Business
Britain has opened a door: Sri Lanka’s SME apparel exporters need help walking through it
Trade preferences are often spoken of as though tariff cuts alone can remake an industry. They cannot. Preferences matter only when firms are able to use them. That is what makes the United Kingdom’s revised Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS), effective from January 1, 2026, important for Sri Lanka’s apparel sector. It offers more than continued market access. It offers a more usable route into one of Sri Lanka’s key export markets. For large exporters, that is beneficial. For small and medium-sized firms, it could be pivotal.
The real significance lies in the rules of origin. Earlier preference regimes imposed conditions that often constrained smaller exporters, especially those without vertically integrated operations. The revised DCTS eases those constraints by allowing greater sourcing flexibility. For Sri Lankan apparel SMEs, that matters more than the headline concession. Smaller exporters rarely struggle because they cannot manufacture. More often, they struggle because they cannot source inputs competitively, price with enough agility, or meet delivery timelines reliably enough to retain buyer confidence. The DCTS begins to ease those commercial pressures.
That is the theory. The more important question is what it means in practice.
Joe Jayawardena, an exporter to the UK speaking from the perspective of a UK-linked buying and manufacturing business sourcing from Sri Lanka and other apparel-producing countries, put it plainly: the DCTS is a duty concession for developing countries. But its real value lies in how it changes the commercial conversation. If exporters can source from a wider pool of inputs without losing preferential access, they gain more room to negotiate on price, lead time, and fabric choice. In apparel, that is not a marginal gain. It can determine whether a supplier is shortlisted or ignored.
That matters particularly for Sri Lankan SMEs because they operate with structural disadvantages. They typically have less working capital, narrower supplier networks, and weaker bargaining power than larger manufacturers. They cannot absorb long delays. They cannot tie up cash in excessive inventory. And they rarely enjoy the upstream integration that allows major firms to manage both cost and compliance. When rules are rigid, smaller firms feel the pressure first. When rules become more flexible, they stand to benefit disproportionately.
That is why the DCTS should be viewed not merely as a customs adjustment, but as a competitiveness instrument.
Yet preferential access on paper does not automatically become export orders. Here, the exporters’ comments point to a harder truth. Jayawardena’s sharper criticism was not of the scheme itself, but of Sri Lanka’s failure, so far, to exploit it properly. The opportunity exists, he argued, but the connectivity does not. Better access means little if buyers are not being brought closer to suppliers, if exporters remain insufficiently visible in the market, and if the state treats market access as a passive entitlement rather than something to be actively commercialised.
That critique deserves attention. Sri Lanka has too often assumed that preferential access will somehow speak for itself. It does not. Trade schemes reward countries that organise around them. That means stronger participation in trade fairs, more direct buyer outreach, easier commercial engagement, and a more deliberate effort to market Sri Lanka’s value proposition. It also means helping SMEs turn regulatory change into business decisions. Which products are best placed under the new rules? How should firms restructure sourcing? What level of documentation is enough to avoid customs disputes? How should mixed shipments be managed? These are practical questions, and SMEs need practical answers.
Amindra Wimalasena, another exporter to the UK, pointed to the second half of the problem. Better market access alone will not allow firms to scale if they lack the means to modernise. His point was straightforward: with the right support for automation, and financing mechanisms designed around how the industry actually operates, output could rise materially without a proportional increase in labour. Productivity gains are possible, but only if investment reaches the factory floor rather than being trapped by wider financial constraints.
This is where the DCTS debate becomes more strategic. The scheme creates external opportunity. But Sri Lanka’s SME exporters still face internal constraints, especially in finance, systems, and market connection. Many smaller firms do not need another seminar on trade policy. They need inventory-backed lending, grace periods for machinery investment, stronger production planning, and better access to buyers. Without that, the gains from DCTS will flow mainly to firms already large enough to move quickly.
That would be a missed opportunity.
Sri Lanka’s apparel sector has long been anchored by a small number of established players. But the next phase of growth will require a broader base. SMEs can provide that, particularly in segments where flexibility, specialisation, and shorter production runs matter. Britain’s revised scheme could support exactly this part of the industry, if used properly. Greater sourcing freedom allows smaller firms to become more responsive. It lets them choose inputs on commercial merit rather than regulatory necessity. It can improve pricing, shorten lead times, and make them more attractive to UK buyers seeking agile sourcing partners.
But that outcome will not happen on its own. It requires an ecosystem response. Government and industry bodies need to treat DCTS as a commercial opening, not just a policy achievement. Support for SMEs must become more operational, not merely informational. And policymakers should link DCTS directly to productivity finance, so that smaller exporters can invest in efficiency and automation rather than simply admire improved market access from a distance.
