Connect with us

Opinion

Feathering one’s own nest:The name of the game!

Published

on

By Dr Upul Wijayawardhana

“Just you wait sir, we will show them how to make money when we get to power”: These words of an Opposition parliamentarian, made in mid-1980s, after a consultation, still ring in my ears and rings truer today, more than ever before. Being a pioneer in the field, when Cardiology emerged as a speciality in Sri Lanka, was a privilege as we were, much sought, after and became well acquainted with VIPs. Many poured their hearts out to us and even the politicians who came to consult us were honest with us; being honest about their dishonesty!

Politicians around the time when we gained Independence, had the welfare of the nation as their prime concern, but the euphoria generated by Independence gave way to the interests of a self-serving political class whose primary concern, was making money for themselves. In short, politics became a business and it is pretty obvious that the distinguishing characteristic of all our governments, irrespective of political affiliations, is that each government is more corrupt than the previous. Most of us who supported the blossoming of Pohottuwa were hopeful that there would be a reversal, in the belief that Rajapaksas had learned a lesson from the defeat of 2015 and the disaster of Yahapalanaya. How wrong were we!

There is no doubt, whatsoever, that the present economic crisis is largely, though not solely, due to the misdeeds of this government. Though the nefarious activities of the criminal underworld have been largely curtailed, the corrupt practices of politicians and their kith and kin continue unabated, much to the great disappointment of the masses that reposed their trust in a strongman. The first budget was a disaster which reduced revenue by imposing totally unnecessary tax cuts. Though the government managed the pandemic admirably, proactive management of the likely economic strain of the epidemic was totally neglected.

It was pretty obvious that foreign remittances from those who toil in the Middle East would decrease significantly and that foreign exchange earnings from tourism would sharply diminish for at least two or three years. Had the Rupee been allowed to float, instead of pegged artificially, the black market in foreign currency would not have developed. Price increases and the resultant agitations are the result of the prolonged delay in floating the Rupee which resulted in a sharp devaluation, instead of a gradual fall. Failing to go to the IMF for structural readjustments of our loans, going a round with a begging-bowl instead, was another mistake. Of course, the organic fertiliser fiasco, a good deed with the wrong timing, contributed to the economic woes.

The totally unwanted war in Ukraine is making matters worse for all countries but it is countries without any buffer, like Sri Lanka, that would be worse affected. The prices of all goods are rising in the UK and fuel bills would be at least doubled from next month! Worse is yet to come and it is the bounden duty of all politicians in Sri Lanka to help solve the most severe economic crisis the country has ever faced. But what are they doing? The rallying cry of all the opposition politicians, at the moment, seems to be elections for a change of government. A cynics view would be, that it is like changing pillows for a headache!

The Leader of the Opposition has been silent for a long time and I was taken aback by the following comments in The Sunday Times political column of 13 March, in reference to the protest led by a government MP outside SJB office, under the subheading, “Sajith busy with MSc degree”: “It is ironic that SJB leader Sajith Premadasa did not think it fit to summon a news conference. Nor did he issue a statement. By doing so, his front could have told Sri Lankans and the outside world that as the economy deteriorates and the people suffer, the Government was stifling the Opposition. The issue has already raised unease among SJB parliamentarians who complain that their leader is taking a “very soft approach.” Asked by an Opposition colleague why he had not led his party “to the streets,” Premadasa replied “wait for a few days. I am busy with my MSc degree. You will see me in action after that.”

Wonder what Sajith’s MSc is on? Perhaps, he has completed this task, for he led a public protest on 15 March. However, though the gathering was meant to be a protest rally, he made it an election rally outlining what his government would do. He stated:

“President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, Finance Minister Basil Rajapaksa and the Government should give us the power to develop the country if they cannot perform. We will show them how we work if we are given power. We tell the people who are awaiting at fuel queues that three Middle Eastern countries have agreed to provide fuel for two years for our Samagi Jana Balawegaya government.”

Wonder what these Middle Eastern countries are? Or, are these pies in the sky? If this is serious talk, Sajith should have, for the sake of the country, joined the All-Party Talks which the President has summoned, than boycotting it. Perhaps, the President could have considered a national government with Sajith as Prime Minister so that the fuel problem would have been solved immediately! I am sure Mahinda would have been happy to be relaxed as the Senior Minister for Buddha Sasana!

What about the JVP? At a time when even some right-leaning intellectuals seem to be considering whether JVP should be given a chance, their action seems to portray their true nature; that they want to be disruptive. Their unified call for withholding of inward remittances of foreign exchange, surely, is a totally disruptive measure. Further, it is an encouragement for an illegal activity by the black-market. They too seem to crave for an election and have decided to boycott the All-Party Talks!

Surprisingly, no one seems to care for the plight of the poor. Everyone seems to be more interested in feathering his or her own nest. All Opposition politicians want to topple the government and come to power. Instead, what they should be doing is joining hands with the government to find a solution to the present crisis. Though it may not be politically popular, my suggestion is that the government, with the support of the Opposition, consider introducing a rationing system for all essential goods so that people dropping dead in long queues could be avoided. It may not be popular with the rich and affluent but will ensure that the basic needs of the poor are met. Hard times demand drastic measures!

There should be no shame with rationing. After all, food rationing introduced during the Second World War in the UK ended after 14 years in 1954!



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Morning Star of Nursing Education in Sri Lanka

Published

on

Chandra

Chandra de Silva, 20th Death Anniversary

After a convulsive struggle for national liberation from British colonialism which tore the subcontinent apart, India gained its independence in 1947. Way ahead of Ceylon, on the cusp of this momentous event, it established a degree-awarding College of Nursing at the University of Delhi in 1946, a committee having visited and considered the best practices in nursing education in Canada, the USA, England and Scotland. It then carefully designed a course to meet the needs of India’s social and health requirements, and admitted its first batch of 13 students in July 1946, for a four-year BSc (Honors) degree in Nursing.

Soon after, they offered this advantage through a competitive interview to students from Ceylon.

In 1950, the year India adopted its first Republican Constitution, Chandra Samarasinghe was one of the three persons admitted to this course, and would go on to be the one who eventually introduced university education for Sri Lankan nurses in 1992, after a lifetime of campaigning.

When Chandra de Silva (nee Samarasinghe), much loved and respected by her students and colleagues alike, passed away 20 years ago on 28th January 2006, a former student wrote a moving tribute to her titled “The Morning Star of the World of Nursing Has Faded…” on the front page of the February 2006 issue of the magazine New Vision, a publication of the Graduate Nurses’ Foundation of Sri Lanka.

Describing Chandra as “the Nightingale of Sri Lanka”, a “most noble lady (Athi uththama kanthawa) filled with compassion”, “born for the good fortune of the nation” and “incomparable teacher-mother (guru mathawa) of hundreds of thousands of students”, the writer, Malini Ranasinghe, who was the President of the Graduate Nurses Foundation, confesses it is beyond her to set down in full Chandra’s life-long service of over 50 years to the profession. The magazine New Vision itself was one of Chandra’s many initiatives as was the encouragement for the Nursing Profession to obtain membership of the Sri Lanka Association of Professionals. Malini Ranasinghe promises in this heartfelt farewell, that Chandra’s legacy would be passed down the ages to each new batch of nursing students, to remain in their hearts through the course on the History of Nursing.

Chandra was Sri Lanka’s first Chief Nursing Education Officer (CNEO, now titled Director Nursing) at the Ministry of Health. She took up the pioneering role in 1967, having returned from Boston University, USA, after completing a Master’s degree in Education and Administration.

In her first year in the role, Chandra presented a comprehensive memorandum drawing the attention of the government of the day to the country’s need for a Bachelor’s degree in Nursing. She was the first to do so. It took decades before this dream came true, with Chandra having made several more proposals many years apart, before she was invited by a Canadian University in collaboration with the Open University of Sri Lanka (OUSL) to help set up the degree course in Nursing in 1992. Having spent most of her professional life in a battle to uplift the nursing profession in Sri Lanka to international standards, she was setting exam papers at the OUSL the day before she was admitted to hospital for kidney surgery, and passed away at the recovery unit. By then, she had seen not only several batches of undergraduate nurses don their robes, but also graduate nurses earn Master’s degrees with a PhD programme well on its way to being implemented.

When Delhi Built Bridges

It all started when three young ladies boarded a train with their Thomas Cooks travel documents, to Delhi in July 1950, having competed and won places at Delhi University to follow a BSc Honours degree, majoring in Nursing. Chandra Samarasinghe from Mahamaya College Kandy, dressed in a Kandyan Saree, Trixie Marthenesz from Ladies College and later Ananda College Colombo, and Shireen Packeer, also from Ananda College Colombo, in dresses, were the lucky ones selected, and became firm friends known as the “The Trio from Ceylon” at their university in India. They had “luxury accommodation” at their residential university campus at number 12, Jaswant Singh Road, New Delhi, and travelled everywhere on their bikes.

