News
Defying expectations of the 21st Amendment to the Constitution insult to fundamental law – Karu
Karu Jayasuriya, Chairman of the National Movement for Social Justice (NMSJ) yesterday said that Government had not yet taken steps to fulfill certain basic and main objectives expected of the 21st Amendment to the Constitution.Given below is his statement: “It has been two months since the Parliament passed the 21st Amendment to the Constitution following great efforts made by social forces that are working for democracy and the well-being of the country. However, we are deeply concerned that the Government has not yet taken steps to fulfill certain basic and main objectives expected by the said Amendment.
“By adopting the 21st Amendment to the Constitution, it was expected to remove the unlimited power that had been secured to a one-man (the Executive President) through the 20th Amendment to the Constitution, to represent the views of the entire society, and to establish a democratic governance structure with transparency and unity through a legislative assembly with civil society representation.
“With the 21st amendment to the Constitution, a full Constitutional Council should be appointed in accordance with the Constitution and the Commissions appointed under the 20th Amendment to the Constitution should be re-appointed subject to the agreement of a Constitutional Council appointed under the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. However, the civil society representatives to be appointed for the Constitutional Council have not been appointed yet.
“Moreover, Independent Commissions have not been enforced under the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. Considering the Independent Commissions, a need for them to be reappointed arises because there is evidence that some members of such Commissions appointed under the 20th Amendment to the Constitution have been appointed to those positions while engaging in party politics, and promoting such.
“This situation is something that really is unfortunate. Ignoring or abusing the spaces subject to the fundamental law, which were able to be secured due to enormous commitment and influence of the civil and political forces that appeared for the well-being and democracy of the country, is a serious insult to the existence of the State. In the face of such situations, we must express our strong opposition, and the failure to do so will be a great betrayal.
As the National Movement for Social Justice (NMSJ), we demand that the members who should be appointed on the basis of civil society representation for the Constitutional Council be appointed without further delay, thereby respecting the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. Also, subject to the provisions of the 21st Amendment to the Constitution, re-appointments should be made in such a way that the existing suitable members are also included for all Independent Commissions.”
News
Prison rules to be revised over monks’ attire
Appointment of committee eyewash, says UNP
The government is considering changes to prison regulations pertaining to the treatment of Buddhist monks serving jail terms, including their right to wear monastic robes when taken outside prison.
Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara announced the proposed changes yesterday (14) following the submission of an interim report by a committee appointed to review the rules and procedures governing prisons.
The report was handed over to Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake at the Presidential Secretariat.
One of the key recommendations is to amend Prison Standing Order 356 by introducing a new provision, 356(A). The proposed revision would require prison authorities to consult the Department of Buddhist Affairs on the removal of a monk’s robes upon admission to prison. The Commissioner of Prisons would be allowed 10 days to notify the department and take the necessary steps.
A separate amendment to Departmental Order 550 would allow Buddhist monks to wear their robes whenever they are taken outside prison, unless their respective Nikaya formally requests that the privilege be withdrawn.
The committee has also recommended extending similar arrangements, with suitable modifications, to members of other religious clergy who are imprisoned.
The proposals follow concerns raised over the treatment of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera after he was taken into custody. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake subsequently held discussions with representatives of the three main Buddhist Nikayas and appointed the committee to examine the existing legal framework.
Nanayakkara said the interim report had been forwarded to the Acting Commissioner General of Prisons, along with instructions to revise the relevant standing orders in accordance with its recommendations.
The proposed amendments have yet to be confirmed as formally implemented.
Meanwhile, the UNP yesterday criticised the government’s decision to appoint a committee to make recommendations on the attire to be worn by imprisoned Buddhist monks and other religious leaders when taken outside prison, describing the move as unnecessary.
In a statement issued yesterday (14), the UNP said the procedures governing the matter were already clearly set out in the Department of Prisons’ Standing Orders, making the appointment of a separate committee unwarranted.
The party cited remarks by Professor G.L. Peiris, Convenor of the Janathawadi Joint Opposition, who had described the committee’s appointment as a
“complete eyewash” and questioned the need for such a move.
Referring to Standing Order 550 of the Prisons Department, the UNP said convicted prisoners appearing before court for legal proceedings should not be required to wear prison uniforms.
It further stated that the regulations allowed prisoners to wear civilian clothing consistent with what they wore before imprisonment, including attire appropriate to their cultural and religious backgrounds.
The UNP accused the government of unnecessarily prolonging the issue by appointing a committee, despite the existence of regulations governing prisoners’ attire.
The party also called on the government to seek forgiveness from the Mahanayake Thera and the Sangha Council of the Kotte Sri Kalyani Samagri Dharma Maha Sangha Sabha of the Siyam Maha Nikaya over the decision concerning the religious attire of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera.
News
AC President recuses himself from hearing prison attire case pertaining to Gnanasara Thera
Court of Appeal President Justice Rohantha Abeysuriya yesterday withdrew from the bench hearing petitions challenging the decision by prison authorities to require Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire following his imprisonment.
The decision was announced when the petitions seeking to invalidate the prison authorities’ decision were taken up for consideration on October 14.
Following his withdrawal, a three-judge bench was appointed to hear the petitions.
The petitions relate to the prison authorities’ decision to require Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire after he was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his sentence for contempt of court.
In September this year, the Supreme Court annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by former President Maithripala Sirisena in May 2019.
Following the ruling, the Court of Appeal directed the Commissioner General of Prisons to take the necessary steps to enforce the remainder of the monk’s prison sentence.
Gnanasara Thera had originally been sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for contempt of court but had served only around nine months before receiving the presidential pardon in 2019.
News
Court orders steps to obtain INTERPOL Red Notice against Basil
The Fort Magistrate’s Court yesterday issued an arrest warrant for former Minister Basil Rajapaksa over the alleged misuse of funds belonging to the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau during the 2014 Uva Provincial Council election.
The Magistrate also directed the CID Illegal Assets Investigation Division to take necessary steps to obtain a Red Notice through Interpol.
The orders were issued following submissions made by the CID in connection with the alleged financial irregularities.
The CID’s Illegal Assets Investigation Unit informed the court that Rs. 7.8 million allocated to the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau in 2014 had allegedly not been used for the Bureau’s promotional activities.
Instead, the funds had allegedly been used to provide 12,000 T-shirts during the Uva Provincial Council election, causing a financial loss to the government, the CID told court.
-
News6 days agoNDB fraud Rs 60mn more than reported
-
News6 days agoRemoving monk’s robes matter for Sangha to decide: Mahanayake Theras
-
News5 days agoNPP govt. reminded of its responsibilities as US warship leaves Colombo
-
News4 days agoSri Lanka escalates anti-graft drive with Shiranthi’s jailing
-
Latest News6 days agoFarhan, Sadaqat help Pakistan ace 183 chase to go 1-0 up
-
News6 days agoBHC, Colombo: “LTTE remains a proscribed org. in the UK”
-
Latest News3 days agoFarhan and Sadaqat help Pakistan seal series in style
-
News4 days agoIranian ships stranded, Lanka fears US sanctions
