News
Battle over proposed power tariff intensifies as PUCSL Chief rejects NC deadline
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Chairman of the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL), Janaka Ratnayake, yesterday (22) said that Parliament couldn’t, under any circumstances, settle the simmering dispute over the power tariffs, proposed by the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB), outside the PUCSL Act No 35 of 2002 and the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No 20 of 2009.
The outspoken official, embroiled in a running battle with the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government, said so when The Island sought his response to the all-party National Council (NC) directive to the PUCSL, and the CEB, to reach a consensus on electricity tariffs before they appeared before the NC tomorrow (24).
Emphasising the need to finalize the required calculations, before a final decision could be made, intrepid official Ratnayake said that he didn’t mince his words when the situation was explained to the National Council.The PUCSL and the CEB received specific directive, in this regard, from the National Council, on January 19, during proceedings chaired by Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena.
The leader of the ruling party parliamentary group, Premier Dinesh Gunawardena, sat at the head table, with the Speaker and Secretary General of Parliament Dhammika Dasanayake.
“Let me stress, the National Council or any other institution cannot impose a deadline on the PUCSL. We abide by the relevant parliamentary Act,” Ratnayake said.
However, the PUCSL and the CEB haven’t met so far.Asked whether he had the backing of the entire Board, the PUCSL Chairman said that having unanimously taken a stand against the Cabinet-of-Ministers backed CEB’s pricing formula, on January 12, some other members reneged on their word.
The PUCSL board consists of Janaka Ratnayake (Chairman), Udeni Wickramasingle (Deputy Chairman), Chathurika Wijesinghe and Mohan Samaranayake. Prof. Janaka B. Ekanayake (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Peradeniya) quit the PUCSL board in early part of last year. That vacancy hasn’t been filled yet.
Ratnayake alleged that the other members had switched their allegiance to the government and were pursuing a strategy harmful to the electricity consumers.
Asked whether the majority could override him to pave the way for the second electricity increase, within months, Ratnayake answered in the affirmative. Ratnayake said that he would resort to legal action if that happened. He questioned the circumstances the other members met President Ranil Wickremesinghe, a few hours before they appeared before the NC.
Ratnayake said that he couldn’t be removed unless approved by 113 members of the parliament.
The Island raised the issues at hand with Mohan Samaranayake, who strongly denied accusations made by the PUCSL Chairman, as regards their response to the Cabinet-of-Ministers reconfirming on January 09, 2023, a decision taken in November last year, to increase electricity tariffs.
“The Cabinet of Ministers, in a note addressed to the PUCSL, advised what was expected of us,” Samaranayake said, emphasising that the PUCSL was not asked to take decisions beyond its mandate. Referring to change of policy guidelines, Samaranayake said that the Cabinet had asked for an interim revision of electricity tariffs, pending a final decision by 15 February 2023, and backdated increase with effect from January 01, 2023.
Having received the Cabinet note, the PUCSL board met on 12 January to discuss its response and it had been agreed to respond in writing, Samaranayake said. “The letter was to be shown to us before dispatching it to the Cabinet. However, the letter dated January 13 was sent on the evening of 16 January,” Samaranayake alleged.
Declaring that the Chairman didn’t have special powers at all, Samaranayake questioned the legality of Janaka Ratnayake signing the letter, on behalf of the entire PUCSL even without showing it to them.
In spite of the PUCSL Chairman repeatedly declaring that he was opposed to the CEB’s pricing formula, the letter addressed to the Cabinet-of-Ministers had not said so, Samaranayake said. What the Chairman really said was that the PUCSL was in the process of reviewing the CEB proposal, Samaranayake said, acknowledging that the interim tariff hike and backdated increase, with effect from 01 January 2023, had been rejected.
Samaranayake, one-time head of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s Media Division, said that he had accepted an invitation from President Wickremesinghe. Two other members, too, had received separate invitations and, during discussions with President Wickremesinghe, in the presence of Power Minister Kanchana Wijesekera, the rapidly developing crisis had been explained.
“There was absolutely no basis for claims the President exerted pressure on us,” Samaranayake said.
Responding to another query, Samaranayake said that when Premier Gunawardena and other lawmakers raised the issues at hand, he had explained the situation to them and why they couldn’t agree with the PUCSL Chairman.
Samaranayake alleged that some persons had threatened him and Deputy Chairman Wickramasinghe on the 17th floor of the Merchant Tower Building, Kollupitiya, while they were returning from a special meeting of the PUCSL board, on 21 January.
Chathurika Wijesinghe hadn’t attended that particular meeting as she was out of Colombo, Samaranayake said, adding that several persons confronted them as they arrived at the Bank of Ceylon-owned building for the meeting. “They asked us not to betray the people for perks and privileges,” Samaranayake said. However, after the conclusion of the meeting, there was a group on the 17th floor who acted in a threatening manner and then joined Samaranayake and Wickremesinghe in the elevators, where they warned of consequences if they ‘collaborated’ with the government, Samaranayake said.