The broader lesson is simple. Trade preferences create potential only when domestic institutions convert that potential into capability. The UK has widened the opening. Sri Lanka must now decide whether to merely welcome the gesture or make full commercial use of it.
For SME apparel exporters, the stakes are considerable. If the DCTS is properly leveraged, it could improve competitiveness, widen buyer access, and bring smaller firms closer to the centre of Sri Lanka’s export economy. If it is not, Sri Lanka risks repeating a familiar pattern: favourable terms, but limited results.
Britain has opened a door. Sri Lanka’s SMEs now need the systems, capital, and market access to walk through it.
Business
Central Bank says it merely executed government instructions
USD 2.5 million sovereign debt payment:
The Central Bank merely carried out the controversial USD 2.5 million sovereign debt payment in accordance with instructions issued by the government, Central Bank Governor Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe said yesterday, emphasising that the institution acted solely in its capacity as banker to the state.
Addressing a question at a public seminar, Dr. Weerasinghe explained that the Central Bank’s responsibility in such transactions is operational rather than supervisory. According to him, once the Ministry of Finance or the Treasury issues a payment order, the Central Bank processes the transfer exactly as instructed, without involvement in determining the beneficiary or the broader decision-making process behind the payment.
The Governor’s remarks came in response to a query regarding the widely discussed USD 2.5 million sovereign debt repayment reportedly sent to a party in Australia and later alleged to have been siphoned off by a cyber criminal.
“The Central Bank is the banker to the government just as it is to commercial banks,” he explained. “When we receive a payment instruction from the Ministry of Finance or the Treasury, we execute that payment in line with the instructions given to us.”
He noted that the Central Bank credits the account specified by its client, in this case, the government — and subsequently informs the relevant authorities once the transaction has been completed. If a payment cannot be processed or is rejected by the banking system, the Bank notifies the client accordingly. And when a payment is successful, the client would receive a notification, he said.
However, Dr. Weerasinghe indicated that the Central Bank would not necessarily be aware if recipient details had been altered elsewhere in the chain of communication prior to the transaction reaching the Bank for execution.
The Governor also highlighted the institutional changes that took effect from January 1, 2026. He explained that when the Public Debt Department functioned under the Central Bank, the institution had a more direct role in sovereign debt management and decision-making. With the External Debt Department now operating under the Ministry of Finance, the Central Bank’s role has become largely facilitative.
Under the current arrangement, he said, the Bank simply processes payments on behalf of the government. If the Treasury provides funds in Sri Lankan rupees, the Central Bank converts them into US dollars before remitting the payment. Alternatively, the payment may be made from government accounts maintained at the Central Bank or from the country’s foreign reserves.
To simplify the explanation, Dr. Weerasinghe compared the process to an ordinary customer instructing a commercial bank to transfer money to a designated recipient. In such instances, the bank processes the transaction based on the customer’s instructions rather than independently verifying the account details of the recipient.
Through his remarks, the Governor strongly conveyed that the Central Bank had no involvement in the policy or decision-making aspects of the disputed payment and acted purely as the executing financial institution on behalf of the government.
By Sanath Nanayakkare
Business
Lime trees to crack HEC conundrum
A pioneering community-based conservation initiative aimed at reducing the devastating impact of Human-Elephant Conflict (HEC) while strengthening rural livelihoods was launched on Sunday in the Anuradhapura District under the theme “Lime Trees for Peace Between Elephants and People.”
The project, spearheaded by the Elephant Human Coexistence Foundation, was officially launched in Maningamuwa Village in the Central Nuwaragam Palatha Divisional Secretariat area, marking what conservationists describe as a practical and environmentally sustainable approach to one of Sri Lanka’s gravest socio-economic and ecological crises.
As part of the inaugural phase, 1,200 lime plants were distributed among four farming families to establish bio fences around agricultural lands.
The initiative seeks to use citrus-based living barriers as a natural deterrent to elephants, reducing crop raids without harming wildlife.
Co-Founder and Director of the Foundation, Panchali Panapitiya, said the project was designed not only to protect crops, but also to transform vulnerable farming communities into active custodians of coexistence.
“Human-Elephant Conflict cannot be solved through fear, violence, or isolation,” Panapitiya told The Island Financial Review. “We believe coexistence becomes sustainable only when communities themselves are empowered as leaders and partners in conservation. This initiative combines environmental protection with livelihood security.”
She said the lime tree fences would create a “living shield” around farms while simultaneously generating long-term economic benefits for rural families.
“Coexistence grows as communities thrive. Peace takes root when livelihoods are strengthened,” she said.
