News
‘Bring in Petroleum, Water Acts to address power sector crisis’
SJB asks Prez whether he is only interested in fully implementing 13 A
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Convenor of the Samagi Joint Trade Union Alliance, Ananda Palitha, yesterday (07) alleged that the failure on the part of successive governments to properly implement the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Act No 35 of 2002 prevented the PUC from performing its regulatory responsibilities.
Palitha said that as long as this Act, introduced during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s tenure as the Prime Minister of the UNP-led UNF government, way back in 2002, remained not fully implemented, electricity consumers wouldn’t get a fair deal.
The primary reason for the ongoing controversy, over the proposed electricity hike, approved by the Cabinet-of-Ministers, was the non-implementation of the relevant Act, the former UNP activist said.
Former Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) employee, Ananda Palitha, switched his allegiance to the SJB, in the wake of the UNP split in the run-up to the last parliamentary election, in August 2020.
The trade union leader said that President Ranil Wickremesinghe should take immediate measures to implement the relevant Act. Referring to President Wickremesinghe’s recent declaration that he would have no other option but to fully implement the 13th Amendment to the Constitution as it was law of the country, the SJB activist urged the UNP leader to implement the PUC Act, as well.
In terms of this Act, the PUC is the watchdog for Petroleum and Water, in addition to Electricity, Palitha said. Pointing out that though the PUC received authority to regulate the electricity industry, in terms of Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 20 of 2009, Palitha said that respective Acts, pertaining to Petroleum and Water, were yet to be passed by Parliament.
The Act, passed in 2002, was meant to empower the PUC as the economic, technical and safety regulator of Water, Petroleum and Electricity sectors. Palitha said that in spite of the PUC Chairman Janaka Ratnayake’s declaration of his readiness to regulate the Petroleum and Water sectors, Parliament was dragging its feet. The SJB representative said so in response to The Island queries.
Asked whether his trade union alliance intended to pressure the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government over this issue, Palitha said that those at the helm of political authority should realize that full implementation of the (PUC) Act of No 35 of 2002 would benefit the government. Proper regulation of Electricity, Petroleum and Water would enable the PUC to make available services, at an affordable price, Palitha said.
Instead, successive governments had deliberately denied constitutional authority to the PUC for obvious reasons, Palitha said, alleging that those who financially benefited through ‘deals’ kept the overall process under their control.
Referring to the abortive bid made by the Human Rights Commission (HRC) recently to provide electricity, without interruption, during the duration of the Advanced Level examination, and its decision to seek judicial intervention in that regard, Palitha questioned the responsibility of Parliament. Palitha said that the electricity industry was in deepening turmoil as the issues therein couldn’t be addressed unless the PUC received oversight powers over Petroleum and Water sectors, too.
Palitha declined to comment on recent accusations that he, along with the Secretary of the Electricity Consumers’ Association, Sanjeewa Dhammika, threatened two PUC members, Mohan Samaranayake, and its Deputy Chairman Udeni Wickremesinghe, as the matter was before the Fort Magistrate Court. Since then Samaranayake and Wickremesinghe sent in their resignation letters.
Asked whether he expected the PUC to address the issues at hand, the SJB official pointed out that progress couldn’t be made until Parliament enacted the relevant Petroleum and Water acts, on the lines of the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 20 of 2009. Palitha said that the recent disclosure of Lanka Coal Company Chairman Shehan Sumanasekera’s urgent request for money for procurement of coal underscored the crisis in the power sector. “All this is part of a continuing drama. Have you ever heard of any previous Coal Company Chairman discussing such a matter with the media,” Palitha asked.
Sumanasekera has warned of possible disruption of operations at the Norochcholai coal-fired power plant complex, unless USD 12.32 mn (Rs. 4.56 billion) could be made available.
Palitha said that the government was trying to justify steep increases in electricity tariffs. The ongoing crisis was brazenly used by interested parties to pursue their agenda meant to facilitate the privatization of the CEB, Palitha said, urging the Opposition to pressure the government to enact the relevant Acts, pertaining to the Petroleum and Water sectors.
The trade unionist said that he was quite surprised that the Opposition, and all those demanding a system change, pushed hard for legislation that would make far reaching change in the lives of the hapless public, as well as save industries from collapse, due to intolerable power tariffs.
Against the backdrop of a near 70 percent power tariff increase last year, if electricity rates go up by another 65% percent, consumers would have to implement their own blackouts to save on electriity bills, the SJB official said.
News
Prez seeks Harsha’s help to address CC’s concerns over appointment of AG
Chairman of the Committee on Public Finance (CoPF), MP Dr. Harsha de Silva, told Parliament yesterday that President Anura Kumara Dissanayake had personally telephoned him in response to a letter highlighting the prolonged delay in appointing an Auditor General, a vacancy that has remained unfilled since 07 December.
Addressing the House, Dr. de Silva said the President had contacted him following the letter he sent, in his capacity as CoPF Chairman, regarding the urgent need to appoint the constitutionally mandated head of the National Audit Office. During the conversation, the President had sought his intervention to inform the Constitutional Council (CC) about approving the names already forwarded by the President for consideration.
Dr. de Silva said the President had inquired whether he could convey the matter to the Constitutional Council after their discussion. He stressed that both the President and the CC must act in cooperation and in strict accordance with the Constitution, warning that institutional deadlock should not undermine constitutional governance.
He also raised concerns over the Speaker’s decision to prevent the letter he sent to the President from being shared with members of the Constitutional Council, stating that this had been done without any valid basis. Dr. de Silva subsequently tabled the letter in Parliament.
