performance across its portfolio of industries. The Tourism sector accounted for 68% of Group revenue, while the Maritime & Freight Logistics sector and Strategic Investments sector contributed 18% and 12% respectively. Furthermore, the Group’s revenue for the third quarter improved by 3.8%, reflecting steady performance across key sectors.

The Group’s total Profit Before Tax (PBT) stood at Rs. 5.6 billion for the nine months ending 31st December 2025, compared to Rs. 4.3 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year, reflecting a growth of 30%. Correspondingly, the Group’s Profit After Tax improved by 42% to reach Rs. 3.4 billion.

Sectoral Performance

The Tourism sector recorded the most notable improvement during the period under review, reporting a Profit Before Tax (PBT) of Rs. 2.0 billion for the nine months ended December 2025. This performance was primarily attributable to the sustained recovery and growth of the tourism industry in Sri Lanka. In addition, the sector benefited from significant improvements in profitability at the Group’s Maldivian resorts, as well as enhanced operating performance across hotel operations in India and Oman.

The Group’s Maritime & Freight Logistics sector was the largest contributor to Profit Before Tax for the period under review, reporting a Profit Before Tax of Rs. 3.3 billion. Sector performance, however, was moderated by lower volumes and margin pressures, particularly impacting overseas freight and airline operations. This was reflected in the reduced contribution from the sector’s equity-accounted investee for the period.

In the Strategic Investments sector, the key contributing segments of printing and plantations both recorded stellar performance for the period under review despite the challenging market conditions of these industries, while the power generation segment witnessed a steady performance with notable contributions from the Waste-to-Energy and renewable power generation operations. However, the significant losses incurred in the apparel manufacturing segment impacted the overall performance of the sector, resulting in a loss of Rs. 652 million at PBT level.

The Services sector recorded strong growth during the period under review, driven primarily by the expansion of operations at Port City BPO, the Group’s most recent investment. This performance was further supported by improvements in performance by the Group’s elevators segment. As a result, the Services sector reported a Profit Before Tax of Rs. 843 million, compared to Rs. 114 million in the corresponding period of the previous year.

The period was marked by notable achievements:

Aitken Spence PLC became the first and only diversified holdings company in Sri Lanka to have its climate targets validated by the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi).

Continue Reading

Trending