Features
Divisions and polarisation in our society
By Prof.Kirthi Tennakone
Humans are not united as a species. Divisions based on geography, ethnicity, coloir, religion, opinions and other attributes present everywhere dominate the social and political dynamics of the world.
Nobody knows why this happens: a naïve explanation is that birds of the same feather flock together. A person feels more comfortable when he or she associates with people who look similar and think alike. Intolerances of differences leads to social segregation.
Human communities also polarise. Polarisation is the widening separation of a society into two physically unseparated opposing camps based on some identity or belief. The colour, the language spoken and the religion, the political ideology are examples of the former and latter.
Polarisation differs from division. Unlike in division, the polarised parties oppose or confront each other. However, division can be triggered to ensue polarization.
As inspiringly illustrated in a cartoon of a blog by the American vocational minister, David Servant, titled “The end of political polarisation”, different interpretations of the same thing could lead to polarisation.
Division and polarisation, resulting conflicts, and their subsequent relaxation, influenced social evolution.
The primitive people, segregated into tribes geographically demarcated by streams, mountains and impenetrable forests. They spoke different dialects and followed varying traditions. The encounter between two tribes resulted in a confrontation. Often, two tribes fighting each other coalesce into a larger community.
Frequently, the latency of two ethnicities or religious believers in a community causes polarisation, a trend continuing to be exploited by politicians.
Social systems are intricately complex. Despite divisive and polarising forces, communities have a propensity to amalgamate, with one community capturing another. The emergence of community leaders or rulers facilitated the process. A larger community adapts better to the utilisation of resources using a massive workforce. The largest ancient communities were hydraulic civilisations that required excessive manpower.
Finally, nations, or centrally governed political systems, evolved. Now we have countries on the world map with clearly marked boundaries. The global territorial political landscape today stands relatively stable compared to the situation centuries ago.
Nevertheless, there are divisive and polarising forces between nations. The greatest divide in the world is between the East and the West. And the major polarisation is between the opposing forces of capitalism and socialism. Branding capitalism as right and socialism as left psychologically widened the separation.
What was the primary factor that created the East-West dichotomy? Ancient Eastern societies advanced before their contemporaries in the West. Before 625 BCE, almost all civilizations, either East or West, believed the happenings in nature were governed by the deeds of deities. In that background, they developed empirical technologies and often prayed for the blessings of the gods to succeed in technical endeavors.
The Greek philosopher and mathematician, Thales of Miletus, was the first man to think differently. He said, natural phenomena could be understood by humans via deductive thought without involving deities. Subsequent Greek philosophers, followed Thales, creating science.
As a result of the culture of rational thinking, Greeks debated how people should be ruled, inventing democracy. Greek thought diffused throughout Europe. Science transformed empirical technology. Democratic changes relieved people of oppression.
Unlike Greeks, Easterners did not raise questions about simultaneous equations and theories of how people should be ruled in the marketplace. They continued to follow the old tradition of spiritualism and remained ruled by autocrats, until they were conquered by the West.
Later, Western powers withdrew from colonies in the East, voluntarily due to pressure or revolt. Few turned fully democratic, and others partly or authoritarian. All of them retained and adopted science and technology introduced by the West, but many kept indigenous equivalents and ideas on a higher pedestal.
The failure to assimilate science and technology and democratic values naturally accounts for the weaknesses of the East compared to the West and the continuation of the East-West rift.
Capitalism and socialism are both conceptualisations of the West. The East was indifferent to these ideals, until infiltration from the West.
Capitalism represents the economic system that allows private ownership of property, the production of goods and the delivery of services. The rapid technological advancement of the West beginning in the 18th century promoted capitalism.
The expansion of capitalism created disparity between those who earned excessive wealth at the sacrifice of workers who remained poor. The result was the world’s agitation for socialism.
According to the classical definition, socialism advocates the public ownership of property and the management of production. Socialism is not contradictory to democracy. In a way, a method of democratization of the economy.
Socialism and democracy can coexist.
However, Karl Marx postulated that socialism can only be initially implemented by a dictatorship of people – the so-called dictatorship of the proletariat. The first extreme socialist nation, the Soviet Union, adopted this dictum, restricting freedom. The dictatorship of the proletariat soon reverted virtually to a one-man dictatorship. It is this historical development that polarised socialism and capitalism. Nevertheless, the socialist policies succeeded in the industrialisation of Soviet Union.