Last week, Dr. de Silva formally urged President Dissanayake to immediately fill the Auditor General’s post, warning that the continued vacancy was disrupting key constitutional functions. In his letter, dated 22 December, he pointed out that the absence of an Auditor General undermines Articles 148 and 154 of the Constitution, which vest Parliament with control over public finance.
He said that the vacancy has severely hampered the work of oversight bodies such as the Committee on Public Accounts (COPA) and the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE), particularly at a time when the country is grappling with a major flood disaster.
As Chair of the Committee responsible for overseeing the National Audit Office, Dr. de Silva stressed that a swift appointment was essential to safeguard transparency, accountability and financial oversight.
In a separate public statement, he warned that Sri Lanka was operating without its constitutionally mandated Chief Auditor at a critical juncture. In a six-point appeal to the President, Dr. de Silva emphasised that an Auditor General must be appointed urgently in the context of ongoing disaster response and reconstruction efforts.
“Given the large number of transactions taking place now with Cyclone Ditwah reconstruction and the yet-to-be-legally-established Rebuilding Sri Lanka Fund, an Auditor General must be appointed urgently,” he said in a post on X.
By Saman Indrajith
News
Govt. exploring possibility of converting EPF benefits into private sector pensions
The NPP government was exploring the feasibility of introducing a regular pension, or annuity scheme, for Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) contributors, Deputy Minister of Labour Mahinda Jayasinghe told Parliament yesterday.
Responding to a question raised by NPP Kalutara District MP Oshani Umanga in the House, Jayasinghe said the government was examining whether EPF benefits, which are currently paid as a lump sum at retirement, could instead be converted into a system that provides regular payments throughout a retiree’s lifetime.
“We are looking at whether it is possible to provide a pension,” Jayasinghe said, stressing that there was no immediate plan to abolish the existing lump-sum payment. “But we are paying greater attention to whether a regular payment can be provided throughout their retired life.”
Jayasinghe noted that the EPF was established as a social security mechanism for private sector employees after retirement and warned that receiving the entire fund in a single installment could place retirees at financial risk, particularly as life expectancy increases.
He also cautioned that interim withdrawals from the EPF undermined its long-term sustainability. “Even the interim payments that are given from time to time undermine the ability to give security at the time of retirement,” he said, distinguishing the EPF from the Employees’ Trust Fund, which provides more frequent interim benefits.
Addressing concerns over early withdrawals, the Deputy Minister explained that contributors have been allowed to withdraw up to 30 percent of their EPF balance since 2015, with a further 20 percent permitted after 10 years, subject to specific conditions and documentary proof.
Of 744 applications received for such withdrawals, 702 had been approved, he said.
The proposed shift towards an annuity-based system comes amid broader concerns over Sri Lanka’s ageing population and pressures on retirement financing. While state sector employees receive pensions funded by taxpayers, including EPF contributors, the EPF itself has been facing growing strain as it is also used to finance budget deficits.
Jayasinghe said the government’s focus was to formulate a mechanism that would ensure long-term income security for private sector employees, placing them on a footing closer to a pension scheme rather than a one-time retirement payout.
News
Sajith accuses govt. of exacerbating people’s suffering to please IMF
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa yesterday strongly criticised proposals to increase electricity tariffs, warning that the move would deepen the hardships faced by the public already reeling from disasters and rising fuel costs.
Premadasa, who is also the leader of the SJB, told Parliament that the government was considering an electricity price hike at a time when people were struggling to recover from recent crises, while coping with higher fuel prices. He accused the administration of acting contrary to its own election pledges and the expectations of suffering people.
Making a special statement, the Opposition Leader recalled that the government had come to power promising to reduce electricity bills by 30 percent, within three years, by shifting from fuel-based power generation to cheaper renewable sources, such as solar, wind and hydropower. Instead, he said, those commitments had been abandoned.
Premadasa pointed out that the CEB has sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for an 11.57 per cent tariff increase for the first quarter of 2026 to cover its losses. He questioned whether the government had assessed the impact of such an increase on low- and middle-income households, as well as state institutions.
He also asked why the government had failed to honour its promise to cut electricity tariffs by one-third through a transparent pricing mechanism.
The Opposition Leader further criticised the limited time allocated for public consultations on the proposed new energy policy, saying it was unfair and should be extended, particularly given the prevailing national crises.
Premadasa warned that the removal of competitive tariff structures for industries would be unjust to large-scale consumers using more than five million units of electricity, and called for comparative reports before any subsidies are withdrawn.
He added that despite earlier assurances to reduce electricity bills by 33 percent, the government has once again increased fuel prices, even as global fuel prices decline, continuing, what he described as, a pattern of broken election promises.
Accusing the government of being constrained by International Monetary Fund (IMF) conditions, Premadasa said the simultaneous increases in fuel and electricity prices were exacerbating the economic burden on the public.
By Saman Indrajith
-
News1 day agoBroad support emerges for Faiszer’s sweeping proposals on long- delayed divorce and personal law reforms
-
News1 day agoInterception of SL fishing craft by Seychelles: Trawler owners demand international investigation
-
News2 days agoPrivate airline crew member nabbed with contraband gold
-
News4 days agoHealth Minister sends letter of demand for one billion rupees in damages
-
Opinion6 days agoRemembering Douglas Devananda on New Year’s Day 2026
-
Features2 days agoPharmaceuticals, deaths, and work ethics
-
Features1 day agoEducational reforms under the NPP government
-
News1 day agoUS raid on Venezuela violation of UN Charter and intl. law: Govt.
