Connect with us

Sports

Bhanuka Rajapaksa outburst and possible repercussions

Published

on

A frustrated fan’s viewpoint

by Aravinthan Arunthavanathan

Bhanuka Rajapaksa’s media outburst recently gave rise to polarizing views in cricketing circles. Whether it was warranted or not is a secondary issue, in fact it depends on the lens you chose to review his views, but for a common fan it is so disheartening to see a player of that caliber and talent being forced to vent his frustration in public.

My first memory of Bhanuka was in New Zealand in the 2010 Under-19 World Cup. As Bhanuka was dominating a minnow attack, the commentator was saying “He is showing that he is a brilliant player against mediocre attacks, it is interesting to see how he fares against the big boys”.

Fast forward to 2019 on a dewy night in Lahore, the same Bhanuka jumps down the track, gets inside the line of a 140 plus Wahab Riaz thunderbolt and smacks it over cover for an extravagant six intertwined with nonchalant elegance. If one had gone into oblivion and returned almost a decade later since seeing Bhanuka as a schoolboy cricketer, fair chance is that he would have thought by now Bhanuka was a superstar on World stage. His skill on that tour was such that one would find it hard to believe that he was just playing his first international series. How such a talent did not get a chance shall not be an enigma for anyone who understands the peculiar ways in which Sri Lankan cricket works. At times comprehending the fuel pricing formula and travel restrictions are cakewalks compared to decoding selection policies. While a lot has been heard and read about Bhanuka one thing is clear, he seems to be one who does not mince his words. His views and opinion are so strong and polarized, that at times it almost projects him as an entitled personality finding fault with everyone else but himself.

But imagine being asked to bat out of position in immediate aftermath of having eviscerated the number one bowling attack in the world in one series, and that too lower down the order after a solitary failure. Imagine being asked to forego franchise commitments, losing out on big money only to be thrown out of the squad without a reason. Imagine the commitment being questioned and labeled as sloppy for carrying the gloves while running, that too after almost pulling off a domestic T20 final single handedly with a hamstring injury. Bhanuka Rajapaksa unfortunately has endured it all. Life has certainly been unfair on Bhanuka in his own words and by anyone’s standards.

Before we judge and let the jury out on whether Bhanuka’s recent media outbursts were warranted or not, one must empathize with the agony he must have endured. There could be many others in the same boat. Angelo Perera not many fans’ favourite also had echoed the same thoughts regarding selection policies in a recent interview on a sports program. If you are good enough to be selected, you at least need to be told where you fit in the scheme of things and why you are dropped from the side. Anybody who has worn the national cap deserves that courtesy. It is not an add on feature but a necessity in managing a team. While the new selection committee has shown an inclination towards an inclusive and transparent environment it’s yet to be seen how consistent it would be.

To make matters complicated for Bhanuka the recently introduced fitness standards seem to make him a nonstarter in the race to selection. A stringent selection criterion is essential in the long run to lift the lackluster standards ailing the game. But there would always be exceptions based on the genetics. If at all if that is a valid reason it should be factored in properly. Lasith Malinga recently went on record stating after his foot injury he had to prove his fitness through bowling and no other means. While a uniform scale is an essential there should be secondary mechanisms which are validated to ensure the best talent is not left out due to rigid policies.

It looks like unfair to see a player of Bhanuka’ caliber being kept out of the squad. But change is difficult. There will be casualties for greater good. Bhanuka having ended on the wrong side of the tide seems to be ending up on the wrong end again. He may not play for Sri Lanka anytime soon after his recent outbursts and probably may not never ever wear the national Jersey.

But as a fan who was mesmerized by the 19-year-old back in 2010 and then again in Pakistan all one could hope is he goes onto play domestic leagues and scores truckloads of runs not knocking the door but bulldoze the door so that nobody can keep him out citing any reason.

Bhanuka seems to be that kid who is not happy with the system. It looks justifiable on surface. But history has shown those are the ones who go onto change the world. If Bhanuka turns out to be that person in Sri Lankan context it would be the ultimate high for any Sri Lankan fan and the fairy tale culmination to a career which never got what it deserved.

After all, as Saurav Ganguly recalls, when he was recalled to the Indian side under Greg Chappell after being ousted as skipper, he had to face a baptism of fire on the fiery venomous tracks of South Africa. He faced fire with fire and came out on top to find his place not only in Tests but also the World Cup squad in 2007 and bowed out in 2008 on a high. Only a few years before it seemed impossible. But history has shown nothing is impossible.

Bhanuka Rajapaksa has dished out a welcome, audacious stream of words which has created a stir. Now he would have to perform way more than what he would have had to prior to his outbursts. It will be interesting to see how he emerges out of this. But as a Sri Lankan fan all one could wish is that the nonchalance mixed with aggression in Bhanuka’s batting will be seen for years to come.

 

(This writer’s blogs can be found at “Cricketing Perspectives” on Facebook)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Classy Brook century puts nervy England in the semi-final

Published

on

By

Harry Brook's classy century steered the England chase (Cricinfo)

If you want a thing done well, do it yourself.  Harry Brook, England’s captain, took matters into his own hands in Pallekele, promoting himself to No. 3 and blazing his maiden T20 international hundred to drag his team past Pakistan and into the semi-finals of the Men’s T20 World Cup 2026  with a game to spare, almost single-handedly.

Brook started the tournament, his first as captain, with 53 against Nepal but had been dismissed by spin for less than 20 for four innings in a row. His response was to move up two spots from No. 5 in order to bat in the powerplay, and he found himself walking out to face the second ball after Shaheen Shah Afridi  – recalled by Pakistan – struck with the first ball of England’s chase.

Afridi took three wickets in the powerplay to check England’s progress, and Usman Tariq  struck twice in the middle overs to reduce them to 58 for 4 and then 103 for 5. But Brook continued to flay Pakistan’s attack to all parts, reaching a 50-ball hundred by launching Afridi over cover for six and then over mid-off for four.

He was cleaned up one ball later by Afridi’s pinpoint yorker, but walked off to a standing ovation with England needing only 10 to win. They made hard work of it, gifting two wickets to Mohammad Nawaz to take the game into the 20th over, but Jofra Archer smeared Salman Mirza through midwicket as England’s dugout breathed a sigh of relief.

England’s win sealed their qualification for the semi-finals with a match to spare, and they will top the group if they can beat New Zealand in Colombo on Friday. They are yet to put a complete performance together and were shoddy in the field against Pakistan, but have now reached the semi-finals for a fifth men’s T20 World Cup in a row.

Pakistan, meanwhile, must beat Sri Lanka in their final group game and rely on other results falling their way. Despite  Shahibzada Farhan’s impressive 63, they always look short on runs after they were bogged down by spin in the middle overs, with Liam Dawson’s 3 for 24 the outstanding performance among England’s attack.

Brief scores:

England 166 for 8 in 19.1 overs  (Harry Brook 100, Sam Curran 16, Will Jacks 28; Shaheen Shah Afridi 4-30, Mohammad Nawaz 2-26,  Usman Tarique 2-31) beat Pakistan 164 for 9 in 20 overs (Shahibzada Farhan 63, Babar Azam 25, Fakhar Zaman 25,  Shadab Khan 23; Jofra Archer 2-32, Jamie Overton 2-26, Liam  Dawson 3-24, Adil Rashid 1-31) by two wickets

(Cricinfo)

 

Continue Reading

Latest News

Pakistan bat vs unchanged England with Afridi back

Published

on

By

Salman Agha and Harry Brook shake hands at the toss (Cricinfo)

Pakistan  have recalled Shaheen Shah Afridi for their Super Eight fixture against England in Pallekle at the expense of Faheem Ashraf, and will bat first after Salman Agha won the toss on a fresh pitch.

Afridi’s nine overs at the T20 World Cup have cost 101 runs and he has been left out for consecutive matches after Pakistan’s heavy defeat to India in Colombo, including their no-result against New Zealand to start the Super Eight stage. But he has been recalled to face England, perhaps due to their top order’s perceived vulnerability against left-arm seam.

Ashraf rescued Pakistan in their opening group-stage match against the Netherlands, hitting 29 not out off 11 balls to secure a three-wicket win. But he has only bowled two overs in the tournament and has been batting down the order.