Sri Lanka continues to record alarming levels of Human-Elephant Conflict annually, with both elephant and human fatalities increasing in recent years. Rural farmers in districts such as Anuradhapura, Polonnaruwa, and Moneragala frequently suffer severe crop losses, while conventional mitigation methods — including electric fencing — often remain costly, difficult to maintain, or ecologically disruptive.
Against this backdrop, conservationists say the use of lime-based bio fencing presents a low-cost and climate-friendly alternative.
The Foundation noted that similar citrus-based deterrent systems have already demonstrated success in parts of Africa and Thailand, where elephants naturally avoid strong citrus scents. The Sri Lankan initiative aims to scientifically assess the effectiveness of local lime species as protective barriers for small and medium-scale farms.
Importantly, lime tree bio fences have already been recognised in the official Anuradhapura District Plan for the Mitigation of Human-Elephant Conflict, giving the initiative institutional backing from the District Secretariat, Divisional Secretariats, and the Department of Wildlife Conservation.
Panapitiya stressed that the project also carries broader environmental and social goals beyond conflict mitigation.
“This is about restoring harmony between people, elephants, and landscapes,” she said. “At the same time, these trees contribute to carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and economic resilience in farming communities.”
A notable component of the programme is its emphasis on women’s empowerment within the agriculture sector, traditionally dominated by men. The Foundation believes conservation-linked agriculture can create pathways towards financial independence for rural women while strengthening household resilience.
The project’s broader objectives include reducing fatalities linked to Human-Elephant Conflict, improving rural economic stability, increasing community participation in conservation efforts, and supporting the long-term preservation of Sri Lanka’s endangered elephant populations.
Environmentalists attending the launch described the initiative as an example of how conservation and rural development can work together rather than in opposition.
Those present at the event included Panapitiya, Co-Founder and Director Manoja Weerakkody, Co-Founder and Director Duminda Dissanayake, officials from the Central Nuwaragam Palatha Divisional Secretariat, and representatives of the Department of Wildlife Conservation.
The Foundation expressed hope that the programme would eventually be expanded throughout the Anuradhapura District and potentially replicated in other Human-Elephant Conflict hotspots across Sri Lanka.
By Ifham Nizam
Business
Strangers at orientation, family by finals- the story of friends at SLIIT
“Bro” is a word you hear frequently at SLIIT. Study halls, elevators, canteens and even corridors echo with lively chatter of students either discussing project work, venting frustrations, debating the latest films or catching their breath from laughing. Almost immediately, ethnic backgrounds, religious beliefs, gender, and place of origin don’t matter when you hear “Bro, send me the notes,” or “Bro, let’s go for the match.”
The traditional idea of a family requires some form of biological relationship, but behind the gates at SLIIT, this is not necessarily the case. In a student body of over 25,000, studying more than 100 different programmes, friend groups frequently develop into something deeper: a sense of belonging that feels like family. Every year on International Day of Families (May 15), we are reminded of the importance of family in creating our identities and these close-knit groups at SLIIT are no different.
For many students, the university experience begins with uncertainty. Being surrounded by unexpected faces and new expectations can be intimidating at first. However, it is during these moments that long-term ties begin to form. A simple introduction during orientation, a shared chuckle during lectures, or teamwork in group projects are frequently the beginnings of meaningful friendships.
SLIIT’s vibrant student life is designed to foster these friendships. From faculty-led events and sports activities to student organizations and societies, students are nudged to collaborate despite their differences. Most importantly, these environments are designed to inspire growth and personal reflection even when faced with conflicting ideas. What results is a strong sense of community and students who have the skill to thrive in challenging situations.
These relationships evolve throughout time. Friends who stood in as study partners, motivators, and emotional support systems stay connected even after they graduate. For many alumni, these friendships are among the most treasured aspects of their academic experience. Even after transitioning into professional employment, these ties remain strong, forming networks of support, collaboration, and continued friendship.
According to Harshana, currently in their third year at SLIIT, it is critical to remember that family is not only defined by where we come from, but also by the ties we form. The friendships created at SLIIT teach that sometimes the strongest families are those we create for ourselves.
-
News4 days agoLanka Port City officials to meet investors in Dubai
-
News1 day agoEx-SriLankan CEO’s death: Controversy surrounds execution of bail bond
-
News5 days agoSLPP expresses concern over death of former SriLankan CEO
-
Editorial6 days agoThe Vijay factor
-
News5 days agoPolice inform Fort Magistrate’s Court of finding ex-CEO of SriLankan dead under suspicious circumstances
-
Features2 days agoHigh Stakes in Pursuing corruption cases
-
Features2 days agoWhen University systems fail:Supreme Court’s landmark intervention in sexual harassment case
-
Features6 days agoPalm leaf manuscripts of Sri Lanka – 1