They had a blast during their four years there, not only completing their degrees but also able to experience the newly independent nation in transition, already forging a future for itself. Chandra continued to wear the Kandyan saree throughout her stay there, and when she had to introduce herself to the rest of the students, said “I am Chandra Samarasinghe from Kandy, in Lanka”, leaving a puzzled Trixie wondering why she didn’t say Ceylon.  When they left the university after four years, the Principal, Dr. Margeretta Craig, O.B.E. told them “You three Ceylonese girls have been live wires!” They got on well with the staff including the Vice Principal Dr. Edith Buchanan, a Canadian from the Canadian Faculty of Nursing, who had an interesting experience with Chandra at their first encounter. When asked to explain the meaning of the term “prone position”, Chandra, always the first to offer an answer, piped up to say somewhat indelicately, “That’s the one with the backside up!” to giggles from the class. She was soon persuaded that “face-down” was a much more decorous way of saying it.

They sang and danced in the presence of Lady Edwina Mountbatten who graced the university’s annual concerts and had their names appear approvingly in the Indian newspaper report of the event. They were invited to Rashtrapati Bhavan in 1951 where they met India’s iconic first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Dr. Rajendra Prasad, the first President. They made friends with J. Wijetunga, author of ‘Grass for my Feet’ fame who lived only a short distance away from their hostel, who gave them free access to his pantry and taught them the cultural history of India and also of Sri Lanka. They travelled to places of interest including a long-desired visit to Shanthi Nikethan, having developed a love for Rabindranath Tagore’s work, and took photos in front of the Taj Mahal.

When they first arrived in Delhi, they were thrilled to meet another Sri Lankan student in the senior year who had known them from Ceylon, Viola Perera. Viola introduced them to her friends, one of whom on obtaining her PhD became the Principal of the College of Nursing, University of Delhi.

It was clear that their time at Delhi University left a deep impression on the girls. They were being trained to take over from the departing British, and to maintain the required standards as well as to develop them further.  The sense of patriotic duty they saw in India made an impression on them. They also had plenty of fun, and Chandra was able to keep Ceylon’s end up when the beautiful Bengali voices of Indian students sang at their gatherings, having herself been voice-trained by Saranagupta Amarasinghe, and according to Trixie Marthenesz’s reminiscences in her book, ‘Those Delhi Days”, also by Ananda Samarakoon (p143).

A Worthy Battle Waged

Back in Ceylon, Chandra tried many times to introduce the educational opportunities she herself had obtained, to others in her profession. And yet, unlike India at Independence, Ceylon and later even Sri Lanka, was not ready to accept such progress easily. With the Health Ministry decision makers being male and mostly doctors, they ignorantly regarded the role of the nurse as a minor one, needing just “a pair of hands”. It may have involved some insecurity which masqueraded as good sense, at the cost to the country for many decades. As CNEO, Chandra battled through it all, rewriting the curriculum to bring it up to international standards, doing what she could to send Nurses overseas for training. And she kept presenting proposals for a BSc programme, which fell on deaf ears. Decades later, she was rewarded for her unwavering commitment to the cause when she was asked to start the BSc Nursing programme at the Open University of Sri Lanka (OUSL), which is now a great asset to the country, with other universities also offering it.

In 2004, two years before she passed away, the first publication of New Vision by the Graduate Nurses Foundation of Sri Lanka was presented to her. In the 2005 issue, they reproduced on the front page her keynote address at their AGM on the 31st of October 2004, at which she was Chief Guest.

Her speech recounts the painfully hard journey that the profession (and she herself) had to endure to raise it to its current status. Chandra recalls with sadness that the three-year Nursing Diploma did not entitle Sri Lankan nurses to pursue higher education, qualifying them only to follow a few courses at the Post Basic School of Nursing:

“I had to fight a very hard battle to keep the 3 year programme intact because there was a very serious effort to downgrade the three year programme to two years, a step that would have prevented our nurses from obtaining any acceptance and recognition in a foreign country. There was intense official and political pressure for a long time to effect this change but with the assistance of a few other Nursing Leaders this retrograde step was suppressed, perhaps forever. Such dangers can arise in the future too. The price we nurses have to pay, is eternal vigilance to challenge and suppress any effort to downgrade the standard of Nursing Education in Sri Lanka.”

She happily announced that at that stage, there were 200 BSc graduates and 25 who had obtained their Master’s degree, with two heading for their PhD. She defined the lack of access to higher education for nurses as a “human right denied”. She also declared that for the first time, there was agreement across all nursing services to propose a nursing degree at conventional universities, disclosing that this was the “first time such consensus has manifested in the Nursing Services”. She called upon nurses to retain this unity “at whatever cost” and just as in other professions such an engineering, law, medicine, “it was time to rectify this anomaly” and “work together to achieve this new dimension in Nursing Education.”

A Mother to More Than Her Own

As I write this memorial to honour my mother Chandra for her life of service and unwavering dedication to provide for others the education she herself received at two of the best universities in the world (Delhi and Boston), her determination and grace under pressure, I know why I have focused on her professional life rather than her personal one. It is because I grew up sensing that she was truly a mother to a larger family, of nursing students and professionals she was responsible for. She never turned away any of them coming over to her home for special help with their dissertation topics or applications for scholarships. She encouraged the senior nursing staff to follow the degree course and helped them complete it when they were discouraged. Some who recognized me at the counters in private hospitals came up to declare their gratitude to her for this specific gesture of help, because their employment prospects had expanded greatly with that.

