Connect with us

News

Debt crisis: 33 NGOs target some creditors

Published

on

 By Ifham Nizam

Thirty three orgnisations yesterday joined hands urging the government to `Cancel Illegitimate Debt of Sri Lanka’, obviously referring to borrowings from China and other creditors.

Representatives hinted that due to whims and fancies of some political giants, the Central Bank top brass is also facing numerous pressures from all quarters.

Senior Environmental Scientist Hemantha Withanage stressed that transparency is of paramount importance when taking loans. At least when taking such loans, it should be discussed in parliament.

However, he said that successive governments had failed and often been on the path of illegitimate debt, criminal debt or unfair debts.

He said that although all the Debt, Sri Lanka owes is taken by the democratically elected governments, they may have not spent in a transparent way.

Some of the projects implemented with loans have created many social and environmental impacts. Some projects have not achieved any ground work even though money is borrowed and spent or Costs are exaggerated, he added.

“These loans would do nothing for the development or progress of the country,” he told a media briefing yesterday in Colombo citing many examples, particularly how four billion rupees were allocated for a Chinese company with regard to the Nilwala and Gin Ganga Project.

He said that two billion rupees have gone missing according to the Auditor General’s report on the Lotus Tower Project.

Withanage also said that the current crisis in Sri Lanka is food, fuel, medicine and other essentials

causing severe scarcity of materials, thereby pushing more people into deep poverty.

He said that for some nine million of Sri Lanka’s population getting food and drink every day is becoming impossible.

“The worst consequences of the current economic crisis and solutions to it, the poorest sections of the country have to experience. Those people will be more affected by the plans presented by the government. We are afraid of being burdened with unbearable and illegitimate (illegal) debt,

Claiming to have the cooperation of the people of all the other countries, the people of Sri Lanka  has designated tomorrow as the protest day for “Illegitimate Debt”, they said

Thilak Kariyawasam of FIAN Sri Lanka said that Colombo Port City is a similar questionable  project in Sri Lanka which is claimed to be  developed as a financial hub. The land reclamation stage has been completed.

Colombo Port city construction was begun arbitrarily  without having a genuine Environmental Impact Assessment study or feasibility study and against the public opinion.

“Although they have done some EIA studies at a later stage, the intention was only to justify the ongoing construction. Relevant government agencies have denied access to the Tri Party agreement between China and Sri Lanka to date,” he added.

Withanage also said that the project cost is estimated at USD 1.35 billion, and the construction was started in 2012 by China Harbour Corporation and the proposed year of completion is 2045.

The project used almost USD 4 billion worth of sea sand and rocks that comes from Sri Lanka’s natural resources free of charge.

According to the auditor General’s report “A sum of Rs. 625,731,680 had been deprived of to the Bureau due to the failure in obtaining the fee of Rs. 68,000,000 relating to the license no. IML/A/HO/8328 dated 16 September 2014 issued to the Sri Lanka Ports Authority for mining sea sand for the Port City and failure to taking action to recover the royalty of Rs. 557,731,680 recoverable for 3,485,823 cubes of sea sand mined prior to the year 2016, recoverable in terms of Section 35 and 44 of the Mines and Minerals Act, No.33 of 1992.

Movement of Land and Agriculture Reforms (MONLAR) Executive Director Chinthana Rajapakse, activist Herman Kumara of the National Fisheries Cooperation (NAFSO), and Law and Society Trust (LST) Sadun Tudugala also spoke



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Sun directly overhead Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura at about 12.10 noon today (31)

Published

on

By

The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from  28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.

The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (31) are Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura about 12.10 noon.

Continue Reading

News

BASL takes exception to Justice Ganepola being denied a place in SC

Published

on

… highlights injustice caused to Justice R. Gurusinghe

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has alleged that due to the failure on the part of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to fill the existing vacancies in the Supreme Court, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled. The BASL pointed out at the time of Ganepola’s retirement there were four vacancies in the Supreme Court.

In a letter dated 17 August, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake, the BASL declared that the failure to promote and recognise Ganepola’s distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.

A top BASL spokesman told The Island yesterday (30) that the Bar Council, over the weekend, had decided to release the hitherto confidential letter.

The official said that they also wanted to remind the President of his assurance given to BASL, on 12 August, 2026, that vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal would be filled as soon as possible, within a month.

The following is the text of the BASL letter, signed by  Rajeev Amarasuriya, President, BASL, and its Secretary Nalin De Silva: “We write further to our letters dated 29th December 2025 and 30th June 2026 in relation to the above, to which we have not received any response.

