Features
Civilizational values come to the fore in Ukraine
Civilizational values are at the heart of the conflict in Ukraine and none other than UN chief Antonio Guterres broached the principal challenge before the invaders of the country when he called on them to stop the incursion ‘in the name of humanity’. Humanity or loving-kindness and compassion, markers of a civilized conscience, are indeed the gut issues in Ukraine because it is the citizenry of that country that is suffering most, as is plain to see.
People around the world will be judged on the basis of the humanity with which they respond to the suffering of ordinary Ukrainians. In other words, they would stand or fall as civilized humans in proportion to which they respond positively to the promptings of their consciences on this crisis and the issues growing out of it. And enabling Ukrainian citizens to live with dignity is a prime prompting.
If it is agreed that bringing relief and a measure of happiness to the ordinary citizens of Ukraine and respecting their rights are among the most urgent tasks at hand, looking for what are considered historical justifications for the invasion is inapposite and meaningless. They are barren exercises that serve no useful purpose currently and smack of fork-tongued gibberish since many of these sections of opinion, and they are strongly prevalent in Sri Lanka, also recognize the Russian offensive for what it is: an invasion of Ukraine and a gross violation of the latter’s sovereignty. If the latter is accepted by them to be true, elaborate excursions into history at present take on the character of diversionary prattle. Besides, these commentators project themselves as apologists for the invasion.
No doubt, the authoritarian Russian state is not the only invader of countries in contemporary times who have helped spawn unbearable misery for ordinary people who have had nothing to do with the confrontational struggles of major powers in international politics. President Putin had the historical precedents of the Western invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, to take just two examples from the past two decades, that, among other things, stood International Law on its head as it were. As pointed out in this column last week, it is perhaps the impunity with which the US and its allies engaged in their military invasions and misadventures in the South that emboldened President Putin to invade Ukraine.
However, civilian suffering anywhere ought to shake consciences. If this does not occur sufficiently, we are left with the inescapable conclusion that consciences have been steadily deadened as a result of continuous bloodletting the world over and this bodes ill for the future of humanity. Fortunately, the UN has taken the lead in trying to awaken consciences to their prime responsibilities and the hope of humanists is that the call of the UN chief would prove effective.
The fact that Russian and Ukrainian state delegations have been in talks indicates that both sides have taken careful note of the heavy costs that both sides would be called upon to endure in the event of a further prolongation of the conflict. It may appear, at first blush, that Russia is in a position to hold the whip hand over the Ukrainian forces indefinitely but there is no guarantee that this would necessarily be so. First, the morale of the Ukrainian forces is at present high. Second, Ukraine is heavily and steadfastly backed by the West in many vital areas, including arms supplies.
The indications are that the West, with the UK and the EU too figuring in a big way, would not be faltering in the provision of such support for the foreseeable future and this could lead to a military stalemate on the ground. Russia would do well to recall to mind its Afghan experience which threw up the lesson that a prolonged military stalemate is really a victory for the adversary. Besides, with time Western economic sanctions are likely to kick in and this could lead to the steady weakening of the Russian economy. In other words, this conflict is unlikely to feature an easy winner.
However, what is also certain is that as long as the armed conflict lasts, Ukrainian civilians’ suffering would be prolonged. Likewise, the ordinary citizenry of Russia would suffer as well, as a result of Western economic sanctions taking effect, leading to a no-win situation for both sides. The ruble’s tumble is a pointer to worse times ahead for the Russian people.
Accordingly, the sides to the conflict need to explore the possibility of declaring a ceasefire. In the short term, emotions need to cool and a cessation of hostilities is the way to achieve it. Deliberations on the gut issues in the conflict would need to be taken up next. However, when the latter stage is reached, a sense of realism needs to take hold in both quarters. For example, the partitioning of the Ukraine on ethnic grounds is unlikely to be permitted by the Ukrainian state. But governing mechanisms that will satisfy both sides are possible to be worked out and the Baltic states offer some examples of such workable solutions.
It would be plainly foolish for Russia to raise the possibility of a nuclear strike. Retaliatory strikes by Russia’s adversaries with like weapons would trigger large-scale devastation for the world. These considerations should render the nuclear option unthinkable. Mature leadership is needed on both sides of the divide to work out a fair negotiated settlement.
It would be correct to say that with the Ukrainian crisis, the world has come very close to another world war. Even if the world manages to ward off a major war in Europe, it will be left nursing the scars and cleavages from this crisis for a long time to come. The adversarial sides would need to talk constructively to each other for a considerable period to heal the wounds opened by the Ukrainian conflict.
