Features
Fighting the Conference Lines with help of Trade Minister Hugh Fernando
PB Karandawela introduced innovative strategies to counter cartels
(Excerpted from the Merrill Fernando autobiography)
Shipping, a crucial aspect of the high volume tea export business, was controlled by Shipping Conference Lines, created during the colonial era in order to confine export rights to British vessels. It was, essentially, a cartel, which both suppressed and oppressed the local entrepreneur who posed even a minimal threat to the multinational. This tightly-controlled operation effectively prevented other companies from trading, not just in Ceylon but in other countries as well.
There was a Conference line to every destination and since it had very few ships, sailings were intermittent and, therefore, highly detrimental to our trade with Australia and New Zealand in particular. It was not unusual for a vessel scheduled to sail in January, to show up as late as April. Meanwhile, our export cargo would pile up, eating into warehousing space, whilst our overseas customers, running short of stock, turned to Indonesia for urgently-needed tea.
Though there were non-Conference Line vessels calling at our port, they were not permitted to carry our cargo, whilst they were also denied admission to Shipping Conference Lines. My numerous appeals to the regulatory bodies for a relaxation of these adverse conditions, went unheeded for a long time.
Eventually, following incessant lobbying, largely on my part, as my trade with Australia and New Zealand was seriously under threat, Messageries Maritimes was permitted to carry 250 tonnes of cargo.
However, that space was commandeered by Brooke Bonds for Bushells of Australia, in another classic instance of a multinational’s suppression of a local entrepreneur. I was aware that sometimes large multinationals booked shipping space and held it till the last minute, thus denying the local exporter the opportunity of booking space to ship his produce. I had to fight tooth and nail for an allocation of 30-40 tonnes.
During this period local companies dominated the exports to Middle Eastern countries, which imported substantial volumes of Low-Grown tea, whilst the multinationals dominated markets in Europe, USA, Canada, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. At that time Ceylon had to depend on the UK for the disposal of around 65% of total national production, which included about 50 – 60 million kg shipped direct to the London Auction, annually.
Whilst Ceylon had her own ships, operating under Ceylon Shipping Lines, of which the government of Ceylon was the major shareholder, the stranglehold of the UK-Ceylon Conference Lines was such that our ships were not permitted to carry any tea to the UK. The entire volume of tea exported annually to UK, had to be carried on ships owned and run by the UK-Ceylon Shipping Conference.
Shipping Conference Lines also effectively prevented intervention from any other shipper. It had a two-way advantage in that after discharging its cargoes of tea at designated ports in the UK, the same ships returned to Ceylon with fertilizer, machinery, and other goods destined for the plantations. In my view, it was inconceivable that Ceylon-owned ships should be debarred from carrying Ceylon Tea, the only large volume export from the country that identified Ceylon globally. Those who represented Conference Lines were, mostly, our own people, though!
Assistance from high places
Fortunately, the then Minister of Trade and Commerce (1968-1970), a member of Dudley Senanayake’s Cabinet, was my former school teacher, Hugh Fernando. I made my submission to him, not on the basis of soliciting a personal favour, but seeking relief on behalf of all exporters who were being adversely affected by the shipping restrictions. The Minister accepted my arguments and immediately instructed the Shipping Corporation to carry this cargo only in our vessels. His decision made headlines in the papers the next day. It was a bold step that outraged vested interests in both the UK and Ceylon.
Soon afterwards, the Chairmen of two companies representing Shipping Conference Lines, Chari de Silva of Aitken Spence and Basil Jesudasan of Carsons, came to meet me to canvass their case. One of their arguments was that as a result of the Minister’s new ruling, Ceylon would not be able to sell its tea to the UK. Their view was that I had misled the Minister. However, I stood my ground whilst the Minister’s decision also remained unchanged. Soon afterwards, Ceylon Shipping Lines was granted membership of Ceylon-UK Conference Lines.
In this affair I also had the assistance of a very competent, unbiased, and courageous civil servant in P.B. Karandawela, Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Tourism and Shipping under Minister P.BG Kalugalle, who moved swiftly to implement the Minister’s directives. Karandawela is still remembered by the old-timers in local shipping circles, as the man who introduced innovative strategies to counter the strong-arm tactics of Shipping Conference Lines.
During the 1970s Karandawela was the Chairman of Air Ceylon and the Ceylon Transport Board, as well as the founding Chairman of the Ceylon Shipping Corporation. He was a genuine logistics pundit.
Over dinner one day with Minister Fernando, I explained to him the limitations imposed on the growth of the local entrepreneur by the colonial trading culture and conventions.
Apart from Shipping Conference Lines, a creation of British interests to exploit our shipping to their advantage, I also explained to him how the disparity in freight rates between bulk exports and packets, inhibited the local exporters’ ability to export value-added tea under locally-owned brand names. Obviously, whilst I stood to gain personally by a rational revision of the rates, so did all other exporters who were interested in developing exports of packeted tea and own brands. This was before the tea bag and the containerized cargo era.
The Minister, however, pointed out that the shipping companies would strongly resist any revision of freight rates. Instead, he revised the export duty on tea by 15 cents per kilo on packeted tea, in order to correct the freight rate disadvantage. It was also a decision which could be implemented overnight, with favourable outcomes to the exporter of value-added tea. Shipping Conference Lines, with the approval of the Ceylon Tea Traders Association (CTTA) committee, responded with equal speed, convening an emergency meeting and increasing the freight rate on value-added tea, by 15 cents per kilo, thus neutralizing the benefit gained by the duty reduction.
Such was the influence of the shipping cartel and the CTTA, whose members were largely locals. However, I continued my campaign against the Australia/New Zealand cartel until the freight rate to Australian ports dropped from USD 3,600 for a 20-foot Container Load, to USD 1,400.
The British dominance of the trading world also extended to insurance, another vital ancillary to export. The first local insurance company was ‘The Ceylon Insurance Company Ltd.,’ which, at first, was unable to compete on equal terms with the long-established British insurance companies. However, with other insurance companies being gradually incorporated, the British hold on this aspect of trade was eventually loosened.
A matter of interest that many, even those in the tea industry, may have forgotten or lost sight of, is that the Agency House Investigation Commission appointed in or around 1971, by the United Front Government, highlighted, among other matters, the control exerted, both directly and indirectly, by multinational interests in Ceylon, on shipping, banking, and insurance. Arguably, there may have been an element of leftist bias in the manner in which the report framed its findings but, still, the bare facts spoke for themselves.
I have been very critical of, and confrontational with, many private and State organizations which, through rigid adherence to archaic statutes and conventions, designed specifically to protect British interests, inhibited the advancement of the local entrepreneur. However, I must also thank the few far-sighted politicians and national-minded public servants with integrity, who have had both the political will and the courage to assist me, in many of my trade-related initiatives, launched not solely in my interests, but also in the interests of all local businessmen engaged in the tea export trade and other allied ventures.
Features
Recruiting academics to state universities – beset by archaic selection processes?
Time has, by and large, stood still in the business of academic staff recruitment to state universities. Qualifications have proliferated and evolved to be more interdisciplinary, but our selection processes and evaluation criteria are unchanged since at least the late 1990s. But before I delve into the problems, I will describe the existing processes and schemes of recruitment. The discussion is limited to UGC-governed state universities (and does not include recruitment to medical and engineering sectors) though the problems may be relevant to other higher education institutions (HEIs).
How recruitment happens currently in SL state universities
Academic ranks in Sri Lankan state universities can be divided into three tiers (subdivisions are not discussed).
* Lecturer (Probationary)
– recruited with a four-year undergraduate degree. A tiny step higher is the Lecturer (Unconfirmed), recruited with a postgraduate degree but no teaching experience.
* A Senior Lecturer can be recruited with certain postgraduate qualifications and some number of years of teaching and research.
* Above this is the professor (of four types), which can be left out of this discussion since only one of those (Chair Professor) is by application.
State universities cannot hire permanent academic staff as and when they wish. Prior to advertising a vacancy, approval to recruit is obtained through a mind-numbing and time-consuming process (months!) ending at the Department of Management Services. The call for applications must list all ranks up to Senior Lecturer. All eligible candidates for Probationary to Senior Lecturer are interviewed, e.g., if a Department wants someone with a doctoral degree, they must still advertise for and interview candidates for all ranks, not only candidates with a doctoral degree. In the evaluation criteria, the first degree is more important than the doctoral degree (more on this strange phenomenon later). All of this is only possible when universities are not under a ‘hiring freeze’, which governments declare regularly and generally lasts several years.