Though infinitely patient, graceful and ladylike, my mother was a fighter. I saw how she never gave up on her ambitions for her profession, although she was hardly ambitious for herself. I saw her pain, and her determination to fight on in a hostile environment of male dominated bureaucracy.

I am eternally grateful to Aunty Trixie (Trixie Marthenesz, her fellow student at Delhi Uni) for writing a delightful little booklet called “Those Delhi Days” (Tharanjee Prints, Maharagama, 2009), recounting their time from 1950 to 1954 at the University of Delhi, with wonderful photographs of their 4-year journey as undergraduates, including at the annual concert in creative costumes and also on their holidays around India. An especially charming photo on the first page is the one on Convocation Day 1954, which shows Chandra, Trixie and Shareen together with a few of their batch mates wearing their robes with the distinctive Delhi Uni Cap. The book recalls in such delicious detail their time during such an exciting period in India, just two years after Independence from the British. I found some of the facts for this article from that book. Aunty Trixie, whom my mother drew in, together with Aunty Viola (Viola Perera, the senior student at Delhi University) talking them both out of retirement to begin the work of setting up a new department of Nursing at the Open University, writes in her book, of the young student Chandra who screamed at witnessing the death of their first patient in a hospital in India, bringing “half the ward to the scene”, but who then turned into “a leader among professional nurses in Sri Lanka” which appellation Trixie says “befitted her”.

I see that others have now taken the profession to new heights. Her students are now the warriors at the forefront of the battle for even further professional and pedagogical development. She would be proud. I like to believe that she was as much a guiding light as a Morning Star, softly glowing in the memories of those who knew her, inspiring them to never give up, and to do things with grace. That’s why I share these memories of my exceptional, beloved mother with all those nurses who have known her personally, her colleagues, lecturers and students in white who lined the path throwing jasmine blossoms at the vehicle taking her on her final journey through Kanatte, Colombo’s the main cemetery, and those who have and will come to know her, and the contribution she made to their profession, through the History of Nursing in Sri Lanka.

By Sanja de Silva Jayatilleka

Continue Reading

Opinion

to pathi

Published

on

Pathiraja

Dharmasena Pathiraja’s eight death anniversary falls today

it is in loss and loneliness, one
finds words of solace, without which,
none may live or even die,
fling forging nouns,
into the far-flung corners
of birth and death, departing
from the beaten tracks of heavy tread.

dreams come and go,
in colour, as a contamination of the real,
the waking hours, a coming and going,
of departure and death
of bodies lined up shot,
in eelam, in lanka, or any other place.
the political is strained, half breathing,
lines the tongue with lashing words.
stories we tell our children
of war in words of peace,
and of peace in words there’s nothing to tell.

in silence, the quiet beat of the heart, strums louder and louder,
calling up the sound of waiting, for that time, when it is
all a matter of leaving, and now a matter for grieving,
living out the vanishing moments as limn, time pass, and
as our life foreshadowing death, not yet dreamt of,
but dreaded still.

in gaza, the children are gone forever
and it’s been a long journey, these forever years.

sumathy – january 2026

Continue Reading

Opinion

Those who play at bowls must look out for rubbers

Published

on

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake should  listen at least to the views of the Mothers’ Front on proposed educational reforms.

I was listening to the apolitical views expressed by the mothers’ front criticising the proposed educational reforms of the government and I found that their views were addressing some of the core questionable issues relevant to the schoolchildren, and their parents, too.

They were critical of the way the educational reforms were formulated. The absence of any consultation with the stakeholders or any accredited professional organisation about the terms and the scope of education was one of the key criticisms of the Mothers’ Front and it is critically important to comprehend the validity of their opposition to the proposed reforms. Further, the proposals do include ideas and designs borrowed from some of the foreign countries which they are now re-evaluating in view of the various shortcomings which they themselves have encountered. On the subject, History, it is indeed unfortunate that it has been included as an optional, whereas in many developed countries it is a compulsory subject; further, in the module the subject is practically limited to pre-historic periods whereas Sri Lanka can proudly claim a longer recorded history which is important to be studied for the students to understand what happened in the past and comprehend the present.

Another important criticism of the Mothers’ Front was the attempted promotion of sexuality in place of sex education. Further there is a visible effort to promote trans-gender concepts as an example  when considering the module on family unit which is drawn with two males  and a child and two females  and a child which are nor representative of Sri Lankan family unit.

Ranjith Soysa

Continue Reading

Trending