News
Cut power bills by 3-5%, don’t hike them, consumers demand
By Anuradha Hiripitiyage
Electricity tariffs should be reduced by between 3 and 5 percent instead of being increased by 2.88 percent in the fourth quarter, as proposed by the National System Operator (NSO), Electricity Consumers’ Association Secretary Sanjeewa Dhammika said.
Addressing a media briefing in Maradagahamula, Divulapitiya, Gampaha, yesterday (16), Dhammika said a proper assessment of electricity generation costs, including the contribution of hydropower, could justify a reduction in tariffs.
He said the NSO had sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for a 2.88 percent tariff increase, which was expected to generate an additional Rs. 4,438 million.
However, the Commission had indicated that an increase of only 1.46 percent was warranted, amounting to Rs. 2,245 million, he said, adding that even this increase was unnecessary.
Dhammika alleged that the proposed revision sought to pass on to electricity consumers the financial burden arising from the non-arrival of five coal shipments and failed tenders.
“The Government had said that the burden of coal-related losses would not be passed on to the public. It is therefore unjust to make consumers bear these costs,” he said.
He pointed out that the PUCSL had forecast that hydropower would account for 32.34 percent of total electricity generation in the coming quarter, while the cost of such generation would represent only 3.45 percent of the overall cost of electricity production.
Consumers should benefit from the lower cost of hydropower generation rather than bear the burden of more expensive thermal power generation, he said.
Dhammika also questioned the inclusion of Rs. 669 million in capacity charges that had not been approved by the PUCSL, as well as a further Rs. 1,069 million to repay loans relating to incomplete projects.
Including such charges in the proposed tariff revision was unjustifiable, he said.
The PUCSL has given the public until October 30 to submit their views on the proposed tariff revision.
Dhammika said the possibility of increased hydropower generation in the coming weeks, as reservoir levels rise, should also be taken into account when determining electricity tariffs.
He maintained that tariffs could be reduced by 3 to 5 percent if hydropower generation was properly assessed and coal-related losses and unapproved charges were excluded from the calculations.
He further claimed that electricity tariffs could be reduced by as much as 10 percent through the promotion of renewable energy and the effective use of solar power and battery storage systems.
The Electricity Consumers’ Association urged the Government to withdraw the proposed tariff increase, insisting that consumers should not be made to bear costs arising from coal supply problems and other disputed charges.
News
Asgiri Mahanayake calls for immediate release of Gnanasara Thera
By S.K. Samaranayake
Most Ven. Warakagoda Sri Gnanaratana Mahanayake Thera of the Asgiri Chapter has called for the immediate release of Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who is currently serving a prison sentence, following a court ruling.
The Asgiri Mahanayake made the appeal when a delegation of senior prison officials, including Assistant Commissioner of Prisons and Director of Operations Senaka Pallegedara, called on him on the 16th.
During the meeting, the prelate warned that the continued incarceration of Ven. Gnanasara Thera could lead to a volatile situation and cause public agitation.
Responding to the appeal, the prison officials informed the Mahanayake Thera that the authority to order the release of Ven. Gnanasara Thera did not rest with the Prisons Department but with the President.
Other senior prison officials, including Rajeev Srimal Silva, Sampath Warnakulasooriya and Mangala Welivita, were also present at the meeting.
News
Lanka Air Force joins multinational exercise in India
The Sri Lanka Air Force participated in a multinational air exercise in India, alongside the air forces of the United States, France and Germany, as Sri Lanka continues to expand military cooperation with foreign countries.
A Sri Lankan Air Force Beechcraft King Air 360ER aircraft, and a six-member crew, took part in Exercise Tarang Shakti 2026, held at Air Force Station Jodhpur, from September 26 to October 12.
The exercise was hosted by the Indian Air Force, under the theme “Power in Partnership,” and involved Australia, Bangladesh and the United Arab Emirates, among other participating countries.
According to the Sri Lanka Air Force, the exercise was aimed at enhancing operational cooperation and interoperability among participating air forces and providing opportunities to share tactics and operational experience.
India’s public broadcaster reported that the exercise included training and experience in planning and conducting joint multinational combat operations, including counter-air, air defence, reconnaissance and air-to-air refuelling missions.
The exercise also involved 32 countries as observers.
Sri Lanka’s participation comes amid increased military engagement with foreign partners. India and Sri Lanka recently exchanged 240 military personnel under a tri-service exchange programme.
Sri Lankan military personnel also recently participated in a counter-terrorism exercise with Russia, while a senior US Army Pacific official visited Sri Lanka and discussed opportunities for greater joint training.
-
News6 days agoSri Lanka escalates anti-graft drive with Shiranthi’s jailing
-
Latest News5 days agoFarhan and Sadaqat help Pakistan seal series in style
-
News6 days agoIranian ships stranded, Lanka fears US sanctions
-
Latest News4 days agoNissanka’s return headlines Sri Lanka’s Test squad against Pakistan
-
Features5 days agoIntake 16: 45 years of duty and honour
-
News5 days agoMalwathu Chapter issues statement on talks with President over Gnanasara Thera’s robes
-
News5 days agoCP alleges NPP has taken the blame for illegal US sanctions on Iranian vessels
-
News6 days agoNavi Pillay’s Lankan affairs in focus as she wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize
