Connect with us

News

Civil society in conundrum in issuing report card on NPP

Published

on

Absence of transparency in public disclosure of Cabinet decisions highlighted

Senior election monitor Rohana Hettiarachchi explained the difficulty in ascertaining a government performance on the basis of Cabinet decisions taken as all such decisions weren’t made available to the public.

Appearing on Sirasa ‘Pethikada’ with presenter Asoka Dias, yesterday (30), Hettiarachchi revealed PAFFREL (People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections) and March 12 Movement (M12M) have discussed the conundrum with the government.

Hettiarachchi underscored the importance of transparency in respect of Cabinet decisions. In the absence of anticipated transparency, PAFFREL and M12M had no option but to examine 299 Cabinet decisions taken during the period November 2024 to May 2025.

Responding to Asoka Dias’ queries, Hettiarachchi said that the first bi-annual report that dealt with the NPP government’s manifesto titled, ‘A Thriving Nation-A Beautiful Life,’ indicated what he called a generally positive correlation between NPP’s actions and the commitments outlined in the manifesto. Of the 216 Cabinet decisions analysed, 23% had been taken in line with the manifesto, 27% showed support for manifesto themes, though not always with exact correspondence, 43% didn’t really correspond with the manifesto, whereas 7% were irrelevant.

Hettiarachchi appreciated the NPP’s commitment to restrict the number of Cabinet Ministers and Deputies to 50 as declared in their presidential manifesto.

There hadn’t been a separate manifesto for parliamentary elections, the civil society activist said.

The 50 Ministers and Deputy Ministers consists of 22 Ministers and 28 Deputies. While commending the NPP for enacting the ‘Proceeds of Crime Bill’ on 08 April, 2025, Hettiarachchci pointed out that the much touted promise to conduct long delayed Provincial Council polls were yet to be held. Hettiarachchi said that contrary to assurances given by the NPP, allowances granted to lawmakers haven’t been stopped and at least initial measures were yet to be taken in that regard.

The government hasn’t initiated action to do away with MPs pensions though there was a private member’s motion in that regard.

Although duty-free vehicle permits hadn’t been issued to members of Parliament, payments were being made for the maintenance of vehicles, Hettiarachchci said. Their report pointed out that the use of vehicles by MPs remains unclear.

According to Hettiarachchi, their report could guide the government and facilitate its efforts to achieve targets/objectives mentioned in NPP’s presidential polls manifesto.

Asked whether PAFFREL and M12M had taken over the responsibilities of the parliamentary Opposition, Hettiarachchi said that it would be a grave mistake on their part not to make an intervention. Hettiarachchi said that they wouldn’t continue to monitor the NPP’s performance while explaining how they determines the execution of the government’s manifesto.

Hettiarachchi said that in the run-up to presidential and parliamentary polls and thereafter, they had talks with the top NPP leadership. Top polls monitor said that they discussed the issues at hand with both JVP General Secretary Tilvin Silva and NPP General Secretary Dr. Nihal Abeysinghe.

The civil society activist emphasised the responsibility on the part of the government to make available information necessary for them to make informed assessments. Appreciating the NPP’s response so far, Hettiarachchi pointed out that their work would benefit the government only if the administration fulfilled its promises. Otherwise, assessments undertaken by them would be inimical to the government, he said.

Hettiarachchi assured their intention was not to cause unbearable pressure on the government but facilitate implementation of its manifesto by continuously assessing the progress.

The examination of the report revealed that the NPP government would have to go a long way to achieve the objectives mentioned in its manifesto.

By Shamindra Ferdinando



News

Pakistan naval trio arrives at Colombo Port

Published

on

By

In a display of naval tradition, the Sri Lanka Navy formally welcomed the Pakistan Navy Ships ‘PNS Taimur’ and ‘PNS Aslat’, alongside the submarine ‘PNS/M Hangor’, arrived at the Port of Colombo on 01 Jun 26.

The Pakistan naval units made port in Sri Lanka for a goodwill visit as well as replenishment.

The visiting naval assets are commanded by a lineup of naval officers, with Captain Niamat Saeed Khan (‘PNS Taimur’), Captain Nadir Mateen Afridi (‘PNS Aslat’), and Captain Uzair Farooq (‘PNS/M Hangor’).

During their stay in Sri Lanka, the crew members of the visiting ships and submarine are scheduled to tour several key locations across the country.

Concluding the visit, the Pakistan naval units will engage in a Passage Exercise (PASSEX) with the Sri Lanka Navy off the west coast.

Continue Reading

News

IMF turning a blind eye to NPP corruption: Opp.

Published

on

Patali / G. L. Peiris

The People’s United Opposition yesterday (01) alleged that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had turned a blind eye to serious corruption allegations against the NPP government and was going ahead with the USD 2.9 bn loan in terms of the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) programme, finalised in 2023.

Addressing the regular weekly media briefing at the Flower Road Office of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, former Ministers Prof. G. L. Peiris and Patali Champika Ranawaka questioned the failure on the part of the IMF to act in spite of the NPP government engaging in open corrupt practices, contrary to the terms and conditions of the agreement/understanding with the lending agency.