Hopefully, the US and Russia would sooner rather than later get down to talking in earnest on how the rifts opened by this conflict could be healed. Simultaneously, the silent majority or the ordinary people on both sides of the divide, whose one wish is likely to be peace, would need to impress on their ruling elites that war is clearly not the way forward.
Features
The challenge of keeping value-based politics alive
The current outbreak of anti-immigrant protests in Durban, South Africa is bound to have taken many a subscriber to value-based politics or political idealism quite by surprise. After all, this is evidence that despite the historic accomplishments of nation-builders of the stature of the late President Nelson Mandela it cannot be taken for granted that identity politics, including racism in its worst forms, is no more in South Africa.
At the time of this writing details are scarce on the substantive root causes of the protests but it could very well be that economic grievances, particularly on the part of the majority community in South Africa, are contributing considerably to the disaffection. Shrinking employment and material prospects are likely to figure majorly among the factors igniting the unrest.
Fortunately, the local authorities in Durban are losing no time in calling for peaceful co-existence among the relevant communities and are pointing to the vital importance of stepping-up national integration processes. Apparently, immigrants in sizable numbers from neighbouring countries are present in Durban. However, international TV footage of the protests quoted some local authorities as saying that the majority of the immigrants in some centres that housed them were not illegal migrants and had the documents that entitle them to be in Durban.
In the Durban protests the world has fresh proof of the socially divisive consequences of the gathering globe-wide economic disaffection, touched off particularly by the continuing crisis in West Asia. Going ahead, the world would need to brace for increasing identity-based unrest of the kind it is just witnessing in South Africa.
Considering that the material lot of ordinary people everywhere could only aggravate progressively, with the US and Iran showing no signs of negotiating an end to their confrontation any time soon, it will be left to the more democratic and progressive sections of the world community to initiate positive measures collectively to bring a measure of relief to the discontented.
The swiftness with which such relief will be provided would depend crucially on the importance those sections taking up these undertakings attach to value-based politics as opposed to Realpolitik of power politics.
Going by these yardsticks, Italy could be considered to be moving in the right direction. Recently Italy came to the fore in initiating the collective named, ‘Rome Coalition for Food Security and Access to Fertilizer’, which has as one of its aims the swift provision of fertilizer to economically weak African countries.
In a recent statement Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, Antonio Tajani, said that a principal aim of the project was to ensure that the farmers of Africa gained easy access to fertilizer, considering that food security is a growing concern among some of Africa’s economically vulnerable countries.
The statement went on to mention that some 30 countries hailing from the Mediterranean region, the Middle East, the Balkans as well as the FAO had been invited to join the coalition. The venture is far-seeing in that food security is main among the reasons for social discontent which in turn could degenerate into endemic political turmoil and bloodshed. Separatist violence and geographical fragmentation of countries wouldn’t be too far behind these developments, as Africa itself has often proved.
It is hoped that more G7 countries would take the cue from Italy and do what they could to ease the hardships of economically distressed countries, particularly of the global South. In these efforts they would need to break rank with the US, which is today brutally indifferent to the consequences of its policy of making ‘America First’, come what may.
Going by current developments, the Trump administration seems to be blithely oblivious to the wider, deleterious effects of its policy course in West Asia. Besides rendering Iran militarily and otherwise impotent nothing else seems to matter to Washington, as regards West Asia. This is policy short-sightedness of an extreme kind. After all, right now West Asia could be said to be sitting on the proverbial powder keg.
On the other hand, Iran is not giving the world the impression that it is doing anything constructive to get out of the policy straitjacket that it wove for itself decades ago. Rather than enter into a policy of ‘live and let live’ in relation to Israel in particular and initiate a process of reconciliation with the latter, it has chosen to operate within policy parameters that continue to damn Israel. This has put Israel always on the ‘defensive’ so to speak and prevented the opening up of space for meaningful dialogue.
That said, Israel is obliged to explore the possibilities of entering into a negotiatory process with the Arab-Islamic world that could lead to a de-escalation of tensions and bloodshed. It cannot continue to look at its neighbours through lenses that distort them as archetypal enemies who should be ‘wiped off completely from the face of the earth.’
In other words, the need is urgent for Realpolitik to give way to value-based politicks. Italy is beginning to prove that the latter approach could be pursued with some success. May be the EU and the UK could throw their weight behind these initiatives as well and establish that international politics could be refashioned on the basis of humane, civilized norms. The UN would need to be fully supportive of these moves and prove an organizational nucleus of the operations that follow.