Problem type 1
– Archaic processes and evaluation criteria
Twenty-five years ago, as a probationary lecturer with a first degree, I was a typical hire. We would be recruited, work some years and obtain postgraduate degrees (ideally using the privilege of paid study leave to attend a reputed university in the first world). State universities are primarily undergraduate teaching spaces, and when doctoral degrees were scarce, hiring probationary lecturers may have been a practical solution. The path to a higher degree was through the academic job. Now, due to availability of candidates with postgraduate qualifications and the problems of retaining academics who find foreign postgraduate opportunities, preference for candidates applying with a postgraduate qualification is growing. The evaluation scheme, however, prioritises the first degree over the candidate’s postgraduate education. Were I to apply to a Faculty of Education, despite a PhD on language teaching and research in education, I may not even be interviewed since my undergraduate degree is not in education. The ‘first degree first’ phenomenon shows that universities essentially ignore the intellectual development of a person beyond their early twenties. It also ignores the breadth of disciplines and their overlap with other fields.
This can be helped (not solved) by a simple fix, which can also reduce brain drain: give precedence to the doctoral degree in the required field, regardless of the candidate’s first degree, effected by a UGC circular. The suggestion is not fool-proof. It is a first step, and offered with the understanding that any selection process, however well the evaluation criteria are articulated, will be beset by multiple issues, including that of bias. Like other Sri Lankan institutions, universities, too, have tribal tendencies, surfacing in the form of a preference for one’s own alumni. Nevertheless, there are other problems that are, arguably, more pressing as I discuss next. In relation to the evaluation criteria, a problem is the narrow interpretation of any regulation, e.g., deciding the degree’s suitability based on the title rather than considering courses in the transcript. Despite rhetoric promoting internationalising and inter-disciplinarity, decision-making administrative and academic bodies have very literal expectations of candidates’ qualifications, e.g., a candidate with knowledge of digital literacy should show this through the title of the degree!
Problem type 2 – The mess of badly regulated higher education
A direct consequence of the contemporary expansion of higher education is a large number of applicants with myriad qualifications. The diversity of degree programmes cited makes the responsibility of selecting a suitable candidate for the job a challenging but very important one. After all, the job is for life – it is very difficult to fire a permanent employer in the state sector.
Widely varying undergraduate degree programmes.
At present, Sri Lankan undergraduates bring qualifications (at times more than one) from multiple types of higher education institutions: a degree from a UGC-affiliated state university, a state university external to the UGC, a state institution that is not a university, a foreign university, or a private HEI aka ‘private university’. It could be a degree received by attending on-site, in Sri Lanka or abroad. It could be from a private HEI’s affiliated foreign university or an external degree from a state university or an online only degree from a private HEI that is ‘UGC-approved’ or ‘Ministry of Education approved’, i.e., never studied in a university setting. Needless to say, the diversity (and their differences in quality) are dizzying. Unfortunately, under the evaluation scheme all degrees ‘recognised’ by the UGC are assigned the same marks. The same goes for the candidates’ merits or distinctions, first classes, etc., regardless of how difficult or easy the degree programme may be and even when capabilities, exposure, input, etc are obviously different.
Similar issues are faced when we consider postgraduate qualifications, though to a lesser degree. In my discipline(s), at least, a postgraduate degree obtained on-site from a first-world university is preferable to one from a local university (which usually have weekend or evening classes similar to part-time study) or online from a foreign university. Elitist this may be, but even the best local postgraduate degrees cannot provide the experience and intellectual growth gained by being in a university that gives you access to six million books and teaching and supervision by internationally-recognised scholars. Unfortunately, in the evaluation schemes for recruitment, the worst postgraduate qualification you know of will receive the same marks as one from NUS, Harvard or Leiden.
The problem is clear but what about a solution?
Recruitment to state universities needs to change to meet contemporary needs. We need evaluation criteria that allows us to get rid of the dross as well as a more sophisticated institutional understanding of using them. Recruitment is key if we want our institutions (and our country) to progress. I reiterate here the recommendations proposed in ‘Considerations for Higher Education Reform’ circulated previously by Kuppi Collective:
* Change bond regulations to be more just, in order to retain better qualified academics.
* Update the schemes of recruitment to reflect present-day realities of inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary training in order to recruit suitably qualified candidates.
* Ensure recruitment processes are made transparent by university administrations.
Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.
(Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.)
Features
Talento … oozing with talent
This week, too, the spotlight is on an outfit that has gained popularity, mainly through social media.