The media was told that the IMF couldn’t absolve itself of the responsibility for the actions of the government, especially because Sri Lanka, experiencing severe economic difficulties, was receiving loans from IMF at over 8%. Ex-parliamentarian Ranawaka pointed out that what Sri Lanka received from the IMF was not JAICA-type soft loans and the country was further burdened.

Prof. Peiris and Ranawaka alleged that the IMF appeared to have chosen not to take up the serious and growing accusations, particularly over coal and fuel scams that caused massive losses. They claimed the government had taken decisions at the expense of the country but for the benefit of certain businessmen close to them.

Both Prof. Peiris and Ranawaka explained the circumstances under which certain persons and companies received privileged status to import very costly vehicles and even helicopters and aircraft as the government

wasted precious foreign reserves for the benefit of friends. Ranawaka named two companies that benefited from government actions while alleging that those engaged in lucrative coal and fuel business made a killing.

They pointed out that the IMF released the latest USD 695 mn amidst stepped up serious allegations against the government. (SF)

Continue Reading

News

Shavendra tells Beijing meet Sri Lanka should not become an arena for geopolitical rivalry among major powers

Published

on

Shavendra Silva

Former Commander of Sri Lanka Army with possibly the best battlefield record, having recovered the most amount of enemy occupied territory by troops he led from the front in the Vanni theatre of operations (2007-2009), General Shavendra Silva recently discussed growing challenges faced by smaller countries, like Sri Lanka, in what he called the evolving global environment.

Stressing that responsibilities must be shared across all states, the former Commander of the Sri Lanka Army told the 5th edition of the Wanshou Dialogue on Global Security in Beijing: “Major powers bear a special responsibility to exercise strategic restraint, avoid coercive practices, uphold international law, and contribute toward global stability rather than fragmentation.

Emerging and middle powers have an increasingly important role as bridge builders promoting dialogue, cooperation, and institutional reform.

For countries such as Sri Lanka, the path forward lies in principled and balanced diplomacy.

This requires maintaining constructive relations with all nations while safeguarding sovereignty, strategic independence, and national interests.

Sri Lanka has consistently maintained that its territory should not become an arena for geopolitical rivalry or military confrontation among larger powers.

Instead, our focus remains on strengthening national resilience through economic development, institutional stability, maritime awareness, modern defence capabilities, and agile diplomacy.

Credible domestic institutions, accountable governance, and national cohesion ultimately strengthen sovereignty while reducing opportunities for external interference.”

Referring to his service as Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN in New York, General Silva said that his engagements at the UN and other international forums reinforced the importance of defending national interests while remaining committed to reconciliation, development, and peaceful coexistence.

The celebrated battlefield commander discussed the transformation of global security, the future direction of the international order and the responsibilities of states in this transitional era. Silva said: “Today, security threats extend far beyond conventional warfare.

Cyber threats, terrorism, disinformation, economic coercion, artificial intelligence, and the weaponisation of technology increasingly influence global stability. At the same time, climate change, pandemics, food insecurity, and economic disruptions have demonstrated how closely national security and human security are now interconnected.

For Sri Lanka, located at the centre of the Indian Ocean along one of the world’s most important maritime trade routes, these developments carry direct strategic significance. Sri Lanka’s own experience offers valuable lessons.

The defeat of the LTTE, in 2009 demonstrated the importance of decisive state action against terrorism, while also revealing how modern conflicts become internationalised through financing networks, propaganda, illicit arms flows, and external geopolitical pressures.

The post-conflict period further reinforced the importance of reconciliation, economic recovery, institutional rebuilding, and long-term national resilience.

Smaller states increasingly face pressures arising from great-power rivalry, economic dependency, and strategic competition.

Sri Lanka has, therefore, consistently sought to maintain strategic balance while safeguarding sovereignty and constructive engagement with all partners.

China has remained an important development and economic partner for Sri Lanka over many decades. The relationship, strengthened through the 1952 Rubber-Rice Pact, expanded significantly in the post-war period through cooperation in infrastructure, connectivity, logistics, energy, and economic recovery. Projects associated with the Belt and Road Initiative have contributed to Sri Lanka’s development, regional connectivity, and post-crisis resilience. China also extended support during the COVID-19 pandemic and Sri Lanka’s recent economic stabilisation efforts.

The future international order must be shaped not by confrontation or exclusive blocs, but through pragmatic cooperation, institutional reform, and balanced multilateral engagement.

International institutions, particularly the United Nations system, must evolve to better reflect contemporary geopolitical realities and the growing voice of the Global South.

Without greater inclusivity and legitimacy, multilateral institutions risk losing effectiveness in addressing increasingly complex global challenges.

Equally important is preserving a rules based maritime order grounded in international law, particularly the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The international community must also establish clearer norms governing emerging technologies, cyber operations, artificial intelligence, autonomous weapons systems, and outer space security.

Sri Lanka’s recent economic stabilisation efforts further demonstrated that internal resilience is essential for maintaining strategic autonomy and an independent foreign policy.

It is also an opportunity to build a more inclusive, balanced, and resilient international order capable of responding to the realities of the 21st century.

Continue Reading

Trending