In fact the time is ripe for people of conscience to collectively stand up on the side of peace and say ‘No’ to war and violence. Organizations such as the ICRC, the WHO and Medicines Sans Frontiers have already taken up this call. Referring to the widespread destruction of health facilities and their dehumanizing results these organizations have said, among other things, that ‘This is not a failure of the law. It is a failure of political will.’
True, ‘failure of political will’ among those powers that matter accounts for the runaway, uncontrollable nature of war and destruction in contemporary times, but more fundamentally it is a failure of the human conscience. It could very well be that the phenomenal levels to which violence and war have been unleashed today have had the effect of deadening consciences. This is a matter for urgent study and wide discussion.
Features
Vesak celebrations … with Cuteefly
I would describe Indunil Kaushalya Dissanayaka as innovative and creative, and she operates under the name of Cuteefly.
Indunil always comes up with something novel to celebrate special occasions, and she does it with candles … and that’s her profession.
She was in the spotlight when she created a happening scene, with candles, for Christmas, Sinhala and Tamil New Year, and Valentine’s Day.
As lanterns light up Sri Lanka for Vesak, the Colombo-based candle maker is quietly turning wax and wick into little pieces of the festival.

Candles reflecting Vesak themes
Her candles reflect Vesak themes – light, peace, remembrance, giving, etc., to enable you to fill your Vesak celebration with devotion and beauty.
Among her Vesak creations is a lotus-shaped soy candle, scented with sandalwood, lavender, etc., meant to burn during this Vesak Poya Day.

Indunil Kaushalya Dissanayaka: Customers
praise her for her creativity
These handcrafted Vesak candles are perfect for offering at the temple, she says.
What makes her creations so novel is that they come in different shapes, scents, themes, and all are handmade.
What’s more, her customers have heaped praise on her for her creativity.
According to Indunil, her creations are perfect as a thoughtful gift … to bring beauty, unity, and light into every moment.
Says Indunil: “Our beautifully handcrafted Unity candles are designed with premium detail and love, making them perfect for celebrations, gifts, and meaningful occasions.”
Cuteefly, says Indunil, is available online.
Readers could contact Indunil on 0778506066 for more details.
He Facebook Page is: Cuteefly.

Handmade with love
Features
Dark Spots …
Yes, dark spots do crop up on the skin, especially with sun exposure and, of course, as the skin ages.
However, these tips should be of immense benefit to those who are faced with dark spots.
* Lemon and Honey Glow Mask:
You will need 01 teaspoon lemon juice and 01 teaspoon honey.
Mix the lemon juice and honey well and then apply this mixture, only on the dark spots.
Leave for 10–15 minutes and then rinse with cool water.
Benefits:
Lemon helps brighten pigmentation.
Honey moisturises and heals skin.
Gives a natural glow.
* Aloe Vera Gel Treatment:
All you need is fresh aloe vera gel.
Apply the gel apply on dark spots, before going to bed.
Leave overnight and wash in the morning.
Benefits:
Reduces acne marks and pigmentation.
Soothes irritated skin.
Helps skin repair naturally.
* Turmeric and Yoghurt Paste:
You will need 01 teaspoon yoghurt and a pinch of turmeric
Mix the yoghurt and turmeric into a smooth paste and apply on affected areas.
Leave for 15 minutes and then wash gently with lukewarm water.
Benefits:
Turmeric brightens skin naturally.
Yoghurt removes dead skin cells.
Helps fade dark spots gradually.
Use these packs 02-03 times a week as results are generally seen over time.
You can also try this out: Mix a ripe papaya into a smooth paste and apply to the face, or directly on to the dark spots. Leave for 15-20 minutes and then wash with lukewarm water.
-
Business7 days agoHistoric launch of CCWE Fashion Week & International Summit 2026
-
News5 days agoAll-New GRAVITE launches at LKR 6.99 Mn
-
Features5 days agoThe NPP’s pivot to the past
-
News4 days agoPolice probe underway to ascertain links between criminals deported from UAE and local politicians
-
News3 days agoEaster Sunday carnage: Court told Maulana’s statement cannot be accepted without cross-examination
-
Opinion7 days agoThe need to reform Buddhist ecclesiastical order
-
Features5 days agoEnd of Peacekeeping
-
Opinion3 days agoUndermining the democratic political framework
