Connect with us

News

BASL hopes talks with President on 22A may yield positive outcome

Published

on

Amarasuriya

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) yesterday expressed cautious optimism that the government might reconsider its proposed constitutional amendment to extend the retirement ages of judges, following a meeting with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Speaking to reporters after the meeting at the Presidential Secretariat, BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya said the Association had explained in detail the reasons for the legal community’s opposition to the proposed amendment.

The BASL delegation included President’s Counsel, former BASL presidents, academics and other legal experts, including Prof. Savitri Goonesekere and Lal Wijenayake.

Amarasuriya said the President had also explained his position during what he described as a “good and frank discussion”.

The BASL’s principal request was that any change to the retirement ages of judges should be considered only after a broad consultation, involving the legal profession, academics, researchers and others with expertise in the subject.

He stressed that the BASL’s position was not directed against any individual and should not be viewed as a confrontation with the Government.

“This is not a fight against anyone,” Amarasuriya said, noting that both sides had presented their respective views during the meeting. He added that although no agreement had been reached, the BASL remained hopeful that the discussion would lead to wider consultations and eventually result in the proposed amendment being reconsidered before a final decision was taken.

Amarasuriya also said the BASL did not condone personal attacks or criticism directed at judges amid the controversy.

He acknowledged that amending the Constitution was within the government’s powers, while the BASL was equally entitled to express its opposition if it believed such a move was inappropriate.

He said the BASL expected President Dissanayake, whom he described as a political leader who had long advocated the rule of law and judicial independence, to carefully consider the concerns raised.

“I hope that after today’s discussion, this will move in a positive direction,” he said.

Full text of the BASL statement issued to the media last evening: The following delegation of 20 members of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), met with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara and Legal Advisor to the President J.M. Wijebandara this afternoon. The BASL Delegation comprised:- Rajeev Amarasuriya President – BASL, Rienzie Arsecularatne, PC Deputy President – BASL Nalin De Silva Secretary – BASL Pasindu Silva Treasurer – BASL Geoffrey Alagaratnam, PC Former President – BASL Upul Jayasuriya, PC, Former President – BASL U.R. De Silva, PC, Former President – BASL Prof. Savithri Goonasekera Senior Member – BASL, Lal Wijenayake Senior Member – BASL, Mahinda Wijesurendra, PC Senior Member – BASL (Galle),T. Jayanaga, PC Senior Member – BASL (Kurunegala), A.P.G. Sarathchandra, PC Senior Member – BASL (Galle) ,Upali Mohotti PC Zonal Vice President – Hambantota, Sandun Nagahawatte Zonal Vice President – Colombo Zone, A.L. Natheer Zonal Vice President – East, Chandima Wijeratne Zonal Vice President – Gampaha, Ruwan Asiri De Silva Zonal Vice President – Galle, Sunil Weerakoon Zonal Vice President – Kandy, B. Thavapalan President – Jaffna Bar Association, Nalani Manathunga Senior Member – BASL.

The Ministry of Justice informed the BASL this morning that the seats were limited, and the numbers of the Delegation had to be curtailed.

The delegation explained to His Excellency the President the position of the BASL and the reasons for its objection to the proposed constitutional amendment, from the perspective of the affectation independence of the judiciary as well as this not being a priority measure required for improving the system.

The BASL emphasized that the proposed amendment would have a serious impact on the independence of the Judiciary and that, in the circumstances, the proposed amendment should not be proceeded with. The BASL further pointed out that there are several other urgent matters requiring the attention of the Government which must be given priority.

The BASL impressed upon the President that, in view of the concerns raised regarding judicial independence and the absence of a demonstrated need for the proposed amendment to be treated as a priority, the Government should not proceed with the proposed amendment at this stage.

BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya, BASL Deputy President Rienzie Arsakularatne, PC, Prof. Savithri Goonasekera, Geoffrey Alagaratnam, PC (Former President BASL), and Upul Jayasuriya (Former President BASL) expressed these views.

BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya inviting Prof. Savithri Goonasekera to express her views said that that there was no better person than Prof. Savithri Goonasekera with all her experience in the law, to well explain the matter of affectation to the independence of the judiciary, which she did, commencing from the conceptual basis of the separation of powers, the imperative of independence of the judiciary and the need for the judiciary to have public confidence at all times. She also drew distinction between extension of tenure in the public sector and extension of tenure of judges who form one pillar of democracy.

The President, in turn, explained the Government’s position on this proposal.

The BASL delegation, led by the President, proposed that a proper and meaningful consultative process be commenced, involving all relevant stakeholders, including the legal profession, Judges, academics and other stakeholders, before the Government decides on further proceeding. It was also suggested that the matter could possibly be referred to and considered by a Parliamentary Select Committee as part of such a consultative process.



News

Sri Lanka faces new grid challenge as rooftop solar surges: former CEB GM

Published

on

BY IfhAm NIzAm

Sri Lanka could soon face a new electricity-grid challenge—not from too little power, but from having too much solar generation in the wrong places and at the wrong times, a former Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) General Manager told The Island.

The former CEB GM who insisted not to be named warned that the rapid growth of rooftop and utility-scale solar could place increasing pressure on CEB and LECO distribution feeders, substations and the national grid unless transmission, storage and grid-management systems are upgraded at the same pace.

“The issue is no longer simply how much solar we can install. The question is whether the grid can absorb those electrons when and where they are produced,” he told The Island.

He said Sri Lanka should learn from China and India, where the enormous expansion of renewable generation is now forcing policymakers to focus increasingly on storage, transmission capacity, intelligent dispatch and grid flexibility.

“China has already exceeded 1.28 TW of installed solar, while India’s grid-connected installed solar capacity stood at around 162.15 GW as of June 30, 2026. The difficult question now is what you actually do with so much solar when everyone is generating at almost the same time,” he said.

For Sri Lanka, he said, the warning is particularly relevant to the distribution network.

A feeder carrying a high concentration of rooftop solar can, during periods of strong sunshine and low local demand, move from the traditional one-way flow of electricity towards consumers to reverse power flow back towards the transformer and upstream network.

“That means the feeder is no longer simply a one-way road for electricity. At certain times of the day, it becomes a two-way road,” he said.

This can create voltage-rise, protection-coordination and transformer-loading issues and could eventually limit the amount of additional rooftop solar that can safely be connected to particular feeders.

“What matters is where those megawatts are connected,” he told The Island.

He said Sri Lanka therefore needs to begin looking at solar hosting capacity feeder by feeder and substation by substation, rather than treating the national grid as having unlimited capacity to absorb new distributed generation.

The problem is compounded by the evening transition, when solar generation falls rapidly just as electricity demand can increase.

“If the system has a lot of solar in the middle of the day and then loses that generation rapidly in the evening, something else has to respond. That is a flexibility problem,” he said.

This is where battery energy storage systems (BESS) are likely to become increasingly important—but the former CEB chief cautioned against allowing cheap imported battery hardware to drive the market.

“Sri Lanka could soon have huge BESS demand, very cheap battery hardware and everyone suddenly becoming a BESS pundit. What could possibly go wrong?” he said.

He cited fire safety, degradation, poor integration, weak energy-management systems, questionable warranties, incorrect sizing, inappropriate grid locations and poor thermal management as major risks.

“A system can look fantastic in Excel on Day One but perform very differently in Year Two,” he told The Island.

He said the future BESS market would therefore be determined less by who could supply the cheapest container and more by who understood the complete system.

“The future BESS business will not be about who can assemble the cheapest container. It will be about who understands battery, PCS, EMS, grid, safety, degradation and dispatch economics as one system,” he said.

For Sri Lanka, storage should also be considered as a distribution-grid asset, rather than solely as a large transmission-level installation.

Strategically located batteries could absorb excess rooftop solar on constrained feeders during the middle of the day and release electricity later when local demand rises, potentially reducing network congestion and improving the value of distributed generation.

“The question is not simply, ‘How many megawatt-hours of batteries do we need?’ The question is, ‘Where does the battery create the greatest system value?’” he said.

He said China’s and India’s experience could broadly be viewed as three stages: Phase One—build solar and wind; Phase Two—build storage; and Phase Three—redesign the grid around renewables.

Sri Lanka, he said, should learn from that progression before renewable penetration makes grid problems significantly more expensive to solve.

“Installing another large amount of solar is one thing. Absorbing those electrons when the sun is shining everywhere at once is quite another,” he said.

“Solar taught us how to generate cheap electrons. BESS and the grid will decide whether those cheap electrons are actually useful when they are needed.”

“That is perhaps the biggest lesson Sri Lanka should take from China and India’s energy transition right now,” he added.

Continue Reading

News

SC rules President Sirisena’s pardon of Gnanasara thera invalid

Published

on

The Supreme Court yesterday ruled that former President Maithripala Sirisena’s decision to grant a presidential pardon to Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Ven. Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thera was arbitrary and invalid in law.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Janak de Silva delivered the judgment in response to fundamental rights petitions filed by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and Sandhya Ekneligoda, challenging the former President’s decision to release the monk from prison.

Gnanasara Thera had been sentenced by the Court of Appeal in August 2018 to 19 years’ rigorous imprisonment, to run concurrently as six years, after being found guilty of contempt of court over his conduct inside the Homagama Magistrate’s Court on January 25, 2016, during proceedings related to the disappearance of Prageeth Ekneligoda.

The Supreme Court subsequently upheld the Court of Appeal’s finding of guilt on October 5, 2018.

However, Gnanasara Thera was released from Welikada Prison on May 23, 2019, after the then President Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon.

The petitioners challenged the legality of the pardon, prompting the Supreme Court to examine the exercise of the President’s constitutional power of clemency.

The Court’s ruling yesterday effectively nullifies the pardon granted to the BBS leader.

Viran Corea, PC, with Luwie Ganeshathasan and Khyati Wikramanayake appeared for the CPA, while Counsel Asthika Devendra, with Pulasthi Hewamanne, instructed by Manjula Balasuriya, appeared for Sandhya Ekneligoda.Counsel Thishya Weragoda, with Sanjaya Marambe and Iresh Senevirathne, appeared for Gnanasara Thera. Faiszer Musthapha, PC, with Pulasthi Rupesinghe, appeared for former President Sirisena.

Continue Reading

News

Duminda, another indicted in gold-plated T-56 case

Published

on

Duminda Dissanayake

The Colombo High Court yesterday served indictments on former Minister Duminda Dissanayake and a woman in connection with the discovery of a gold-plated T-56 assault rifle at the Havelock City apartment complex in Wellawatte.

Following the indictments, the High Court Judge ordered that both accused be released on bail.

Court records indicate that indictments had also been filed against Dissanayake and the same co-accused on September 9, after which they were granted bail.

The case relates to the discovery of the gold-plated firearm at the apartment complex in May 2025.

Two women, aged 40 and 68, were initially arrested in connection with the possession of the weapon, before the investigation was handed over to the Terrorism Investigation Division (TID).

Subsequent investigations by the TID led to Dissanayake being arrested and produced before court. However, he was later released after the Attorney General’s Department informed court that there was insufficient evidence at the time to proceed with legal action against him.

Continue Reading

Trending