Last week we had MISTER Band in our scene, and on 10th February, Yellow Beatz – both social media favourites.
Talento is a seven-piece band that plays all types of music, from the ‘60s to the modern tracks of today.
The band has reached many heights, since its inception in 2012, and has gained recognition as a leading wedding and dance band in the scene here.
The members that makeup the outfit have a solid musical background, which comes through years of hard work and dedication
Their portfolio of music contains a mix of both western and eastern songs and are carefully selected, they say, to match the requirements of the intended audience, occasion, or event.
Although the baila is a specialty, which is inherent to this group, that originates from Moratuwa, their repertoire is made up of a vast collection of love, classic, oldies and modern-day hits.
The musicians, who make up Talento, are:
Prabuddha Geetharuchi:
(Vocalist/ Frontman). He is an avid music enthusiast and was mentored by a lot of famous musicians, and trainers, since he was a child. Growing up with them influenced him to take on western songs, as well as other music styles. A Peterite, he is the main man behind the band Talento and is a versatile singer/entertainer who never fails to get the crowd going.
Geilee Fonseka (Vocals):
A dynamic and charismatic vocalist whose vibrant stage presence, and powerful voice, bring a fresh spark to every performance. Young, energetic, and musically refined, she is an artiste who effortlessly blends passion with precision – captivating audiences from the very first note. Blessed with an immense vocal range, Geilee is a truly versatile singer, confidently delivering Western and Eastern music across multiple languages and genres.
Chandana Perera (Drummer):
His expertise and exceptional skills have earned him recognition as one of the finest acoustic drummers in Sri Lanka. With over 40 tours under his belt, Chandana has demonstrated his dedication and passion for music, embodying the essential role of a drummer as the heartbeat of any band.
Harsha Soysa:
(Bassist/Vocalist). He a chorister of the western choir of St. Sebastian’s College, Moratuwa, who began his musical education under famous voice trainers, as well as bass guitar trainers in Sri Lanka. He has also performed at events overseas. He acts as the second singer of the band
Udara Jayakody:
(Keyboardist). He is also a qualified pianist, adding technical flavour to Talento’s music. His singing and harmonising skills are an extra asset to the band. From his childhood he has been a part of a number of orchestras as a pianist. He has also previously performed with several famous western bands.
Aruna Madushanka:
(Saxophonist). His proficiciency in playing various instruments, including the saxophone, soprano saxophone, and western flute, showcases his versatility as a musician, and his musical repertoire is further enhanced by his remarkable singing ability.
Prashan Pramuditha:
(Lead guitar). He has the ability to play different styles, both oriental and western music, and he also creates unique tones and patterns with the guitar..
Features
Special milestone for JJ Twins
The JJ Twins, the Sri Lankan musical duo, performing in the Maldives, and known for blending R&B, Hip Hop, and Sri Lankan rhythms, thereby creating a unique sound, have come out with a brand-new single ‘Me Mawathe.’
In fact, it’s a very special milestone for the twin brothers, Julian and Jason Prins, as ‘Me Mawathe’ is their first ever Sinhala song!
‘Me Mawathe’ showcases a fresh new sound, while staying true to the signature harmony and emotion that their fans love.
This heartfelt track captures the beauty of love, journey, and connection, brought to life through powerful vocals and captivating melodies.
It marks an exciting new chapter for the JJ Twins as they expand their musical journey and connect with audiences in a whole new way.
Their recent album, ‘CONCLUDED,’ explores themes of love, heartbreak, and healing, and include hits like ‘Can’t Get You Off My Mind’ and ‘You Left Me Here to Die’ which showcase their emotional intensity.
Readers could stay connected and follow JJ Twins on social media for exclusive updates, behind-the-scenes moments, and upcoming releases:
Instagram: http://instagram.com/jjtwinsofficial
TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@jjtwinsmusic
Facebook: http://facebook.com/jjtwinssingers
YouTube: http://youtube.com/jjtwins
-
Opinion5 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features5 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Features6 days agoRatmalana Airport: The Truth, The Whole Truth, And Nothing But The Truth
-
Business7 days agoDialog partners with Xiaomi to introduce Redmi Note 15 5G Series in Sri Lanka
-
Features2 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more
-
Features7 days agoBuilding on Sand: The Indian market trap
-
Opinion7 days agoFuture must be won
-
Opinion2 days agoSri Lanka – world’s worst facilities for cricket fans




