Connect with us

News

Dispute over Kuliyapitiya property: CA moved against Chamuditha, others – Justice Ministry

Published

on

Claim of foreign intelligence service’s role in arrest of hired gunman confirmed

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Justice Ministry over the weekend announced that a person named Muthukuda Arachchige Don Suranga Dilruk, proprietor of the building ‘Atambahamula bim vasiya’ in Kuliyapitiya had moved Court of Appeal against journalist Chamuditha Samarawickrema, Harini Amali Cabraal Wijetunga and Keerthi Ratnayake for their comments on the judiciary in relation to an ongoing court case.

The Justice Ministry released the three petitions filed by Dilruk in terms of Article 105(3) of the Constitution.The appeals pertaining to a case heard by the District Court of Kuliyapitiya regarding the ownership of the building called ‘Atambahamula bim vasiya’ consisting of 176 units. The respondents were Gamma International (Pvt) Ltd, Kiribathgoda and two of its directors.

Appearing on ‘Truth with Chamuditha’ released on 20 Sept., 2023, on behalf of Gamma International (Pvt) Ltd., Wijetunga said that the property worth Rs 2-4 bn belonged her company and she was ever grateful to the judiciary for doing away with an interim order issued in connection with the case.

In spite of the favourable court directive received in March this year Kuliyapitiya-based thugs had prevented her from moving into the premises, Wijetunga alleged. Therefore, the services of private security personnel had been obtained to regain the building, she said, claiming that a lawyer hired by her parents to represent their interests had switched his allegiance to the other party.

Chamuditha Samarawickrema told The Island that he was ready to face the legal challenge. He asked why the Justice Ministry had intervened in that matter. Samarawickrema said that there hadn’t been previous instances of the Justice Ministry releasing petitions filed in respect of a private case along with a statement to the media. According to the Justice Ministry, the petitioner moved Court of Appeal having found fault with ‘Truth with Chamuditha’ programme posted on 20 Sept., 2023, two Facebook posts by Keerthi Ratnayake on June 23, 2023 and Aug same year and Chamuditha Samarawickrema’s ‘News Brief’ programme on Aug 23, 2023

Wijetunga has said that she had received a threatening call from a person identified as Ganemulle Sanjeewa soon after another gangster based in Kuliyapitiya involved with the gang called her.

Wijetunga has accused the CID of failing to take action against those involved in spite of her taking up this issue with Public Security Minister Tiran Alles. Declaring that complaints lodged with the CID as well as Police Headquarters hadn’t yielded the expected results Wijetunga justified her decision to seek assistance of a serving officer with the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) to arrest Ganemulle Sanjeewa with the backing of a foreign intelligence service. She has declined to confirm whether India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) is the outfit she referred to in her interview with Chamuditha Samarawickrema.

Ganemulle Sanjeewa was taken into custody at the Bandaranaike International Airport (BIA) as he arrived from Nepal on 13 Sept. Wijetunga repeatedly denied allegations that she had the backing of SLPP Kurunegala district MP Johnston Fernando and used political influence to pursue the case over the disputed Kuliyapitiya building.

She has alleged that several lawyers based in Kurunegala and Kuliyapitiya, including an Acting judge had been involved in producing forged deeds and were part of the racket. They wouldn’t be named at the moment on the advice of her lawyers, Wijetunga said, alleging that in addition to the mastermind, a businessman and an MP were involved in this racket. They too would be named and her lawyers had advised her against doing so at the moment, Wijetunga said.

Wijetunga said that her team of lawyers comprising Jagath Wickremanayake, Ronald Perera, Samantha Premachandra, Niroshan Siriwardena and Chaminda Atukorale had handled her case well.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

US$ 2.5 mn cyber heist exposes system failures

Published

on

COPF final report on USD 2.5 mn cyber fraud recommends action against all responsible

The US$2.5 million loss incurred during Sri Lanka’s foreign debt repayment to Australia was a clear case of a cybercrime and theft, Committee on Public Finance (COPF) Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva told Parliament yesterday.

Presenting the COPF final report on the cyber fraud, Dr. de Silva said the incident amounted to a serious financial crime and called for a comprehensive investigation, by law enforcement authorities, to identify and prosecute all those responsible.

The report revealed serious governance, procedural and operational failures that enabled the fraudulent transfer of public funds, while recommending sweeping reforms to strengthen cybersecurity, financial controls and public debt management systems.

According to the report, officials of the Treasury and the Central Bank bore responsibility for governance lapses that contributed to the failures. It also highlighted the fact that the Ministry of Finance was operating an outdated Microsoft Exchange Server after security support had ended, while basic safeguards, such as multi-factor authentication, had not been implemented.

The COPF said suspicious payment instructions linked to debt repayments involving India, the United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium had also been detected, preventing further losses. However, the US$ 2.5 million fraud materialised only in the repayment transaction involving Australia.

The report has noted that officials had failed to verify lender email domains, relied on unverified email communications and lacked adequate internal controls, allowing the fraud to continue for months.

Although the investigation uncovered system-wide weaknesses across several institutions, only four mid-level Finance Ministry officials had been suspended so far, the report said.

The COPF has recommended a special audit of the foreign debt repayment process, strengthened cybersecurity measures across state institutions, updated financial regulations and improvements to public debt management systems.

by Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Opposition signs no-confidence motion against Justice Minister for dereliction of duty over Negombo Prison deaths

Published

on

Opposition and SJB leader Sajith Premadasa signing the no-confidence motion against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara in the presence of Opposition MPs at the Parliamentary complex yesterday

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, together with Opposition MPs, yesterday signed a No-Confidence Motion (NCM) in Parliament against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara.The move comes in response to the unrest at the Negombo Prison, where both prison officers and inmates were killed.

Opposition members said the Minister had failed to fulfill his responsibility and accountability regarding their safety.According to the Opposition group, the NCM seeks to hold the Minister directly accountable for lapses in ensuring protection within the prison system.

Continue Reading

News

AG informs SC of e-visa agreement review  

Published

on

The Attorney General yesterday informed the Supreme Court that the government has decided to review the legality of agreements entered into by the previous administration to hand over the country’s electronic visa issuance operations to private companies.

Additional Solicitor General Viveka Siriwardena, appearing for the Attorney General, made the submission when the Supreme Court took up the fundamental rights petitions filed by former MPs President’s Counsel M.A. Sumanthiran, Patali Champika Ranawaka, and Rauff Hakeem, challenging the previous Cabinet’s decision to outsource the e-visa system.

The petitions were heard before a three-judge bench, comprising Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena and Justices Achala Wengappuli and Arjuna Obeyesekere.

The Additional Solicitor General informed court that the current Cabinet had appointed a subcommittee to examine the legality of the agreements with the private companies and requested time to report on its findings, stating that the review was still underway.

President’s Counsel Sumanthiran, appearing as one of the petitioners, told the court that although the present government had indicated its intention to cancel the transaction, the petitioners wished to proceed with the case.

He noted that members of the current Cabinet had been named as respondents in the petitions.The Supreme Court directed the petitioners to issue notice on the members of the current Cabinet, named as respondents, and fixed September 29 for further proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending