Connect with us

News

Bhandari’s 13A to Shringla’s 13A

Published

on

President Rajapaksa and Indian Foreign Secretary

by Austin Fernando
(Former High Commissioner of
Sri Lanka to India

Continued from yesterday

India’s security first

Lok Sabha Member Brajamohan Mohanty wished that the Sri Lankan Government would not stand any negotiations with foreign countries to invite foreign forces. Member Mohanarangam (Lok Sabha 27-2-1986) criticized Sri Lanka for inviting Americans, training, and President Zia’s visit.

Sri Lankans’ fear of Indians is deep-seated. When the British Cabinet delegation met PM DS Senanayaka, he had conveyed that he regarded the Indian problem as a danger, and therefore signed a military pact with the British in 1948.

The literature further reveals that India’s neighbours “should not seek to invite outside power(s). If anyone of them needed any assistance it should look to India. India’s attitude and relationship with her immediate neighbours depended on their appreciation of India’s regional security concerns; they would serve as buffer states in the event of an extra-regional threat and not proxies of the outside powers…” After 73 years, Indians’ position remains unchanged. This attitude is reflected in the Letters Exchanged in 1987.

Additional benefits to India

While the implementation of the Agreement is further clarified in the only Annexure in the Agreement, the ‘Exchange of Letters’ (not an Annexure) is concerned with security and economic benefits for India. In PM Rajiv Gandhi’s exchanged letter, reference is made to “the agreement reached.” President Jayewardene’s response mentions “the understanding reached.” The wording confuses the legal status, thus requiring interpretation.

However, the contents of the exchanged letters like broadcasting stations, ports, or airports reflect India’s security concerns. The Oil Tanks being serviced by Trincomalee Port will be of much anxiety for India. One may argue that the contents of Letters Exchanged demonstrate that India’s security interests took precedence over Lanka’s political and security issues in the Agreement. PM Gandhi has fished in troubled waters after the Bangalore meeting.

Flashback to 1986 from 2021

Focusing on the past, I refer to Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) stalwart Jaswant Singh (Lok Sabha 13-5-1986). He posed seven questions based on Sri Lankan responses. They are relevant even today.

* What is the Indian stand in the debate on devolution and delegation?

* Where do India and Sri Lanka stand on the amalgamation of the North and Eastern Provinces?

* What is the stand on land use by the Indian Government, GOSL, and the Tamil groups?

* What is the status of the language?

* What is the stand on Law and Order?

* What is the time frame for reaching a solution?

* What is the Indian government’s stand on foreign threats emerging in the context of the Sri Lankan issues?

 Had he lived today, as a former Jawan (Soldier), he would have either joined P Kulandaivelu and V Gopalaswamy in demanding military action or questioned PM Modi and Minister Jaishankar about Indian inefficiency or ineffectiveness.

After 35 years the status in response to Singh is:

* Devolution is ‘paralysed’ by the partial implementation of 13A and delayed elections.

* The amalgamation of Provinces shelved, judicially disfavouring India.

* Land power-sharing, by Sri Lanka’s rejection, is in India’s disfavor.

* The language issue is constitutionally solved but partially failed in implementation.

* Sri Lanka has disfavoured Indians by rejecting the Law and Order issue.

* The time frame for a solution is abstract, even after crushing Tigers 12 years ago.

* Foreign threats have heavily increased in India’s disfavor.

* The background scenarios or environments have changed.

* No military operations in the north and east.

* Ceasing violence and power-sharing, as a remedy, was the then demand. Now the focus is on human rights and humanitarian violations, returning refugees, and participatory development with dignity, equality, and self-respect. One may question whether failed 13A is the best tool for the purpose.

* Interventions were limited to India then, whereas now GOSL is cornered internationally.

* Tamil demands circulated mostly between the TULF and India then, whereas now the Diaspora’s enhanced lobbying has created negative consequences. Nevertheless, the President wishes to discuss with the Diaspora, though some are listed. The need is a mechanism.

* Other than to gain politically in Tamil Nadu because BJP is weak there, the Modi government has much bigger stakes to focus on, for example, ‘Chinese expansionism’, international capital movements, and Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean Alliance’s interests than to toil for Lankan devolution.

* BJP has alternatives to win the GOSL, e.g. Kushinagar aviation, 15-million-dollar grant for Buddhist affairs, financial swap deals.

Fresh thinking

 Based on Jaswant Singh’s queries, and the current situation, instead of pursuing the 35-year-old demand, will not a new power-sharing approach pay richer dividends? For India, in the present geopolitical context, the Exchanged Letter has more to gain than from 13A or the Agreement.

 President Jayewardene strategised by vacillating until 13A finally happened. President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, a military strategist, must be emulating political veteran President Jayewardene on a different learning curve, i.e., what Sun Tzu said, “In war, practice dissimulation, and you will succeed.”

 I believe the President’s terminology: “must look at” plusses and minuses of 13A is an excuse for procrastination. If Secretary Shringla has gauged this behaviour correctly, he may have the last laugh as his goal must be to gain from Trincomalee Oil Tanks, ports, and aviation, etc, (contents of Exchanged Letters) while pleasing Tamil Nadu and our Tamil groups with 13A.

 Sri Lanka won the conflict in 2009, but still, devolutionary goals set in 1987 are yet to be achieved. Prabhakaran was unhappy and felt he was tricked and revenged. Successive governments have not pursued devolution and debilitated the PCs. The incumbent government must be thinking about new strategies. Therefore, Secretary Shringla’s ‘full implementation of 13A’ demand is likely to be listed for operations.

 Since the war and 13A have not resolved the reconciliation issues, what remains from Secretary Shringla’s demand is what Rajiv Gandhi said in Lok Sabha (4-3-1987.) “We know that no ethnic problem such as this has a military solution.” War victory and peace efforts have not relieved the affected. The tool (13A) has failed to succeed with and without war. To consider it as an all-season remedy may not stand the test.

 Therefore, PM Modi, Minister Jaishankar, and Secretary Shringla can repeat PM Gandhi’s quote to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, 35- years later! What was considered appropriate during the war must be adjusted to suit the emerged environments.

Mahinda Rajapaksa and Maithripala Sirisena-Ranil Wickremesinghe governments and the incumbent administration have wasted 12 years from 2009. From Bhandari to Shringla, and Rajiv Gandhi to Narendra Modi, India also has failed in moving the politico-development process to success. Best wishes Secretary Shringla’s turn!

(Concluded)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Power sector overhaul targets losses, debt and tariffs

Published

on

Independent trade unions cry foul

The government has launched a far-reaching overhaul of the electricity industry, breaking up the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) into six fully state-owned companies, claiming to rein in chronic losses and mounting debt.

Under the Preliminary Transfer Plan, the newly incorporated entities, namely, Electricity Generation Lanka (Pvt) Ltd (EGL), National Transmission Network Service Provider (Pvt) Ltd (NTNSP), National System Operator (Pvt) Ltd (NSO), Electricity Distribution Lanka (Pvt) Ltd (EDL), CEB Employees Funds (Pvt) Ltd (CEBEF) and Energy Ventures Lanka (Pvt) Ltd (EVL), will take over the assets, liabilities and operations of the CEB from the appointed date.

Independent trade unions have opposed the restructuring programme.

At the core of the new model is the creation of an independent National System Operator, which will handle power system planning and competitively procure electricity from Electricity Generation Lanka, Independent Power Producers and non-conventional renewable energy developers. Power will be wheeled through the national grid operated by the NTNSP and sold to distribution companies.

Explaining the economic rationale, Eng. Pubudu Niroshan Hedigallage said the separation of functions was critical to restoring cost discipline in the sector.

“Electricity planning and procurement will now be carried out independently, based on least-cost principles. That is essential if we are to control generation costs and ease the upward pressure on tariffs,” he said.

Electricity Generation Lanka, though a successor to the CEB, will compete with private and renewable energy producers for projects, a move expected to curb inefficiencies and end guaranteed returns enjoyed under earlier arrangements.

“There will be no automatic allocation of projects. EGL must compete in the market like any other generator,” Eng. Hedigallage said.

According to officials, the Preliminary Transfer Plan provides for one generation and one distribution company initially, with further unbundling planned under the Final Transfer Plan to introduce sharper financial accountability at operational level.

Economists note that the restructuring is closely watched by multilateral lenders and investors, who have repeatedly flagged the power sector as a major fiscal risk.

The government has insisted that the reforms do not amount to privatisation, stressing that all six entities remain 100 percent state-owned. However, independent trade unions are of the view that what the government has undertaken is divestiture in all but name.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

India, Sri Lanka speakers discuss technology-driven parliamentary innovation, including AI-enabled systems

Published

on

Indian and Sri Lankan delegations meet in New Delhi (pic courtesy IHC)

Speaker of Lok Sabha Om Birla and Sri Lankan Speaker (Dr.) Jagath Wickramaratne recently discussed the possibility of expanding parliamentary cooperation through regular exchanges, formation of friendship groups, collaboration in policy and programme design and deeper engagement in technology-driven parliamentary innovation, including AI-enabled systems, real-time multilingual translation, and capacity building through Parliamentary Research and Training Institute for Democracies (PRIDE).

The discussion took place on the sidelines of the 28th Conference of Speakers and Presiding Officers of the Commonwealth (CSPOC) held in New Delhi recently.

The following is the text of the statement issued by the Indian High Commission in Colombo: ” Speaker of the Parliament of Sri Lanka (Dr.) Jagath Wickramaratne concluded his visit to India from 14-18 January 2026, for participation in the 28th Conference of Speakers and Presiding Officers of the Commonwealth (CSPOC) held in New Delhi. This was his first visit to India after assuming office. He was accompanied by Secretary-General of Parliament Kushani Rohanadeera and Assistant Director, (Administration) of the Parliament of Sri Lanka Kanchana Ruchitha Herath. Following the 28th CSPOC from 14-16 January 2026, Speaker and his delegation visited Jaipur, Rajasthan as a part of a two-day tour for CSPOC delegates from 17-18 January 2026.

The 28th CSPOC was inaugurated by Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi on 15 January 2026 at the Central Hall of Samvidhan Sadan, Parliament House Complex, New Delhi. Welcoming parliamentary leaders from across the Commonwealth, Prime Minister Modi highlighted the success of Indian democracy in providing stability, speed, and scale. He shared India’s efforts at giving voice to the Global South and forging new paths of cooperation to co-develop innovation ecosystems. He underlined the use of Artificial Intelligence by the Parliament of India to attract youth to understand Parliament. Prime Minister expressed his confidence in the CSPOC platform for exploring ways to promote knowledge and understanding of parliamentary democracy.

The conference, chaired by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, convened 44 Speakers and 15 Deputy Speakers from 41 Commonwealth countries, along with representatives of four semi-autonomous Parliaments. The theme of the conference was “Effective Delivery of Parliamentary Democracy.” During the conference, participants addressed the role of Speakers in reinforcing democratic institutions, the integration of artificial intelligence in Parliamentary functions, the influence of social media on Members, approaches to enhance public engagement with Parliament, and measures to ensure the security, health, and wellbeing of Members and Parliamentary staff.

The visit marked a significant milestone in the evolving parliamentary partnership between India and Sri Lanka. Last year, two Parliamentary Delegations visited India for Orientation Programmes in May 2025 and August 2025 respectively. These visits, in line with the intent of the India – Sri Lanka Joint Statement on ‘Fostering Partnerships for a Shared Future’, further reinforce the strong democratic ethos and enduring friendship shared between the two nations.”

Continue Reading

News

Pakistan HC celebrates academic achievements of Lankan graduates

Published

on

A section of the participants at the Pakistan HC event

The High Commissioner of Pakistan in Sri Lanka hosted a special reception on Friday (16) for Sri Lankan alumni who have recently returned from their studies in Pakistan. The event, held at the Pakistan High Commission, celebrated the academic achievements of the graduates and reinforced the deep-rooted educational ties between the two nations.

The Allama Iqbal Scholarship Programme, a flagship initiative launched in 2019, has become a vital pillar of bilateral cooperation. The High Commissioner highlighted that Pakistan offers 1,000 fully funded scholarships at graduate, postgraduate, and PhD levels, with over 500 Sri Lankan students currently pursuing their education in Pakistan’s premier universities.

“Sri Lanka and Pakistan share an enduring friendship rooted in a shared history of mutual respect and culture,” the High Commissioner remarked during the address. “Education is the key to unlocking the success of your brilliant futures and creating bonds that extend well beyond the classroom”.

Addressing the alumni as “custodians” of a noble cause, the High Commissioner urged the alumni to act as brand ambassadors by sharing their knowledge to guide deserving students toward academic opportunities in Pakistan.

He emphasised their responsibility to mentor young minds, ensuring no capable student misses the chance for a promising future. Furthermore, the alumni were encouraged to take an active role in organising frequent educational and cultural engagements to inspire and enlighten others while strengthening the ties between the two nations.

The High Commissioner emphasized that each graduate serves as a “bridge” between the two countries, playing a meaningful role in uplifting Sri Lanka while further strengthening Pakistan–Sri Lanka relations. The alumni were invited to remain closely connected with the High Commission to facilitate future initiatives that strengthen people-to-people ties.

The evening concluded with a traditional Pakistani dinner, where the alumni shared stories of their academic growth and cultural experiences in Pakistan in a spirit of friendship and togetherness.

Continue Reading

Trending