We also refer to our meeting with Your Excellency on 12th August. As discussed during the meeting, there have been vacancies in the Supreme Court since May 2025, and the number of vacancies has now increased to four (04). There are also four (04) vacancies in the Court of Appeal. These are all matters we have already written to Your Excellency about.

Your Excellency informed the BASL Delegation when we met that you would be taking steps to make recommendations to fill these vacancies as soon as possible, within a month.

We write to reiterate the importance of giving due consideration to the criteria set out in our aforesaid letter dated 29th December 2025. We also wish to emphasise that, in making judicial appointments and promotions, seniority should be given due priority, in keeping with longstanding practice, until such time there are objective and defensible guidelines governing the assessment of merit.

The only justifiable departure to this criterion would be where there exists a specific and recognized demerit in respect of the particular Judge concerned or such other known compelling circumstances that are objectively identifiable such as where a Judge has previously been overlooked for promotion unfairly or conversely, where a Judge has been unfairly previously granted promotions above others.

This approach will safeguard both the integrity of the Judiciary and the trust reposed in it by the public.

Further, while there has been considerable discussion and representation by the Government regarding the importance of retaining experienced judges, as reminded to Your Excellency at our said meeting that, only a few months ago on 8th May 2026, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled, and in which there were four vacancies at the time.

The failure to promote and recognise his distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.

We also drew Your Excellency’s attention at the said meeting to the fact that the Senior-most Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice R. Gurusinghe, who joined the Judicial Service in 1996, who also Acted in the Office of President of the Court of Appeal (appointed by Your Excellency) on 11th May 2026, is due to retire at the end of this month. In fact, we learnt through the Media that Her Ladyship then Chief Justice Justice Murdu Fernando, PC, had previously in July 2025 recommended to Your Excellency the promotion of Justice R. Gurusinghe to the Supreme Court, but the same is pending from that time.

 He too is well deserving of promotion to the Supreme Court and has already been recommended by the former Chief Justice, and his case must also receive due and urgent consideration before his impending retirement.

We hope that Your Excellency will take due note of and give due regard to the concerns of the Bar, as well as to the established principles, practices and conventions governing judicial appointments, when taking steps to fill these vacancies.

On this, Your Excellency is already open to the accusation that these vacancies have been kept open, to fill with favourites of the Government which is yet another serious indictment on the independence of the judiciary which accusation would be confirmed if recommendations are made outside established practice.

Moreover, the BASL expresses grave concern that withholding promotions of Judicial Officers for extended periods of time places undue pressure on Judicial Officers in the discharge of their duties and constitutes both directly and indirectly, interference with the independence of the Judiciary, in addition to the strain obviously caused to the dispensation of justice in other Courts and the stifling and delay of career progression of Judges legitimately entitled to promotions.

We do hope that Your Excellency would take due note and cognizance of the foregoing when effecting these judicial promotions which have been long overdue and which have already adversely impacted the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration of justice.”

The BASL has copied the letter to Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and all members of the Constitutional Council.

Continue Reading

News

Sajith challenges govt. to hold PC polls

Published

on

Sajith

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa on Saturday (29) challenged the government to hold the long-delayed Provincial Council elections, saying the polls would provide an opportunity to gauge the level of public support enjoyed by the administration.

Addressing a farmers’ meeting in Tissamaharama, Hambantota, Premadasa also criticised the latest Rs. 17 per kilogram increase in wheat flour prices, warning that it would push up the prices of bread, bakery products and other flour-based food items and place further pressure on households already struggling with the rising cost of living.

He said Sri Lanka ranked 120th among 130 countries in an international comparison of minimum wages, arguing that wages remained inadequate to meet the escalating cost of living.

Premadasa also questioned official assessments of living standards, asking whether a person could survive for an entire month on Rs. 17,315, a figure he attributed to the Department of Census and Statistics.

He claimed that between 30 and 40 percent of the population was living in poverty and called for a clear programme to help affected families improve their economic conditions.

Turning to the proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which seeks to increase the retirement age of superior court judges, the Opposition Leader accused the government of attempting to undermine judicial independence and interfere with democratic institutions.

He also criticised the government’s handling of poverty, employment, agriculture, healthcare and investment, saying more effective measures were needed to provide relief to people facing economic hardships.Premadasa called for stronger policies to attract foreign direct investment and urged the government to formulate a national strategy for developing the tourism industry.

Continue Reading

Trending