The weakness of capitalism is the concentration of wealth among a minority of individuals at the expense of neglecting the welfare of the majority. The resource limitation prohibits making every citizen of a nation adequately rich.
The weakness of socialism is the state ownership of property and production of goods. Humans desire to own property and production needs competitiveness to innovate quality items and novel ideas.
The problem of democracy is the fault of its implementation in choosing representatives of the people. The party system makes society susceptible to polarisation. A party could raise emotional issues, instigate violence or commit crime to induce polarisation in its favour. The representatives, once elected, could make decisions or frame the legislature biased to their advantage. There is no mechanism to prevent corrupt and devious candidates seeking election as representatives.
Would it be possible to compromise capitalism and socialism within a framework of democracy and cure the ills of both? Democratic socialism evolved as an answer to this question. In general, democratic socialism commits to providing social welfare without rigidly restricting private enterprise but encouraging it, subject proportionately heavy taxation.
Recently, Bernie Sanders, United States Senator for the State of Vermont, a proponent of democratic socialism, wrote:
“We need to address the unprecedented level of income and wealth inequality and demand that the wealthy and large corporations start paying the fair share of taxes. Working people should not be paying an effective tax rate higher than one percent”
The World Population Review (2024) classifies 20 countries, including Sri Lanka, as democratic socialist. The success of democratic socialism in Nordic countries is often highlighted.
Over the past 4-5 decades, there has been a trend world-wide, socialist countries to accommodate capitalist policies, with capitalist countries (despite sporadic bursts of right- wing impulses) inclining towards socialist reforms.
Theoretically, democratic socialism is more stable, because it dilutes the polarisation between rich and poor.
Just after independence, Sri Lanka was exemplary in successfully implementing free education, health care and initiating developmental projects in agriculture and industry. And stood as a leading progressive nation in Asia. Later, despite its declaration as a Democratic Socialist Republic, the country moved down the economic cliff.
The cause is not a fault of capitalism or socialism, but a craft of corrupt opportunists who instigated divisions and polarisations and manipulated democratic procedures, for self-interest.
Features
Recruiting academics to state universities – beset by archaic selection processes?
Time has, by and large, stood still in the business of academic staff recruitment to state universities. Qualifications have proliferated and evolved to be more interdisciplinary, but our selection processes and evaluation criteria are unchanged since at least the late 1990s. But before I delve into the problems, I will describe the existing processes and schemes of recruitment. The discussion is limited to UGC-governed state universities (and does not include recruitment to medical and engineering sectors) though the problems may be relevant to other higher education institutions (HEIs).
How recruitment happens currently in SL state universities
Academic ranks in Sri Lankan state universities can be divided into three tiers (subdivisions are not discussed).
* Lecturer (Probationary)
– recruited with a four-year undergraduate degree. A tiny step higher is the Lecturer (Unconfirmed), recruited with a postgraduate degree but no teaching experience.
* A Senior Lecturer can be recruited with certain postgraduate qualifications and some number of years of teaching and research.
* Above this is the professor (of four types), which can be left out of this discussion since only one of those (Chair Professor) is by application.
State universities cannot hire permanent academic staff as and when they wish. Prior to advertising a vacancy, approval to recruit is obtained through a mind-numbing and time-consuming process (months!) ending at the Department of Management Services. The call for applications must list all ranks up to Senior Lecturer. All eligible candidates for Probationary to Senior Lecturer are interviewed, e.g., if a Department wants someone with a doctoral degree, they must still advertise for and interview candidates for all ranks, not only candidates with a doctoral degree. In the evaluation criteria, the first degree is more important than the doctoral degree (more on this strange phenomenon later). All of this is only possible when universities are not under a ‘hiring freeze’, which governments declare regularly and generally lasts several years.
Problem type 1
– Archaic processes and evaluation criteria
Twenty-five years ago, as a probationary lecturer with a first degree, I was a typical hire. We would be recruited, work some years and obtain postgraduate degrees (ideally using the privilege of paid study leave to attend a reputed university in the first world). State universities are primarily undergraduate teaching spaces, and when doctoral degrees were scarce, hiring probationary lecturers may have been a practical solution. The path to a higher degree was through the academic job. Now, due to availability of candidates with postgraduate qualifications and the problems of retaining academics who find foreign postgraduate opportunities, preference for candidates applying with a postgraduate qualification is growing. The evaluation scheme, however, prioritises the first degree over the candidate’s postgraduate education. Were I to apply to a Faculty of Education, despite a PhD on language teaching and research in education, I may not even be interviewed since my undergraduate degree is not in education. The ‘first degree first’ phenomenon shows that universities essentially ignore the intellectual development of a person beyond their early twenties. It also ignores the breadth of disciplines and their overlap with other fields.
This can be helped (not solved) by a simple fix, which can also reduce brain drain: give precedence to the doctoral degree in the required field, regardless of the candidate’s first degree, effected by a UGC circular. The suggestion is not fool-proof. It is a first step, and offered with the understanding that any selection process, however well the evaluation criteria are articulated, will be beset by multiple issues, including that of bias. Like other Sri Lankan institutions, universities, too, have tribal tendencies, surfacing in the form of a preference for one’s own alumni. Nevertheless, there are other problems that are, arguably, more pressing as I discuss next. In relation to the evaluation criteria, a problem is the narrow interpretation of any regulation, e.g., deciding the degree’s suitability based on the title rather than considering courses in the transcript. Despite rhetoric promoting internationalising and inter-disciplinarity, decision-making administrative and academic bodies have very literal expectations of candidates’ qualifications, e.g., a candidate with knowledge of digital literacy should show this through the title of the degree!
Problem type 2 – The mess of badly regulated higher education
A direct consequence of the contemporary expansion of higher education is a large number of applicants with myriad qualifications. The diversity of degree programmes cited makes the responsibility of selecting a suitable candidate for the job a challenging but very important one. After all, the job is for life – it is very difficult to fire a permanent employer in the state sector.
Widely varying undergraduate degree programmes.
At present, Sri Lankan undergraduates bring qualifications (at times more than one) from multiple types of higher education institutions: a degree from a UGC-affiliated state university, a state university external to the UGC, a state institution that is not a university, a foreign university, or a private HEI aka ‘private university’. It could be a degree received by attending on-site, in Sri Lanka or abroad. It could be from a private HEI’s affiliated foreign university or an external degree from a state university or an online only degree from a private HEI that is ‘UGC-approved’ or ‘Ministry of Education approved’, i.e., never studied in a university setting. Needless to say, the diversity (and their differences in quality) are dizzying. Unfortunately, under the evaluation scheme all degrees ‘recognised’ by the UGC are assigned the same marks. The same goes for the candidates’ merits or distinctions, first classes, etc., regardless of how difficult or easy the degree programme may be and even when capabilities, exposure, input, etc are obviously different.
Similar issues are faced when we consider postgraduate qualifications, though to a lesser degree. In my discipline(s), at least, a postgraduate degree obtained on-site from a first-world university is preferable to one from a local university (which usually have weekend or evening classes similar to part-time study) or online from a foreign university. Elitist this may be, but even the best local postgraduate degrees cannot provide the experience and intellectual growth gained by being in a university that gives you access to six million books and teaching and supervision by internationally-recognised scholars. Unfortunately, in the evaluation schemes for recruitment, the worst postgraduate qualification you know of will receive the same marks as one from NUS, Harvard or Leiden.
The problem is clear but what about a solution?
Recruitment to state universities needs to change to meet contemporary needs. We need evaluation criteria that allows us to get rid of the dross as well as a more sophisticated institutional understanding of using them. Recruitment is key if we want our institutions (and our country) to progress. I reiterate here the recommendations proposed in ‘Considerations for Higher Education Reform’ circulated previously by Kuppi Collective:
* Change bond regulations to be more just, in order to retain better qualified academics.
* Update the schemes of recruitment to reflect present-day realities of inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary training in order to recruit suitably qualified candidates.
* Ensure recruitment processes are made transparent by university administrations.
Kaushalya Perera is a senior lecturer at the University of Colombo.
(Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.)
Features
Talento … oozing with talent
This week, too, the spotlight is on an outfit that has gained popularity, mainly through social media.
Last week we had MISTER Band in our scene, and on 10th February, Yellow Beatz – both social media favourites.
Talento is a seven-piece band that plays all types of music, from the ‘60s to the modern tracks of today.
The band has reached many heights, since its inception in 2012, and has gained recognition as a leading wedding and dance band in the scene here.
The members that makeup the outfit have a solid musical background, which comes through years of hard work and dedication
Their portfolio of music contains a mix of both western and eastern songs and are carefully selected, they say, to match the requirements of the intended audience, occasion, or event.
Although the baila is a specialty, which is inherent to this group, that originates from Moratuwa, their repertoire is made up of a vast collection of love, classic, oldies and modern-day hits.
The musicians, who make up Talento, are:
Prabuddha Geetharuchi:
(Vocalist/ Frontman). He is an avid music enthusiast and was mentored by a lot of famous musicians, and trainers, since he was a child. Growing up with them influenced him to take on western songs, as well as other music styles. A Peterite, he is the main man behind the band Talento and is a versatile singer/entertainer who never fails to get the crowd going.
Geilee Fonseka (Vocals):
A dynamic and charismatic vocalist whose vibrant stage presence, and powerful voice, bring a fresh spark to every performance. Young, energetic, and musically refined, she is an artiste who effortlessly blends passion with precision – captivating audiences from the very first note. Blessed with an immense vocal range, Geilee is a truly versatile singer, confidently delivering Western and Eastern music across multiple languages and genres.
Chandana Perera (Drummer):
His expertise and exceptional skills have earned him recognition as one of the finest acoustic drummers in Sri Lanka. With over 40 tours under his belt, Chandana has demonstrated his dedication and passion for music, embodying the essential role of a drummer as the heartbeat of any band.
Harsha Soysa:
(Bassist/Vocalist). He a chorister of the western choir of St. Sebastian’s College, Moratuwa, who began his musical education under famous voice trainers, as well as bass guitar trainers in Sri Lanka. He has also performed at events overseas. He acts as the second singer of the band
Udara Jayakody:
(Keyboardist). He is also a qualified pianist, adding technical flavour to Talento’s music. His singing and harmonising skills are an extra asset to the band. From his childhood he has been a part of a number of orchestras as a pianist. He has also previously performed with several famous western bands.
Aruna Madushanka:
(Saxophonist). His proficiciency in playing various instruments, including the saxophone, soprano saxophone, and western flute, showcases his versatility as a musician, and his musical repertoire is further enhanced by his remarkable singing ability.
Prashan Pramuditha:
(Lead guitar). He has the ability to play different styles, both oriental and western music, and he also creates unique tones and patterns with the guitar..
Features
Special milestone for JJ Twins
The JJ Twins, the Sri Lankan musical duo, performing in the Maldives, and known for blending R&B, Hip Hop, and Sri Lankan rhythms, thereby creating a unique sound, have come out with a brand-new single ‘Me Mawathe.’
In fact, it’s a very special milestone for the twin brothers, Julian and Jason Prins, as ‘Me Mawathe’ is their first ever Sinhala song!
‘Me Mawathe’ showcases a fresh new sound, while staying true to the signature harmony and emotion that their fans love.
This heartfelt track captures the beauty of love, journey, and connection, brought to life through powerful vocals and captivating melodies.
It marks an exciting new chapter for the JJ Twins as they expand their musical journey and connect with audiences in a whole new way.
Their recent album, ‘CONCLUDED,’ explores themes of love, heartbreak, and healing, and include hits like ‘Can’t Get You Off My Mind’ and ‘You Left Me Here to Die’ which showcase their emotional intensity.
Readers could stay connected and follow JJ Twins on social media for exclusive updates, behind-the-scenes moments, and upcoming releases:
Instagram: http://instagram.com/jjtwinsofficial
TikTok: http://tiktok.com/@jjtwinsmusic
Facebook: http://facebook.com/jjtwinssingers
YouTube: http://youtube.com/jjtwins
-
Opinion5 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features5 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Features6 days agoRatmalana Airport: The Truth, The Whole Truth, And Nothing But The Truth
-
Features7 days agoBuilding on Sand: The Indian market trap
-
Business7 days agoDialog partners with Xiaomi to introduce Redmi Note 15 5G Series in Sri Lanka
-
Opinion7 days agoFuture must be won
-
Business6 days agoIRCSL transforms Sri Lanka’s insurance industry with first-ever Centralized Insurance Data Repository
-
Features2 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more