“It looks like a good pitch,” Agha said at the toss. “We want to put up an above-par score and defend that total.”

England will qualify for the semi-finals if they win either of their remaining Super Eight fixtures, but Brook said that he would rather get the job done this evening than face a must-win match against New Zealand on Friday. “That would be lovely, wouldn’t it? But you never know in T20 cricket, it’s such a fickle game,” he said.

Brook said that he would have chosen to bat first if he had won the toss, but expects a better surface than the one that England played on at Pallekele two days ago in their low-scoring win over Sri Lanka. “Hopefully, it’s going to be a little bit better,” he said. “We haven’t had our perfect game yet. Hopefully, it’s just around the corner.”

England have picked the same team for the fifth consecutive match at this World Cup, and have carded their batting line-up in the same order despite some calls for Brook to be promoted from No. 5.

The fixture is a rematch of the 2022 T20 World Cup final, which England won by five wickets at the MCG, and there are nine survivors across the two teams.

England:  Phil Salt,  Jos Buttler (wk),  Jacob Bethell,  Tom Banton,  Harry Brook (capt),  Sam Curran,  Will Jacks,  Jamie Overton,  Liam Dawson,  Jofra Archer,  Adil Rashid.

Pakistan:  Sahibzada Farhan,  Saim Ayub,  Salman Agha (capt), Babar Azam,  Fakhar Zaman, Shadab Khan,  Usman Khan (wk), Mohammad Nawaz,  Shaheen Shah Afridi,  Salman Mirza,  Usman Tariq.

(Cricinfo)

Continue Reading

Sports

Brilliant one day, baffled the next

Published

on

Dasun Shanka’s captaincy has been uninspiring

One day they were kings of the hill, brushing aside mighty Australia with two overs to spare and sending the faithful into raptures. The next, they were brought crashing down to earth, unable to bat out their 20 overs as England handed them a sobering reality check. Cricket, as ever, proved to be the great leveller, lifting you to the heavens on Monday and reminding you of your frailties by Sunday.

The same fans who had burnt the midnight oil celebrating Australia’s exit turned restless when Sri Lanka ate humble pie. The wheel turns quickly in this fickle game. Applause morphs into angst in the space of little time.

Kandy’s supporters, passionate as they are, must tread carefully. Their behaviour in recent years has not always been up to scratch and the last thing the city needs is a clampdown on international cricket. Disappointment is part and parcel of sport. But hurling abuse and worse, objects onto the field, crosses the boundary rope of decency. That is simply not cricket.

There were positives amid the rubble. A depleted bowling attack did a commendable job to restrict England to under 150, no mean feat given modern T20 batting excesses. On another evening, that total might have been hunted down with calculated aggression. Instead, Sri Lanka’s chase never quite got out of second gear.

The over-reliance on Pathum Nissanka and Kusal Mendis is becoming glaring. Once the top order’s twin pillars are dislodged early, the middle order appears to play catch-up cricket, swinging between caution and desperation. It is a dangerous tightrope.

Conditions, too, played their part. After incessant rain in Kandy, the pitch had been under covers for more than 48 hours. Surfaces suffocated that long tend to wear a different face once unveiled, gripping, stopping, turning. The return catches that accounted for Kusal and Kamindu Mendis told their own tale. They weren’t able to get the timing right.

Selection, meanwhile, has raised more than a few eyebrows. The omission of seasoned campaigner Kusal Janith Perera after two outings begs explanation. The recall of Kamil Mishara has left many scratching their heads. And Charith Asalanka, arguably one of Sri Lanka’s more assured players of spin, remains on the sidelines as the team grapples with slow surfaces. At this level, such calls can make or break campaigns.

Questions, too, swirl around leadership. Sliding down the batting order while wickets tumble is rarely the hallmark of strong captaincy. When the ship is taking on water, the skipper must be seen on deck. Leaders shoulder the burden; they do not pass the parcel.

Now Sri Lanka face a classic Hobson’s choice. Win their remaining two games and book a ticket to Calcutta for the semi-finals. Slip up once more, and it will be curtains. In tournament cricket, there is no room for half-measures. It is time to either hold their nerve or pack their bags.

by Rex Clementine

Continue Reading

Trending